Yeah both of those are overrated and mediocre written. They are just hot and that's why people like them

@@mihaimercenarul7467 Thank you for the comment from the peanut gallery, but I don't find either one physically attractive.

@@hansgretl1787 good, cuz they aren't well written either. Especially Dimitri for being so cartoonish and silly written post tike skip, his trauma and edginess îs played like a cartoon, and his redemption after touchibg the avatar's hand îs hilarious,"well I am ok now, let's beat the empire".

As for edelgard, sure, asking if she did or not the good thing îs an ok part aboit her character, but The execution of her character îs done mediocre wise în all her routes. Also she didn't really lose everything lmao. She was The heir of the empire from the beggining. And no, her mentality îs în făct extremely weak. As for her tragedy, even lysithea hâd a more tragic bacstory. So no edelgard îs not even top 10 most tragic characters în fire emblem.

@@mihaimercenarul7467 Good for you

BIG AGREE. So many people complained that Hopes Claude isn’t Houses Claude. In Hopes, we see Claude’s schemes and plans. We see his cunning when sacrificing Randolf or betraying Edelgard in Scarlet Blaze bring his true character to screen. When Seteth and Claude had the same idea for raiding Fort Merceus I was so unimpressed. This master schemer has the same idea as another character? Sure, Jan. I felt weirdly proud of Claude for being the way he was in Hopes

Absolutely yes. I liked him so much more in Hopes

Too bad his story îs so mediocre and his character so goofy, cartoonish and forced.

Faxxx

@@EXchoco wrong

@@mihaimercenarul7467 So are we not allowed to like characters?

You two really suck at analysing characters

I agree 100% on this. I always see : “Micaiah bad unit, can’t survive anything and gets doubles by everything.” My first though is always… wait… why are we letting the healer tank shots? It’s just strange, I think her position as a lord is what frustrates people because she’s relegated more to a backup role in combat, when the traditional lord is more frontline heavy. But make no mistake, she’s a great unit IMO.

The problem is honestly a lot to do with act 1 of Radiant Dawn. She's not just frail, she is "one rounded by a generic soldier" frail. Mix that in with being in one of the single worst lineups of units in fire emblem. The Dawn Brigade is just SO bad which means you just lack good options for killing units near her. Mix that in with the fact that her healing in act 1 doest actually generate a single point of healing and just offloads damage to a different unit that still needs to be healed properly afterwards. You also have maps like that one map with the Black Knight where basically everyone gets a game over their first playthrough because the moment you let anything on this cramped fog of war map get within 2 squares of her she just dies. Sure after act 1 when she has staffs and Jill is online and currently soloing most of the map and Noland or someone else is likely able to mop up anything not torn apart in the Jillnado, sure. She feels much better then.

I love using Micaiah, even with the difficulties she can bring 😅 I do wonder how she would do if she was the lord in any of the other FE games? 🤔

I agree with everything except the "rig max stats" Thing, I think that's just silly. I know there's a way to do this, but despite playing the game twice I have no idea how to do it and 99% of people playing this game wouldn't even know that much. If your argument relies on 'rigging' something, most people don't know that and thus it's not applicable.

@@nahte123456 In FE10 using BEXP guarantees you plus 3 stats every level up, so (In this case Micaiah) with Magic, Res, and luck pretty much guaranteed to cap, you use "Rig" BEXP to level her up to Tier 3 Level 20 in the end and will pretty much max out the rest of her stats like Speed, Defense, etc. So it's actually really easy to do, and probably a lot of people did, if not intentionally 😅 Though I guess if you never used BEXP or never noticed that you always got 3 stat ups from BEXP there was no way you would know, since the game doesn't explain that 🤔

Exactly what I thought at the end of Silver the Hedgehog's story when Blaze died at the end of Sonic 06.

@@yoder6162 you're weird

@@mihaimercenarul7467 Take accountability. You know what you were doing in all of these comments

@@yoder6162 ok you obviously have brain damage. Get well soon, buddy.

The thing is that Celica has been taught and raised with the Mila's mentality which means acting not thinking on herself, but on others. For that reason, she has no faith in humanity and thinks that only she and her faith she has in Mila can make a real change in the world, this can be proved when Mae says to Celica that she always has been that kind of person that always do things by her own, without looking for support. Of course it's frustating from our point of view, I couldn't understand why she did all these things, but if we put ourselves in her shoes, what else could she possibly do? She couldn't know if Jeddah was telling the truth or not, she was risking her comrades' lifes, her love was also risking his life for no reason and also the fate of the world was on her shoulders, therefore, she arrived at the conclusion that the best for all is to sacrifice herself to restore the balance in the world, all just because she didn't take into account the strength and potential humanity have for the first reason I said at the beginning. It's at the end, when Mila gives the Falchion that she realises that she has lost that faith in humanity at some point, and since then, she no longer lives with that fear of a world without the gods, but now she has hope on humanity and the future they have ahead. I would lie if I say that I haven't questioned Celica's decisions during the story, but when you think about it, it's tough. All the things she appreciated had clashed, and she had to choose what to prioritize: her life, her love, the world... it's not about selfishness, it was more deciding on what has more value: herself or others

Cheff kiss? Edelgard fans are so weird. Also edelgard's writing îs messy and she îs loved cuz she îs a female mainly. She îs not even that complex. It's just that some hate her for what she did or they fangirl over Dimitri, or others love her cuz she îs hot. Edelgard îs overrated as a character

Also The plots she brings to The story are. mediocre. Chef kiss my ass

@@mihaimercenarul7467 I’m not attracted to Edelgard and I love her. I find her personal struggles relatable and I love her story and amazing designs both before and after timeskip. I also like Dimitri and Claude. I’m not attracted to Dimitri but I find Claude hot and he still isn’t my favorite character and I can still criticize his character. You’re whole perspective of “Edelgard is only loved because she is a woman” is actually pretty secretly sexist. She is objectively an interesting character and she plays a very important role in the story. More so than Claude or Dimitri. To imply that she is only considered interesting because of her sex is not only wrong but sexist. And I shouldn’t have to explain how THATS wrong 👀

@@biandanxious3438 relatable? Yeah sure. Lao relatable doesn't make a character better. Also she plays an important role în The story? Wooow really? It's almost like she îs a villain în 3 routes and a main lord în one. No way! Doesn't change The făct that her execution îs mediocre. Also no, if edelgard was an ugly man, people would have not liked him as much. Edelgard being hot îs one of The main reasons she îs so popular, you can deny it, but it's The truth.

@@biandanxious3438 also you just said that you like her cuz of her design lmao. You just admitted that it's because she îs hot that she îs loved lmao.

So your saying that Hunger Games is just a rip off of Gaiden?

KZfaq does time stamps automatically now. More often than not, it is down poorly.

@@AdamWithFED thx for telling me :)

Calm down. His story was mediocre af. Angry dude who sees dead people, touches the avatar's hand and he îs ok, let's beat the empire hooraaay. His story îs forced, nonsnensical and Dimitri îs too cartoonish

​@@mihaimercenarul7467You're weird

In general I don't trust those who are unable to creat their own opinion but rather follow what is popular

@@eleonorepb4565 your saying that Eliwood is a Popular character. He is not Also everything we know and everything we believe is influenced by others. So your statement is meaningless.

I don't know. I liked Dimitri's Three Hopes characterization a lot more than his Three Houses self, but I don't think Dimitri is a bad character in that too. It's valid that you dislike Dimitri, but I personally don't. He's a fun unit to play as, his backstory is amongst the darkest of all the Lords (only rival is Edelgard), this is unfortunately something that does occur within war times for infantry soldiers (though it's sometimes messy to determine if Dimitri actually did the really, really messed up stuff he was accused of doing), and considering the time period, it's easier to see he's more a victim to his environment and the corruption of the Kingdom and racism than his mental illness, which even I agree is one of the two major issues I have with his characterization if he's supposed to represent mental health. Also, you know the Fire Emblem fanbase mostly despises Gilbert right?

@@yusifudo46 1. I didn't play three hopes and I don't really want to after how much I disliked Three Houses (it is also a spin off, so I don't really count it) 2. Dark backstory does not equal a good character and his dark backstory is basically just a worse done version of the Serenes forest massacre 3. the corruption of the kingdom plays a part, but the crux of his "character arc" is based way more around metal illness 4. The fandom disliking a character does not make them bad especially when those reason are moralistic (i.e. judging a character for being morally gray) speaking of which Gilbert is a much better example of a morally gray character with metal health issues and it is a large part of why I like him, as he does not fall into the same trappings of the violent murderer with mental health issues that Dimitri does

Thank you for your comment! I can totally see where you are coming from. I don't love that the mentally ill man is portrayed as a murderous sociopath, but I just love how he "comes out of it." He doesn't. He resolves himself to work day in and day out to improve, but he is never cured. That resonated with me personally.

​@@AdamWithFED I understand, my problem is I think that FE never has had a problem with metal health issues being magically cured and I think there are other characters who do a better job of depicting a slow recovery without the baggage of the story singling them out as killing people in a particularly violent and warped way (Soren is the most obvious example of this). I do not want to diminish your love of this character, but hearing people constantly praise his portrayal without acknowledging the negative aspects has left me rather disillusioned with the fandom in general. I also want to be clear there is room to disagree on if a character is good or bad rep, but there is also a problem when potential issues are ignored. I will also admit you may not be the best person to bring this up with, because my biggest concern is that people who do not have metal health issues may be using Dimitri as an example of a deep complex character, while ignoring or understating the problematic elements of his writing and speaking over people who have experienced these issues irl

@@aureliumsol8572 Except I didn't say any of that nor did I glorify Dimitri's character as I said there were some aspects of his story I didn't like. As I said from the jump, your hatred for Dimitri I believe is very valid as it is for everyone on this list as they all have certain qualities or events in a story that can make them all very unlikable. I like Dimitri and think he's a good character. Top 5 for me. I'm not defending him, but I personally never saw Dimitri as a representation of mental health. I don't believe he was even designed to be that. Just a broken Lord like people in the fandom wanted in the series for so long. What I am saying is it was 1000 years ago. Those times people thought vastly different than today. I'm saying he was more influenced by the environment and the circumstances around him instead of it being specifically his mental illness or his dark past being the driving force of his actions as the World of Fodlan in itself is extremely problematic (for example The Tragedy of Duscur was a racially motivated event) and his Three Hopes version is extremely chill and much more level-headed. Although it's a spin-off, the plot of it takes place in the main timeline. I'm not excusing him, I even said I had some grievances with Dimitri's writing at certain stages in the story. I lived in the ghetto so I know we're all products of our environment, but justifiable or not, people should have to pay some form of karmic accountability for their errors and misdeeds, as Dimitri is no exception to that rule and I think he got off a little too easy, but I love how despite that, he isn't exactly cured or just gets over it. In his route, he learns to live with and deal with it. He wasn't completely redeemed, but he is trying hard in his own route, and that's at least respectable, like Renault from Blazing Sword. TLDR; I get where you're coming from, but Dimitri has redeeming character traits and I don't see him as an example of mental illness. Just a guy dealt a very bad hand who I still think should pay some karmic justice for what he did. I never excused his actions just contextualized them, but at least he's trying and it's not glorified at all like someone like Peri from Fates. She is extremely irredeemable and does close to nothing to improve or reflect on her past and present actions. She's even actively rewarded for the messed up things she did in the past and her psychotic disposition is still aggressively rewarded.

:3

Honestly the whole point of the Edelgard sees a deeply flawed and tragic world and thinks it is up to her to fix it at all costs. The problem is that her view is so deeply clouded by the events of her childhood that she just isn't able to see the real problems with her ideology. Great villian but some people really miss the light the other paths shed on the fatal flaws with her grand plan.

Honestly villain wise she îs one of The weakest în The franchise

She is an antagonist, but Rhea is just as much of an antagonist as her. The Agarthans are really the only “villains” in the game. Edelgard is still the main character though, the theming of the game is built around her, and that’s extremely literal bc the main theme’s lyrics are from her perspective

The number 1 is valid and too many people like the character now. What you mean?

​@@yusifudo46Dimitri îs overrated cuz sad hot edgy lord. Execution wise, Dimitri îs cartoonish and silly. Him seeing the dead people, and then acting like a brainless asshole '' whatever'' îs so hilarious and silly for The wrong reasons. And his redemption, he touches the hand of the avatar god and he îs ok, time to beat the empire. Many people just like how hot and edgy Dimitri îs and they feel sorry for his silly tragedy despite how badly executed it is.

​@@mihaimercenarul7467Naw. Y'all just hate what's popular. All the Lords and main characters have the same writing problems and angst among them.