Where is your home country?

Nice video man

​@@jamesashley9127 Pakistan

Good video about the ordinary life in the heartlands of the Abbasid caliphate. Though I could nit-pick a lot and come with complaints about various missed things, I still think this was a very good overview video.

GREAT VIDEO

if you weren't paying attention, the vid shows how unislamic was the Islamic caliphate top to bottom

You could do the exact same thing currently in Baghdad 🤣🤣🤣

@@isamohammed150 you are right 😂. But I'd rather be living under the rule of Harun Al Rashid and not these corrupt Iraqi politicians of today

@@thestrangerofmountains lol Harun was way more corrupt

@@mhmadbedrddeen3414 but then how come his Empire was so prosperous?

*The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

There's an upcoming game, Assassin's Creed Mirage where the side quests are said to explore everyday life in the Abbasid caliphate.

⁠@@MrHazz111 I’m so hyped for it

I'd like to make one as soon as A.I gets there

A show like HBO's Rome (without the gratuitous nudity).

@@lastword8783 As if the Abbasides never had non marital sex or saw nude women who were not their wives!! A real sex maniac would prefer living in the Abbasides era to the Roman one

Jazby has some good videos lije this. One is from day in the life in constantinople.

Military history is only a small portion of life lived by our ancestors. It is fun but grossly overrated.

True. Videos about Rome had spoiled me on how much information I expected. Daily Life in most of the Islamic World isn't as well studied as the Roman one and so, there's so much we don't know.

@@AlMuqaddimahYT exactly, thank you for this contribution

​@@AlMuqaddimahYT *The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

Is it a coincidence that they were invented just as Capitalism was starting to enter its golden age?

@@AlMuqaddimahYT*Confused Marxist noises*

​@@AlMuqaddimahYTI almost thought that you were trying to disrespect Islam but I was mistaken Anyways just to let you know, we as Muslims are not allowed to celebrate the birth of the prophet SAW.

@@harunobaid4977 debatable

@@arkseven what's debatable? Celebrating the prophets birth? Thats prohibited.

*Atheists claim that they are intellectually superior to religious people because they are willing to question their beliefs, whereas religious people are dogmatic and refuse to question their deepest beliefs and won't consider evidence that could potentially undermine those beliefs.* Well, have you ever heard an atheist say: "I wonder if constantly increasing individual freedom is a good thing." "I was wrong about democracy being a viable system." "Maybe the sexual revolution was a mistake." "The evidence shows that equality of the sexes is destructive." "Let's have a debate on if freedom of speech and religion is good for society." "Could it be that women need fewer rights?" I have never seen an atheist raise these questions or hold these positions up to serious scrutiny. Nor do they provide any evidence for their beliefs on these matters. They simply assert them and ridicule and mock anyone who disagrees with them.

*The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

*The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

Oh, yeah, that story is really fascinating. It features the Byzantines, the Andalusians, Arab Pirates, and a Muslim Kingdom in Switzerland.

@@AlMuqaddimahYT Yeah, I remembered that there was a short-lived Islamic power in Switzerland too. But they were kicked out because nobody likes being "taxed" when using the roads. And by being "taxed", I mean they robbed the travelers.

@@lerneanlion Few decades isn’t short lived

@@1sultan189 I know that.

​@@AlMuqaddimahYTa Muslim kingdom in Switzerland? How did I not know that

@harrykx I am Tajik. There are many Pashtuns who celebrate it.

Imam Ghazali an persian but he was Against celebrate nawroz. Nawroz is Zarathustraian religious festival not Muslim.

*The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

*Atheists claim that they are intellectually superior to religious people because they are willing to question their beliefs, whereas religious people are dogmatic and refuse to question their deepest beliefs and won't consider evidence that could potentially undermine those beliefs.* Well, have you ever heard an atheist say: "I wonder if constantly increasing individual freedom is a good thing." "I was wrong about democracy being a viable system." "Maybe the sexual revolution was a mistake." "The evidence shows that equality of the sexes is destructive." "Let's have a debate on if freedom of speech and religion is good for society." "Could it be that women need fewer rights?" I have never seen an atheist raise these questions or hold these positions up to serious scrutiny. Nor do they provide any evidence for their beliefs on these matters. They simply assert them and ridicule and mock anyone who disagrees with them.

Duddeeee!!! I've been active for more than a month now.

Ah! I'm so sorry. I try not to use any pieces that aren't in the public domain. I'll talk to Eastern Roman History. Can you please email me at syawish@almuqaddimahyt.com? I'd like to stay in touch for illustrations in the future.

​@@AlMuqaddimahYT *The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

Nonsense

@@mas-udal-hassan9277 what do you mean

Propaganda atheist channel

*The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

if i were to live in any historical time period, i’d choose the abassid caliphate!

Failures of past generations who sought power. Inshallah the future would be great if we learned from them

Hope you enjoyed it.

⁠@Afghan Lion avg afghan

Meanwhile turkish women had the equality since 1934

Lmao 🤣 Why does Islam attract more converts than any other religion? One major reason is that vIslam says: "refugees welcome" to those fleeing failing liberal social and religious institutions. Let me explain. Liberal secularists promote the idea that their norms for regulating marriage, family, and religion are ideal. Nevertheless, statistical data indicates that wherever a society is governed by liberal secular norms, people stop marrying, having children, and practising religion. Put differently, the liberal is fundamentally a hypocrite - despite what he or she might say, no liberal person is actually interested in being part of a liberal marriage, a liberal family, or a liberal religion. Matters are different when it comes to Islam. Muslims also promote the idea that their norms for regulating marriage, family, and religion are ideal. Moreover, statistical data indicates that wherever a society is governed by Islamic norms, it boosts marriage, birth rate, and religious practice. Put differently, the Muslim is actually interested in being part of a Muslim marriage, a Muslim family, and the Muslim religion. The current era is an era of refugees fleeing from liberalism. Liberal marriage, family, and religion have collapsed. As a result, refugees from liberal societies seek marriage partners abroad, and if they practice any type of religion , it is a non-liberal version whose centers are located abroad. Islam is the most obvious choice for them.

It appears that you have zero knowledge of what the people of Iran want and don't want, stop looking at the world with your narrow western lebral lens and stop forcing your views on others, practice what you preach

@@mhmadbedrddeen3414What do the people of Iran want according to you?

@@polishherowitoldpilecki5521 The majority of the Iranians support their country and their Islamic way of life, other regimes with no support would've changed already by the economic and cultural war against Iran for over 40 years if it weren't that much supported

@@mhmadbedrddeen3414 The generation of women who grew up after the Islamic revolution in Iran want to choose whether to wear a veil or not themselves instead of having the decision be decided by old men. Religious choices should be the choice of a person themselves, instead of like in Iran where renouncing faith to Islam is punishable by death by law, which also states that basically all marriages lead to a non-Muslim woman becoming automatically Muslim while marriages with non-Muslim men aren't allowed. Also what you might not be aware of is the fact that the Iranian revolution was done by a lot of different groups who were much more popular than the more fringe hardline Shia clergy of Ayatollah, including republicans, social democrats, conservatives and all kinds of different anti-Shah forces. However it was a little thing of the Mosques having been the only place not surpressed by the Shah during his reign that gave the more fringe clergy disproportionate power following the revolution, which they used to betray literally all the other participants of the revolution in the name of forcing hardline Shia faith on Iran. A similar story played out in Cuba, where the anti dictatorship protestors succeeded who were in majority comprised of more social democratic/moderate socialists, only to see Fidel Castro's more hardline socialist communists take over after the revolution was won, ignoring the will of the majority. Also while the Iranian embargo today is less of a justified thing leftover from the cold war (though the idea of revoking them has become less popular after Mahsa Amini was beaten to death despite wearing the hijab correctly and the subsequent killing of protestors and gassing of girls schools), it was originally embargoed for the fact that the US embassy was attacked and the people inside were taken hostage, against basically all international law.

@@alehaim The women and men of Iran elected their representatives for the parliament who is on charge of legislation and their legislation says it's against the law to not wear a scarf on the head, I bet whatever country you are from, it's legislation ban walking naked in public, why do you let "old men" decide for you by banning walking naked in the streets, typical liberal twisted logic, your subjective opinion of what is permitted and what is not is irrelevant, the world don't revolve around your oppressive ideology, what Islam permits and doesn't permits is none of your business, keep to your country and destroy your societies with woke culture and take your hands of of our way of life, The Iranian revolution was carried out by different groups yes but that majority of the people decided, again decided to make it an Islamic republic with Islamic law and traditions and customs having a role in their life, that's their choice, respect it and stop being hypocritical calling for democracy and liberty only when it suits you, The issue of Mahasa was a tragic case and the ones who were responsible got punished, are your racist police that kill and oppress based on color Angels ?? Save your hypocrisy, the US got what they deserve for meddling in other nations business, your governments killed the millions of people worldwide in that name democracy and freedom just to steal resources, your hypocrisy has no limits

*Let's offer a course on Western/liberal marriage:* *_Lesson #1: Don't ever argue with your wife because that is emotional abuse, and she will call the police and accuse you of hurting her. Police don't need any evidence to arrest you, so enjoy your stay in prison._* Lesson #2: Don't you ever dare to deny your wife having sex with others. You don't own her. If you're a real man, you'll help her find a boyfriend or two and let them use your bed while you sleep on the couch. *Lesson #3: Be fair to each other, but remember, she can accuse you of abuse at any time and destroy your life.* _Lesson #4. Your wife is tilth for all men (and women). They will use her as they, please. Enjoy your married celibacy._ Lesson #5: If your spouse wants to change "their" gender, don't argue. Just be happy for "them," you transphobe. *_Lesson #6: Want a divorce? Don't want a divorce? Doesn't matter. She can leave you for any reason or no reason at all. She gets to take at least half your wealth and custody of your children, and you pay all her legal fees. She might even end up living with her boyfriends in the house you bought with your kids._*

​@@mas-udal-hassan9277 Shut up bot. Its unrelated.

@@SetuwoKecik Indeed, those who disbelieve spend their wealth to avert [people] from the way of Allāh. So they will spend it; then it will be for them a [source of] regret; then they will be overcome. And those who have disbelieved - unto Hell they will be gathered. Qur'aan [8:36]

@@mas-udal-hassan9277 Dont use quranic script to justify your biased political agenda, bot.

I love Iran and Iranian culture (especially the poetry) so much but Iranian Nationalists have been annoying me a lot recently.

@@AlMuqaddimahYT Bro I could def tell you love Iran nd have a lot of Persian people in your life, you were too accurate 😂 ain't no one that don't love that place and people know that much. I used to be one of those annoying Iranian nationalists as a young man - it's practically a rite of passage for us all lol

Those sources that talk about women were also invented in the 17th century. For legal reasons, I'm joking.

Not really. After the Battle of the Talas, there wasn't much contact between the two. Except, al-Mansur (I think) sent some men during the An Lushan Rebellion. They were known as the Black Flags because of the Abbasid black banner.

@@AlMuqaddimahYT what a pity. Two of the greatest empires on earth not talking regularly.

Keep speaking from your feelings while he speaks from the historical data.

@EV-EV-EV what feelings? These are historical facts, these are the rules of the Jizya like it or not. I don't think in the video he provided any kind of historical sources or references to back up what he said so why are you assuming that what he is saying is based on historical data? What I said is how Jizya has been historically applied, we have hadeths to tell us the rules of Jizya we historical events that proves how it was applied and we have Omarian treatise that provides even more evidence. I have no interest in defending the Abbasid Caliphate but those were the rules of Jizya history doesn't care about your biases or feelings. If you have any counter arguments then please provide the historical references and sources.

Also, if you go to any Islamic country, you'll find markets like the ones I described with people putting their wares in the street and being an annoyance for passersby. Remarkable how some things don't change.

Oh... The sale and purchase of alcohol was forbidden. But at the entry of every grocery store would be a pile 8ft high of everything you might want or need to brew your own, which we found intriguing.

​@@AlMuqaddimahYTJust want to mention how very appreciated your work is. You're one of my favorite content creators. I saw your video regarding anti-islamic sentiment and the burning of the library at Alexandra. It was very moving and well done!

The shia Zaydis in Yemen became pretty much independent from the sunni caliphate plus the rough terrain and the distance from the center of the empire

​@@mhmadbedrddeen3414 Indeed, those who disbelieve spend their wealth to avert [people] from the way of Allāh. So they will spend it; then it will be for them a [source of] regret; then they will be overcome. And those who have disbelieved - unto Hell they will be gathered. 8:36

@@mas-udal-hassan9277 Indeed what, what do you mean by mentioning this verse ?

The game is pure anti-khilafah propaganda

​@@rusi6219 *The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

No its a dhal sound ذ and should not be pronounced as "zimmi". Bless you brother make sure of the info that you give. ذمة is a person who has a covenant which means we as muslims have an obligations towards them and they have an obligation towards us too

No, the Dh sound is not pronounced as the Z sound. Dh is phonetically a dental fricative like the "TH" sound of English as in the word "the".

This is a common mistake made by some of the Indo-Paki brothers when speaking Arabic... do not give advice on speaking Arabic if you are not an expert brother.

Stick to one language

No Its like "themmi"

Many of them reverted back to nomadic life, during the later Abbasid caliphate armies had to be dispatched to assert control over land in Syria and Iraq that had been taken over by tribes.

@@y5anger Crazy how they conquered empires and ushered in the Islamic golden ages. Only to go back as herdsmen.

many of them settled in the newly founded cities and became urbanized, like basra - baghdad - kufa and some of them returned to the desert over conflicts and returned to nomadic life.

@@y5anger and many settled in cities and became urban people.

​@@y5angersome settled in cities, some returned to nomadic life in the desert

*The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species which could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn! Of course all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours, even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens. They fail to grasp how we too say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

*Let's offer a course on Western/liberal marriage:* *_Lesson #1: Don't ever argue with your wife because that is emotional abuse, and she will call the police and accuse you of hurting her. Police don't need any evidence to arrest you, so enjoy your stay in prison._* Lesson #2: Don't you ever dare to deny your wife having sex with others. You don't own her. If you're a real man, you'll help her find a boyfriend or two and let them use your bed while you sleep on the couch. *Lesson #3: Be fair to each other, but remember, she can accuse you of abuse at any time and destroy your life.* _Lesson #4. Your wife is tilth for all men (and women). They will use her as they, please. Enjoy your married celibacy._ Lesson #5: If your spouse wants to change "their" gender, don't argue. Just be happy for "them," you transphobe. *_Lesson #6: Want a divorce? Don't want a divorce? Doesn't matter. She can leave you for any reason or no reason at all. She gets to take at least half your wealth and custody of your children, and you pay all her legal fees. She might even end up living with her boyfriends in the house you bought with your kids._*

Just because Islam says that it should be lower doesn't mean that it was. People do all kinds of things Islam doesn't allow.

@@AlMuqaddimahYT so we need to see the record. Islam says it's lower or not, we need to see how much and how Jizyah was actually, right?

​@@loudirga Grate propaganda against Muslims

​@@AlMuqaddimahYT*The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

Okay, I don't think of Muslim sources as untrustworthy. However, if we can recount a story from both Muslim and Non-Muslim sources, that lends credence to the story if both sides are telling the same or similar stories. "Orientalist" historians also rely on Islamic sources but they analyze them to come to a conclusion about their authenticity. As far as the biography of the Prophet is concerned, that is uniquely unreliable, not because it's from an Islamic Source (the same problem exists for the biography of Jesus) but because it comes from a deeply religious and pious source. That source was obviously biased and we can not accept any word at face value.

​ Ah okay, well have you talk to like sheikh uthman ibn Farooq or Muslim Lantern, both will shows how authentic biography of Prophet Muhammad Salallahualaiwassalam, if not all then some will, but I understand your intentions, sorry brother if I sounds condescending, I just wanna asked that for so long, take care

​@@AlMuqaddimahYT *The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

​@@Pendekar-1144 Indeed, those who disbelieve spend their wealth to avert [people] from the way of Allāh. So they will spend it; then it will be for them a [source of] regret; then they will be overcome. And those who have disbelieved - unto Hell they will be gathered. 8:36

Islam can have golden age only why attacking and looting other nations

He is supported by some anti Muslim forces in the west. *The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

He avoid it Muslim pay zakat

zakat is fixed but jizya is not it can be higher than zakat or lower it depends on the ruler but i ca not think society and goverment can be run on 2.5 percent taxes although i heard only working men payed the jizya

*The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*

The way the liberal Persians living in the west treat Islam as a foreign imposition on them is baffling given that Persians crafted major parts of Islam. They embraced it and took it further. It is as much theirs as any other nation. I don't mind that they're connected to their rich ancient traditions so much but Islam is a part of Persian tradition as well. I don't even know what kind of Iran these guys want. Like, what would Iran without Islam look like? Not the Islamic Republic, I mean Islam. How much would a Zoroastrian Iran differ from Muslim Iran, really?

BUTT HURT WESTROID SPOTTED 😂😂😂😂😂😂

​@@AlMuqaddimahYT if Iran was still zorastrian , we would say sweat home Iran instead of Alabama

@@fnansjy456 Don't worry Islam is coming to you in the west, guess you better run to the moon

@@mhmadbedrddeen3414Are you Iranian.

He conveniently ignored that *The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th-century.* And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.*