There actually is, though. In the tomb of Atemhotep, there’s a series of 3 tablets which explain what happened. They’ve been largely dismissed because it doesn’t fit with the idea that Ramses must be that Pharoah. Look at his life.

​@youtubesucks3811 To your point, this very thing is actively happiness all around us. It accidentally happened in North America with our largest known earthquake. We literally forgot it in our history, and it was rediscovered almost a generation later.

​@PaulKinley54 There's much more archeological evidence than this . Actually good evidence. Give it a serious objective search and you night just be surprised. If you're sincere that is , because there's still many people who are so insincere or just ignorant that they deny CHRIST JESUS ever even lived . Lol .

@@cecilspurlockjr.9421 I completely agree but I would like a source. Not for argument sake but because I like reading about it.

Look up Ipuwer papyrus

The only reason the Bible does not mention the name of the rulers during Joseph’s time, Moses’ birth or exodus, is that these stories are fabricated based on the collective memory of different migrations from Egypt including the Hyksos. It doesn’t make sense that the writers of the Bible cared for mentioning names and events of other less important people thought out the Bible, but somehow ‘conveniently’ ‘forgot’ to mention the names of Egypt’s rulers during the so called presence of Joseph and Moses in Egypt. BTW- It’s naive to believe that agricultural Egypt took agricultural advice from Bedouin Joseph or that a large number of people would go undetected in the Sinai desert for 40 years by Egyptian patrols.

​@@doyouknoworjustbelieve6694 "It doesn't make sense" The Bible contains several "less important people" so you're comment is fabricated. What you've done is listen to those around you and taken their beliefs as fact. Take some time and read the Bible and compare it with historical events and you just might believe the Bible is based on fact.

​@@doyouknoworjustbelieve6694 "BTW" Why is it naive? Joseph was a blessed follower of God and got his knowledge from God, his agricultural abilities stem from discerning the dream of pharoah and Joseph set about mechanisms to protect the Egyptians like building store houses, water storage dams, as well as a city.

​@doyouknoworjustbelieve6694 the Hebrews did not call them by their names. They used Pharaoh.

It also known as the spine and the high country.

Palestine is not Latin for Philistine; it is a translation from the Greek name Palaistinê.

Hadrian renamed Israel as Palestine to mock the Jews by renaming their land after their most hated ancient enemy - the Philistines.

@josiepens4480 There are many claims about the Romans being responsible for the name Palestine, even in pompous theological institutions, but under a little scrutiny, these claims are rendered as juvenile imaginations. As early as the "Histories" of Herodotus (Greek, written in the second half of the fifth century B.C.E.) , the term Palaistinê is used to describe the area between Phoenicia and Egypt. Herodotus traveled the area so had firsthand knowledge of the land & people. He references the population of Palaistinê as being circumcised.

@@rwewew While it's true that the name 'Palestine' has ancient roots, and Herodotus did use the term 'Palaistinê' to describe the region in the 5th century B.C.E., it's essential to approach historical claims with a nuanced perspective. Herodotus's observations were undoubtedly valuable, but they were based on his specific travels and experiences along the shoreline. It's important to note that Herodotus's account might not provide a comprehensive view of the entire population of the land of Israel during his time, nor does it necessarily negate other historical factors, such as Roman influence. The Romans changed people's names when they were captured one example, is Flavius Josephus, this was common. Additionally, during ancient times, there were people living along the shoreline known as the Philistines. Their presence is an essential part of the region's history and contributes to the complexity of its cultural and historical tapestry.

What an amazing thought 😀

I favour Thutmoses II?

Evidence has been discovered which confirms, (proves); that the biblical story of the 'Exodus' is based on fact and a true story. The route that the Hebrews took when they fled from Egypt was traced by amateur biblical archaeologist Ron Wyatt. R.I.P. Using the bible for reference, along with holy spirit; he was able too pinpoint the exact location of where the Red Sea was parted allowing escape for the Israelites and death for the Egyptians. Whilst diving off the coast of Nuweiba beach in Egypt he found the remains of Pharaoh's army including chariots with the wheels detached, which confirms the biblical narrative that God made the wheels of their chariots come off. Human bones have been found along with the shrunken hooves of horses.. Over thousands of years the remains have become encrusted with coral which has preserved their shapes and sizes. A gold chariot wheel was discovered, interestingly only the chariot wheels of the Pharaoh or high priest were layered with gold. Coral doesn't adhere to gold so the wheel is still plain to see. The Gulf of Aqaba goes down to a depth of five thousand feet and during nautical surveys of the area the British Navy mapped a gently sloping land bridge that stretched the eight miles across the sea, connecting Nuweiba beach on the west too Saudi Arabia on the eastern side. The bridge is a couple of hundred feet wide and gently slopes down to a depth in the middle of a thousand feet below sea level. Due to tidal effects the bridge remains relatively clear of deep deposits of sand which would have made it easy to navigate and walk upon. The remains of the Egyptian army are found on both sides of the land bridge. Ron also discovered two stone columns one on either side of the crossing site the one on the Egyptian side had been toppled over and was laying in the surf on the shore line. The inscriptions on it had been eroded away but the column on the Saudi side was still upright and in situ. Ron said he could read the names of YHVH, Moses Egypt and Solomon inscribed on it. These columns would have been erected by Solomon in remembrance of the miracle of the crossing. The column on the Saudi side was removed by Saudi authorities and a plaque was put in its place. The column on the Egyptian side was lifted upright and cemented in place. Ron then traced the route that they took from the Red Sea to Mt. Sinai, along the route he discovered places that are mentioned in scripture, including the twelve wells where the Israelites camped and rested. To this day the top of the mountain where Moses received the commandments of God is still scorched and blackened where the angel of God descended upon it in flame. At the base of the mountain there are the remains of a corral structure where the animals were led to slaughter, the bones of theses animals were found buried nearby. The alter upon which they placed the golden calf, when they turned back to the gods of Egypt; is inscribed with petroglyphs of cows & bulls and the engraving of a menorah was also discovered nearby, which proves an Israelite connection with the area. The huge split rock at Horeb shows clear signs of water erosion where the water had flowed out and down to form a lake at the base of the mountain. This provided clean water for the Israelites who were encamped at the base of Mt. Sinai. Archaeological finds and discoveries are still being made and are ongoing. Egyptian arrow heads have been found in the immediate area. These archaeological discoveries have been confirmed and verified by numerous researchers and academics. . The evidence is overwhelming and undeniable. And through the archaeological finds discovered on the seafloor of the Gulf of Aqaba, (Red Sea); particularly an Egyptian eight spoked chariot wheel; we can determine that the Exodus must have occurred around the time of Thutmose II, and from this time period we can calculate back to the approximate date of when Joseph was born and when he was taken in bondage to Egypt, c1890BC and c1873BC respectively. In c1860BC, after spending thirteen years in prison, aged thirty he met with Pharaoh Amunemhat III, (c1860 -1814BC) Moses was born in c1553BC, at the time of Pharaoh Apepi (c1573 - 1549BC), and he fled from Egypt, c1513BC, (Pharaoh Thutmose I - (c1528 -1492BC). He returned to Egypt forty years later in c1473BC, New Kingdom Thutmose II (c1493 - 1479BC} (c993BC), Four hundred and eighty years after the exodus Solomon began construction of the first temple, It took seven years to complete.

@PaulKinley54 Unfortunately some people never learn and you my friend are one such person!

@@spiritoftruth56 Or…… someone else also found the same remains thousands of years ago and either A.) invented a story to explain the mystery of what it is and what it’s doing there… or B.) adjust the story they were already selling in order to use the “evidence” as validation for their mythology.

Yep. Too many churches turned into self-help groups instead of informed believers. Time to undo that era of shopping for a God that fits what theybalready were instead of one that has an objective truth and requires something.

Sorry but you obviously do not know the definition of nostrasism! Jesus was a nostic so was Mary, Joseph ,and most Esenes!!!

The only reason the Bible does not mention the name of the rulers during Joseph’s time, Moses’ birth or exodus, is that these stories are fabricated based on the collective memory of different migrations from Egypt including the Hyksos. It doesn’t make sense that the writers of the Bible cared for mentioning names and events of other less important people thought out the Bible, but somehow ‘conveniently’ ‘forgot’ to mention the names of Egypt’s rulers during the so called presence of Joseph and Moses in Egypt. BTW- It’s naive to believe that agricultural Egypt took agricultural advice from Bedouin Joseph or that a large number of people would go undetected in the Sinai desert for 40 years by Egyptian patrols.

Thank you for showing us that even archeology will be misconstrued depending on the biases of the person doing the digging.

@@mattbritton6222 Thank you! Going through this comment section, I already thought rational thinking was dead!

Dr.David Faik Egyptologist videos are far more accurate!

Dear @calebwilliams7659, It is very difficult to defend the idea that the 19th Dynasty was that late (Rameses II 943 BC to 877 BC,). That is why the vast majority of Egyptologists disagree with that idea. After looking at the various theories for the date of the Exodus, I have come to the conclusion that the Early Exodus Theory (Approx. 1446 BC) is the most probable date of the Exodus. There is some convincing evidence that appears to support this theory the best. I will probably stand with that one unless some big discovery is significant enough to support something else and provide a better explanatory perspective. Be Well, DZ

i agree with david rohl. he posits that there is an artificial gap of 300 years. i have also searched the eclipse tables and i have reason to believe that battle of gibeon happened on 14th july 1406 BC(this has a peculiar path running from rome, olympia, to babylon. furthermore, i have encountered a research stating hittite chronology to be off by 332 years, and that mursili II of the hittite empire occurred on aug. 2, 979 bc (kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a5dxrbeeurevj6c.html). while james lowdermilk derives the beginning of the egyptian calendar and point of origin of 1st day of the egyptian calendar was july 20, 4243 bc or jdn 171868 (kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q9GEhsx1uN6tn4k.html)

1446 BC actually came before 943 to 877 BC by several hundred years since BC dates count down from higher to lower numbers. Consequently, 1446 BC was over 400 years earlier than Rameses II time period. I do believe the Biblical texts and believe that Moses did lead the Israelites out of Egypt, but the dates for Rameses II's reign are after they left Egypt.

@@davidjanbaz7728 🤣

Thank you for watching! I’m glad you enjoyed it. Patterns of Evidence is an amazing resource for sure.

@@EasternRomeOrthodoxy are you suggesting that we have the original text?

@@jgv4513 Of course we do. What you read (in your bad English translation though) IS the original text, and to suggest otherwise would be nothing but Protestant heresy

@@EasternRomeOrthodoxy you cannot simultaneously claim something is a ‘bad translation’ AND ‘the original text’. You just posited a contradiction. You also fail to explain how you determined which variants are the originals. If you’re just going to continue to default to ad hominem this will be very unproductive. If you are willing to actually converse I have no problem hearing you out.

@@jgv4513 I am conversing, only you don't listen or you just don't get it, so complain to yourself. Either you're trying to be a wiseguy with that reply or you don't understand the difference between changing the substance of the original text and TRANSLATING the original to other languages, as your English translations of the Bible. Your English translations are not that good, but at least they meant to translate it without changing the substance, only by mistakes they got things wrong occasionally. While the Greek, Latin and Slavonic translations are the most accurate of the original text of which I am fluid with. Just like Muslims are required to read, know and understand the Quran in the original Arabic, so do all Christians should know the Bible in the ancient Hebrew text, in my opinion. But that's besides the point. Point is that we're not allowed to change names and words in the original text ESPECIALLY not the Hebrew one (of which you have no excuses of translation etc)

Glad it was helpful!

The right order is, evidence then conclusion. Starting with the Exodus is not the right order.

Evidence requires interpretation and interpreters are always working with a preconceived foundation or lens of interpretation. This is always true. The key is not allowing your starting point to force the evidence in one direction. As I stated in the video, I cannot be dogmatic about my interpretation considering there are many different views and the amount of evidence we have of Egypt’s history, as a great archaeologist has said, is just scraps.

@@thegeologian That is why Scientists go to great lengths to not let their biases interfere with their conclusions. For example look up double blind. But most importantly they are willing to say, "I don't know", and "I was wrong" Believers look for confirmation and can't change their beliefs.

@@stephenolan5539 I would agree that the double blind peer review process is probably the best way of doing it. However, this doesn’t fully work when everyone who is publishing and reviewing also abides by the same paradigm almost religiously. The current paradigm abides by philosophical naturalism, which is a huge bias and an illogical one at that.

🤺☦🇷🇺Nope. No one "updated" anything and there were no "biblical authors"🤦‍♂️To say a thing like that it is pure heresy, since Jesus himself said that not even 1 letter can be changed from the original text, and God Himself wrote the 5 books of Moses, by dictating it to Moses, so stop making up false theories, you Protestant heathens. The correct answer is that the Bible is a prophetic book, not plain history, and certain place names were given retrospectively as they were called in the future, that's all. Like it was the case with the river of Eden which encircled the land of "Cush"...Abraham going all the way to "Dan"... The Pharaohs of Moses' time were Ahmose I, Thutmose III, and Amenhotep II, with Hatshepsut as the Pharaoh's daughter. Repent and convert, Protestants👉

@@EasternRomeOrthodoxy really? you're trying to call Protestants heretics? Yeah, the Pope is a heretic.... by the standard of the Word,. not a standard of my creation.

His channel is fantastic!

It looks to me with the 'boils' on Amenhotepll neck, is apparent that he is 'The Pharoah. that knew not Joseph'(Ex.?) Hence the accelerated mistreatment 0f the Israeli people,raising the alarm with prayers for a 'Deliverer('MOSES)...jn

Inspiring Philosophy has tried to debunk Joel Kramer. Have you seen it? What do you think? I'm still not sure ...

I have not seen it yet. Is it the video about the Pharaoh of the Exodus? Or another video? I’d like to watch it myself and then I’ll be better able to comment.

No doubt exodus happened... Past that i don't know which pharaoh specifically it was for sure for sure though mt Horeb/Sinai being in Saudi is a guarantee... Bless all!

In reality, all you’ve provided is your opinion. There’s plenty of evidence.

Oh what I was saying was that you didn’t offer any evidence against the arguments I put forward in the video. So, yes, you merely offered your opinion.

​@@thegeologianthere literally isint any evidence backing up exodus in any way. Exodus is the most erroneous and fabricated book in the entire collection. It even has the timeline off by about 800yrs, it gets the wrong pharaoh, and there were no hebrew slaves in egypt, ffs. And moses, one of the most plagerized characters in scriptures His story being a echo of Sargon of Akkad, Ra Harakhti, Bacchus etc etc. The whole thing is just rather pathetic and silly and you never presented any evidence for anything, you just resort to the same old delusional drivle. Your whole faith is plagerized, erroneous, fictitious nonsense. It's really quite sad to witness such delusion and cowardice of not even being able to face reality.

@@taylorthetunafish5737 How do you relate to the evidence of the Moses story in a temple? And the tomb of the biological parents of Moses? Mary Wyatt has all the pictures in her book.

@taylorthetunafish5737 in the video, I offer plenty of evidence. My comment was in reference to the fact that the Bible’s historicity isn’t made or broken by the exodus alone.

Considering that egypt's archaeological finds were tightly controlled by avid anti semite and corrupt black market antiquities dealer Zahi Hawass its no surprise that that very little very little evidence of israel was found in egypt.

SUBSCRIBED!

Thank you!

🤺☦🇷🇺Nope. No one "updated" anything and there were no "biblical authors"🤦‍♂️To say a thing like that it is pure heresy, since Jesus himself said that not even 1 letter can be changed from the original text, and God Himself wrote the 5 books of Moses, by dictating it to Moses, so stop making up false theories, you Protestant heathens. The correct answer is that the Bible is a prophetic book, not plain history, and certain place names were given retrospectively as they were called in the future, that's all. Like it was the case with the river of Eden which encircled the land of "Cush"...Abraham going all the way to "Dan"... The Pharaohs of Moses' time were Ahmose I, Thutmose III, and Amenhotep II, with Hatshepsut as the Pharaoh's daughter. Repent and convert, Protestants👉

EXODUS 15:19 PHAROAH AND HIS ARMY DID DROWN IN THE RED SEA. PLEASE READ IT FOR YOURSELF.

@@briendoyle4680 🔥🗽💥💥💥🔫🪆🇷🇺

+1. Also an interesting fact is that Hatshepsut dissapears entirely while co reigning with thutmose 3 once he returns from war campaigns. . Its beleived she was assasinated or poisioned so thutmose 3 could become sole ruler. A conspiracy. Hatshepsut and Thut 3(her step son) did not have a good relationship because he was not her son but born of one of her husbands concubines. Hatshepsut never was able to concieve a son. This lends strength to why she adopts Moses and raises him as her own. Thut 3 considered to be one of the greatest of egypts pharoas was not born of pure royal blood! Moses had no support once she dies and is not recognized as legit by thut 3. Then moses is pegged for killing an egyptian to save a hebrew slave,,,Not good for Moses

That’s a great point!

Love that song. 😂

@@luciparadise6781 And there's a cover of it by the duo "They Might Be Giants..." which sounds kind of Biblical itself! LOL! "They Might Be Nephilim"...

That's Patterns of Evidence, which he's cited in the description.

Interesting. What’s the inscription called?

@@thegeologian I can't remember but will check my feed for the site. I NEED to write these sites down! Something always comes up and I don't have the reference. There was some concern about the location due the change in name over time and the change in the Nile River bed

Please give more info. I know Sakarya and used to gaze at the pyramid while having breakfast

@@hpinchen9451 Ron Wyatt museum has proof of Hebrews in Egypt. They may be able to find the references to Joseph in Egypt. So much has been suppressed due to political and academic communities

And look at what they did to Hatshepsut as well. They did the same thing.

I’ve never heard the Imhotep-Joseph connection before but now that it’s mentioned that makes A LOT of sense. Imhotep was a real outlier.

Dear @dgreg493 What you are speaking of is a Wyattism and therefore is an unreliable story. Surely if you study this claim of Wyatt and study the Scripture and Biblical history you will become aware of the huge problem with that very unreasonable Idea. If you are not familiar with Biblical history in relation to Egyptian history and you cannot see the problem (that should just jump out at you ), Then please let me know and I will walk you through the problem step by step and you will certainly see why that Wyattism does not at all fit with the Scriptures. It amazes me that people cannot see the problem. I teach theology and apologetics in an adult Sunday School class. When I presented this Wyattism to them, almost half of them saw the problem right away without having to go and study the issue. Of course they are older Christians that have been studying the Scriptures at a fairly deep level for a long time. I have noticed Wyatt fans and followers, often do not have a very strong understanding of the background of the Scriptures, Their foundation is poor and their knowledge of the Scriptures is very basic. I suspect that have never had a class in Christian theology or apologetics, and don't have a good grasp of Biblical history and Biblical background. I also suspect their church has never given the a class in basic hermeneutical and exegetical principles, and that explains why their skills of interpreting the Scriptures are so poor. When christians have a poorly Scriptural education and don't have these skills mentioned above then that makes them susceptible to being deceived. Wyatt has a silver tongue and uses sensationalism and emotionalism to convince his followers that his claims are creditable, and many fall for it without ever really fact checking his words. His emotional presentation gets the emotions aroused and they just "FEEL" that what he says must be true. I think their emotions make them think Wyatt's words are true and they think their emotions is the Holy Spirit. BUT ........ the Holy Spirit will never contradict the Scriptures and truth. Be Well, Let me know if you can see the problem. -- Yes or No ! DZ

Yes All of Ron Wyatts videos on his amazing Biblical discoveries are well worth watching and learning from!

Glad you liked it!!

I’m so thankful that God has used this video to help you! To God be the glory!

Dear @Tess1061, Seems like I sat down to figure this out at one time. If I recall correctly, I think I figured Hatshepsut was around 19 at the time, so I reckoned that it was possible that she was the princess that rescued Moses. I will have to set down someday and redo those calculations and take notes this time. Be Well, DZ

@@Silverheart1956 If you remember to revisit this video, I'd love to see your notes sometime!

Dear@@Tess1061 , I probably will not remember that, Sorry. Our Pastor recently died and that places an extra burden on me to teach, so it will proabably be a long time before i have the freedom to study things and issues I want to study (call it recreational study). I have spent a lot of time in the last few years studying Biblical / Middle Eastern archaeology. One great resource I recommend are the articles and videos of "Associates For Biblical Research" (ABR). You might want to check them out. They have some very interesting information. As I recall I used the date of the Early Exodus Theory as a base line. That would be 1446 BC. From that base line you can determine the birth and death dates of Moses. I cannot recall my sources for Hatshepsut's time line, but you can experiment with various timelines and see what you can get when the two timelines intersect. Be Well, DZ

Yes! That is a great possibility! It could have just been the new name given to Avaris as either the Hyksos sought to solidify their reign as rightful pharaohs or as another pharaoh, such as Ahmose or Thutmose III built over the old Hebrew city. Thank you for the thought!

​@@troyhaileyhow are you able to pin point exactly when all these people lived? I don't think the Bible reveals when Abraham was born

The Bible gives genealogies along with the age of individuals when they died. You can follow the record back to a specific date.

@@thegeologian the Bible doesn't say how many years each person lived in every genealogy nor the parent's age when each kid was born. Some yes, but not all

It takes you to Abraham and the rest of Genesis takes you to Jacob’s sons. From there there’s plenty of data to accurately date it back into the past.

Very interesting, I’d love to know the context of these death bed confessions? Can you provide a source or link?

@@YaH_Gives_WisdomOP is most likely lying

Does this evidence prove the miraculous claims of the exodus story? Because that’s all critics really care about. Whether there were Hebrew slaves in Egypt or not is of little importance

Thanks for watching!

@nicholasbenton1088 I would enjoy that. Send me an email at geologianask@gmail.com or continue commenting here if you’d prefer that. I’m interested in what you’ve learned!

There is an archaeologist who travels around the whole country telling the truth about the Bible from a Christian archaeological point of view to children and teens . Her programs sound a lot like your response. And her programs are free , check out Digging Your Bible Children programs.

@@Heavensoon7 Found her. Thank you.

The Masoretic text of the old testament is from around 1000ad but that doesn't mean the events in it date to then. Same with the ipuwer papyrus me thinks

Agreed @waddellski

@@Ka112eb I think everyone would agree with your statement (although the Masoretic is more like 600-700AD), so I'm curious: what is the point you're making?

I may be able to do that, yes. I’m not exactly sure what format to share that on. Perhaps a google drive link?

@@thegeologian Hi. That would be a good way. Social media is another way as well. Perhaps on LinkedIn. Or perhaps on your own web site.

These are assertions not evidence

The evidence are the multiple ancient documents and inscriptions cited as well as the lines of logic presented. Would you like to attempt to refute them?

I don’t remember talking about prophecy in my video so I’m confused as to what you’re referencing.

Your recollection was indeed excellent! When one adds up all historical/forensic "bullet-points," it is indeed Pharaoh Amenhotep II that appears to be the Pharaoh of the Exodus. He also suddenly disappears from the Egyptain Pharaohnic historical record. He was also not replaced by his first-born son because he died early in childhood, but was indeed replaced by his second son. This second son of Pharaoh Amenhotep II, as I recall the historical narrative, ruled during a great period of difficulty for Egypt.

How does a people escape to the Promised Land when that land was a highly controlled land with vassal states of Egypt, and remained under control from Thutmose III and his dynasty of 5 subsequent Pharaohs? Plus Egyptian presence in the Sinai for mining.

I agree. it is Amenotep 2 who is pharoah of the Exodus. I think you do have the facts correct. The key clue which i dont know why the lecturer completely missed is that the father of the exodus pharoah must have reigned at least 40 years based on the biblical account. Thutmose 2 did not. not many in egyptian history qualify. Thutmose 3 does.

Glad it was helpful!

This is not correct. If Hatshepsut was Moses’ adoptive mother, she was likely dead by this point. Bithiah was likely Nefrubity, her sister. This would also explain how she was young enough to marry a Hebrew. There is also nothing to substantiate the claim about Mered her husband nor of Bithiah being ancestors to Christ. Where’d you get that from?

bless you for reading the written word of god. that's what keeps us from erroneous/vain/false/deceptive teachings. may your zeal for the truth inspires the rest of us.

Thank you!

I’m so glad! Please feel free to ask questions in the comments of any video or send me an email at Geologianask@gmail.com

@@thegeologian I really appreciate that. We need all the help we can get! Lol

K9 you might also be interested for your son the archeological finds of Ron Wyatt, there are several documentary films on YT. He has located the Red Sea crossing, Mt. Sinai, the Rock Moses struck, Noah’s Boat & Sodom & Gomorrah. It proves the Bible is pure history, more so than any secular history book could ever dream.

@YaH_Gives_Wisdom I suggest checking with other Christian organizations about the reliability of Ron Wyatt’s findings. Here me when I say this, I think Ron was very sincere and I used to think he had found Noah’s Ark. I don’t think that any more. I don’t think Ron had the education he needed to properly evaluate the geology of the area. As someone who loves God’s word and who has studied geoscience, I think he was wrong. I’ve checked with other organizations that uphold God’s word and they likewise were skeptical of his findings. The Red Sea crossing has some support, though no chariot wheels were recovered sadly.

@@YaH_Gives_Wisdom I watched several videos on Ron Wyatt and his sons! I get teary eyed every time I think of when the DNA specialists in Israel handed Ron the test results of the blood he brought in and said “This is the blood of your Savior!” My son has always held a very skeptical outlook on everything since he was a child. He is a (prove it) kind of man. He does fully accept the Bible as 100% fact now that he has began his walk with Our Lord. He became involved with this Apostolic church as a web page consultant and must have received this “oneness” outlook from their preacher. Im going to be very careful how I say this next part. He was baptized this past Sunday. Praise God! During the service that we had attended, Three different preachers delivered a message, with the last one being the head pastor who spent 3 and a half hours yelling loudly that there is no trinity and cited dozens upon dozens of versus where The Lord spoke in singularity. He however never spoke on the versus that show where Jesus speaks to the Father, or when the Father speaks of Jesus, or where Jesus speaks on the Holy Spirit. As we left the church, and my son still trying to cling to the oneness idea, I referenced every scripture I could possibly remember, I also used all of the resources Joshua had shared with me. To make this long story shorter, I left him with two things to think about. First, I told him that in order to converse, teach, learn, or correct someone in the Word, you have to read it. The second was that I told him that while I understand that there are verses in the Bible that his pastor has used to argue his opinion, but made him promise that when he read the word, and read the versus that totally disprove Unitarianism, that he would accept it, believe it, and not try to twist it to fit into something that it’s not. Thank you guys so much for your responses. I absolutely love and appreciate all of your information and kindness to share your time with me. Blessings on all of you!

Moses is an invented person.

@@matswessling6600 You are _"an invented person"._ If you think that is a silly statement, consider your statement about Moses.

@@KenJackson_US No, you sre wrong. I am a real person.

@@matswessling6600 Moses is.

@@KenJackson_US moses never existed. its a mythical character.

The circles are the chariot wheels covered in gold. Search Ron Wyatt discoveries, the Red Sea crossing is just one of them. Though perhaps there were shields but most were wheeels.

Not the shallow Reed sea but the Red Sea is the crossing place. The Reed sea was todays logical but wrong answer to diminish any miracle by substituting a plausible explanation in opposition to the word of God.

Those corals are completely natural and form throughout the region.

​@@YaH_Gives_WisdomRon Wyatt made over a hundred outlandish claims. The funniest one was that he discovered Jesus blood in a crack in a rock and that it had half the chromosomes necessary thus proving a virgin birth.

Have you not seen the archeological site in Saudi with everything mentioned right there? Mt jabal al lawz is the real Mt. Sinai. The split rock, the Altars, the 12 wells,...epochs cave... the actual red sea crossing area. It's all