The T-54 and T-55 are the world’s most prolific mbts.They crushed Budapest in 56,stared down American tanks in Berlin in 61,fought in the 67,and 73 wars.Fought in the Vietnam war.Crushed Prague in 68,

Поставил мало опытных танков, их было куда больше, намного больше

There is much more,the T-54/55 has fought in wars in Africa,of course it was a T-54 that crashed through the gates of South Vietnam’s presidential palace in 1975.Hussein had thousands of T-55s,including Polish models with more oval shaped turrets,that fought Iran,and then confronted a 30 some country coalition led by a superpower in 1991.

The T-54/55 is the AK-47 of tanks,and the fact that the 54/55 was still considered a Main Battle Tank of the Warsaw Pact in the 1980s,is absolutely remarkable.

T54 , T55 were named Medium tanks. First MBT in USSR was T64. ASU57 was not a tank too, it was self propelled gun. Video is great though!

Thank you for your reply, the next video is a history of the evolution of American tanks after WWII, there should be some models you haven't seen as well.

Thank you very much for your comment!

we can't

Well to be fair t-44 was built before cold War

@@Fesko-ly1wr first prototypes of T-44 and T-54 were build even at the end of WWII, before september 1 of 1945. Also there should be mentioned T-80BV - reactive armored T-80B, T-55AMV and T-62MV (both with explosive reactive armor), T-10 with T-10A or T-10M and it's early model called IS-8. As for tanks, there were extensive modernisation of IS-2 and T-34-85 in Cold-War Era. Oh, and there must be T-72AV (T-72A with reactive armor), T-72B mod.1989 (with new Kontakt-5) and T-72BU (mean T-72B-Upgraded, the prototype of T-90, or even objects 187 and 188). And interesting objects 477 and 292 (T-80 with 152mm gun).

Yes. 44 is beginning of era T-54 T-55 legends T-62 T-64 T-72 one of the best ever

Всё же даже такая броня не спасёт от бомбы, но для защиты от этого есть, были и будут ПВО

Мне кажется современные снаряды смогли бы сделать пробитие и такого. Просто надобности нет. Ну и такие танки были бы золотые конечно.

@@user-gd4br2nt4q да, современные войны показали, что танки сильно устарели. Но Об. 490 создавался 30+ лет назад, когда на поле боя ещё не было дронов камикадзе. Хотя данный образец танкостроения был оснащëн бронекапсулой из комбинированной брони толщиной в 180 мм по кругу и в 80-90 мм с крыши и днища.

@@SilentioMortus современные урановые ломики сейчас способны пробить максимум до 1400 мм комбинированной брони. У Об. 490 защита от такого типа вооружения во лбу была до 2000 мм. Возможно единственный аллюминиевый прототип такой ломик бы и пробил, но серийную машину точно бы не пробили!

​@@_FFGG_ современный бой показал, что танки нужны и без них никуда, но не такие сверх дорогие мастадонты, ибо 1-2 дрона выводят его в лучшем случае из строя

Thank you very much. The next instalment is a history of the evolution of the American tank.

zelenskys fanboy?

Agreed

Indeed

@@theangrychicken5026 Somehow somebody makes everything political🙄 I do not support Ukraine or Russia in this war but the people on both sides who unwillingly get dragged into it and suffer.

Бмп 2 до сих пор используется в нашей армии, только ПТУР стал новее.

Согласен, с таким успехом можно было и 2с1, 2с3, 2с4, 2с5, 2с7 и так далее сувать

@@FF-zw9wf поддерживаю. Особенно смотрелся бы кадре миномет "Ока" он точно был бы уместен в рамках холодной войны чем какая-то асу-57

Thank you very much. The next instalment is a history of the evolution of the American tank.

А как же сам Т-90?

Thank you very much. The next instalment is a history of the evolution of the American tank.

Thank you very much. The next instalment is a history of the evolution of the American tank.

Thank you very much. The next instalment is a history of the evolution of the American tank.

@@cucumberhistory274 cool, I'll watch it

Thank you for your reply, there are a lot of sample cars from the USSR, I just chose a selection of my favourite tanks to draw. I hope you continue to follow my channel.

@@cucumberhistory274 Обязательно буду смотреть ваши видео, когда будет свободное время. С наступающим Новым Годом! 👍👍👍

@@user-ms4sw4nc9v Happy New Year!

BMP is not really a tank, it’s IFV (Infantry fighting vehicle)

@@legiahuy9436 yeah, but the IT-1 is not really a tank either

@@jonaslavicka2411 Its an ATGM carrier, more comparable to a tank destroyer, which he showed multiple of, than an IFV

@@ryangoslingIRL yes I know that, my argument is that if tank destroyers are featured, IFVs should be as well

Thank you for your reply. I think the BMP series vehicles are armoured personnel carriers, and I would like to make a video dedicated to armoured personnel carriers.

Yeah, I feel similar to the tanks in video games when I was a kid.

Многое из того, что вы поставляли по ленд-лизу вы сами применяли в войне на западном театре военных действий. И немецкие танки т-IV, т-V и т-VI показали, что они лучше американских и британский машин. Ваши танки даже близко не подошли по боевым характеристикам с русскими танками КВ-1, КВ-2, ИС-1, ИС-2 и Т-34. Будьте честны, хотя бы перед самим собой, ваша Матильда это просто убогое подобие танка. А вы в основном их и поставляли.

Чувак ты шутишь или бредишь? Русские танкисты считали английские и американские танки дерьмом с бензиновыми двигателями, которые горели как спичечные коробки.

In a nutshell, veterans of war used to say - USA, UK tanks are good, convenient for peaceful service, but not good for war.

Probably beacause the Object 279 is a "Nuclear" tank, meaning it was designed to survive a nuclear blast, to some limit, hence the hull shape...

Which means it was more interesting... The 770 is just a normal heavy tank.

everything you said is correct, i mean that the tank that played a bigger role in soviet tank development is not shown in this or many similar videos just because the first one gets more love from the commmunity. Which is sad bc development of 277, 770 and 278 is very intersting considering things like 278's gas turbine engine or possibility of mounting 140mm smootbore gun (M-65GL Molot-T) on either one of those @@Epsilon2042

Why T-54 1949 ,but not 1946?

wdym IS-7 was made in 1946-1949 when T-10 was in production from 1952, and T-10M from 1957

После смерти Иосифа Сталина IS-8 переименовали в Т-10

Можешь не сомневаться они точно есть. В видео показаны не все прототипы 😊

"первым советским ОБТ" был Т-54, гений.

@@user-yz9ko1yj2e нет, Т-54 был средним танком, гений. Даже Т-64 бвл средним танком, и лишь Т-64А стал основным танком. И нет, ОБТ вообще не существует в советско-российской терминологии, существует именно основной танк, а ОБТ - это дословный перевод MBT - main battle tank. Но проблема в том, что в русском языке слово танк имеет только одно значение, поэтому слово боевой тут лишнее

​@@drunklorry3406 Тут я тоже огу поспорить 😅

@@damirxp5599 вопрос только в том, насколько успешно :D

​@@drunklorry3406это спорно, это как многие называют СТРВ103 и Центурионы ОБТ, забывая что они кроме них служили и другие типы танков.

Thanks for the reply, post cold war tanks are not included in this video.

@@cucumberhistory274 Yeah, I was guessing they were post...

@@Epsilon2042 T-72B3 was introduced around 2010 if I remember correctly, and the T-80UK is just a command tank variant of the T-80U.

@@MaxCroat Oh ok, thanks.

Всё что есть у вас янки всё это украдено, своего у вас нет ничего

@@user-rx3dn6uy4c i don't understand bro i am not even american

@@chewbacca7690 Бро , историю учил наверное в школе , почитай на досуге))

thanks

Thank you for your reply, a video of the French tanks is in the works. It will be posted after the US, German and UK tank videos.

As ridiculous as it is, you're right. The Kharkov Design Bureau really wanted to put the 130 mm gun on heavy tanks, but also because of it, most of the prototypes could not even make it to military trials. Soviet 130-mm gun S-69 (on its basis was created experimental tank gun S-70) had a rather low barrel life, which was tolerable in artillery, because there were not used shells with large powder filling, but for the tank gun it was necessary to have a ballistic straightness, which wore out the barrel after 300-400 shots.

@@Scorchluckdude… Russian naval guns calibre is 130mm and 152mm

you might not know but soviet also experimanted with 140mm guns, such as M-65GL Molot-T (there also was another one, 140mm "Razor") which was a 140mm smothbore gun based on 130mm M-65 (mounted on tanks like Object 279, Obj. 770 or Obj. 277) which fired APFSDS shells at about 1 700m/s which could pentrate 360mm of armor at 1km range... and all this in late 50's (soviets went crazy with this one. For comparison APDS shell fired from Chieftains's 120mm L11 could penetrate only 265mm at the same range - and it entered service few years after those soviet experiments). This gun was supposed to be mounted on Object 770 or Object 278 heavy tanks or Object 120 SU-152 Taran self-proppeled gun

@@user-zw6ld3nu1k The Navy's 130mm gun is a B-13. Obviously, the tank gun was not made on its basis. The S-70 tank gun was made on the basis of the S-69 towed gun. I specifically stated the names so it can be googled.

Наоборот, как раз таки ИС-3, не удачный, его косяки пытались править в ИС-3М

@@_b_x_b_1063 ИС-3 это был прорыв танкостроения всего мира, с его щучим носом и колоссальной броней в купе его скорости.

Нет они разные 115мм унитарный 125 раздельно гильзовый Хотя возможно сами бопс имеют схожую конструкцию)

@@user-mr5zy6gf8h I cannot read Russian

125 мм орудия танков те что после дракона предназначены не только для стрельбы снарядами но и для стрельбы РАКЕТАМИ

Los sovieticos solo diseñaron los planos y un solo prototipo que se llamo diferente, fueron los rusos quienes tomaron ese tanque y lo recontra mejoraron hasta llegar al.t-90M

Уже дошли бы до чего-то, наподобие как в фильме "Хроники хищных городов" )

Well, there was the largest nuclear reactor, industrial and economic capacity, and good infrastructure The same applies to America, some money is for the development of the country and some is for the army

Если ты не хочешь кормить свою армию, то будешь кормить чужую

No. The USSR at the time did not yet have large enough transport planes to allow for the dropping of vehicles.

Асу-57 и Асу-85 были созданы для ВДВ - предшественники семейства Бмд.

There were several projects labeled IS 6. None entered production, though at least one prototype was built. Probably it is the one you can see in some pictures and games

Харьковский завод и Ленинградский были основными танковыми заводами советского союза, в 80-х к ним подключился и Омский с Тагильским

тут перечень только советских танков)

@@user-cc1pc9dh8j понятно.😁

T-64a was 125mm gun

Actually, the earliest production tanks did have 115mm gun initially (the same gun as the T-62) as the 125mm was not ready in time. Although, if I am not mistaken, those tanks were later retrofitted with the 125mm gun.

@@MaxCroat only 600, and yes they were all converted to 2A26.

@@PugilistCactus yeah, but they still had it for a short while

Este videos avarca desde 1945 hasta 1991 el t-34 se creo en 1942

прочитай название ролика! Советские танки,а не Российские

@@user-ty6to5lt8q т-72 хоть и разрабатывать начали в СССР и производство началось тоже в СССР но производят сейчас в России

Это танки Холодной войны, ролик так и называется. Соответственно, техника до 1991 года

@@user-ty6to5lt8q прочитайте,мы с вами вместе не пили и бабу не делили

Los sovieticos solo hicieron los planos y los rusos los continuaron

EVOLUTION OF COLD WAR SOVIET TANKS

oh , yhea , sorry , i did not reade the entire title

my fault

De hecho, la urss sola sin sus aliados ya tenia 4 veces mas tanques y armas que toda la otan

it is a video during soviet cold war era, T-90 and T-14 are russians

@@stefphoenix9642 T-90 Vladimir (1991)

Asi es y porque te ries? Los proyectos de tanques fallidos son muy comunes no es para reirse considerando la otan tambien tuvo muchos prototipos

Название ролика прочитайте внимательнт

в кавычках

@@arnoldlynchthewanderer без кавычек

@@nektar4ik и почему же?

@@arnoldlynchthewanderer ну по крайней мере,для Украины и Казахстана это прям счастье,а для балков тоже норм

@@nektar4ik полный бред, учи историю и поймёшь, что никто украинцев, белорусов и казахов не морил

Во времена холодной войны термин "средний танк" уже не использовали. Автор всё правильно сделал

You are a World of tanks player, am i right? If yes, wargaming fooled you, only T-62A (pre production versioon, only few where made) uses a 100mm gun, normal T-62 uses a 115mm U-5TS smoothbore gun

@@VulcanCannon_yes you are right, but t62a with 100mm gun must have

@@FF-zw9wf It's not really relevant, though. Probably a similar situation as with the T-64, where the planned gun was not ready in time so they put an older cannon on the initial tanks. That is how the early T-64s got the 115mm gun, although to my knowledge all of them were later retrofitted with the 125mm gun. It is an interesting fact to know, but not that relevant, even though in the case of T-64 a significant number of tanks did receive the 115mm gun. But the tank was always meant to have the new 125mm cannon, the cannon just wasn't ready in time.

There not fake my guy there is literally photos of them built now prototypes? Yes but not fake

They are prototypes not fake

Tank museum in Kubinka - Do i am a joke to you?

My dude, I don't know if there are a lot of materials in English, but look for information about the "Sovershenstvovanie-88" program. All the latest "objects" shown in the video were developed within the framework of this competition. And the Object-490A not mentioned here. Most of them were created in metal (here it should be noted that we are talking about full-size running models of structural steel), Object-477 "Molot", had three prototypes, 2 of them were undergoing military testing, its development was conducted in 2007, when the new Defense Minister Serdyukov curtailed the program, and tried to buy wheeled tanks from the Italians. The developments on the 477 object became the basis for the T-14. Tank development stopped only with the collapse of the USSR and the monstrous economic disaster. The T-14 is an economically stripped down version of the tank that the USSR would have put into service sometime by 1995 (the planned date for the competition). And it is the most modest version of what was planned.

Smartest furry

i thought so too, but the prototype version actually did have the same 115mm gun that was on the t62. the 125 was fitted on the production models.

ah@@gallustsp

@@gallustsp Actually, I think the video is right, some tanks were produced with the 115mm gun because the new 125mm wasn't ready in time. Video states 1000 tanks produced this way, I don't know whether or not this is accurate, but I do remember reading about early production models receiving the older gun. However, if I recall correctly, they were all later retrofitted with the 125mm gun.

@@MaxCroat could very well be the case. I only did a quick google search. Thanks for the info

@@gallustsp of course, no problem