​@@menamenasŵŵŵqŵŵŵqŵqŵwwwŵŵ

Yes!

yup! he is such a nice guy

leev jr I

Me too!

But the Holy Spirit led them to the Catholic Church😊

@@helenr.2184 yeap. Not my will be done

Diane Sic gala Welcome home my sister.

That’s actually not a real quote from St. Augustine

If you have more questions, watch “ Called to Communion” live on KZfaq (Monday through Friday at 2pm EST) and you can call in to Dr. Anders and he will give you the answers.

C Pa You should listen to his radio show, he’s even more polite and is just absolutely genius!!!

@@Alexander-fr1kk -Sounds good! Where can I find his radio show?

@@theabrescia1955 1:00 central time on EWTN, ch.130 on XM radio, iHeartRadio radio EWTN channel, download EWTN App... great channel.

@@Alexander-fr1kk -Many thanks for the info!

@@Alexander-fr1kk-Thank you

TCB KINGZ no not quite. Now he needs to become a traditionalist Catholic. That’s where real Catholicism still is.

They do it the same way as the pharizees labeled Jesu a heretic influenced by devil. This world hates God to the core and all that are his. It goes beyond racio.

It is the devil speaking through them. satan hates Our Lady desperately.

Nabeel Younis “concerning Christ and the Church, I just know they are ONE.” St Joan of Arc

james white already lost against patrick madrid

@@miranda54084 Clearly, Mr. White took him to school

@@joecannes2421 many Protestants converted to Catholicism after that debate that means a lot, that some do not want to accept it is another problem

@@miranda54084 And many more converted to Christ. I grew up catholic and was never taught the Biblical way of salvation, I am just saying search the Scriptures yourself and see if your belief agrees with it

👍

To force upon someone, yes... that will never work.

ever seen Called to Communion?

In reality, scholarly disagreements over the canonicity (proper) of certain books (peacebyjesus.net/Ancients_on_Scripture.html#2) continued down through the centuries and right into Trent, until it provided the first "infallible," indisputable canon  after the death of Luther. Thus Luther was no maverick but had substantial RC support for his non-binding canon. Furthermore, the (standard) RC objection against the Protestant lack of an assuredly true and reliable complete canon via an infallible magisterium would also apply to the majority of RC history, in addition to the time of Christ, despite the Lord and the apostles referencing so many OT writings as as being the word of God, as being Scripture, as having authority, which their opposition never contended against as being so.

Thank you Dr Anders very enlightening and informative. May God bless and keep you always.

crazynik57

He acts like Protestants doesn't see Luther and Calvin as flawed men God used. We agree the reformers (Protestants) made some of the same mistakes that the Catholics and Orthodox made which lead to the USA , the freedom of speech and religion. We can't help but to be influenced by the culture we live in. As CS Lewis noted with time we can more easily see how their environment influenced their decisions and beliefs and which ones held true with time. This is why CS Lewis encourage reading books written outside our own time and culture and not just the ones from modern scholars.

wisdom and catholicism don't mix.

@@tony1685 your opinion is worthless.

@@PInk77W1 thankfully, the Word of Truth proves what i've stated as *Unalterable Reality* = *Truth* or are you admitting (like your 'church') that you just don't agree with the Word of Truth (John 17:17) and as such are creating what you choose to call Truth?

@@tony1685 your church sadly skipped 100s of years of Truth. The Catholic Church has been with Jesus since day one. Jesus said “I will be with you always.” Mt 28:20 Jesus said “Since u have been with me from the beginning.” Jn 15:27

@@PInk77W1 you haven't defined His church yet - does His church follow (1 Tim 3:15) or ignore Truth? you wrote: _'The Catholic Church has been with Jesus since day one.'_ - really?? did Jesus' church keep Holy the 7th day, or pretend the 1st is now Holy? because if they did what He does (Luke 4:16) then it would obviously mean they are His - isn't this so?

Dr. Anders hosts “Called to Communion” on KZfaq live Monday thru Friday 2pm EST. You can call in with your questions or ask them in the “Comment” section.

MsHello2468 protestants would agree that early Christians were Catholic. They would say that they are the real catholics. Although the word fell in disuse in Protestant circles, it's still valid.

MsHello2468 ironically the strongest shades of sola fide is in the church fathers that the Protestants disagree with on other things. Luther even brought up john Chrisostome to justify his charging of the verse to faith alone.

@@GodFamilyCountryCorp On the internet look at annoying

The saints are in heaven they are mentioned in the book of revelation they wear white robes and with palm leaves on their hands. Enoch Elijah Moses are living saints. Moses and Elijah with Jesus on transfiguration. Matthew 27 52 53 resurrections of many bodies of saints.

1 Timothy 3 15 church is the pillar and foundation of truth. Ephesian 3 10 through the church the manifold wisdom of God. 2 thessalonians 2 15 hold on fast to the traditions we have taught you whether by word of mouth or epistle.. Hebrew 13 17 obey the elders of the church. True church is a teaching church means impart knowledge.

Acts 11 26 first time the word christian was used. Christians in Antioch they were Catholics and they had Ignatius of Antioch as Bishop. And Ignatius of Antioch said where there is catholic there is Jesus

@po18guy Actually the Jews are the best!!!

+Wil liam www.amazon.com/Biblical-Defense-Catholicism-Dave-Armstrong/dp/1928832954

Wil liam so now its about YOU. Jesus only is not biblical. Your envy and pride has your ears burning when you sit there listening to his testimony.. You cannot ever change the lies that were tought to you unless you humble yourself. Bless

I’ve seen thousands come home to the Catholic Church.

This man Wil liam is on every Catholic video claiming to be a former Catholic but he knows nothing about the Catholic faith. He post this same comment on every Catholic video. We'll pray for you bro

Interesting how that prayer to a Saint finally led to his ultimate conversion to the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Faith.

I caught that one too, thought I misheard, and went back a few seconds to hear it again. I'm not quite sure what he was getting at there.

@@Henry._Jones Yeah, there were a few remarks that were just inaccurate.

@po18guy Who wrote which history? Historical actuality (geschichtlichen Wirklichkeit) is always far removed from any later discursive attempt at documenting that history; my point was that he treats the data as though it were a monolithic reform movement, when in reality his interview betrays a more one-dimensional familiarity with the Swiss Reformation filtered through the lens of American low-church evangelicalism. No one in the West understands the Orthodox well enough to "bang on them." Most people's experience of Protestantism is very much like this man's; you have to be in the academy to have had a different experience and at that point all apologetic tropes fail because everybody is familiar enough with the material to make the necessary qualifications that are seldom made by the polemically minded salespersons of various theological positions. The typical either/or characterisations fall apart in discussing East-West, participatory versus juridical language and the like because a survey of the data shows that the historical actuality is not nearly so simple. There are always exceptions to the rule.

The Early Church was called the Catholic Church, which was started by Jesus Christ. ....According to Catholics....

Silla castaneda Being born again comes from Baptism.

Gary Simmons Well, whaddya know. Hi, Garrryyyy! It's a small social media world. Lol. :3

What is God's manifest most reliable permanent means of preserving what He told man as well as what man does: oral transmission or writing? What became the established supreme authoritative source for testing Truth claims: oral transmission or "it is written/Scripture?" Which came first: the written word of God and an authoritative body of it, or the NT church? Did the establishment of a body of wholly inspired authoritative writings await the church and require an infallible magisterium? Which transcendent sure source was so abundantly invoked by the Lord Jesus and NT church in substantiating her claims to the nation that was the historical instruments and stewards of express Divine revelation: oral transmission or writing? Was the veracity of Scripture subject to testing by the oral words of men or vice versa? Do Catholic popes and councils speak or write as wholly inspired of God in giving His word like as men such as apostles did, and also provide new public revelation thereby? In the light of the above, do you deny that only Scripture is the supreme, wholly inspired-of-God substantive and authoritative word of God, and sure record of what the NT church believed? Do you think sola scripture must mean that only the Bible is to be used in understanding what God says? Do you think the sufficiency aspect of sola scripture must mean that the Bible formally provides everything needed for salvation and growth in grace, including reason, writing, ability to discern, teachers, synods, etc. or that this sufficiency refers to Scripture as regards sources of express Divine revelation, and which materially provides for such things as were listed above? What wholly inspired oral source has spoken to man the public word of God outside Scripture since the last book was penned? Where in Scripture is a magisterium of men promised ensured perpetual infallibility of office whenever it defines as a body a matter of faith or morals for the whole church? Does being the historical instruments, discerners and stewards of express Divine revelation mean that such possess that magisterial infallibility? What is the basis for your assurance that your church is the one true apostolic church? The weight of evidence for it or because the church who declared she it cannot err in such a matter?

Timothy was referring to the Old Testament here. Remember, the New Testament had not been published.

@@maryjordan4129 Yes the Old Testament was sufficient at that time to bring a person to Christ now being able to see Christ in it. Scripture has always been enough.

And how is it that you KNOW that Paul’s second letter to Timothy belongs in the Sacred Canon?

John Caldwell i didn't see him saying that reformers didn't believe in regeneration. The Church has always believed it. I think he meant more of the "personal conversion experience" phenomenon that's popular in modern Protestantism. His point being that baptism is the actual born again event. Even though one doesn't feel emotional.

John Caldwell

Did you listen to the entire discussion? I'm guessing not.

Mark 4:12 (NIV) so that, "'they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding; otherwise they might turn and be forgiven!'"

PeaceBy Jesus a lot of talk but no sense

I use the Church Fathers to help me learn and interpret scripture. It is easier to learn from a teacher than on my own. The Church Fathers convinced me that the Catholic Church is the true Church.

The Pope is not infallible as you Protestants understand it. This means you people do not know the Church you are attacking. Please go back and learn about Papal infallibility first.

John Caldwell the only place in the bible faith alone is written, the words “not by” are written right before them.

You are clueless. And yes, you are a protestant. What you typed is 1000% fiction. I wouldn't even know where to begin. Millions of Christians tortured and murdered? Nice try. You know nothing of the Church and nothing of history. Like the MAJORITY of your protestant (most likely baptist or seventh day adventist) ilk. You're not fooling anyone with a brain. Unfortunately you fool millions with your hysterical fictional narratives, those stupid enough to believe utter HOGWASH and unlikely to do any research or study or learn actual facts. Bearing false witness is a grave sin which you will answer for. The ignorant and hateful believe liars like you because they want a scapegoat which prevents them from acknowledging their own sins. The good news is that intelligent protestants are doing their own research, learning the TRUTH, and getting away from your heretical sects. The intelligent protestants like Anders here become Catholics while the ignorant swim in stupidity and hysteria and lies, like you are doing. And if you had any understanding of the BIble, which you clearly don't, you would realize it was a CATHOLIC book compiled by the Catholic Church in 397 AD. Before that there was only the CHURCH. The CATHOLIC CHURCH established by Jesus Christ.

Prancer1231 Your visceral reaction to a little truth is indicative of the extent to which you have been brainwashed and defrauded by your religion. Reminds me of John 3:19-20: And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. Unfortunately for you and your religion, the catholic persecution of Christianity over the centuries is well documented. The Bible is a catholic book inspired by the catholic cherch? The catholic cherch wasn't invented until 3-400 years after it was completed (although the pagan religions, from which catholicism was derived, go back much further). If the catholic cherch had had its way, they Bible wouldn't exist today. Jesus Christ, along with the Father and Holy Spirit, are nowhere near your abomination of a cherch. In fact, Jesus Christ, upon His return, is going to destroy your religion (read Revelation 17). These are undoubtedly some hard truths for you to swallow; all I can recommend is that you fervently pray to God for guidance and actually read the Bible without filtering it through your preconceived religious ideas. You will be amazed at just how thoroughly the Bible condemns just about every doctrine of the catholic religion.

No, you are brainwashed and defrauded and spouting the same anticatholic nonsense narrative that your ilk has been spewing since the "reformation." Light came into the world, He founded a Church, ONE Church, it is called Catholic. I'm not even bothering with people like you anymore, it's a waste of time. Your hatred of the Catholic Church prevents you from learning any TRUE history or anything FACTUAL about the Catholic faith. Sorry, YOU are brainwashed. If you had a love of truth, you would learn real history and the truth about the Catholic Church. Your hysterical fictitious narratives are not the truth, sorry. I cannot debate someone whose arguments are based on fiction, bigotry, and paranoia. Enjoy your anticatholic fantasy world. You have no knowledge of history and are just parroting stupid anticatholic nonsense that ignorant protestants parrot because they are too lazy to study. For starters, you might want to look into protestant atrocities against Catholics. That's right, you wouldn't, because in your fantasy world everyone is sinless except Catholics. Remove the beam from your own eye.

Foxe's Book of Martyrs is a Protestant Reformation propaganda manifest. It was written in Queen Elizabeth's I time after Roman Catholic Queen Mary I of England was demonized, calumized and executed by her political and anti-Catholic enemies. The history contained therein is a highly biased "revisionist history" if it is not an outright fiction. The proponents of Protestantism had to create a myth ever since King Henry VIII broke from Rome to claim by a a naked abuse of kingly authority that he was the new head of the Anglican Catholic branch of the Catholic Church. King Henry was a staunch Catholic up to the point it got in his personal way and when he realized he did not have the political clout of an emperor. This book was an attempt to assert a historical justification to establish the Church of England as a continuation of the true Christian church rather than the modern innovation that it really was and is. If anyone knows the true history they know just how ironic and outrageous these lies are. Catholics were in fact the ones brutalized during this period by the Protestants in England - monasteries burned to the ground, churches looted and vandalized. precious art and artifacts stolen and sold, lands confiscated and given to nobles for political favor. Catholics were forced to attend Church of England/Protestant services or pay fines or face imprisonment and confiscation of property. Priests and monks and religious who refused to obey the kings secular appointed bishops faced hideous tortures and executions (lift-hung to near strangulation, drawn on carts around town while barely alive to be mocked publicly then publicly disemboweled with entrails burned on a spit, castrated and quartered to have body parts displayed in hanging cages etc.). It was a brutal time to be Catholic and most went underground and others pretended to comply by going to Protestant services then to private masses from smuggled in continental European priests. The Protestants lacking any legacy or self identity outside of the Catholic Church had to reinvent a new history to make it look like they were the original Christian Church and that "true Christians" had been persecuted and held down secretly by the evil Romansh loyal Catholics ever since Constantine. It's all utter nonsence and demagoguery. To be called a "Papist" was to demonize English Catholics as not loyal to their king but to a foreign ruler. This was an attempt to incite the populate to not tolerate Catholics and to turn in any who refused to comply with the King's new religion. English Catholics in particular were very loyal to the king except for his usurping the church and over a few centuries of persecution most caved into the absurdity started by King Henry VIII. It of course all unravels now even to this day as Anglicans mass convert back to Catholicism in response to the latent ultra-liberalism now emergent showing its head. An interesting point. If not for the Catholic Countries defending all of Christendom from the Muslims during these periods (including what becomes/was the Protestants states - who lifted not a single sword to help) there would be no "west" today. If we count the number of deaths caused by Protestantism (The peasant revolution/slaughter, French Revolution, the bloody 30 years war, Napoleonic wars, etc. and all the after effects we have even today) there are no doubt many many 10's of millions of deaths that can legitimately counted as a direct consequence of Protestantism. So its ironic that this book still has any ear at all in this "enlightened age" ( ). Yet this book it is the genesis of much of the polemics we suffer even to this modern day from the historical ignorance being passed around as truth in some of the more "redneck"/lowbrow Protestant churches. See it for what it is -- classic propaganda, revisionist history and demagoguery that was used to create a false dichotomy. Now in modern times some are resurrecting it and trying to plagiarize the lies so they can resell a new variant-Christianity to the impressionable. It's all snake oil and the people who push it have no pedigree nor a shred of linkage to the early church and the legacy of the apostolic Catholic Church. They are in fact impostors that the apostles warned would come in latter days. -- by Bona Fides at Catholic Answers

Sir Jacko if you are not a Catholic or a protestant and I presume neither a estern Christian orthodox why you care so much about theology. You do not believe 8n Christianity but at the same time you use Christian theology to criticize chrianity. Do you actually know who you are a s what you believe? You sound like someone completely lost I afraid

Go back and start at 00:00.

@@BAR-ct7ti try John 14:15 reconciled with Exodus 20:8-11. no catholic can do that.

Are you one of those 7th Day Adventists???

@@BAR-ct7ti i am, Sir.

@@tony1685 Jew wannabes putting old mosaic law above Christ’s. Have a pork chop and think about it.