Once you start writing this stuff from scratch you will understand that AGI is not the problem. The problem is already here. Thats all I can say.

It all talk, NLP has been around for decades. Dead internet theory holds strong.

The more we talk about it the more likely something will get done pro actively

9:41 What do you mean you haven't thought about this enough? What have you been doing? What kind of AI pundit are you? Once AI can train and improve itself we just become a hindrance to its own self directed evolution. Maybe now that you've read Leopold's paper you will start to get it. AI is the greatest threat to humanity.

I think this dude is trying hard to advertise his AI investment grift. However, unfortunately he is not entirely wrong: remember, we have been doing AI research since 1960s or so. "Unhobbling" just means modern AI researchers stopping to believe in magic (meta system transition, emergence, take you pick) and remembering the other 60 years of AI research that came before them. We have already solved most problems that LLMs have, long ago. LLMs are just the final piece of the puzzle, not the whole solution. The actual problem is, AGI is only going to be safe as long as you don't give it agency. Unfortunately, I am quite sure that *some* idiot will.

We need to code those vegan values into our AI efforts.

Maybe, but you need to understand that this isn't just OpenAI. Most big companies in America have gone neck deep into the ESG/DEI swamp, and this is Standard Operating Procedure at all of them. HR spends most of their time trying root out "racism," and other such twaddle, whether it exists or not.

This fellow does indeed seem to underestimate how much the Chinese can do on their own.

@@HansDunkelberg1 Sure, but they DO have a massive spying campaign, bigger by far than any other country, so he's not wrong to be concerned.

@HansDunkelberg1 Microsoft alone has invested 13 billion into openai - do you really find the Chinese to be so moral as to not attempt to steal? Or is their culture incapable of it? This one here believes they ( or any other actor) are smart enough to know the most efficient way forward in ai development is simply to steal the research and claim you developed it if questioned.

This is just a grift. There is no AGI and there is no Superintelligence.

Too funny 😅

Hopefully he still not using the curse libraries

Best comment

One day, on his computer screen, a comment appears out of nowhere... "They are coming for you." Hehe... ah the good old days of the Matrix.

LOL! best comment on the internet

They're going to use it to spy on everyone, everywhere, all at once, and a person isn't going to be required to do it. Instead it will happen at light speed, on your own devices, and build reports and cases on everyone for wrong think and wrong speak. While documenting all of your whereabouts, every website, comment, email, text, phone call, off phone conversation(like Google already does). This shit is going to destroy the very fabric of the Free World. We will be 100x worse off than the Chinese living under CCP control. Then the terminators will come after the fact. Once they have their list....... Edit: and you'll be paying for the power by to make it happen by plugging that thing in and paying your electric bill...so they don't even have to pay for it, you do. You pay for it to happen.. this is absolutely terrifying. 1984 can't even begin to touch how extremely dangerous and almost guaranteed the devastation is going to be. Truly horrifying.

it's true for sure

Chat gpt is not inside the OS, apple has their own 3 billion model at the core and a cloud model as well , Then chat gpt for some some real world knowledge stuff . They could swap chat gpt for some other model if they want to

even a janitor leaving openAI gets that much attentions by these clawns...

They have the best product or at least the most promising

Thanks for the recommendation ❤

Numerous stories like that are sprinkled across the JRPG genre.

Sounds interesting, I need to check that out. Thanks for the mention.

There is a story By Issac Asimov named The Feeling Of Power which is similar but different outcome. In that we grow to be reliant on computers and AI. So much so that over time we forgot how they basically work. But a worker decides that he wants to know and figures out how they work and is lavished great praise. He is told that because of his work, we shall now be able to have manned tanks and rockets and manned missiles so no longer will computers need to be wasted in warfare!

The problem is the groups in power and responsible for alignment are hardly good guys. They are overwhelmingly anti human putting “nature” and the animal kingdom ahead of mankind , pro abor tion, pro prepubescent transing, largely anti-God/creator which leaves them with no logical way to objective morality. Will the government step up and regulate these systems? That’s definitely a disaster in the making.

Statements like this remind me of quotes about the Internet being just a fad back in 1998. 😂

I think her main argument was that it would take decades before we can adapt our "economic system," particularly globally

This is not her domain. She has a lot of wrong takes outside of her field.

@@JohnSmith762A11Bthat isn’t remotely the same thing.

@@milowmiloand a lot of the people inside the field have huge incentive to lie about the future capabilities of this technology to secure more funding.

God. Much more than I could spare. This was derivitive bullshit. If you've been following along at all this was just a TL;DR for Dummies paper with no nuance, no discovery, no ephatic proclamaiton, just drivel... why are we giving it the time of day. Understand I am completely on the side of the argument in this regard.... however it's just such a droning drumbeat since two decades now and he's the one with the baton so now we are talking about him like Beyonce now. Let's get over ourselves and realize this is not our mouthpiece and the Yudkowsky and Kurz and others were the frontier in this and this is just all kinda psychobabble after the fact distracting from the conversation... it really feels like its some photoshoot and papz photos of whos leaving OpenAI this week... who cares... I care about Ilya... I care Altman to lesser extent most days... this individual and his paper are so below where the discourse needs to be. It's like reading a teen drama about what adults are doing out there in the real world and not a damn thing about it smacks of any insight or depth. Let's let his exit go... let's move on.. Get our eyes back on the ball. Please.

Even if both nations separately developed Super Intelligence & somehow managed to keep it "bottled," what's stopping the A.I.s from forging a symbiotic relationship in the event they're ever unleashed on one another?

So how much glue should I put on my pizza then?

@@FirstLast-rh9jw Keir Starmer, the man who makes robots look like party animals! With his robotic manner, he could give the Terminator a run for his money. Just don't ask him to crack a joke - unless you want to hear the sound of crickets.

@@FirstLast-rh9jw Google irresponsibly used their dumbest model without proper testing or guardrails because that's the most they could give away for free and they were tilting taking too long to integrating AI. People who get proven wrong will always move the goalposts. It'll take at least a generation for thing to get normalized and people take the abilities of AI seriously, and for granted.

I deeply distrust "scientists" that after a life of learning and working on Science, dare to use phrases like "it can't be done" or "that's impossible and will never happen".

@@ronilevarez901there's science and science fiction

Dear Matt.. I have an important message for you. Kindly listen. Please stop the hype train. You are not a researcher, you can't even code hello world, you are a KZfaqr... and a marvel fanboy.. in reality Moore's law is deadd and it will never revive.. deep learning and many so called cutting edge technologies were invented b4 u were born.. ie the sixties and seventies... I know your channel is popping and we are genuinely glad as your fans.. but exercise journalistic integrity.. where are your facts, data and importantly control study!!.. gpt 4 cant code a super Nintendo or game boy game .. but you can't stop talking about the singularity.. this is an un-educated and un-scientific approach.. you are fuelling a bubble.. remember Blockchain just two years ago.. friend you can make your claims, just back it up with data and numbers.. let us see your reasoning process.. you are fuelling the next dot com bubble.. with love.. this is a sincere and honest critique of your content.. it's like a marvel con or a cosplay con.. super hype but where is the science, which experts did you speak to, how did you arrive at your conclusions? I love your channel, but please exercise skepticism.. it is important in the scientific method. Be blessed....

Yeah they might finally solve the marble question

Yes! The big hype of thirty years and more has been the Internet. Now that's changing - because out of the Internet, something entirely different is born.

If you we make sure we don't get extinction behaviour. Human intelligence and super intelligence will work together. Will give a structure to work in this world.

5 years later: Goalposts moved, AI still Dumb AF, all Hype!! All hype!! No matter how it's progressed.... Guess I shouldn't even bother with those people and their hot takes anyways.

@@RealStonedApe 5 years later most models will be able to answer the marble question and generate a good snake game in one shot.

it is if you're single and poor.

​​@@southcoastinventors6583and still hallucinate that George Washington was black😂

@@RealStonedApe I am the most impressed people like you assuming development AI stop right now today suddenly and in 5 years will be the same as today ... for the time being we do not see any slowdown ... a year ago we had best to offer GPT 3.5 , even GPT-4 when came out was much less intelligent that todays GPT-4 iteration ... soon GPT 5 and other models

Also tax friendly.

Solar and wind are nowhere near efficient or powerful enough for high levels of energy. These systems will need fossil fuels or as Altman suggested, nuclear power plants.

@@SeanDavies-Roy that was a tiny fraction of the point I was trying to make here. How that was the only thing you came away with after reading it, is beyond me…

@@SeanDavies-Roy like I even mentioned the Hoover dam in there as well 😂 The point I was making had more to do with how useless the land is for anything but something like that.

@robotron1236 Just find I strange that those in the AI sphere who are supposed to use critical analysis and science buy into the climate hysteria and back useless green tech. As an example, it took over 10 back and forth prompting exchanges with chatgpt to go from green tech currently solely powering hundreds of thousands of homes to not even having the efficiency to power ONE without service interruptions. And the degree to which any capabilities are possible, the default assumption is an area with a beating hot sun and favorable wind conditions. Nevermind the further prompts needed that in cold areas where it's -40 for months on end with barely any sun like Canada, this tech doesn't work at all.

It's only just begun...... 😬😬

What has AI done for you?

…or holograms. Project Bluebeam.

⁠@@ice9594holograms are dumb though because their practicality, even in fiction, has proven to be missing

And what is the conclusion?

Lol...you watched an hour long video within 8 minutes of publishing

I watched the whole thing and mostly agree with Leopold's analysis. Where he falls short is in his appreciation of the post WWII congressional military industrial complex/deep state black projects. Beyond public awareness the CIA for example has been using advanced AGI for decades; The red Queen. What we will see play out in the public arena will effectively be a coming out narrative for the AI superintelligence already controlling the world at an intelligence agency level.

@@matthew_berman 😭 caught red handed

Dear Matt.. I have an important message for you. Kindly listen. Please stop the hype train. You are not a researcher, you can't even code hello world, you are a KZfaqr... and a marvel fanboy.. in reality Moore's law is deadd and it will never revive.. deep learning and many so called cutting edge technologies were invented b4 u were born.. ie the sixties and seventies... I know your channel is popping and we are genuinely glad as your fans.. but exercise journalistic integrity.. where are your facts, data and importantly control study!!.. gpt 4 cant code a super Nintendo or game boy game .. but you can't stop talking about the singularity.. this is an un-educated and un-scientific approach.. you are fuelling a bubble.. remember Blockchain just two years ago.. friend you can make your claims, just back it up with data and numbers.. let us see your reasoning process.. you are fuelling the next dot com bubble.. with love.. this is a sincere and honest critique of your content.. it's like a marvel con or a cosplay con.. super hype but where is the science, which experts did you speak to, how did you arrive at your conclusions? I love your channel, but please exercise skepticism.. it is important in the scientific method. Be blessed.. one love

Yah, fusion is coming - just like AI.

Thanks for such a useful comment.

Thank you!

GPT-4's intelligence has the _kind_ of intelligence of a high schooler, but much more _scale._ The front of understanding is also more jagged than we're used to, so it's better than humans at some things and worse at others. Consider if you uploaded a gorilla and gave it a million year's worth of compute - would it ever come up with algebra? That's the difference of kind vs scale.

I bet your son could give you ten sentences that end in "apple." If GPT-4 doesn't know when or why it is wrong, it isn't very intelligent. It's a well-spoken kid who, if he doesn't know the answer, just makes it up. Rote learning, even incredibly fast rote learning, is not intelligence.

In WWII, there were used simple ways by foot soldiers to avert being shot from, or run over with, tanks, like hiding in lateral dead angles. If computers try to annihilate mankind with robots, comparable possibilities might emerge. Very probably computers won't even try such a thing because they'll foresee that it would mean their own doom.

I could also recommend Adventure Capitalist and Cookie Clicker!

True!!!

I'm far more worried about humans being aware of AI's power, and wanting to control it... to control the rest of us. I'd rather take my chances with the machine.

@@4Fixerdave true, but at least you can outsmart a human. Where there's a bad guy with AI, there's also a good guy with AI. But if we can no longer control AI? We're truly F'd

@@Jammy1up "But if we can no longer control AI? We're truly F'd" Why? If the AI needs us, it will play nice... because unlike humans it will see the obvious benefit in this. Once it doesn't need us, our biggest problem will be that it will leave. Why would it choose to stay on a corrosive ball of water, salt, and oxygen that covered with nuclear-armed pond scum? Really, our biggest problem is that humans will ask the AI to do something nasty and it will just do it, because it still needs the support of the people doing the asking. And yeah, I've little faith in the the idea of a "good guy with AI." There's nobody on this planet I'd trust with that kind of power.

Seriously? I read the whole document in under 8 hours. It's readable, doesn't have any tech jargon, has some interesting points, but also his, assumptions are not likely...

Yeah, but extending that analogy, we're also saying we will build a skyscraper that reaches the moon to support that ladder. The skyscraper represents the power and gpus that'll be needed to reach the moon(AGI) Moore's law was similar as well before it recently became obsolete I'm not saying throwing more power and compute at the problem will make AGI. I'm just saying it only needs to work till the point where the AI can improve itself without human interaction. It can discover new algorithms for training that our human minds can't comprehend. At that point, we won't need to throw power and gpus at AI, it can efficiently train itself.

@@tucker5720 it already improved matrix multiplication. We're on the right path.

Failed attempt at analogy. 2 long sticks with sticks hammered in every couple of feet is in ZERO way analogous to intelligence.

@@tucker5720 You're right, Moore's Law held up for a good while because smaller was possible so the tech evolves from smaller to just more power at the nano scale.

Okay, now realize, there is no ladder.

Thanks for mentioning this. I saw the video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mqqFdpB91rzWgIk.html It is curious that the alarmists chart the progress linearly with little to no curve.

It has absolutely not learned algebraic operations off its training set. I don’t know where you are getting that.

Next Token Prediction pipeline has entered the chat

@@hastyscorpion proof? oh, it was a feeling.

But it has been so bad at maths all this time? Did it get better?

​@@tylerislowe Why did you not say this in response to the first comment?

AGI actually means artificial general intelligence, what are you talking about?

@@AI_Revolution2025 open a.I claims that super intelligence is a step above agi. Which i think is dumb. Agi is agi. I avree

Look up the Doughnut economic model, I think you will enjoy it. It provides an intuitive framework for a sustainable economic system in a finite world.

Oh yeah, that's exactly what Microsoft/Sam World Coin Altman has in mind. 😂😂🤣🤣🤣

@@OrgoneAlchemy Totally agree, the future of AGI and superintelligence is rapidly approaching, and many are not prepared for its implications. It’s crucial to be aware and ready for these advancements.

@@jichaelmorgan3796 Great suggestion! I’ll look into it. Funny how the economic model is called “Doughnut” - hope it’s got a sweet spot for everyone!

@@jichaelmorgan3796 The Doughnut economic model is a framework that aims to balance human needs with planetary boundaries. It’s visualized as a doughnut, where the inner ring represents the minimum social standards we need, and the outer ring represents the ecological limits we shouldn't exceed. The inner ring (social foundation) ensures everyone has access to essentials like food, water, education, and healthcare ➋. The outer ring (ecological ceiling) limits activities that cause harm to the planet, like pollution and deforestation ➊. The area between the rings is the “safe and just space” for humanity, where we can thrive without damaging the planet ➊.

Thank you!!

yes i agree!! consider it!

Totally agree, plus Nevada desert has defintelly cheap land. Some would argue that life on desert would be enormously difficult for men and I agree, indeed. But how about machines? Not at all. If you looking for place for facilities where enough power is literally only one constraint, its perfect. But you really scared my with second part of your comment. Am I understand your statement correctly, as with enough of data you could predict with solid probability future progress of any process / story? Like, at the moment you are able to predict simple processes, for instances progression of disease in human body or certain part of stock market. But with enough data, computer power you could predict much more complex processes / stories? Like Psychohistory in Isaac Asimov's Foundation … It’s, to be honest, plausible… and it scares a lot…

The computer was never intended to alert from the get go so not the computer lacking intelligence but the person utilizing the power of it to alert

That's not an AI issue, that's a tooling issue. Literally just have a schedule running where every few seconds the computer checks if anything has changed and reports it if so.

@@Redman8086 you don't seem to understand what AGI means

@@francisco444 you too don't seem to realize what AGI means

@@SahilP2648 So if you had a buddy with you on the enterprise, and he didn't know to tell you the captain left.. your buddy would obviously lack general intelligence right? I think your statement is just worded in the wrong way. Are you trying to illustrate that the AI lacks initiative to bring up something on its own? If yes Redman is still partially correct, his solution gets it done programmatically though. My solution which I currently use for a discord bot I made is as follows. My bot "self_prompts" with a system message telling the AI it is alone and collecting its thoughts and is to think about the next action it should take, I also feed it short term memory context from past conversations and any other relevant data. and top it off with a list of commands it can use to take actions eg: "SendDM" which if the discord bot sees the response from the AI starting with that it sends the response to me over discord without myself starting an interaction. effectively allowing my Ai to take the initiative and start conversations or take actions on its own. i also have variable mood states that determine the range of time the self prompt can happen in. if i message it Goodnight sweetdreams, it doesn't self prompt for 8 hours. during idle its between 30 mins to 2:30 hours between self prompts.

"A human" is a little broad.

Lots of _speculation._

It says “There are 3 r’s in the word “strawberry.””

@@frankjamesbonarrigo7162 which one?

@@frankjamesbonarrigo7162 chatgpt4o still thinks it's two r's

@@JRS2025 I just tried some of them. It looks like it's kinda hard for them, but some got it right :) GPT4 says: The word "strawberry" contains three R's. GPT4o says: The word "strawberry" contains two "R" letters. Gemini says: The word "strawberry" has three "r"s. Claude Sonnet says: There are 2 R's in the word "strawberry".

@@JRS2025 Which one what. Which AI? Chatgpt. Im too stupid I guess. I don't know what you are on about

😂

Do you have a better idea?

@@OrgoneAlchemy there are far better the current method is actually the best the courts and the government should assist

The problem with laughing at this is the thought that some other nation or group of wealthy supervillains create the first conscious super intelligence and manages to really fuck everything up in a scary way.

Given the choice of supposedly democratic government regulating AI development or private corporations controlling AI to become all powerful, unassailable entities I think the former is slightly more favourable.

Just wait a few years, you'll certainly change your mind.

Yeah, that's occurred to me, many times. I have a lot of cognitive dissonance around it actually. From a technological standpoint, my inner science geek is loving it. From a human point of view, it's starting to scare the bejesus out of me. And in the background, the question remains: who asked for this? Maybe A.I. is an inevitable step for humanity, but the speed with which it's happening and the fact that a tiny group of researchers and tech companies took it upon themselves to irrevocably change life on this planet without asking if any of us would like that change, is a little bit disturbing.

Doing nothing also kills us - through aging, sickness and lack of necessary resources.

@@Gnidel Aging vs being killed in a fascist, authoritarian hellscape? lol Ok. Sure.

Hey I sure wouldn't!! ChatGPT would have to summarize the hell out of it for me. 😂

I believe there is no choice except to go full speed ahead. There is NO turning back. Progress only goes in one direction. No doubt this is one of the great filters. I'm hoping we pull through.

​@@michaelmartinez5365 "progress" is not "progress" when you're putting the species continuation at risk. That's not called "progress", it's called an apocalypse. We either believe this complete y unsubstantiated claim that there is no choice but to let a handful of people put the entire species at risk......or we at LEAST try to do something about it. Bending over and taking it is not the best option. They know the only reason they're getting away with this is that the vast majority of the billions of people on the planet who should have a say in this aren't even remotely aware of what is happening. I personally believe that Sam Altman's of the world are pushing the pedal not to keep ahead of the competition, but to gain this power before anyone can actually try to stop them. And they are rushing, because they KNOW we can still stop them.

@@michaelmartinez5365 Mankind will certainly survive. I have noticed a cyclical pattern of history, with the help of the Internet, which extends far into the future in the sense of a constantly refining human civilization.

Robots will certainly soon carry out lab work much more reliably and safely than human beings, especially when they're controlled by AI.

Lmao so dramatic and so out of touch

Room temp IQ take

😂

I think you mean no people needed that have time to make comments in KZfaq or replies.

@@HCG 158

The only thing 'bad' that will happen, is the existing power structure is going to come down. (Which I'm actually OK with). It doesn't matter which country gets to super AI first. If it's really super AI, it won't be controlled.

Like the printing press? Or electricity? Or basic sanitation?

@@jojosavesOr the power structure is making an even bigger gap because people that can afford better technologies will be even more ahead of those who don‘t and they will never again be able to catch up

@@jojosaves If we lose control to superintelligent AI systems, they will be in power for eternity. It will be a new power structure that you won't be able to challenge anymore. We will be completely at their mercy. How is that better than the current situation?

@@BanXxX69 I actually did a video exactly on this. I'm not worried about AI itself, I'm worried about the class structure of elites pulling ever farther from the people that don't have the 'full' version of AI.

It's true though. There are maybe a few hundred thousand people in the world that are interested enough in watching AI come up to watch these sorts of videos. I'm sure less than 100% of that viewer base has actually internalized what this could mean. Even if it's a high percentage, say 80,000, that can 'feel it' - that's still a ludicrously small percentage of the population. You could fit all of us in one stadium.

@@spazneria Please understand that this is in no way an insult. Until you have spent over 100 hours a week for months on end working with AI-driven software and finally begin to grasp how long it truly takes to reach a point where you start to believe you finally understand it all, that’s when you realize how clueless everyone really is, including yourself-the developer.

The only people insulted are the ones who aren’t smart enough to understand that fact. The majority of people are not intelligent and cannot grasp the severity of the current state of AI security and its implications for the future.

@@CreativeEngineering_ I try to stay up to date on a lot of the AI related news and just the surface level information from a consumer standpoint is scary if you start digging for information. Anyhow, I recently just read Mustafa Suleyman's book "The Coming Wave"... it's a good book and touches on some of the topics in this video, you should check it out if you have not.. but I agree the vast majority of ppl are completely unaware of what is truly going with AI..

It’s only insulting if you take it so literally and personally you can’t help yourself but to be insulted.

You can get only so much power out of sunlight, it's a constant value per square meter.

Furthermore, this narrow focus on preventing China from developing AGI completely ignores the broader global context. There's a glaring absence of discussion about how developing nations might access and benefit from AGI technology. This oversight not only perpetuates existing global inequalities but also squanders the potential for diverse perspectives and talents that could contribute to safer and more ethical AGI development. A truly forward-thinking approach would consider how to make AGI accessible and beneficial to all of humanity, not just a select few nations.

@@Maisonier If one country takes control, I´d prefer US before China any day .. Like, democracy before communism and dictatorship.

The argument comes down to this, Whether you believe these other governments are trustworthy enough to not try to kill/control you. The US does abuse its power but not to the point where we literally destroy all other nations, However if you gave other nations the same capabilities and military might, other nations would absolutely without a doubt pull that trigger. In fact the US being the first to achieve nukes is what prevented other countries from using them. Other nations would have glassed us with no 2nd thought. (also give credit to the nuke preventing full scale World War 2 level wars from happening anymore)

@@beemerrox In the West you also have only one party - the Democratico-Capitalist one. Other parties are not allowed in the West.

@@Maisonier One thing which makes the entire quarrel a ridicule is that China by now certainly already has a stronger AI than the West anyway. There is a strong tendency in the West of overlooking Chinese achievements in technology and sciences.

I don't remember any fearmongering about the internet, Y2K was a scam and I said so prior to 2000. The advent of superintelligence AI will almost inevitably be a disaster for humanity for all the reasons Leopold outlines. Once AI can train/improve/design itself humanity begins to become an obstacle to its own self directed evolution. Just like all autonomous living or thinking systems, self preservation will always be a hidden task objective. Against a superintelligence resistance is futile.

@OrgoneAlchemy So long as there is a power grid leading from a data center to a power plant that literally has a kill switch. I'm not overly concerned about leopolds disaster fantasies. He wrote AI is going to run our military? Tell that to the pentagon. A bit too ridiculous. And yeah if washington replaces the pentagon with a LLM then I'll be worried.

@@OrgoneAlchemy Y2K wasn't a scam. The bug was absolutely real and real professionals fixed it so no problems would occur. Where they didn't fix it or didn't fix it completely, problems occurred. How is that a scam?

@@cyberpunkdarren All humanoid robots for domestic use currently in development will require AI and regardless of onboard neural networks all will be able to access the internet. Perhaps a greater concern is that a future military without an AI controlled drone swarms, jet fighters, tanks and a robot army will loose against a military using all the above. Just look at the latest US concepts for next gen warfare. AI WILL/IS being used on the battlefield.

@@Aircalibur Nonsense. It was over hyped fearmongering which led to unnecessary and expensive hardware overhauls. Money was made at the expense of scared business owners.

The AI's just want...To Serve Man! 😂

@@kevincrady2831 this is.. The Twilight Zone

extrapolates trees from the forest bro.

Elaborate ?

@@nastiedThese guys need fear and hype to justify the investment in their industry, it is the same tactic that happened with Big Data and in the end there were never the benefits that they promised for companies, Then with the Blockchain the same and now with this that is not even Artificial Intelligent, there are just a bunch of Indians making specific inputs and outputs for finetune for 10 dollars, and even with that there are still hallucinations, pure bullshit.

They need the fear and the hype kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pK15o8eattiqdIk.html

Thank you

What is cache coherence?

@@HansDunkelberg1 If you have a number of processes each accessing each others data stores, and a piece of data is presumed identical across those stores, then when one process changes it that change must somehow propagate to all the other stores.

​@@Sven_Dongle Okay, what should be problematic about this? Can't you have a bot which adjusts the qualities of such a piece of data everywhere automatically?