But you lost it eh titch?

I think it can anď will give non believers what they need, depending on the individual and their amount of pride and fear! Not all of them but, I believe that God preserved the evidence to win souls just before His return! Otherwise, why would He preserved them ya know!?

​@davefrimml1518 I agree. God is slow to anger. He is giving time for everybody to choose him not Satan.

It depends on the person. I used to be an agnostic who became a Christian strictly because of evidence. Don't think that knowing evidence for Christianity is useless. You can convert some people just with evidence and with others evidence is helpful but it is not all that is needed.

Ron Wyatt found Sodom & Gomorrah. And there are sulpfur balls buried into the building relics at the southern end of that Dead Sea

Watch Ron Wyatt Discoveries video to see Sodom and Gomorrah and his other findings like the crossing of the Red Sea, Noah's Ark, that big rock that Moses hit with his staff and God made water come forth to water the Israelites. That rock is split in two. And showed erosion at its base from the large amount of water that flowed out of it. He also found the ark of the covenant and the crucifixion site of Jesus. The ark is under that site.

It's a wonderfully funny story, by it's only a story, "just rewards" according to whose idea of just?*Of_course* its a myth.

The evidence found exactly fits the biblical story of Sodom.

Thanks Steve! I love that line.

@@SeanMcDowell por favor ponga sus videos con subtítulos en español, llegaría a mucha gente Latinoaméricana q buscamos estos materiales y solo están en Inglés, sería muy bueno si le pone subtítulos en español, muchas gracias

YOU SHOULD LISTEN TO ALL THE BIBLICAL FINDING THAT RON WYATT FOUND. PLEASE LISTEN TO THE ARK FILES. IT WAS RON WYATT THAT FOUND SODOM AND GAMORAH. HE ALSO FOUND NOAH'S ARK. MOUNT SINAI WHERE GOD CAME DOWN WHICH IS I SAUDI ARABIA. HE ALSO FOUND THE ARK OF THE COVENANT. HE FOUND ALL THESE BIBLICAL FINDING BUT WERE NOT SPOKEN OFF BECAUSE OF HIS RELIGION. HE WAS A SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST

Yes, I like Joel……but he’s wrong on the location. It would be good to see a discussion between Joel Kramer and Steven Collins about the discovery of Sodom. However people who disagree with Dr. Collin’s do NOT have the evidence……Biblical AND scientific mind you……that Collin’s has.

Dear @gjjk84 Excellent idea !! McDowell !!! Do you hear this ?? I was very surprised that Kramer would take this position on this issue. My respect fro Kramer has dropped . I suspect Dr. Collins would eat Kramer's arguments whole !

Thanks Steve!

Wait until we get to meet Him!

@@jason3775 amen to 🙌

For sure! It's so obvious I feel like the last couple years has revealed the results of God giving "them" over to a depraved (or reprobate) mind. Society's ultimate division. 🙏 God bless

Are you a blood Jew or a religious Jew?

What is his book called?

@@jamesmaybury7452 The title is, “Where God came down”

@@shipwright6122 thanks, Not so available in UK, but I’ll see if I can get it.

That must be quite the souvenir

Wrong location. The bible tells exactly where Sodom is located and it isn't at the South end of the Dead Sea. Genesis 13.18-13 clearly state that Sodom is East of Bethel and Ai. Lot left from Bethel and Ai to Sodom. He surely didn't go south to the Dead Sea. Ask any Israeli where the Jordan river ends and they will all tell you that the Jordan ends when it enters the Dead Sea. Sodom may have fought a war south of the Jordan but Sodom is East of Bethel and Ai. See my notes above.

​@@nahshon9998 the Lord declared in Ezekiel 16:46 that Sodom is Southern of Jerusalem

@@phamnguyet8737 My study Bible says nothing about Sodom's location in Ez. 16.46.

​@@nahshon9998Mine says: "Your elder sister is Samaria, who dwells with her daughters to the north of you; and your younger sister who dwells to the south of you is Sodom and her daughters." - Ezekiel 16:46 (NKJV) And those verses are speaking to Jerusalem. Sounds like a location to me. What does your study Bible say for that verse if it doesn't say that?

👊👊👊

I'm so glad you enjoyed it!

Amen!

Just a comment about seeing burned cities, show the city in Italy , Pompei with bodies burned by lava, very sad and impressive.

Yeah, I like the way that he gives full attention and time to allow a guest to explain the views, without an antagonistic debate. Unfortunately, we don't a full examination of the debate, but it does help a little.

He does, but these guys are talking about a different area from the place Rob found. The real area has nothing growing like these guys speak of. The whole area is just dead.

Why on earth would Wyatt deserve any credit ??

@@Silverheart1956 Because he was the first to popularize these sites and the sulphur balls around there as Sodom and Gomorrah.

​@@Xenosaurian , Hello ! Well, that site (the area off the south western coast of the Dead Sea) has a tradition of speculation of the presence of Sodom. That is why you will find a geological structure around that location called "Lot's Wife" and another called "Mount Sodom". These sites have been known long before Ron Wyatt was born. They also have been rejected as a plausible site for the location of Sodom long before Wyatt was born. Wyatt was pulled in by the traditional hype. The area has been subject to archaeological survey by professionals (before Wyatt's birth) and nothing was found relating to the actual city of Sodom. The area is considered archaeologically insignificant in relation to the idea that it was the location of Sodom and that is why no one has any interest in conducting any excavations in the area. Excavations are expensive - why would anyone want to spend that kind of money when nothing was found in the archaeological survey. Wyatt found Sulfur balls in the area. These sulfur balls are a naturally occurring geological phenomenon resulting from the many sulfur springs in the area. The area is a major fault system called the "Dead Sea Transform" where the African Plate and the Arabian Plate are pulling apart. This is why the Dead Sea is so far below Sea Level. That also explains why sulfur and seismic activity is plentiful in the area. Wyatt did not consult any professional geologists to help him with his understanding of the area. I suppose he thought his training as a nurse qualified him to make these geological interpretations (LOL). Real archaeologists use specialists and consultants. NOTE: the area (Bab Edh-Dhra) being spoken of in the video, where some sulfur balls are found, is located across the Dead Sea from where Wyatt's Sodom is at. There are sulfur balls on each side of the Dead Sea. This just proves that sulfur balls are present all around the Dead Sea. There are sulfur springs on both sides of the Dead Sea because of the geological activity in the area of the Dead Sea.! Wyatt also saw geological structures that lead his imagination to interpret them as ruins of buildings. He was quick to jump to the unmerited conclusion that these structures were man made buildings of Sodom. Geologists have completely dismissed this idea. These same kinds of geological structures are found all around the Dead Sea - we know the buildings of Sodom did not surround the Dead Sea ! If Wyatt and/or associates wanted to provide any real evidence for such assertions, then it is NECESSARY to conduct excavations and if there are any human structures there, there WILL BE EVIDENCE ! Until evidence is found, there is no reason to believe Wyatt found anything other than a vivid imagination. Only gullible, naive people will believe Wyatt's imagination, of Wyatt's Sodom, without any real tangible verifiable evidence, other than Wyatt's imaginations and descriptions of his mind. A major consideration that that students of the Scriptures will be aware of is that The Scriptures provide us with the general location of Sodom and the cities of the plain (Kikkar), and Wyatt's Sodom does NOT fit the description of the location given in the Scriptures. Wyatt and his followers area generally not people who study the Scriptures deeply and in a scholarly manner. This is clear in Wyatt's many Scriptural blunders. He likes to chose and use certain Scriptures that support his ideas at the exclusion of of the significant point of Scripture, and his followers are never the wiser. Bottom line. - Wyatt should have used the Scriptures to find Sodom, not his imagination - But Wyatt ignored what the Scriptures said about the issue. Be Well, DZ

@@Silverheart1956 Be careful tearing other people down. If you are supporting the Lord's plan for your life, then you should never tear down other people.

just a note, you forgot the Greek empire in Daniel's prophecy.

Joel and I are going to do more of these together, so stay tuned!

@@SeanMcDowell Awesome! I can't wait!

Ron Wyatt doesn't necessarily have the best reputation. I've seen some of his videos where he declared certain information that hasn't debunked. Ron Wyatt was an anesthesiological nurse not an archaeologist.

@@francinec2941 so what

​@@francinec2941That didn't stop him from finding Noah's Ark.

Dear @davidnajor7536 That is Wyatt's Imagination at work ! If he or someone who has the credentials to get a permit, wanted to provide some evidence fro these claims then it is NECESSARY to excavate in order to have proof that there are buildings. An excavation would provide evidence, IF there is any thing there. No one has been willing to excavate the area because there is no reason to believe anything is there and no one is wiling to fund and excavation that has such poor potential for any success in finding anything. Besides that is NOT the area that the Scriptures say Sodom and the cities of the kikkar are located. Wyatt used his imagination and ignored using the Scriptures.

@@francinec2941 Ron Wyatt only has a bad reputation in the eyes of haters, and not true supporters of the Lord.

Yeah they also ignored the only true religion to the Father 📜💦 meanwhile pandemic orphans and widows 📈📈📉📉 still skyrocketing ..

@@skellingtonmeteoryballoon Yeah, the "vaccine" is wiping people out. Shame.

@@IISeverusll they're breakthrough cases, it does sound kinda better

I don’t even want to imagine what “strange flesh” meant. 🤢

The History Channel lies about everything they report. Pure junk disinformation.

In what ways did they attack it?

@@ivyrose779 bot.

@@ivyrose779 Basically they tried to say if you believe the biblical account then you are a fool.

Discovery and history channels are useless for Christian topics. I wont watch them.

I'll place another vote on that idea !!!

Ron Wyatt was good on some things, and horrible on others..... He didn't "find them", he heard what the locals had said. Such as the Holy Mountain in Saudi.

@@TheRevering i didn't say Ron Wyatt "found them". Try reading what I said.

Right? Everyone keeps “finding” Ron Wyatt’s finds. Disingenuous.

@@navion1946 Based on Wyatt’s history, I certainly wouldn’t take his word on it. I’d want confirmation from someone with a reliable record.

@@ivyrose779 Hundreds of thousands have visited Sodom and Gomorrah. They aren't hard to find. There are plenty of witnesses. I went there in 1999. Sulphur balls and all. You can clearly see them also from standing on top of Masada!

Those that abuse capital letters not only emphasise nothing but the hysteria of the abuser, they also declare the abuser to be a lunatic Abusers abuse all sorts, who or what remains to be seen or prosecuted.self -abuse like abusing capital letters is like masturbation generally best not done in public. The Torah has *Fcuk_Nothing* to do with the way of christ of which you understand nothing

Cool. We do discuss dating and he gives his reasons for why he thinks they do line up together with the biblical chronology. You can watch and be the judge if you're convinced!

@@SeanMcDowell AMEN brother McDowell I really appreciate your Christ centered and Scripturally accurate content for the furtherance of The Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ 🙏❤️👊. Josephus Flavius mentioned that Sodom and Gomorrah were visibly evidentiary in his writings back over two thousand years ago. This has nothing and everything to do with the video but please listen if you want to otherwise leave it alone and ignore it. Hello my name is Justin and I'm a fellow Christian and Apologist but I'm also a college student. I'm not a closed minded Theist as I have nothing against Atheists or unbelievers as I speak to them often to understand their reasons for unbelief but we as Christians are convinced of God's Existence due to many real factors). I'm not trying to convert anyone or convince anyone to become Christians as that's The Holy Spirit's job to help people believe but only explain why I believe in Jesus Christ. There's actually evidence of God's Existence in Christianity. First of all there's proof that Jesus of Nazareth existed in history since the writings of Tacitus, Josephus Flavius, Pliny the younger and other historical documents prove that He was living two thousand years ago that even scholars both religious and Atheists agree with historically speaking but not that He's The Divine Son of God because obviously they don't. I'm going to give you historical and archeological evidence for God's Existence as The Scriptures have prophecies that predate the events recorded in them by several millennia including Matthew, Hosea and Zechariah which prophesy accurately of the people of Israel becoming a nation again after over 1900 years of being scattered around the nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. spoken of by Christ in Matthew 23:29-24:3 and returning to their homeland after The Holocaust with Jerusalem as their capital in 1948 exactly as Jesus The Christ said. The prophets including Daniel spoke of the time where several world empires would arise and fall including the Babylonian kingdom, Medes and Persians, Roman Empire, and Saladin and the Muslims which went in consecutive order for the past few millennia. The people of Israel becoming a nation after The Holocaust in 1948 (ironically the melting point of gold as God compares Israel to gold that's tested in fire in Zechariah 13:8 and Jeremiah 16:15) exactly how Jesus The Christ said would happen since God us everything to come in The Scriptures and not just because people were working towards as Atheists claim which are impossible for any regular man to predict. Just before anyone says Christianity is a white man's religion made to oppress blacks during slavery you obviously aren't aware that the first Christians were Jews in The Middle East and that Christianity just like any religion can be used by evil and corrupt people to oppress others but you forget that the first Abolitionists/Civil Rights activists were Christians who sought to abolish slavery, racism, segregation, injustice and prejudice throughout American history. Jesus The Christ loves you enough not to give you what we all deserve which is God's Wrath by His Own Blood. Charles Darwin didn't originally come up with The Theory of Evolution over 200 years ago as it is mentioned in the writings of Ancient Greeks who believed in Demons that gave knowledge to philosophers. Evolution makes no sense when nothing has evolved after thousands of years of human history and supposedly the first creature came from primordial sludge several millions of years ago funny how they won't believe that God an Eternal Almighty Spirit Being created us from the Earth) which came from a supermassive expansion of matter at high temperature that inexplicably created everything in the known universe that supposedly came from nothing billions of years ago. How did the organs evolve before there were bones, skin, substance and how did any creatures see before eyes evolved? I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" and I'm not convinced of but not macro or micro Evolution because there's no evidence of it nor clear observable examples of it where living creatures evolve into other kinds of species plus the fact that fossils don't show evidence of evolution and genetic entropy rules out evolution. The question begs how did two genders evolve from a common ancestor with a perfectly hospitable and sustainable environment with breathable oxygen and resources to survive on inexplicably? Atheists have the burden of proof to explain how everything came to be and why our existence is possible without the Existence of God from an godless perspective just as Christians have to provide evidence of God's Existence and the validity of His Word. Evolution requires life to already exist in order to take any effect in living organisms so it doesn't account for the existence of Life and reality. Also evolution is impossible because it goes against The Law of entropy and the second Law of thermodynamics because evolution makes things better whereas nothing continues to get better but decays and turns to absolute destruction in the end. Mark Ridley an Evolutionist said "No evolutionist whether gradualist or punctuationist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of The Theory of Darwinian Evolution as opposed to special Creation". God's Existence is made perfectly known and observable in the universe as demonstrated in His Handiwork in the intelligently designed manner that Creation was made, human consciences and consciousness historical and archaeological evidence of God's Word being valid history, fulfillment of Bible Prophecies God in His Holiness and Righteousness could give us what we deserve in Hell for our since but He's merciful to give us free will to choose to accept or reject His gift of salvation by grace through faith in His Son Jesus. I don't mean this is any condescending manner but if you'd like to discuss The Scriptures with me or have me listen to your view on anything my instagram account is Savage Christian Kombatant.

@@SeanMcDowell Thanks for the response and his take on the C14 dating and pottery alignment is pretty interesting. I think my major issue is that Schaub (the one who he references as taking over the excavations after Lobb) explicitly states that the major destruction layer of Bab edh-Dhra occurred roughly 2350 BC followed by a later resettlement in an unwalled village. He also dates the demise of Numeira to 2600 BC. Neither the re-occupation, the time-period gap, nor the Early Bronze dating seem to fit the Middle Bronze story of Abraham. I'll dig around some more, but would love to see any papers that specify a later dating or deal with the resettlement issue -- the main source I'm looking at right now is "Crossing Jordan: North American Contributions to the Archaeology of Jordan". Edit: Just pulled the field report and it looks like Rast and Shaub also dated the pottery of Strata II (the layer destroyed by fire) at Bab edh-Dhra to EB III (to roughly the same time frame as the C14 date gave), so even if later pottery from the re-settled Strata I matches a Middle Bronze date, the layer with destruction seems from both the account of pottery and C14 dating to be too early.

@@photoionized Excellent feedback, thanks. I will check that out.

I am extremely interested in the answer to this question

Olll

Yes he did

Still visible today

@@Dogsday198 what?

Yacov rambsel would have had data like that

Esther isn't in qumran. It's hidden

Joel Kramer shows other locations than Ron. Ron thought, that Gomorrah would be found right and left of the parking place under Masada, the destroyed cities Zoar, Sodom, Gomorrah, Adama and Zebojim being in one line on the western banks of the dead sea. Those are the areas., where You still find the sulfur balls. I believe, that Ron found the right places, but i'm still wondering if God transformed it so completely that there was only a boiling mess with brimstone and fire. Then the valleys are just wadis cut into the ashes by desert rainfalls. Or if HE wants us to get more proof, that this once were cities. But i don't think, that "normal" excavations would be best to gain proof. I believe core drilling or jabbing a staff with a camera in front into the walls would be best to investigate the area. You don't have a high risk something collapsing in on You, You do not destroy much and You need a camera anyway to document the proof... Some months ago i did one horizontal "core drill". 2m far, ca. 2cm diameter (big enough to put a camera and lamp into) to find out if there may be still hollows to find. I could not spend more time there, did not find a chamber, only all the same gypsum ash material as on the outside. So the quest for truth is still on. If we could find a proof that there was a city, it might help somebody to leave his way to hell. Right before my drilling i was in Jerusalem and spoke with people whom the police withheld from coming to their homes for hours - because the police had to protect a "pride parade". The first word the Bible uses to describe the sins of S.& G. is "Pride"!

Nobody ever responds when asked about Ron.... The truth is out there

But Wyatt did not consult the Biblical Scriptures to see where the Bible says Sodom and the cities of the Kikkar was located. The result there is the Biblical location of Sodom based on the Bible. and there is Wyatt's Sodom, base on Wyatt's speculations and imagination. I chose to follow the Biblical location, instead of Wyatt's Sodom. DZ

I'm not saying he is cirrect, but his wife goes in great detail about why they think they are on the west side. Some of them have windows and doorways. It's short sighted to respond like that. You obviously don't know the whole theory. Regardless of which sight is correct.

​@@theblackflag2020 Hello ! I have studied this issue of the location of Sodom quite a bit, and enough to say that the site Wyatt proposed is contrary to the site the Scriptures describe. I am also aware that the site Wyatt is proposing (the area off the southwestern coast of the Dead Sea) has been subjected to archaeological surveys and professionals have determined that there is nothing of archaeological significance where Wyatt thinks Sodom was located. Even though there are some traditional sites in the area (Lot's Wife and Mt. Sodom), these are strictly natural geological features and do not have any significance in determining the actual location of Sodom. As you said Wyatt saw the geological structures on the west side of the Dead Sea and his imagination lead him to think he saw windows and doorways in these structures, so he jumps to the unmerited conclusion that these structures are ruins of the buildings of Sodom. Unlike real professional archaeologists, Wyatt (who has a poor understanding of the discipline of archaeology) NEVER called in professional geologists and geological consultants (or any consultants of any kind). He relied on his training as a nurse and his imagination to make these interpretations. Geologists have completely dismissed the idea that these structures are man made.They are without a doubt natural geological structures. These same kinds of geological structures are found all around the Dead Sea - we know the buildings of Sodom did not surround the Dead Sea ! Wyatt also never conducted any excavations which would have provided verifiable evidence as to whether these structures were man-made or natural. If Wyatt and/or associates wanted to provide any real evidence for such assertions, then it is NECESSARY to conduct excavations and if there are any human structures there, there WILL BE EVIDENCE ! Until evidence is found, there is no reason to believe Wyatt found anything other than a vivid imagination. Only gullible, naive people will believe Wyatt's imagination, of Wyatt's Sodom, without any real tangible verifiable evidence. A major consideration that that students of the Scriptures will be aware of is that The Scriptures provide us with the general location of Sodom and the cities of the plain (Kikkar), and Wyatt's Sodom does NOT fit the description of the location given in the Scriptures. Wyatt and his followers are generally not people who study the Scriptures deeply and in a scholarly manner. This is clear in Wyatt's many Scriptural blunders. He likes to chose and use certain Scriptures that support his ideas, at the exclusion of of the significant points of Scripture that question Wyatt's interpretations, and his followers are never the wiser. Bottom line. - Wyatt should have used the Scriptures to find the location of Sodom, not his imagination - But Wyatt ignored what the Scriptures said about the issue. Wyatt also ignores established protocols of archaeological field work, the use of specialists to help understand the issues accurately and the importance of record keeping and professional verification. Why people would consider Wyatt has anything creditable to say Is a bit of a mystery, until one hears him speak. He is a master of storytelling and that is how he is able to appeal to those, who don't have the mind of the Bereans. Be Well, DZ.

Dozens to hundreds of each? What do you mean by that?

@@winniecash1654 Noah had a fleet of Arcs for all the Arks that have been found. Multidimensional Jesus was simultaneously crucified on thousands of crosses for all the cross wood that was found. It's a joke at expense of the fact that every relic that Christians find important has been "found" at least dozens of times. Sodom and Gomorrah have been "found" many times too. P.s. "found" = someone claimed that some random nothing was the relic

@@bouncycastle955 I think I understand your point. There's a yes and a no (or perhaps not literally speaking). I'll mull it over.

Are you a blood Jew or a religious Jew?

So you've refuted all the claims being made here? Give us one refutation.

That’s a great question, Chuck. I’m not sure about Ron’s claim, but will ask Joel.

Wasn't Wyatt exposed as a fraudster?

@@bear7098 I don’t know that much about Ron Wyatt. I guess I am skeptical about his claims to have found Noah’s Ark. And I’m not sure that the coral deposits found on the bottom of the Gulf of Aqaba are truly chariot wheels. He may have been a fraudster. But the films that Wyatt shot of himself picking up sulfur balls below the mountain of Masada are genuine; as this new video by Joel Kramer also is. I’ve been a Christian for over 45 years. I’ve come to realize that even if I’m searching in a garbage dump, sometimes it’s possible to find precious things. And so I continue to seek, knock, and ask.

Check out Ron Wyatt discovery here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qsB7dauqrqjWeHU.html

Secular consensus concludes that the sulfur balls match the sulfur of Old Faithful at Yellowstone during Cambrian explosions, then forgotten about in Gobekli teppi stone age as foragers. However, someone uploaded the Kurdish rebel kidnapping news compilations to further expose Ron Wyatt' entire East Turkey Expedition and vandalism on the Anchor stone ⚓. The OG fake news definitely had better style back in them days . 📰

Yeah, I watched a presentation from Dr Collins a while back that seemed convincing. I feel like Collins and Kramer both give compelling reasons for their arguments, but locate Sodom on opposite sides of the Dead Sea. It would be helpful to see them debate this, or at least interact with each other's arguments.

Kramer specifically denied that any such sites exist…is he simply ignorant of that work??

@@JohnVandivier Hi John I believe he said that he didn’t believe Dr. Collins site at Tall Al Hammam was Sodom for an couple of reasons. I think they’re at about year 18 in the dig up there. Quite fascinating. Dr. Collins has several presentations and lots of artifacts. He’s fun to watch.

@@tylerenns Great suggestion. Maybe I can have them on together next!

@@tylerenns Like the Holy grail, I don't think it matters "where it is." What matters is the message and what can happen now if we don't take heed.

Apparently just 50% but it's enough to burn blue 🔥🔵

@@skellingtonmeteoryballoon What is the data source? And what is the mineral content around the Dead Sea in general?

@@edwardtbabinski I tromped around Gomorrah in 2011...there really is no "soil" just compacted ash. You'd prob have to dig deep to get to earth that was not exposed to high temps...also , I recovered some sulfur balls from Gomorrah and had it tested with FTIR Spectroscopy.....95% pure sulfur.

He never discovered squat. He was a fraud. Amazing all these things he 'found' but never produced a thing for any of them.

Joel Kramer shows other locations than Ron. Ron thought, that Gomorrah would be found right and left of the parking place under Masada, the destroyed cities Zoar, Sodom, Gomorrah, Adama and Zebojim being in one line on the western banks of the dead sea. Those are the areas., where You still find the sulfur balls. I believe, that Ron found the right places, but i'm still wondering if God transformed it so completely that there was only a boiling mess with brimstone and fire. Then the valleys are just wadis cut into the ashes by desert rainfalls. Or if HE wants us to get more proof, that this once were cities. But i don't think, that "normal" excavations would be best to gain proof. I believe core drilling or jabbing a staff with a camera in front into the walls would be best to investigate the area. You don't have a high risk something collapsing in on You, You do not destroy much and You need a camera anyway to document the proof... Some months ago i did one horizontal "core drill". 2m far, ca. 2cm diameter (big enough to put a camera and lamp into) to find out if there may be still hollows to find. I could not spend more time there, did not find a chamber, only all the same gypsum ash material as on the outside. So the quest for truth is still on. If we could find a proof that there was a city, it might help somebody to leave his way to hell. Right before my drilling i was in Jerusalem and spoke with people whom the police withheld from coming to their homes for hours - because the police had to protect a "pride parade". The first word the Bible uses to describe the sins of S.& G. is "Pride"!

But Wyatt did not consult the Biblical Scriptures to see where the Bible says Sodom and the cities of the Kikkar was located. The result there is the Biblical location of Sodom based on the Bible. and there is Wyatt's Sodom, base on Wyatt's speculations and imagination. I chose to follow the Biblical location, instead of Wyatt's Sodom. DZ

@michaelibach9063 Or look at the actual results on Tell el-Hammam.

Not sure heat would have any effect on the rate of decay of C14 isotopes, but it is less accurate over long periods of time because the margin of error increases. There is something called the Marine reservoir effect where carbon sources from ocean (e.g. a marine diet) are older and can give misleading results. The biggest problem though is the selection of samples which is open to human error! It certainly isn't the magic bullet a lot of people would have you believe

It seems like the KJV has a significant amount of mistranslations and not inconsequential ones. I don’t understand why so many people insist that it is the “right” Bible outside of that’s just what they’ve been told their entire lives.

Dear @jlouutube65 But Wyatt did not consult the Biblical Scriptures to see where the Bible says Sodom and the cities of the Kikkar was located. The result there is the Biblical location of Sodom based on the Bible. and there is Wyatt's Sodom, base on Wyatt's speculations and imagination. I chose to follow the Biblical location, instead of Wyatt's Sodom. DZ

According to R.Wyatts records it is not volcanic sulfur, which is yellow and is less pure than the white sulfur found at the site

@@marionchase-kleeves8311Ron Wyatt is a fraud and shouldn’t be used to help Christianity

Who told you that"burning Sulfur balls likely devastated the two cities", and why do you believe them, oh credulous little kinderlander child? burning Sulfur balls my arse! You kinderlander-Americans, are as credulous as imbecile children I think because that is how you are programmed or conditioned r wound up. burning sulphur balls indeed. Complete balls that is. Obvious nonsense that not even a retarded child would believe- only the kinderlander, the children of the peoples of the world and as credulous as children.

Joel Kramer shows a different location than Wyatt. Ron thought, that Gomorrah would be found right and left of the parking place under Masada, the destroyed cities Zoar, Sodom, Gomorrah, Adama and Zebojim being in one line on the western banks of the dead sea. Those are the areas., where You still find the sulfur balls. I believe, that Ron found the right places, but i'm still wondering if God transformed it so completely that there was only a boiling mess with brimstone and fire. Then the valleys are just wadis cut into the ashes by desert rainfalls. Or if HE wants us to get more proof, that this once were cities. But i don't think, that "normal" excavations would be best to gain proof. I believe core drilling or jabbing a staff with a camera in front into the walls would be best to investigate the area. You don't have a high risk something collapsing in on You, You do not destroy much and You need a camera anyway to document the proof... Some months ago i did one horizontal "core drill". 2m far, ca. 2cm diameter (big enough to put a camera and lamp into) to find out if there may be still hollows to find. I could not spend more time there, did not find a chamber, only all the same gypsum ash material as on the outside. So the quest for truth is still on. If we could find a proof that there was a city, it might help somebody to leave his way to hell. Right before my drilling i was in Jerusalem and spoke with people whom the police withheld from coming to their homes for hours - because the police had to protect a "pride parade". The first word the Bible uses to describe the sins of S.& G. is "Pride"!

"Evil" meaning It-doesn't-like-it(what else?) It just *is_not* going to like everything; there is always the peace of the grave and the fast asleep.

Eric Metexas isn't an archeologist.

He already interviewed Erick metaxis last year on that book. It was a great interview. I'm really wanting to get the book

Good suggestion, and yes, had him on a few months back!

What temperature couldn't be achieved on Earth at that time?

The name to check out is Dr. Stephen Collins excavating Tal El Hammam. More convincing than this IMO.

the inly times that spelling matters is when you seek to convey the verb to see or the noun the sea, and do not wish to confuse the two, but you missed that class presumably, ty red sea

Would it necessarily exclude other cities though, besides the two?

very little is historical in the OT

@@paulrichards6894 I wouldn't say that. There is solid archaeological evidence for various stories in the book of kings and chronicles as well as people of the OT. Check out the top ten list of OT related archaeological discoveries by the associates of biblical research.

@@paulrichards6894 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o5dmlrOE0q-pcaM.html

@@winniecash1654 actually, I just read deuteronomy 29:22 where it actually mentions two cities beside sodom and gomorrha that were destroyed.

👍👍

One kind of liar is he who believes what he *wants* to believe

In reality Dr. Collins has been excavating Sodom for about a decade. Tall el Hamman is now accepted as Sodom of the bible by the archeological community consensus.

The archeological consensus is that Dr. Collins has found Sodom. Google KZfaq for Tall el Hammam