How can it even be a triple pun

uk: therm8

Africa: termite

Thermite and thermate are different compounds. Thermate is said to be more powerful.

I wonder if Australians use thermite to melt each other's ground harness' in war.

Krystian Kolasinski and COGITO HAZARD

96 likes ecin

or it’s like СМЕРТЬ 💀

*EXPLOSIVE*

Ooooh, ooooh! Don’t forget EXPLOSIVE and FLAMMABLE

" LMG MOUNTED AND LOADED"-lord chanka (271BC)

Yes I was waiting for that lol

I knew I’d find something along these lines

"As my freind would say, a really big fookin hole coming right up" -Yumiko Imigawa

LMAO

@@w0lf667 its called sarcasm dude lmao

@@w0lf667 stfu

@@w0lf667 r/wooosh

@@w0lf667 hyperbole

@@w0lf667 fucken nerd. Its funny and it go boom. Just enjoy

@@someonenoone1636 r/iamverysmart

@@Avery-df9vy r/ihavereddit

@@oskarilindelof2463 r/ihaveihavereddit

@@IMTHEMOTHERFUCKINGMAILMAN r/ihaveihaveihavereddit

Yes we have Reddit nobody cares

ah yes, the 73jk and triangle G std's unfavorable indeed

+minepose98 Basically, the equation says that the reaction is favourable at a temperature that is physically impossible to be achieved.

The calcium is actualy pretty reactive, so it doesn't realy want to give off its oxygens. You really need to heat that, and, at those temperatures, you would be melting the floor. It wouldn't even produce that much heat...

Maybe also magnesium and glitter so it’s like a firework before earth exploded

potato man21 🤦‍♀️

lmfao.

Mum said "go play outside" ;)

1 ton (2000 Lbs) in a hole is EXTREMELY american.

F--- yeah!

+xxX420SwagScopeXxx And sealed it with ONLY Flex-Tape!

In Europe, only half a kilogram had done the job 😉

I don't want to act like r/Iamverysmart but you learn this stuff in school, right? At least where I live (Europe) (Science-Mathematics course in regular Highschool). Maybe it depends on the teacher you would've had at the time?

@@thombrick It all depends.

A lot of the formulas used here are just basic chemistry- enthalpies, gibbs, and the velocity part was physics. If not in high school, you learn all of that stuff and more in the first year of uni.

@@thombrick ha nope

@@thombrickthe american education system is kind of pretty infamous for being kinda not very good at all

BassBear1337 yep

I’m already there

@@chrisedwards3143 yea no been on it for awhile i told them it was cause i had nothing to watch that was intertainin as this but they kept me on watch list

well as long as you dont look it up directly

oh hey

Yes. It's a well known fact that Alkaline Earth Metals when wet react violently.

_"Just Add Water"_

That's how it works its so sensitive it can catch fire if its humid outsider

Because having as much education as possible is awesome

It’s almost as if it’s a compound of two different flammable gasses

Will blow up In hydrogen if there is still oxygen in the "air"

Hmm hydrogen with a oxide layer, yes a man of bombs

How

Argon is mostly inert so........

How about krypton

Did you know I have cronavirus

@@thegatekeeperofchernobyl1320 f

@@thegatekeeperofchernobyl1320 f

God damn right

Yes, it ignited then because the sodium reacted violently to the water, as it is one of the most reactive elements.

Moon NO YOU AGREE TO DISAGREE (because they weren't arguing)

Not surprising two ingredients in his mixture do not like to be soaked with water reminds me of that one song Smoke on the Water I think it's called that pretty much takes it to its literal sense

It's Because Sodium Reacts With Water, If It Weren't For Sodium Your Comment Would've Been Valid

Its kinda ironic lol

Fluorine: *WHAT WAS THAT PUNK?*

@@not_a_nugget2373 azidoazide azide: amateurs

@@translatedfatwas4218 fluorine is the most reactive chemical ever known sorry aha

Francium

(Chuckles in Oxygen)

I love it because it reminds me of where I got my chemistry education, Uncle Fester's Methamphetamine Manufacturers Guide and a Merck Index #11, desoxyephedrine hydrochloride. Oh those were the days! Wish I could have made a bit of money but I'm not that smart, I guess! Then the gov.pigs were multiplying like rats. Still are. Watch yourself ,Styro, they will try and hire you and the first thing they take from you is your humanity and your sense of Humor!

StraightupRussia This guy, _he_ gets it!

I support this fully

Angy

Is the BC-3 Exothermic stuff real?

Imagine being the person who discovered thermite talking to this guy "yeah I made this mix of metal powders that burns at multiple thousands of degrees" "yeah that stuff is super cool, especially the crazy exotic types" "the what now?"

They should make a video to getter

When I saw it in my videos to watch I thought it was one of his videos

He needs to do the tiny thumbs up

Yes, the tiny thumbs up that still has back and forth momentum after waving. lol

just about to write that!! Awesome

Funny enough C4 when exposed to flame will just burn, it needs a blasting cap to actually explode (source: MythBusters)

College.

college

We did it in my high school. We even had explosion Friday’s where we did some sort of explosion or thing with fire

yes!

I like fire and explosions how agrees

It won't work too well. Water has a fairly high index of refraction (1.33) and would disperse any rays of light that entered it.

I feel stupid when i look at that math.

Dylan O'Donnell there are quite a few ways to initiate a chemical reaction just by putting the setup under(in)water

such a cool feeling, rewatching some of his videos after doing chem

yes

and did

Yeah it’s not jet fuel

SixBones6 _ Is this a you know what reference, if so I agree, jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams.

I. Ignacio I have no idea what you just said

Ur right

L but you can L. But you can.

That was very basic. All you need to do, is dive into a chemistry book for beginners (inorganic chemistry).

Lmao

same...although I am not disappointed

I second this. Lmao

Trevurr The wild thermite. In it's natural habitat

So was I . I can't read

No those are just the ppl than engineered nukes

Hey man

You think so? Do the thermo calculations for throwing alkali metals into water. You see that lithium releases more energy than sodium, both by mass AND by mole! Furthermore, the Gibbs free energy change is more negative for LiOH formation than NaOH, in both the aqueous and solid phases. Because ∆G=-RTlnK, this suggests Li reacts more so with water than sodium. Now this does not say anything about the RATE of the reaction, and clearly sodium reacts much more violently. But if you come up with a reversible system where Li and Na are competing to become their respective hydroxides, lithium will beat out sodium the majority of the time, and thus Li is more reactive.

Rubidium/sodium/caesium/potassium/francium should be more reactive than lithium - is that not the general trend with alkalis?

styropyro I suppose it depends on your definition of reactivity. Though I have a great interest in chemistry, I am no chemist and I am not going to pretend I know more than you. I suppose for the context of your video, Li is more reactive. But depending on the source you check, some say that reactivity is based on how "willing" an element will bond with others. I think electronegativity has a lot to do with it too (where elements like cesium and fluorine have great extremes). Anyway, thanks for the intelligent discussion. Keep up the good work.

I Believe that lithium IS more reactive under the circumstance of this chemical reaction, but francium, for instance is easy to react in water and will produce a more powerful ( and dangerous ) reaction , but only will it’s reaction be more powerful than lithium if the other reactant (s) are balanced.

It's more of a speed vs energy type comparison, the lithium has the most energy, but it reacts the slowest out of the alkali metals, whereas caesium has the least energy, but it reacts so fast that it lets go of it all at once, making it seem more reactive.

How do you know they're into BDSM?

Jack, you are my Grammar Nazi Senpai.

Yes to all of this !

Name checks out

TROLL same doe

Same

LMAO

That One Otaku What if your in pre school and he says ok I geuss they taught you something early

What had happened was... the jet fuel burned hotter when the sprinkler system kicked on.😏

Who needs ozone when you can bring the sun into your backyard?

ripfletching so basically just making a huge molten puddle of metal

The most energetic thermites jn existence aren't all that difficult to start most of the time. Manganesse heptoxide + lithium is hypergolic I think, so it's ignition temperature is below room temperature, and it would have to be cooled down a lot or otherwise it will just kill you. 2MgO7 + 14Li = 7Li2O + 2Mg

FOOKIN LASER SIGHTS

A really big fucking hole comming right up

Madness lies herein

Yes, in theory it should work, and it would form the white allotrope of phosphorus. The problem is that phosphorus is highly reactive so the reaction should be done in an oxygen-less enviroment because the phosphorus is instantly boiled as the reaction proceeds, and if oxygen is present it reacts instantly with the phosphorus to form P2O5 again.

vin 950 Yes. There are methods involving a distillation of the white P as the reaction proceeds, and i think these methods are better options over using a thermite reaction to produce white P. Still, the thermite could be worth a try! Using right stoichometry of the reaction/additives should do it.

You are in luck ! get yourself some Sodium or potassium Phosphate and mix it with powdered Aluminum...the Aluminum will reduce the phosphate all the way to phosphorus...but this reaction of course requires that air is not present, or rather just no oxygen otherwise all your phosphorus vapor will turn into P2O5, normally it's done in a metal retort and the spout from the retort is just submerged into cold water, where the Phosphorus cools and condenses and collects at the bottom. Thought about doing this myself, but I'm not sure how to get it going, ie, being Aluminum, is the mixture just heated until the reaction proceeds or is it lit up with a strip of magnesium and then it reacts by itself ? or how angry is this reaction, the old book I read this from left out those details, but I know it's darn site lower temp than the nearly 1500 Celsius one when they mix phosphate, sand (silica dioxide) and carbon into fire clay tubes, bung them in a blast furnace and heat the shit out of it for hours...the Aluminium one proceeds at less than 800 degrees I think....Phosphorus is hard for the amateur to make..

@@psycronizer you can likely reach the ignition temperature by heating your reaction vessel with an h h o torch.

He should team up with some of the firearm channels and make some really angry ammunition but yes your idea is also a good video

Too fuckin right mate

The c4 would just burn off, c4 is very stable and does not explode unless exposed to a very high electric charge, you might as well burn thermite over a piece of wood, wouldnt look much different

Styropyro: "Eh... we can do better."

1- 2,000C° isn't enough to cut through some materials, like salts or tungsten compounds, but it woul probably weaken them. 2- Even if that's hot enough to start the C4, the metals would probably suck a good part of the oxygen in the C4, rendering it useless. You would have to have them well separated. 3- That's just a bomb that splashes molten metal around. You can do better. If you want an incendiary explosive, there are better overall choices. Change the thermite for napalm and now it sticks to people and produces toxic carbon monoxide.

No use acidodi azide