I did that test to figure out the best compromise mattress for me and my gf... Helix advised me to get a different gf...

good on you for advertising $1000 mattresses in a video in which you also film a sleeping homeless person's face without their consent! very typical of the sociopathic selfishness we've all come to expect from hyper-rich tech types. the Memorial Day sale really puts a bow on it, given how many homeless people are ex-military

@@gloverelaxis You could always, you know, just go do something else instead of trolling the internet. That's a thing too.

So can you keep those scooters since they were abandoned?

@@gloverelaxis how dare he to film in public

Lol

Fr

Stockton Rush has left the chat

💀

Inverted Controls.

Ever heard of magnet fishing? If not, check it out. Your comment makes me think you would enjoy it! 👍🏼

indeed

They need a hand winch to help pull stuff up

I then watch all the video other people make when you send them treasure to play with. Or have a build off using only lake parts.

You think that would work with the airplane? ;)

Low oxygen environments do crazy things for preservation. Lots of fossils got produced the same way.

I figured it was stainless based off of how untouched it looked haha. Definitely interesting seeing how all the different alloys hold up underwater.

@@thewatchworks1372 That too, yeah. It's all part of the equation.

@thewatchworks1372 especially fresh vs salt water

Can you guys post the timestamp i lost it

😭😭

I heard militaries actually use controllers

@@jrozlie2280that is a fact. The echo chamber of the MSM and internet would have you think otherwise for whatever reason.

Not just that, help with underwater cave recovery missions with smaller submarines would be cool

@@GoodMorningJuiceBox exactly. the fact of going to the titanic on a sub controlled by a playstation controller is not dangeourus, its just the cheap, unreliable and dangeourus submarine itself that they went down on.

As said at 0:11

​@@MaxFlorian1001 The presenter misspoke and called it pby-4 instead of pb4y. Pby-4 is a Catalina flying boat variant.

@@MaxFlorian1001 Totally missed that lol

Date: 26-AUG-1956 Time: Consolidated P4Y-2 Privateer Owner/operator: United States Navy (USN) Registration: 59695 MSN: Fatalities: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 11 Other fatalities: 0 Aircraft damage: Written off (damaged beyond repair) Location: Lake Washington - United States of America Phase: Nature: Military Departure airport: NAS Sand Point, WA Destination airport: Confidence Rating: Information is only available from news, social media or unofficial sources Narrative: Crashed into Lake Washington near Seattle, WA after taking off from NAS Sand Point with flaps retracted. The crew of eleven occupants is said to have swam to safety. The plane sank within five minutes.

Yep, thats what i was thinking when i saw it had " seattle" painted on it, where it was based from.

the claw?

people really don't like those lime scooters very much lol

​@@jerrymartin7019 yeah, they didn't taste like lime at all.

@@jerrymartin7019 It’s dirtbags throwing them in who don’t have anything better to do.

Just utter A-holes throwing away someone else's property, and jacking up the prices for those who actually use them properly.

@@peytonmac1131 Not only are they dirtbags for throwing in someone elses property, but they're contributing to environmental pollution

5 to 10 feet under water!?! Dude what lake? I've got to see that

@@neonryder8897 I live in Hawaii. The plane is in Kailua bay. The story behind it is the engine died and wouldn't restart right after takeoff when it was low over the water.

@@azuresstuff2363 I imagine the coastlines of Hawaii are littered with plane wrecks from ww2. Very cool when they're accessible to snorkelers, though.

Wonder why they wouldn't have retrieved it if it is so shallow. Apparently they did try to get this PBY4 out of the lake but it failed and sank back to the bottom

@@MarcusBrannon "was moved hundreds of yards from original crash site"

Or maybe a LIDAR

@@GospodinJean LIDAR doesn't work well due to the high absorption of light from the water (and also the mud), same reason you can't have long distance radio contact. A 3D-Sonar mapping would possibly work though, especially for very limited distances.

most fish finders will already do this pretty well.

i wonder if one can do bunch of lidar sensors. not terribly expensive and can be used to map as well as proximity sensors

I think a lidar sensor. You would have to set it up to filter out small items (floating crap)

Just the fact you can buy this stuff is incredible, when a few years ago it was the territory of research vessels.

If you're trying to get a football out of a tree, scuba is DEFINITELY the wrong tool for the job 🤣

this is great. you and Peter should partner up for a boat trip rc junk mining tour

How to get Hired at your outfit?

I would love to have a job like that

@@benmcreynolds8581 are you good with regular drones? If so, simply apply to an ROV company and tell them what they want to hear, and that youre good with drones

@@nokbeen3654 that makes me happy. I'm really good with drones, video games, and it would be so cool to get a job helping science studies, or explorations.. the list goes on. Even doing mundane things in a job like that would be so interesting

💀💀💀💀

It really is too deep, at the depth regular compressed air is poison. You need a tri mixture of inert gas, then you would have to do decompression stops, plus for saftey you need a surface compression chamber in case you get the bends. The navy dive tables were set up for young fit men.

150ft is completely reasonable depth to go to on 1 cylinder of compressed air (S100/15l) if you know, what you are doing. PPO2 at that depth is 1.15, which iirc is around what you would have as a setpoint if you were on CCR. The concerns are mostly nitrogen narcosis (though at that depth, you shouldn't get affected too much) or simply running out of air, because the werck is gorgeous and it'd be very easy to forget about time. The margins are fairly tight though, so such a dive should definitely not be attempted solo.

@@harrodharrod5239 with all due respect, youre clue less.

THANK YOU I was convinced something like that was going to happen.

Like the Jaws jumpscare?

You mean oceanfence

@@Michael-cb3uw you mean river door?

@@AhmeddoesRC You mean LakeLatch?

Same

the front part with the middle glass shows it is a b24 because of the glasses viewing up and the b17 not having a central glass but 2 in the center

@@SentyNel904 the dude in the video said it's a PB4Y bomber according to another comment basically the Navy variant of the B-24

have you seen the Tom Scott video ? i did ......

@@fergabmmx many times

😂😂😂

It ain't a thing anymore

💀💀

💀

Hmmm ummmmmmmm

💀

Lol

💀💀

Probably a wireless ps4

@@Michael-cb3uw no he uses 40 dollar logitech

I guess the titan should’ve used it since it works so well

the batteries in the controller died 😰

You can’t even spell by

@@JamalChosen whoops I made a mistake who gives a fuck

@@JamalChosenconsume cyanide

more like blow in!

​@@TempyTheKnightsmart

bruh

Bro where do I sign up

That's a good question, I'd also like the answer. Google only pulls up international water laws.

The chinese have also been scrapping wrecks.

Ride share vehicles, you could probably ask the actual companies. I doubt they'd want them back due to the damage and they probably already claimed insurance, but legally they do still own them. It's like stolen property, just because you found it doesn't mean you can keep it. I don't think you'd be allowed to claim a crashed WW2 bomber, though.

@@peytonmac1131 Wouldn't the insurance company own it after the claim?

@@peytonmac1131 IANAL, but from what I can tell, salvage law is completely irrelevant in this case. It depends on the state, but I think they just count as lost property. The owner didn't leave them there, so they are not abandoned property. Depending on the state, you may be legally obligated to attempt to return found lost property.