Exploring Formal-Language Syntax with Multiway Systems

Рет қаралды 1,193

12 күн бұрын

Welcome back to the Wolfram Student Podcast! In episode 2 of season 2.5, we feature Navvye Anand and his project on exploring computational dynamics of formal-language syntax using multiway systems. Join us as we discuss the substitution rules in primitive and complex grammars, as well as the visualization of context-free and context-sensitive grammars through multiway systems!

Пікірлер: 8

@BUY_YOUTUB_VIEWS_493 10 күн бұрын

Your number 1 subscriber for sure!

@TheMemesofDestruction 10 күн бұрын

These young folk give me hope in humanity. ^.^

@B_knows_A_R_D-xh5lo 19 күн бұрын

😊😊😊😊

@RalphDratman 9 күн бұрын

It is important to explain slowly and clearly the basic concepts of a topic one is introducing to non-specialist viewers -- who presumably know nothing about the topic in advance. Unless the anticipated audience for this video consists of people who already have some familiarity with multi-way systems, the presenter's brief description, hastily delivered, is not enough to be helpful.

@richardbolger7695 9 күн бұрын

Academic discourse community

@RalphDratman 9 күн бұрын

@@richardbolger7695 All right, academic discourse community, but "multi-way system" is not a well-known term in any community outside of Wolfram Inc. Therefore it is not only polite but actually essential to define the novel object in enough detail to give the audience at least a general idea what is being discussed. To omit that step is both discourteous and self-defeating.

@richardbolger7695 9 күн бұрын

It has a certain charm and felicity to it proprioceptive to itself yes/no?

@Dr.acai.jr. 11 күн бұрын

Would dr wolfram agree that a language anchor worthy of the title THE father of modern linguistics Dr AVram Chomsky is accorded? Historical? Scientific? Also capable of co- operatively gaining from comprehending clearly enough that Dr Hugh Everett was correct. Sean Carroll is excluded from this conversation because he glibly dismisses the evidence of Dr Bertrand Russell and refuses, presumably, to expand on why Russell was so repelled by cruelty, himself blank to it.