They probably can't even hear each other 😂

Not how it's done in NASCAR. Drivers physically attack each other.

If someone did that to me, came up the inside with absolutely no shot of making a move and crashing us both. I would have wanted to kill them

@@williamjordan5554 not in f1 drivers are to physically exhausted to even say a word 😂

​@@Axel22250physically exhausted?

I get the joke, but they have since 1950

Oh please. Senna made some absolutely ridiculous moves against Prost way before Suzuka 89. The way people try to paint Senna as this innocent angel is embarrassing

@@Mark-zk3gu not innocent. But not as villany as some people liked him to be.

89 Suzuka was Prosts fault, there are other angles and you can see that

@@ryansugianto9241 Most people regard Senna as a saint. Prost is painted as the villain in their encounters.

@@Mark-zk3gu i think they were both incredible, generational drivers who got a bit heated in their greed for glory. Nothing strange or villainous about either of them; happens to the best of us

Yeah but Senna did it for a reason. Prost did it without any reason the year before. Schumacher also did it without any reason.

@@DimitriMoreira Schumacher took out Damon Hill at Adelaide in 1994 because if neither of them finished, he won the world title. So obvious, so blatant and the powers that be did nothing.

@@DimitriMoreirathey all had a reason and that was to win the Championship in f1 this has happened 7 times first with prost and senna in 89 and 90 there reasons were to win the title Schumacher did it 3 times in 94 which he won the title and in 97 but was disqualified from the championship and in 2006 at Monaco and was again disqualified from the race and then 2008 crashgate and finally Nico rosberg’s incident at Monaco 2014 which was the same as Schumacher in 2006 but rosberg got away with it there reasons were to prevent there rivals from setting fast times 2008 crashgate reason is still unknown but they all have a reason

Deliberately crashing into your opponents is so cold 🥶

I mean, it was. Vettel would have too

Every driver would have

Of course it was. Maybe you just go ahead and watch competitive bump cars.

Yet he’s the only one who has the numbers and the heart to be there

He would have had a heart attack watching this

That's what I was thinking man, Senna was going inside the corner and prost was definitely going on more than needed to stay on track to prevent Senna overtaking him

Cmon dude senna was clearly in the wrong in both accidents. I get he’s everyone’s hero of F1 but Prost is the better driver.

Senna was the one to blame he dived too late and expected him to leave room.when he wasn't entitled to his front wing were not by prosts back wing so prost by that corner did not need to leave him space

The incident at the chicane was on prost.. he closed the door way too late by turning in earlier than usual. Then they disqualified senna for cutting the chicane which was absurd.

I mean Senna himself said it in this exact same video but you still want to say otherwise lol

Of course he knew. Prost crashed into Senna in 89 and took the championship. Not only that but in 1990 he managed to convinced Ballestre to order the change of position of pole position to the dirty side, which is why Prost has a better start. Senna said BEFORE the race even started that if Prost got to the first corner in front of him, he would crash into Prost and he did just that. Payback not only to Prost but to the FIA too. Senna wins.

The cars - legend The sponsors - legend The engine sounds - legendaria

Senna never said 89 was his fault. Everyone knew why Prost won that championship, it was completely politically motivated, and it was entirely Prosts fault but he knew he had the FIA president behind him, and would get away with it. Senna had every right to do as he did in 1990 and many drivers then, and since then said they would have done the same damn thing.

Prost did crash into Senna in '89, Senna had the inside line (and was along side), Prost should have backed off 100%, but 1990, Senna had no right sticking his nose in, just gave him a taste of his own medicine.

@@gisele2421 NOOOO 😭😭😭SENNA CAN ALWAYS GO FOR CRASH DIVEBOMB 😭😭 PROST SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN OUT OF THE WAY. fuck off honestly. For all his talent senna was so shit at getting results that he alway had to end up playing it dirty

Where did he say it was his fault?

@@mrn95 He never did. He never would have. He was penalized, and treated like a dog all because prost was so far up the FIA presidents ass and Prost knew he could do no wrong, and get away with everything. Senna admitted what he did in 1990, but everyone knew it was going to happen before it even happened. He made no secret of what was going to happen and good for him. He had every right after the way they treated him the year before, and the championship they stole from him. The original commenter of this thread has no clue what he's talking about.

They were always friends until these incidents and then they kinda of became enemies but like you said they became friends on prost last race in the sport and until senna’s death in 1994

No he wouldn’t. Senna dove into that corner, there’s no way he would’ve made that move unless Prost jumped out of the way, which he was not willing to do

@@ben6993 check your facts. What you said come straight out from the bullshit bible

@@ben6993he’s talking about 89 in idiot and even if he isn’t talking bout 90 prost was in the wrong in 89 bc he turned way too early for the chicane and also the FIA President was on prost side so no matter what senna did to try and avoid the FIA would have just made senna lose

Of course he did. I watched the race live. There was a reason for that. Senna had gotten Pole Position and Prost convinced the stewards to change the P1 position on the grid to the dirty side, which is why Prost takes the advantage. So before the race started Senna said that he would crash into Prost if Prost got to the first corner before him. The FIA literally fucked him up and Prost fucked him up the year before. Senna double payback. Senna wins.

@@DimitriMoreira Oh god. That's entirely wrong. The starting places were like that because while Senna asked to have those changed, the steward refused because previous stewards accepted (in portugal, iirc) and that was not legal to do it after the first session has started. Senna never said he would be crashing into Prost T1, he only said that given this track, in his opinion, advantages the P2 side (which prost was in). It was known fact that the previous race (spain), this track and the last one advantages Ferrari, and Prost, to be able to gain the championship had to finish P1 all 3 races, regardless of Senna's results (at this time, only 11 best results were saved). Prost has won the first one (spain), and that was the best occasion to deny him the possibility of coming back in the championship. Both 1989 and 1990 crashes were ultimately useless, as the championship would have been secured regardless due to last race's result

He did not

lies...

Hamilton does that for the last ten years… And Rosberg to him and people loved it

RIP SENNA but what about Niki lauda and James hunt rivalry that was also a good fight but not as good as senna and prost I probably put lauda vs hunt behind senna vs prost

No no it shouldn't.

@@disclaimer.imjokin yeah to soft compared to it, nobody in hospital😅

Rent free

What would you have done? Probably binned it into the wall

He was a shit team mate, Senna clearly had more talent but he wouldn't settle for second even for his own team.

and a deuche. like all the best drivers prost is a legend as well

Indeed, finally someone who understands formule 1 how it’s worked back then👌🏻

He certainly did. Jean-Marie Balestre didn’t exactly hide his preference for his countryman Alain Prost. That said in 1990 Senna was as much to blame as Prost was in 1989.

The only reason it wasn’t was because the FIA were French. Cheating championship destroyers

No it wouldn’t. You need to watch the race and not bias footage.

@@ben6993 I’ve seen the race and I’ve seen what happened and there’s no bias in the footage. It’s just what happens. He took him out on purpose. That’s not a feeling it’s a fact

@@fjcracing1318 you haven’t seen the race then, stop lying. Watch how Senna overtakes Nannini later on in the race.

@@ben6993 you’ve just shown me the video I’ve obviously seen 😂 what’s your point??? He deliberately took out a championship rival, he should’ve been disqualified like Schumi in 97.

Senna could have backed off once he was closing the door but didn't and hit him. If prost shuts the door he gets hit just as if he leaves the door open he still gets hit lol dammed it you do dammed if you don't Senna dive bombed him both times

Senna and Max are so similar in styles, approaches and skills.. maybe rubs Lewis the wrong way, considering how much he loves Senna

Nah Max is way more of a cheat than any of these two. Max has done these things about 20 times in one season.

@@frenchfrench4514 "these things"? "20 times in one season"? Often when people talk like that they are just spreading hate. If you are biased there is no point in sharing it. It only leads to the well-known useless comment wars.

It's not unique at all, but cretins like you think words only have one meaning. The *dictionary* definition of amazing "causing great surprise or wonder; astonishing"

Alongside Jim Clark, Gilles Villeneuve and Jules Bianchi as well

@@JohnWyckand many more legends

Verstappen?

Verstappen never crashed into someone to win a wdc you can say lewis tried and was successful to dnf max and finish the race.

"Black mark", that's only your opinion. Legendary stuff there, it was the perfect payback for 89' - same track and similar situation. Ayrton stood up for his beliefs and didn't take lightly how he was hard done by the FIA.

Verstappen would say the exact same thing😏

@@sstillgar8814 ya but Hamilton like moaning mansell

@@sstillgar8814nah bro verstappen would be hella pissed did you see how he treated ocon when he crashed into him verstappen is literally hella sensitive and delusional bc when drivers do the same moves to him like the ones he does he gets pissed and says it’s unfair you saw what he said to George Russell at Baku

Senna dive bombed him both times The entry Senna took at the chicane in 89 was impossible to correct he was trying to crash not prost who took the corners properly

@@THIS---GUYprost literally turned into the chicane way too early there’s literally and another camera angle that proves it and also the FIA was on prost side so senna couldn’t anything

@Memosr82 prost was inside of the ideal racing line to place his car defensively for the chicane. He was trying to force Senna to go to his left not Hi right. His trajectory took him on the curb which means Senna trajectory was even further to the inside and would guarantee to intersect prost and likely have massive oversteer and wheel off track so it is ignoring a closing gap and dangerous. Senna shot with a dive bomb when it was too late to correct trajectories. Senna should have noted prost trajectory and his trajectory would intersect and let off to follow closely through and attempt overtake onto final section There was no way Senna would have avoided prost which is why I blame him. I take prost driving defensively and closing door into consideration.

@@THIS---GUY i respect your opinion but if senna couldn’t avoid it then why blame him if prost knew senna was going to do what he did he should’ve let him pass which is why I believe prost did what he did and also the FIA decisions after the race as well make it for me prost fault Edit: im also a prost fan but even I think it was his fault for 89 and 90 was obviously senna

Senna took a dive bomb and awful entry at the chicane that was also his fault

That's the dumbest comment ever,you ever hear of inflation and advancement in technology?

Depends if you value consistency or psychopathic speed and attacking

You lost me at "Senna's right"

Two word. Alive "coward"

Just a couple observations: In 89 everyone could see that Prost turned into Senna, not into the turn, so much so that Ballestre had to find another way to punish Senna, by alleging Senna cut through the escape route and invalidating his win (yes, he won th race after the crash). In 1990 Ballestre (yes again Prost's godfather) denied Senna the clean side to start from, as the pole sitter, and Senna said, before the race started, that staring from the dirty side would deny his car enough grip and allow Prost to pull ahead but, that he would catch up with Prost on the first turn and, should Prost not give him room to pass, they would crash, which is exactly what happened.

@@ronpinto9588typical senna fanboy reply 🤣🤣🤣

Lol

No because it was the penultimate race, meaning if he won had they not disqualified him and prost retired, he would be on 69 points, which is 7 points behind prost, so in the last race he had to win and prost to be no higher than either 4th or 5th to win the championship.

@@crowkid5553yeah if senna won that race that prost crashed him he would have keeped his championship hopes alive into the season finale

Karma is the worst idea ever invented . Think about it.

Prost took the chicane properly and shut the door and was dive bombed then left the door open the next year and still got crashed out lol dammed it you do and dammed if you don't because Senna didn't acknowledge the concept of the vortex of danger and wouldn't back out