He is salafi not sunni lol

@@Asad_Qazalbash salafis are Ahlul Sunnah as well

@@Asad_Qazalbash idiot what is ahlu sunnah when not salafiyya

Right!! Like the comments are all saying one beat the other. They are both friendly with each other and both had a calm discussion.

This wasn’t a calm and civil discussion...this is absolutely hatred between themselves.

@@elvislafoudre6689 I don't know if you watched the same video, but they ended with a handshake and a hug. Where's the hatred in that? Fool.

u can see the hatred eyes of this shia guy

Sains argument is silly Allah says his hand is above the hands of the believers in one verse when they were pledging elegance to the Prophet. Allahs hands and face are nothing like ours as he rightly quoted a verse in the Quran that says and their is nothing unto like him. It's like with hand a clock has 2 hands are the hands of a clock like your hands No this is the mistake as in has made when it says Allah has a face his automatically assumed a face like his own and when he read hands he automatically assumed and thought of a human hand. Silly example he tried to use cause in the same breath he kept quoting the verse that says "and their is nothing unto him.

but ibn tamiya says he has hands, legs, fingers, and is sitting on a chair above heaven and comes down every night.

x-manni ok .. how would that refute the verse?how this narative Condradicts this verse.. if allah says he has hands.. we know Muslims. . Its nothing like we seen before.. the moment you picture it in your head that's not Allah's hand.

Allah dsnt say he has (litteral)hands you, he says metaphors in arabic which if you read it literally you think its talking about physical hand. because in the same Quran it says *"everything will be destroyed except his face"* EVERYTHING! so even his hands, and legs, except his face. what a joke is this?? another example: in surah al-kursi it says "Allah knows *what is before them* and whats behind them" but the actual arabic says "Allah knows *whats in their hands* and whats behind them" In arabic "Whats in their hands" is a metaphor for "in front of you". but if you take this litteral it just means "in their hands" which makes no logical sense.

x-manni ok so what's the issue ? Lol

Ali Kobaissi lol you didnt refute what i said.. All you said was I don't understand anything lol

what are you talking about, tell me who is killing people all over the world, who is doing terrorist attacks, who calls everyone beside himself kafir, tell me WHO

@@mustafaa.3100 What does terrorists have to do with anything the dude said. Lmao

@Porrada Everyday There is no such group of people called "rafida". The terrorists are just people who are bribed by the western governments who claim to be 'muslims'. If you are more interested there are more amazing videos of this channel Islamic pulse.

Peace Nothate well said

@@husseinmahdi4282 rafidha, are mushriks who worship and seek help from creation man, woman and child

Don’t be so ridiculous. The Quran says there is nothing like him.

If you read the Sunni hadith they even managed to put Allahs foot in the hellfire.

Don’t forget he came with his notes he’s looked up some Hadith and he genuinely want to be guided to the right path I think

You are very logical and rational.

Abdul Rahman Malik dude bcoz others Muslims don't believe on real god ? if they do why they kill others human .. why they say Allah akbar and blow their slaves to kill others

Abdul Rahman Malik :haha haha......if something is referred in school of thought ..... Better have more knowledge

The irony is Abdul and you are clueless. The Shia don’t do that but sunni do! There is a classification of Hadith that can be accepted from Sunni. But sunni reject Shia Hadiths blindly

lee liton mash’Allah clueless Lee

lee liton mash’Allah clueless Lee

The Lanterns of Guidance so far I know if any authentic Hadith we Sunni no dudes to accept it.

when the hadith goes against the most authentic book the quran, we throw that hadith against the wall and reject it. Just because imam bukhari states something doesnt mean i will stop using my brain and start claiming allah has feet and the prophet can be tempted by satan because bukhari says and contradicts quran so lets ignore the quran, great logic mashallah

The shia beat every wahabi

@@TheAliisawesome funny ...u r wrong

@@TheAliisawesome be careful, Al Wahhab is Allahs name so dont make a mockery out of it Astagfirullah

Ajc 17 Oh please. Al Malik is also one of Allah’s many names. You don’t find the Malikis saying Astagfirullah don’t call us Malikis. The fact of the matter is that you lot are Wahabis to the core.Appropriating the name of the Salaf does not make you a ‘Salafi’.

​@@thrallingFRgloryit was imam Malik not AL MALIK....GET YOUR FACT STRAIGHT

lool, if that makes you sleep at night "i cant anwser because i dont have the knowledge, and i am not allowed to talk about the hands of God" is being well-educated XD this is the reason sunnis lose every war, because you are delusional.

Fidah Ahmed you idiot .. shia never kill other people's and shia never blow people's.. who is ISIS who is DEASH who is TALIBAN SHIA ?

x-manni you blessed

+Qalbe Hassan daesh are weak!

x-manni just play back 36.43 says it all about the shia guy, 'he rejects it even if it's authentic because he's shia'

Look, if Allah will have a face, it means that "the face" is a liability. "the face" can be harmed if it was existing. Having a face limits Allah to space and time. Having a face is a human attribute which you are attributing to Allah. Instead, the term Face in the Ahadith refers as a metaphor, not as a literal face.

@@husseinmahdi4282 could it mean a face we cant comprehend , a face which is beyond our uunderstanding but still a face. cause thts wat the salafis claim .

So what about your clerics who say Mohammed bin Salman is (المحدث الملهم) isn't that shirk.

@Ali Ajam something I don't understand about this is what does "supposed to be the first caliph" mean? If Allah had wanted Ali to be the first Caliph wouldnt he have been the first Caliph? Wouldnt what was best for the Ummah be decreed by Allah?

@Ali Ajam where is loyalty to Ali (ra) as a leader after the death of the Prophet (SAW) stipulated? Sorry if I come off as aggressive I'm just trying to learn about the shia because I find that the scholars around me have little knowledge of you guys.

@Ali Ajam Jazakallah for the information brother. May he guide both of us and all Muslims to whatever the truth is Inshallah.

Here's one for you from the mother of all believers. Tabari in History Volume 9 page 183: Abbas narrates: “I heard Ayesha saying “The Messenger of God died on my bosom during my turn, I did not wrong anyone in regard to him. It was because of my ignorance and youthfulness that the Messenger of God died while he was in my lap. Then I laid his head on a pillow and got up beating my chest and slapping my face along with the women”.

Oh my goodness, Aisha is the prophet? Is that what you are claiming now? I specifically said did the prophet take part in the hit yourself Olympics. Next.

The Batman Ah good, so if the shia is wrong then Aisha is wrong aswell for that practice. Try getting out of the hole buddy.

Abdullah Hadi Tabari was a muffassir and historian, where is this hadith found? What book of hadith? Don't say Tabari because that's tafseer, that's like quoting ibn kathir... What's the reference for that hadith and it's authenticity?

the guy “Rasulullah (s) died while he was in my lap. Then I laid his head on a pillow and got up beating my face along with other women”. 1. Bidayah wa al Nihayah (Urdu), Volume 5, page 420 2. Sirah Ibn Ishaq, page 713 (declared ‘Hasan’) 3. Sirah Ibn Hisham, Volume 4 page 655 4. Musnad Abi Yala, Vol 8 page 63 Hadith 4586 (Hussain Salim Asad declared it ‘Hasan’ and stated that that the same tradition is recorded in Musnad Ahmad with ‘Sahih’ chain)

Sure 75:22-23

Lol. A table has legs. Lol you killed the guy off with that comparison. Nice

@@pwinnymimi6005 a clock has hands and a face

@@omarhussain5382 Haha. That's also a good one.

God is the Ahad ( unique) and never said he has a literal hand or face. Once you describe Allah swt in a physical form you have limited him swt. Allah is not limited and All is the creation of Allah, what we comprehend is never Allah because he cannot be comprehended. So if you believe he is glorious and mighty stop limiting him to your literal understanding.

Do you have a book of his beliefs?

@@c3realK1ll4h your filthy language determines everything.

Momentous Opus wasn’t it your filthy language and cursing towards the sahabas and mother of the believers that provoked my language

@@c3realK1ll4h wasnt it your sahabas that killed Imam Hussein and his family or conspired to kill him. So I do have the right to speak against those who did.

Momentous Opus no, wasn’t it that Shias accused umar(ra) abusing ali(ra) wife? Thus proving ali(ra) a coward, yet Shia scholars have now been protesting that this Hadith is false, lol, idiot, like your religion doesn’t have anything to do with Islam and is contradictory to the Quran, same goes for your accusations

This is just word vomit.

Let him try harder...they disrespect the companion's of prophet محمد صلی اللہ علیہ وآلہ وسلم..these people will not enter paradise. ان شاء اللہ۔

This guy with green his hair style is like Hindus

I've seen him many times and he don't seem like a guy who is really interested to know the truth.

هذا يصدق فيه قوله تعالى ( وإن تتولو يستبدل قوما غيركم ثم لا يكونو أمثالكم)

james khan what? Haha are u joking? The whole world is laughing at u salafis

Quit your bias. Nobody made anyone a fool. It was a beautiful discussion between the two.

Abbas aboud Knowing what you don't/can't know something is also a knowledge. There are things that you know that you know, that you know that you don't know and that you don't know that you don't know.

Zid Straight out of Colin Powell's mouth. Obviously where your aql comes from.

Your bias is clear it has already been said he wasn’t arrogant. Your need to insult is based on him taking your faith apart

Chris hunt you call this guy knowledgeable yet he using pure hypocrisy. It the Shi’i school of thought that logic is used and taught in the hawza. But he doesn’t get it he needs to read our books as his school don’t allow logic. If he debates it at high level it be embarrassing he can’t get the basic point right. Does matter how smart he thinks he sounds.

This Shias integral part of religion is deceit. So if anybody think this Shia has any knowledge prepare to get fooled. And when it comes to arrogance of this Shia ponytail. His game is clear he comes here prepared to catch unprepared Sunnis and use deceit wherever needed. He learned it from jay smith. This is jay smith from Shia.

This comment is word vomit.

احمد Quran: 16-106 Bismillah IrRahman IrRahim "He who disbelieves in Allah after his having believed, not he who is compelled while his heart is at rest on account of faith, but he who opens (his) breast to disbelief-- on these is the wrath of Allah, and they shall have a grievous chastisement." It is unanimously agreed that this verse (16:106) refers to the case of Amman bin Yasir who was forced to renounce his beliefs under physical duress, for proof of this, please see Al-Tabaris comments on sura 16 verse 106 in Tafsir, Bulak 1323, 122: "If any one is compelled and professes unbelief with his tongue, while his heart contradicts him, in order to escape his enemies, no blame falls on him, because God takes his servants as their hearts believe." Another example, also from the Quran is Ibn Kathir providing commentary for Surah 3, verse 28 where he (ibn kathir) states: “meaning, except those believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly." This is not even an exhaustive list so am unsure who told you or why you believe that taqiyya is not a part of sunni belief? So before you try mocking Shias by including yourself as Muslims and Shias as a separate entity, please do me a favour and read/understand the Quran yourself and at least learn what your own beliefs are first... 🤷🏽‍♂️

That's because Arabic is not his 1st language.

@@tentofABBAS Arabic isn’t the Sunni’s first language either so what’s your point? Lol 😂

KrsOne I haven't read that but if such an Ahadith exists it can only be meant in an allegorical sense. There are deviant sects who some 1200 years ago like the Nusari or Imamiyah held beliefs that the Imams were Gods (Naudibillah). But the majority of Shia don't believe this. We believe Imam ali AS like the Imams after him.him . and Prophet PBUH before him were appointed messengers and protectors of God's message.

ALGERIA48 Bechikh to cut yourself is haram. My research has shown me that this is a cultural phenomenon that grew out of the subcontinent. It should have nothing to do with Shiaism. Secondly Mutah is something that was practiced by Muslims before Umar al Khattab banned it. That is bidah. Sunnis practice it too but they call it Misyar. If u want to debate this further rit can be debated.

ALGERIA48 Bechikh I'm sorry Akhi but Mutah was practiced in Islam as you admit. The prominent Sahabi Jabir bin Ansari asked the Prophet if masurbation was allowed when men were away from their wives from war. The Prophet said this was forbidden and that Mutah was permissable so long as conditions were met. This did not change during the time of the Prophet. Even Abu bakr carried on this act. If the Prophet did not think it was prostitution who was Umar to ban it?

ALGERIA48 Bechikh Tawheed is the the sole pillar in which carries Islam. Our understanding is limited but practice what the Prophet taught us. Pray, fast, give zakat, perform hajj, look after the poor, take care of our parents and kids and live a pious life. The Shia narrative is too focused on the AhlulBayt AS at times and karbala. I love and respect the AhlulBayt AS. But we have to love in moderation. I don't see hate in the Shia brothers eyes. I see frustration in him hence why he debates so many sunnis in the mode of a lawyer. There are salafi out ther ewho believe Allah has a throne and a leg Astagfarullah. But this salafi brother answered the questions well.

ALGERIA48 Bechikh A very pertinent question Akhi. Ideally I would want my daughter to marry a Muslim man and for it to be long lasting and happy. But I also respect the Quran, the Sunnah of the Prophet and the world we live in today. She is entitled to do Mutah according to the Quran and Sunnah so long as the criteria of the Prophet is met. The man has to ask the woman's permission. Agree to paying her a dowry. Agree to the length of the mutah contract. Consider mutah as a prerequisite to a long term marriage and to also be prepared to take care of any children that are conceived financially as a result of mutah. Mutah cannot be abused luke it is today. The reason the Prophet PBUH brought into practice was three hold. To stop men masurbating. To stop men fornicating. And to stop men committing adultery. When you consider this I would ask you this question? Would you prefer your daughter, once she has developed into a woman and gained a desire for physical intimacy; to date men outside wedlock? To have boyfriends? To have sex outside of marriage? The Prophet created mutah through wisdom and God's permission because he knows human nature better than anyone.

hey

shia was dumb because he never reaad QUran in his life time. he just picked and choose Quran verses according ot his desire. when Quran it self talks about Allahs has a face Quran talks bout ALlah has hands. Quran talks about Allah have eyes . they just do taqiya but the problem is that they get caught all the time Surah Al-Maidah (5-64);"Nay, both His Hands are widely outstretched, He spends( of His Bounty). Surah Al-Fath (48-10):"Verily, those who give Bai-Ah (Pledge) to you (O Muhammad (pbuh) they are giving Bai-ah (pledge) to Allah. The Hand of Allah is over their hands. Surah Taha (20-39):"And I endued you with love from me, in order that you may be brought up under My Eye", Allah said that when He inspired to the mother of Musa to put him into box or case into the river. Surah Taha (20-46) mentions that Allah (SW) hear and sees: "He (Allah) said fear not verily I am with you both hearing & seeing". Surah Ghafer (40-20):"Verily Allah is The All Hearer and the All- Seer. Surah Al-Rahman (55-27): Allah described himself that He has a Face, Allah said "And the Face of your Lord full of Majesty And Honour will remain forever". Surah A'Shoura (42-11) described that Allah (sw) as "there is nothing like Him and He is the All-Hearer and All- Seer".

Smile Smile Agreed. These Shi’as they do nothing but to come up with specious arguments just to stir the eemaan of the followers of the Jamaa’ah with doubts. May Allah gives us the strength, knowledge & eloquence to bring them back to the right path

Finerounddclock Praise be to Allah Part of the belief of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah is that the believers will see their Lord, may He be glorified, on the Day of Resurrection and in Paradise, because Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning): “Some faces that Day shall be Nadirah (shining and radiant). Looking at their Lord (Allah).” [al-Qiyaamah :22-23]. And there is other evidence to that effect. This is the greatest blessing that He, may He be glorified, will bestow upon them. See also the answers to questions no. 14525 and 116644. Secondly: The people of Paradise will have a gathering with their Lord every Friday on which they will have the blessing of gazing upon His noble Countenance.

Yusuf Best No. The Salafee brother explained it really well - Allah has attributes & we are to affirm them as Allah affirmed them Himself. Simple. And we do not need to discuss how because we were never been told to do that by the Messenger. If there was ever a need to discuss them the Messenger would have done so. But he did not did he? He would never have left us with riddles for us to solve them on our own because that implies that Islam is imperfect. That’s contrary to his mission Allah had sent him for don’t you think?

Selloutfi Extremely misguided..... Sell you out lost....misguided.... Bukhurai and Muslim.....

Lol

And which debating rules are you referring to?

It's the opposite. The literal interpretation is by The Sunnis. ie God HAS AN ACTUAL face (?!). We don't believe that even if it says it in The Qur'an. We are saying it is a METAPHOR. But you guys don't get it. Shi'a got 'owned' ? Abu Bakr got 'owned' when he gave his allegiance to Imam Ali ع at Ghadeer e Khum. Ali ع and the chosen Imams after him 'own' you and everybody else 'till the judgement day because they are the guides to the whole of humanity. Ottomans Abbasids Mamluks Ayyubids Omayyads Nawaz Sharif Saddam Anwar Sadat Kings of Jordan and Saudi .. each and every ruling party/personality is 'owned' by The Imam of The Age. Because of this: There is a guide for every natuon - Holy Qur'an Wassalaam

@@hamzaiqbal820 nothing to love about that lanti usurper bakri

@@aliraza44315 you lot are so messed stop crying coz baker took over instead of ali

@@aliraza44315 say the shahada and try again maybe you wont be misguided this time

@@BruderMitBart1910 you need to say a lot more than the shahada mr bakri

Then it’s settled-he must be right

lmao because Allah doesn't have body parts.

@@hoshem313 the criteria for an authentic hadith are different among the schools of thought. Btw could u mention the time when he said this?

​@@husseinmahdi4282 you'll have to use your logic. implying that Allah has hands like no other still is applying a creation to Allah. Where did this hand come from? Did Allah create his own hand? And if Allah has a hand like no other then it is not a hand. Because there has to be a similarity in the properties of a human hand for it to be an actual hand. If Allah, for example, has fingers but no palm, that's not a hand. And vice versa. It is also implying that Allah would *need* a hand or some form of one in order to function which limits Allah's power and authority. When Allah uses words like Hands in al-Qur'an al-Karim, it is not a literal meaning. Allah does not require a hand or a face or legs in order to function.

@@hoshem313 That's exactly what I'm saying. (I'm not a Sunni) Allah does not have body parts and cannot be perceived by our human eyes. I was actually replying to MrRZ63 when he was talking about authentic hadith.

the hadith isn't authentic, the verse is metaphorical.

Sayyid Hashim Ali Shah al-Hasani says who? Allah just said it. Is it metaphorical that Allah says he hears and sees? So he cannot hear and see you? Stop it Rafidhi

Busta Rhymes Just stop labelling everyone who disagrees with you as a Rafidhi. The position that the Shi’a espouses is the dominant position of the Ahle e Sunnah wal jamah. It’s you lot who need to get their Aqeedah on track.

like what gives us examples beside the shirk of hands legs fingers of Allah .

Weldon shia gay good answer

Not a single person in the comments gave a bad reply to the situation, just urself and a few others, u call urself a muslim? You are the shaytaan, even the brother that was debating had no issue and now u open ur stinky mouth with such accusations

You have to learn and go and read what Ahlulbait said in this subject ..then come and talk. Ahlulbait the right source.

Mashallah sis

Time For A Change Two this dude ya ali786 doijg the same here. Look at his reply accusijg me of me believing god has humanly body when i clearly quoted surah ikhlas that no we dont believe in. Even the brother whos debating shia cult is a convert he also claims the same faith that no we cant comprehens Allah in any shape. Yet those majoais are putting their filth in our mouth. Watch the shia channels how they curse aisha r.a and blames her to be adultrous indirectly they r claiming prophwtcwas adultrous to because he lived with her and he,died in her lap. Surah noor protected aisha r.a chasity. And they,call her adultrous. Quran says evil women fkr evil men and pious women for pious men. Indirectly they called prophet evil man for calling aisha r.a evil. Quran says prophets wives are ur mothers and they go against Quran they,curae aisha and hafsa r.a. their taqiya is being exposed day by day their filthy books and scholars are being exposed. Their shirk is becoming openly. This evil sheikh of shia claim ali al korani is his name claims ya Allah without ya ali is shirk. Allah hu wakbar they have given the status of ali as allah. Hussein al faheed another cult says ur prayers arent accepted till u say ya ali or ya fatimah or ur prayers wontcbe excepted. One of themajosi said this entore universe was made by fatimahs noor. Look at their books full of shirk full ofcfairy tale not one is claimed by sadiq or baqir r.a they make shirk in the name of pious men of prophets time.

Time For A Change Two i dont get it exactly what hes up to. He doesnt wana discuss Quranic aya which i have presented thst Allah talks about his hands and his face on top of that hes accepting tjat i dont believe Allah has body as human s. Yet hes goijg on and on with what? nothing. Running away from ayats n telling me everything Allah means metaphorically like just wow. Allah says pious one will see him so according to him on the day of jugement pious one will see Allah metaphorically

Smile Smile the funny thing is he wil always reject that allah cant see or hear. As we know when we see we see with out own eyes and ears. Surely these are anthropological constructs by their standards!!

Time For A Change Two i noticed thst. I told them to talk to me with Quranic sources but guess what one person woukdjt reply the other wana talk to me over the phone but not here

All they do is fool those without knowledge.

ok my friend so in the quran when it says ' Everything will be destroyed except His Face.' (28:88) does that mean his hands will be destroyed as well? Also all the other human attributes you give to allah (swt) will be destroyed except his face? what is this?

excellent quotation my brother and if you watch the debate careful you will find that the shia brother is refuted numerously based on such assumptions. besides that remember the verse in maida refers to only himself his hands. when the jews said his hands are chained they mean it to be literally and when Allah refuted them he did not denied having a literal hand but he refuted the fact that those hands are chained. (how the hands of Allah looks like no man can comprehend and it is nothing like our hand). now with the verse in qasas remember ALLAH is referring to his creation to himself, that his creation will be destroyed except his face (meaning himself) because his face its also part of himself just like a black american mostly when calling someone to hurry will say GET YOUR ASS RIGHT HERE. it does not mean you should cut your buttocks and bring only it to him but it means you should come in your entirety. just like when Allah speaks in qasas in relation to his creation he does not mean only his face will be safe.

my friend i am refuting you. When allah (swt) says 'everything will be destroyed except his face' you are now interpreting this verse as being allah (swt) in general because otherwise allah (swt) other human attributes will be destroyed. In the verse you quoted, we the shia still say it is metaphorical because how can we give allah human attributes. Everyone knows that allah (swt) cannot have literal physical attributes because that would be limiting allah (swt). As well ibn tamiyya has stated that the hadith that states allah is a young beardless boy is sahih and this is the biggest shirk. May allah (swt) guide us to the path of ahlulbayt.

i haven't study anything about ibn tayimmiyah so i am not going there. now for what i quoted i can see you have refuted nothing. i gave you the reason why the verse in maida is literal and the verse in qasas is not literal and if you wants to refute me you should start from there and why should you even start a new thread. we uses such platforms to clarify issues and not exhibit knowledge

besides that i have some few questions for you. 1 does Allah have a throne. ( and remember no sunni is attributing to Allah any likeness we only talks about him based on the language that he revealed to us. q2. why will ALLAH Refers to himself as HE if he does not want us to attribute anything of human access and nature to him.

The successor to The Final Prophet is Imam Ali ع . But his Caliphate/Leadership position was usurped. These are the initial bones of contention, that need to be resolved.

Yes but to say allah has hands and face ur limiting god. That means those parts are in a location can be split etc. Just look at how imam ali explains god and u will understand.

noor muradi if the Quran says Allah has these things we say we hear and obey without inquiring to the “how” that’s the way ahlusunnah wal jamaa approaches theses kinds of topics, if the Quran says Allah has a face we say yes Allah has a face if asked how we say in a manner befitting his majesty that’s all

Love Letter look just search on google on "imam ali explains god" and maybe you will understand. We as shias believe the prophets family had full knowledge of the quran and they know what the verses mean.

noor muradi prophet Muhammad pbuh was not sent only to teach his family members, he was sent to teach all mankind and the Quran was transmitted to us by everyone that heard it from him including his family members and companions

Road Runner Basri Shah Rohani Atau Mahadi Sunnis like you cant even write let alone read the Quran and actually understand it. Sadly Sunnis have been brainwashed into whatever their sheikhs tell them. Sunnis have lower IQs than Shia, and have lower literacy rates. Thanks to Sunnis, Islam has devolved and has stayed stagnant since the Medieval Age. Hopefully you guys will understand the truth soon. Peace.

+Ali Kobaissi good reply

Sunnis are spreading the message of Allah and succeeding in doing so, this is why Islam the fastest growing religion. Sunnis families are having a very healthy fertilised life and doing very well to educate our children, this is why we are taking over the world you silly clown.

All muslims are lost. You're victim to a paedophile warlords way of life.

@@deusrex6230 Hes better then your jesus.

How outdated are you? Did you know Shia faith is based on Taqlid, which means following a scholar. All Shias have to choose their scholar for following their laws. They have to choose the most learned scholar who is currently living. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Shia_Muslim_scholars_of_Islam#20th_century

That's because you didn't follow who prophet Mohammed said that you should follow them so you don't go to the wrong way. Go read what Ahlulbait said in this subject and you will lear the real and right Agida and religion.

well if we take that verse litteraly, then it becomes a contrediction in the Quran , astagfirulah: And whoever is blind in this [life] will be blind in the Hereafter - 17:72

Yusuf Best so what does looking means then?

x-manni so what does blind mean then? Don’t u have to take it metaphorically too?

Yusuf Best Do not quote me a hadeeth that supports your view and understanding on this matter. I can do that too and we would not go anywhere. The following are what you need to give answer to: 1. If all attributes of Allah are to be understood metaphorically, then what are they in real sense? What is looking, smiling, laughing, ascending, descending, and many more? 2. I have yet to come across any clear-cut text in the Qur’an or in authentic narration from the Messenger telling us that Allah’s attributes as He affirmed them Himself are metaphorical. So for you to come-up with a statement that says as such, who was it from? 3. It is very strange that this religion which Allah had perfected, to still have unsolved “riddles”. How are they not “riddles” when they are still discussed and debated when there is no one who can explain them and answer except the Messenger whom have died? Are you implying that the religion is imperfect? 4. Or perhaps the word “perfected” is metaphorical too? Take your time answering. May Allah guide me and you, and may He make our hearts dear for the truth.

Yusuf Best Just think of me as Sunni Blade Runner. Fire away. Answer my questions. You don’t need to waste your time trying to clarify what is your belief. Just answer my questions...

Secondly, it is a clear ad hominem to question the authority of the person making the argument without addressing the substance of the argument at hand. Both don't have a deep understanding of the Arabic language, yet according to the one who refers to himself as a Sunni, it is fine to present his understanding of the text, while it is unacceptable for the Shi'i to relate to him his understanding of it.

By saying God has a hand, you are immediately implying God has a form and occupies space. If you are to look at God on the day of judgment (according to their belief), then it means you are looking in a certain direction, your eyes are capturing God, meaning he is occupying space. Which means he is in a place, and not in another place. The Human being sharing that place with him, otherwise how can the eye capture something that is not there within the distance of the human vision. Furthermore this means that God is limited to a certain size, because the eye cannot capture that which is beyond its capacity. When you say God has a hand, it means God has parts, because either this hand is connected to something else of God, or it is all one body, the face is the hand and the hand is the face. If you say it is connected to other parts, you've done shirk by making God into parts. If you say the Hand is the Face, the Face is the leg etc. Then you've accused God of being without wisdom, for the hand, face, leg are all the same thing yet God has named them all different names. Another point to ponder over, is WHY does God have a hand (as you claim). A hand is an attribute of limitation for creation, because without the hand you are unable to do certain functions. So either Gods hand has functions and without that hand he would be incapable of carrying out those Functions, rendering God dependent on his hand, which is kufr to say God is dependent. Or you say God has a hand that has no function, which ultimately makes your dilemma worse, because it means God is not Wise, having parts associated to him which have no function at all. Return to the teachings of Ahlul bayt, and enter the city of Knowledge through its gates. The Prophet (sawa) said, I am the city of knowledge, and Ali (as) is its Gate.

Where are the Muslims from the words of Imam Ali (as) who said in Sermon 1 from Nahjul Balagha The foremost in religion is the acknowledgement of Him, the perfection of acknowledging Him is to testify Him, the perfection of testifying Him is to believe in His Oneness, the perfection of believing in His Oneness is to regard Him Pure, and the perfection of His purity is to deny Him attributes, because every attribute is a proof that it is different from that to which it is attributed and everything to which something is attributed is different from the attribute. Thus whoever attaches attributes to Allah recognises His like, and whoever recognises His like regards Him two; and whoever regards Him as two recognises parts for Him; and whoever recognises parts for Him mistook Him; and whoever mistook Him pointed at Him; and whoever pointed at Him admitted limitations for Him; and whoever admitted limitations for Him numbered Him. Whoever said: ‘In what is He?’, held that He is contained; and whoever said: ‘On what is He?’, held He is not on something else. أَوَّلُ الدِّينِ مَعْرِفَتُهُ، وَكَمَالُ مَعْرِفَتِهِ التَّصْديقُ بِهِ، وَكَمَالُ التَّصْدِيقِ بِهِ تَوْحِيدُهُ، وَكَمَالُ تَوْحِيدِهِ الاخْلاصُ لَهُ، وَكَمَالُ الاخْلاصِ لَهُ نَفْيُ الصِّفَاتِ عَنْهُ، لِشَهَادَةِ كُلِّ صِفَة أَنَّها غَيْرُ المَوْصُوفِ، وَشَهَادَةِ كُلِّ مَوْصُوف أَنَّهُ غَيْرُ الصِّفَةِ، فَمَنْ وَصَفَ اللهَ سُبْحَانَهُ فَقَدْ قَرَنَهُ، وَمَنْ قَرَنَهُ فَقَدْ ثَنَّاهُ،وَمَنْ ثَنَّاهُ فَقَد جَزَّأَهُ، وَمَنْ جَزَّأَهُ فَقَدْ جَهِلَهُ، وَمَنْ جَهِلَهُ فَقَدْ أشَارَ إِلَيْهِ، وَمَنْ أشَارَ إِلَيْهِ فَقَدْ حَدَّهُ، وَمَنْ حَدَّهُ فَقَدْ عَدَّهُ، وَمَنْ قَالَ: «فِيمَ» فَقَدْ ضَمَّنَهُ، وَمَنْ قَالَ: «عَلاَمَ؟» فَقَدْ أَخْلَى مِنُهُ. He is a Being, but not through phenomenon of coming into being. He exists but not from non-existence. He is with everything but not in physical nearness. He is different from everything but not in physical separation. He acts but without connotation of movements and instruments. He sees even when there is none to be looked at from among His creation. He is only One, such that there is none with whom He may keep company or whom He may miss in his absence. كائِنٌ لاَ عَنْ حَدَث، مَوْجُودٌ لاَ عَنْ عَدَم، مَعَ كُلِّ شَيْء لاَ بِمُقَارَنَة، وَغَيْرُ كُلِّ شيء لا بِمُزَايَلَة، فَاعِلٌ لا بِمَعْنَى الْحَرَكَاتِ وَالاْلةِ، بَصِيرٌ إذْ لاَ مَنْظُورَ إلَيْهِ مِنْ خَلْقِهِ، مُتَوَحِّدٌ إذْ لاَ سَكَنَ يَسْتَأْنِسُ بهِ وَلاَ يَسْتوْحِشُ لِفَقْدِهِ.

Study literature mate to have better understanding how language is used

Smack my head! You know what is Taqiyyah? Taqiyyah, in Islam, the practice of concealing one's belief and foregoing ordinary religious duties when under threat of death or injury. Derived from the Arabic word waqa (“to shield oneself”) Whats wrong in this? Its also mentioned when you look at the tafsir (sunni and shia) of surah Ale Imran, ayah 28.

Was the Shia brother clean shaved ????

Sajid Shafi where is the brother from ?

MrHtjet Asalamalaikum bro. The brother is a revert from Tottenham, previously a Catholic Christian