No video

Fahrenheit 451 - Movie vs. Book

  Рет қаралды 21,701

Ivan Garelli

10 жыл бұрын

ENG4U - Ivan Garelli
Movie vs. Book comparison script:
Fahrenheit 451 takes place in a strange future where books are set to burn and people are glued to their screens. The two adaptations roughly follow the same storyline where Guy Montag realizes how backwards his society has become and tries desperately to make a change. The main alterations lie in their themes.
The movie basically followed the original in less detail. While it doesn't add much to the story it definitely does some things right, like the directing. Truffaut made the film puzzling and the characters fittingly robotic and lifeless. He also well portrays how mindless technology has made us:
The film also emphasizes on the topic of nature vs. nurture, and while overused, Truffaut handles the subject very well. For example, Julie Christie played both the role of Clarisse and Linda (named Mildred in the book). They are polar opposite characters; Clarisse: lively and smart, Linda: dull and short-sighted (definition of Linda: Cute, Pretty / definition of Mildred: gentle strength). This is interesting as it demonstrates how the same person could go through different paths based on their upbringing. Which also relates, in a bigger scale, to how society had the ability of going in either directions.
An example of this is where kids are taught to fear Clarisse because of her difference from everyone else.
The movie strays away from the original idea that it's the people's fault that society has turned this way, instead, it's more about government censorship and oppression. While it's an important topic, not much originality went into it here.
"Remember, the firemen are rarely necessary. The public itself stopped reading of its own accord. You firemen provide a circus now and then at which buildings are set off and crowds gather for the pretty blaze, but it's a small sideshow indeed, and hardly necessary to keep things in line." This is emphasized often in the book, and it's a very powerful idea. It puts the responsibility on to you instead of the usual higher power.
Bradbury's novel also well expresses the theme of continuity. He explains how the key to society's progression is the preservation of history as people are bound to repeat mistakes if they're ignorant. He stresses the fact that humanity must learn to be selfless by showing how horrible a selfish society can be.
Finally, I think the book is a must-read, especially nowadays, it's very thought-provoking. And the movie? While its foundation was already solid, it still found ways to be an exciting watch.
Apart from themes, the two interpretations leave you with a different taste. The movie ends with the feeling of hope, while the book leaves you in guilt and desperation. Both visions definitely achieve their goals, and while they approach it differently, I definitely feel like I need to make a change in my life.

Пікірлер: 20
@43nostromo
@43nostromo 4 жыл бұрын
The movie had something the book didn't have: One of the greatest music scores of all time by master legendary composer Bernard Herrmann. If you don't know him, look him up and listen. Anyone out there with even a slight appreciation of music, please do this. You will not be sorry.
@jamesgloeckner6113
@jamesgloeckner6113 9 жыл бұрын
Memorize the truth, or annihilate the false. Or both. Decisions, decisions...decisions?
@stevenwiederholt7000
@stevenwiederholt7000 4 жыл бұрын
Fahrenheit 451 takes place in a strange future where books are set to burn and people are glued to their screens. Not so strange anymore.
@montag4516
@montag4516 3 жыл бұрын
Am@zon Kindle : a handy, contemporary format to carry and access literature and text? But what is kindle in the traditional and real world sense? It is the wood that is used to start fires. Am@zon Kindle = book burning 🔥🔥🔥. That's exactly why that name was chosen for the new format. Bit of an 0rwellian oxymoron just to graze the subconscious. Digital formats can be easily edited, censored and deleted, no? It's not being done overnight, but it's definitely being done.
@danielsan3681
@danielsan3681 6 жыл бұрын
Great commentary. :)
@gustavoadriancostela4583
@gustavoadriancostela4583 Жыл бұрын
Hello people! I can not get what the speaker says when describing the characters and what the firm portrays : " bitter?, robotic and lifeless characters".... " he also .......? portrays how mindlesss........ Thanks
@Poshypaws
@Poshypaws 2 жыл бұрын
01:40 " Please sir, I want some more."
@billlombard9911
@billlombard9911 4 жыл бұрын
Top favorite movies of all time
@TheNorthman1957
@TheNorthman1957 3 жыл бұрын
GLUED TO THEIR SCREENS AND REJECT TRUE INFORMATION. 2021
@hemidart7237
@hemidart7237 3 ай бұрын
Monica should have been put in the PINK room.
@veroxidethegod938
@veroxidethegod938 6 жыл бұрын
I have a test on the book can i just watch the movie?
@ZootWorld1
@ZootWorld1 6 жыл бұрын
Your comment is incredibly ironic, considering the message of the original book.
@illfaith1394
@illfaith1394 3 жыл бұрын
@@ZootWorld1 so can I just watch the movie lol
@alarm35m
@alarm35m 7 жыл бұрын
Just a correction, the quote did not come from Captain Beatty but from Faber, the intellectual that was helping Montag.
@veroxidethegod938
@veroxidethegod938 6 жыл бұрын
I have a test on the book can i just watch the movie?
@kingk9407
@kingk9407 4 жыл бұрын
That woman is beautiful does she play Clarisse
@coloneldink9885
@coloneldink9885 6 жыл бұрын
It’s not montog it’s montag
@kingk9407
@kingk9407 4 жыл бұрын
Oh nvm she plays two characters
@montag4516
@montag4516 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, Julie Christie. Having her play two roles was unconvincing and a notable flaw of the film. Not sure why that decision was made.