They can’t read Hebrew, or Greek, but they’ll argue based on English

This guy has no logic. Behind a screen he don't let people talk and face to face he is exposed 😂

Stop wasting your breath on nologic, he's got none😂

Clownlogic common L

As someone who can read and understand the original Greek, the black guy is right. Δια means through/by. You don't have to be Christian to acknowledge it. Also, at the time Christian doctrine was established, all the best scholars were present, all of whom spoke Greek. If you're not educated to understand Koine Greek, how presumptuous do you have to be to think that you understand the meaning of a word better than scholars who spoke the languages fluently?

The Muslim guy is 1/4 right as in , it could mean by means but this translation is not used here . "Dia" means "through" when used with a genitive noun and "because of" or "on account of" when used with an accusative noun. In Colossians 1:16, it is used with a genitive noun which is why it's translated as "through" instead of "because of" But too say it only means “ by means of “ is in correct .

*"My Bible authors is anonymous!"* -GodLogic, a renowned expert on Christianity

NoLogic again? Lmao if he can believe the fake scripture written as Jesus and God is One to mean Jesus is God, I wont be surprised he believed the Disciples are Gods, the Israelites are God; heck better not call priest father, or else he thinks its their biological Father😂

As soon as the christian knew where the muslim was going, all he could hope to do was inturupt as much as possible so that the Muslim brother couldnt speak. Alhamdulillah, Mashallah, the devils will always try to derail us from the truth brothers and gaslight us. Inshallah, we stay guided and loved by the almighty ever merciful Allah (SWT).

He (jesus) went forward a little,fell on his face, and prayed (Mathew 26:39)

What I found funny is how you in the comments think "by means of" is somehow helping your argument.

Judge: Did you kill him Muslims defendant: No, they died by means of me 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Low key he completely detailed his argument. The Christian sadly does not know his own book.

That is incorrect. 'Dia' mean THROUGH not By Means of. Either he is misinformed, or he is purposely being misleading. Either way he's wrong. But what's really egregious about this performance, is the fact he vehemently thinks he's right. I've studied Greek for almost 30 years, but today, all you have to do is Google the word 'dia', and it will tell you what the meaning is.

He doesn't understand indeed.

Jesus says"My teaching is not my own, It comes from the one who sent me(John 7:16)🤔

This guy should not be debated, he is doing the same thing again and again, he twists something, when he is called on it, he interrupts, keep talking, and says this is not his question.

This No logic dude doesn’t allow anyone to speak just so they don’t expose his lies and hypocrisy. The way he interpreted the verse by twisting it to satisfy his narrative is just petty and doesn’t come as a surprise because the majority of Christians I’ve seen do exactly the same.

Dog logic again getting cooked😂 and as usual, he will interrupt again so as not to get obvious.😂 Great strategy😂

It's not the eye that is blind. It's the heart. Your job is only to deliver the message accurately and move on. Take it or leave it

Absolutely nologic at all

"All things were created by means of.. " So what? Can a creature be "used by God" to create all things?

Jesus is God. the first and the last , the beginning and the end, the alpha and the omega, Jesus is The Almighty

The God of Abraham,Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus (Acts 3:13)🤔

Jesus suddenly took on an existence that was lower than the angels(Psalm 8:5)🤔

He Jesus continued all night in prayer to God (Luke 6:12)🤔

They call him QUEERLOGIC bc he believes god has no laws

Why does the Bible say be wise as a serpent if satan is a serpent?

Example: 1. this package was delivered 'by' Amazon 2. This package was delivered 'by means of' Amazon Who is delivering the package? Amazon or Amazon? Sad attempt to make GL look bad.

Dude has a goofy smile

Godlogic seems to be interested in getting more views than learning. He completely ignored the Greek word. A sincere person would say ok let’s look at the word. He doesn’t care and still struggles to even understand the English.

No logic is a looser..

Clown without Logic simply twists words and sentences, taking parts of texts out of context to try to prove his point. He would make a great journalist 😂.

They don't even know the authors of their books 😂 yet they still argue 😂

This guy only debates different languages when his skill on his own language is still poor😂

Logical, more like illogical 😢

Jesus said he was only sent to the lost sheep of Israel (Mathew 15:24)🤔

Firstborn means he was created not a creator.

You made this up. That Greek word Dia is not in 1 Colossians 16.

These guys are too used to muslim argumentation where you just shout down your opponent and don’t let them answer

No logic like saying it started on Oct 7 😂

we know that you are a teacher come from God(John 3:2)🤔

Did he just diss Jahovah witness denomination? Are they not all together Christianity?

How does that change anything??all things were created by means of Jesus..dis means completely by Jesus

I just checked that passage. As usual, the Muslim is a liar

Or just watch the whole video and judge the whole thing by yourself. Not listening to butchered video just like how they butchered the scriptures, saying things out of context. Logic is posting these videos whole so don't be gullible and at least know the whole context.

Basic English grammar….. Greek word is dia things don’t always translate perfectly Just in Northern Europe thing do not translate perfectly

So whos bible version is actually the best? Please decide. I mean there is only one word of God so the rest must be.....😢😢😢

Oh shut up. You think when you yap yap yap yap yap yap , you win???

Avery smashed him

I watch this whole video Christians say no logic won no logic never answers the questions his asked always switching the topic his a liar

Crackhead logic 😂

Jesus work under father (John 10:25)🤔

Clownlogic go home 😂 .

Harry Potter

Doglogic

God logic cooked this man in the whole interview

Yeah keep on talking and not listening how in the world r u going to find the truth? For the sake of argument? Come on use Ur brain and think wisely only the u will find the truth of Islam!

Search up what Dia means Muhammadans.

One god but three people. Christianity logic fails

John 1:1-3 from the Khabouris Codex. In transliteration it reads: b'rēšīṯ ˀīṯawhyē hwāya melṯā wǝhūw melṯā ˀīṯawhyē hwāya lwāṯ ˀălāhā wǝˀlāhā ˀīṯawhyē hwāya hūw melṯā ˀhānā ˀīṯawhyē hwāya b'rēšīṯ lwāṯ ˀălāhā kull b'ˀyaḏə hwā wǝbelˁādˁāwhay ˀāp̄la ḥaḏ' hwāt medˁēm d'ahwāˁ Literal translation: initially [there] was {twice} word (or speech), and it (or he); [the] word was {twice} towards (the) God, and (the) God was {twice} he/himself word this was {twice} in the beginning with (the) God all by/with his hand/power/control was (or became existent), and without (his hand or him or it - unclear) not even one became something [which] was What's interesting here is that the Aramaic is actually copying the opening of Genesis. Genesis in Hebrew isn't called "Genesis", but "bereshit", instead. This is the first Hebrew word in the Old Testament, and it literally means "in the head", but means "initially", as 'the top of the skull', or "ras" in Arabic, i.e. the highest part of your body, functions to indicate priority or precedence (in speech). Like how you say "he was ahead of everyone else", in English, which also uses "head" to refer to a foremost position. This is therefor typically translated to mean "in the beginning". Note that "bereshit" doesn't mean "the first thing", as there could be events that preceded it, and this is true, because the creation of the heavens and the earth, in Genesis, isn't actually the first creation. Water and fire were created before the creation of the heavens and the earth. It simply denotes an initial stage of creation. So this exact same word is used to translate John 1:1:1 in Aramaic, and the author is obviously trying to imitate Genesis 1:1:1. I think that the author is trying to use the opening of Genesis to introduce something new to that creation narrative; to expand on it. He's also trying to give his biography (or 'Gospel') the same kind of religious authority that he thinks Genesis has. And so he starts off with a Genesis-like creation narrative, while mixing it up a bit, and introducing some neo nomenclature. Also, the Aramaic uses a double form for "being", ˀīṯawhyē hwāy sounds like he's saying "was, was", which doesn't happen in the Greek 'originals'. The Greek also lacks the inclusion of God's "hand", in verse 3. This pertains to creating, obviously, but isn't worded as such in the Greek. You have to wonder what manuscript this (rather late) Aramaic version is based on. Do some Greek manuscripts include the word for "hand"? I don't know. English translations of the Greek start verse 2 with "he was", but the Aramaic says "this was". Why would a relatively late Aramaic translation purposely exclude expressions that imply Jesus' divinity? Again, it's peculiar, but I don't know why it differs in this regard. There are multiple interesting (albeit sometimes subtle) differences. Hūw typically means "he", but not necessarily. It can also mean "it", or "himself", or it can be used emphatically; focussing on the word it follows or precedes (e.g. "this" or "that"). ˀīṯawhyē has a third person masculine singular morpheme, and hwāya is also in the third person masculine singular mode. Hwā can mean "to be", "to exist", "to endure", "to turn", "to turn into", "to become", "to change state", "to possess", "to come to pass", "to happen", "to come into existence", "to create", "to be created". Idiomatically it can mean "not" as in "it is not", or "to stay with someone", or "to come to one's senses", or "to have intercourse", or "to let it be", or "to deal with", and finally "to raise a point of discussion". All of these possible meanings are extracted from a variety of texts written in Common Aramaic, Syriac, Galilean Aramaic, Jewish Babylonian, Samaritan, Official Aramaic, Official Egyptian Aramaic, and Biblical Ezra Aramaic. So I'm not pulling this out of thin air. I can provide references for all of these. Gramatically it can be used as an augmentative marker of tense and/or aspect. Moreover, ˀīṯawhyē specifically, can mean "to exist", "to have", "to owe", "to have dealings with", "to be necessary to do", "to be capable (of acting)", and "to have an ability". Lwāṯ means "towards", "at", "with", "according to", "concerning", "along with", "to come along with", "infront of", "facing", "next to", "compared to", etc. The expression wǝˀlāhā ˀīṯawhyē hwāya hūw melṯā, therefor, is somewhat open to interpretation; what your quote renders as "and the Word was God". Consider the third verse: kull b'ˀyaḏə hwā, which means "everything by His hand was (created)", which uses the same verb as before: hwāya melṯā, meaning "[the] word was". Does it mean that the word was created? I don't think it does. I suspect that the double verb (for "to be") functions as an expression of eternal existence. But this is somewhat problematic when it's preceded by the phrase "in the beginning", since this indicates an existential beginning. The Word is not what's being created, but it functions in conjunction with "God's hand", and refers to the act of creation, or the means. What does melṯā mean, exactly? It means "word", "statement" or "speech" in Common Aramaic. It can also mean "cause". Syriac includes the meanings "terminology", "exposition", "treatise", "argumentation", and "proverb". In the Jewish Babylonian Magic Bowls, as well as in Jewish Babylonian literature, and in Jewish Babylonia-geonic, it can mean "magic spell", "incantation" and "charm". Syriac also adds "power of speech", "science", "reasoning", "learning", "promise", "pledge", "verbal consent". It can also mean "to give legal permission" or "to have (philosophical) meaning". Galilean, Syriac, Jewish Babylonian, Jewish Babylonia-geonic, Biblical Daniel Aramaic, and Late Jewish Literary Aramaic all include the meanings "a thing", "a matter", as in "a case", and "a situation". But there's also "complaint", "disagreement", and "the essence of a subject matter". It can also mean "a letter in a word". As an idiom, it can mean "to pray" and "to let bleed", "to give an account" and "to continue speaking". Most interestingly, it can mean "of/by itself" as in "intrinsically". Finally, only in Syriac texts can we find it being used as a theological term for "the logos" (masculine form!), but melṯā here has a feminine morphology, which is interesting. ˀălāhā or Alaha is in an emphatic state: adding -a at the end, which is a shortened form of -ha and just means "the": "Allah (the)", so "The God". You could, if you wanted to, interpret this whole passage differently, and interpret "word" as referring to God's attribute of Speech, by which He commands creations to come into being, as opposed to this referring to a second persona of a triune deity. And God's attributes are beginninglessly eternal, and therefor they exist as intrinsic necessities, which is why I said that the meaning of "by itself" is interesting. God's attributes are not Him Himself, nor are they other than Him (i.e. they are not parts of God). They should be understood to be attributes; full stop. They are not beings in the sense that they are distinct living components. They are beings only in the sense that they exist; are real, and true, and that they do not NOT exist. But the living being here is God, and these are simply the attributes of God. Note that the three verses (like Genesis) talk about the creation (of the world). The melṯā indicates speech, reason and purpose, whereas the 'hand' refers to the capability and absolute power to realize. Possible interpretation: *In the beginning, the creative Word intrinsically existed, and this Speech existed inherently with God, and God enabled createdness Himself; verbally.* *This necessarily existing ability was God's, (even) primordially.* *By His Hand everything was created, and without it, not even a single existence emerged.*