Family Court: Man Thinks Parenting Plan is Void when He Gets Extra Time

Рет қаралды 8,018

Күн бұрын

Support Meg & Furbabies:
Buy Me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/rbybqy0pjm
Paypal: paypal.me/CrimeCraftsandFur
Become a member: / @megscrimewatch
Join the conversation:
Discord: / discord
megscrimewatch
Twitter: / research_meg
Welcome to Meg's Crime Watch! I'm not a #Lawyer, and I don't play one on #KZfaq! I do have degrees in #LegalStudies and #Research and I will #Search to find the #Best #Court #Cases for you!!! They won't all be #Crazy, #Wild, #Wacky tales of #Karen and #Kevin, but they all will be interesting in their own way and something you won't see on every other #LawTube channel. I will #DeepDive into the #Background and give you the #WholeStory in a way that even #JudgeJudy would #Approve of!!! I am a #Proud #MSWarrior, so there may be some #Mistakes, but we can't all be #Perfect like #JudgeBoyd! I love her, but I would rather #KeepItReal like #JudgeSimpson!!!
All Comments are my personal opinions and are intended for entertainment and educational purposes only. Anyone depicted should be presumed innocent until adjudicated guilty in a court of law. Any legal information provided is not an analysis. Definitions and Laws cited are to provide clarification on what is being shown and are not in any way to be construed as legal advice. Media is used under 107 of the copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for FAIR USE for purpose such a as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statues that might otherwise be infringing. Non- Profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of FAIR USE. Other
Image(s), Video(s), and/or Music used under license from Shutterstock.com and Getty iStock, or other publicly available source. There is only one place to get the Whole Story! Meg's Court & Crime Watch!! Your Source for Court Hearings with the Backstory! and a Deep Dive when necessary!

Пікірлер: 89

@lynsmalec5484 Ай бұрын

Dad is conniving! No wonder they got divorced. He doesn’t have proper transport for his kid to/from school & now he’s worried about $3,746. He was wrong. PERIOD

@janedb85 Ай бұрын

My thoughts exactly!

@HRH242 Ай бұрын

Claims it was an error on part of the person who prepared his taxes. Then tries to justify why it’s okay!

@tryk9955 Ай бұрын

Dad is a boldfaced liar and immature. No wonder the adult daughter ghosted him. You can read between the lines here.

@hejnye Ай бұрын

really your daughter is the primary caregiver of your child, men this one especially take so many things for granted, we women need to stop being doormats

@lauralaladarling3775 Ай бұрын

Another manipulating narcissist who feels entitled to overrule the Court and write his own program, use his daughter to back up the plan of having his child over 50%, emergency calls to the ex wife to drive to and collect child and get more money! He deserves to be held accountable and for contempt of Court.

@djcruiselover3827 Ай бұрын

Dude, this is not a contract. This is an order of the court. He could easily hold you in contempt and throw you in jail.

@I__Love_Lamp Ай бұрын

Technically it is a contract just like marriage is! Marriages back in the day before court was introduced by States were never seen as a contract of a government state laws but a contract between two people usually married by a church! The States saw the potential to make money when they decided that in order for a marriage to be recognized that it must be through an official agent registered through the state they reside in, which can be anybody today who takes an online class to be ordained! The State's are responsible for making these court cases a contract's case! These court proceedings are Civil in nature so that in plain terms means its a contract, an order a judge signs binding you to follow the order( contract) or face criminal proceedings for not following the order (contract) According to our Constitution, marriage nor child support should be an arrestable offense because it's a civil matter! When the State's asw how they could benefit then they changed the law and in essence have skirted the Constitution! Think about it, the state uses public funds to help those who are under a certain pay range right? Now say that obliger falls behind on support for whatever reason the State takes action and basically brings them to court to comply but while doing this they charge you interest and jail time if don't comply! Mind you they are using our money to support these kids and our funds to for these court hearings! When these people get caught up do we the public get a cut of the interest they made using our money? Nope! This is a money business and the State's will say that they do this in the best interest of the child lol!

@djcruiselover3827 Ай бұрын

@@I__Love_Lamp that’s an interesting way of thinking about it, though you seem to be completely ignoring the 10th amendment and asserting that the constitution of the United States says things that I don’t really think that it says, but that’s an interesting way of interpreting it

@norarivkis2513 Ай бұрын

@@djcruiselover3827 Classic sovcit nonsense. You were a lot nicer about it than I would have been. The bottom line is that sovereign citizens believe that all civil law is contract law, and that's simply not true. There are many categories of civil law. The difference between contract law and family law is that in contract law, you have to agree to terms in order to be required to follow them, and that's not the case in child custody law. You CAN agree on terms, and IF the court also agrees, then those terms will be recognized as the way things are going to be. But the court also has the right to tell you what to do, whether you like it or not! And you still have to do it, whether you ever agreed to it or not. Because the only factor the court has to consider in ruling on child custody cases is the best interests of the child. They can rule in favor of one individual or the other, or tear up an agreement that both parents voluntarily signed and order something totally different... all if the judge thinks that's in the best interests of the child. So the notion that because marriage is a form of contract -- which it is, though it has several specifics about it which normal contracts don't share, including the way in which it is dissolved -- somehow child custody is a form of contract is nonsense. Child custody is the decision of the court -- lock, stock and barrel. If the parents are permitted to agree on a plan for custody, it's only because the judge chooses to permit that plan, because they believe the parents' choice of plan *is* what's in the best interests of the child... and the judge still gets to tell both parents what to do whether they submit such a plan or no.

@djcruiselover3827 Ай бұрын

@@norarivkis2513 well said

@norarivkis2513 Ай бұрын

@@djcruiselover3827 Thank you. I hadn't seen the entire video when I wrote that, and after seeing it I understand a bit better how a mistaken belief that this was a contractual situation could have come about. The judge went pretty far into the subject of how he wasn't going to get into whether or not the agreement between the parties was a good idea, he was just there to enforce it. I can see how easily someone could read that as this being a matter of contract law, but it isn't really. The only reason there exists a parenting plan in the first place for the judge to enforce is because either he or some previous judge accepted the parenting plan as valid, because they thought it was in the best interests of the child. So, with no new evidence regarding it *not* any longer being in the best interests of the child, the judge isn't going to re-hear any potential changes to the parenting plan just because the father wants him to. But it's not that he can't. It's that he doesn't see a reason to.

@user-fe9dj6wq8e Ай бұрын

When you're more afraid of the IRS than CPS.

@lisajeter9511 Ай бұрын

Dude you don’t have a leg to stand on! Always do the right thing because it’s the right thing to do.

@BobDobbs681 Ай бұрын

I'm a fan of Judge Ricke. Always pleased to see a Judge Ricke video.

@sarahmartin7181 Ай бұрын

Dude it was your responsibility even if your ex-wife was doing it! The daughter moving out suddenly sends red flags immediately. And then the person who was supposed to be picking up the son suddenly stopped? What's the common denominator in all of this - the ex husband. And missing 7 days in 6 weeks? They would send a truancy officer after him.

@chrislsommers Ай бұрын

This Judge is always a fun watch. He has no patience for foolishness.

@creationrebel9698 Ай бұрын

"Ok, what are you opposing?" "pretty much all of it". 😅 I'm gonna enjoy this!

@JustTheClerk Ай бұрын

Dad really thinks he’s a super special boy.

@janetmoquin7828 Ай бұрын

He's an idiot. He's just making things up as he goes along.

@dizzypdx Ай бұрын

The tone of that first "yes" from the dad was enough for to know he's an ass.

@gregwessels7205 Ай бұрын

To think if I had kids I would be RICH by now - except for the fact I'm suppose to feed, clothe, school, iPhone, etc the child. Looks like I came out ahead after all.😂

@innocentBystander19 29 күн бұрын

God forbid you get extra time with your kid, sir. That must have been so hard on you. Some dads in this same court fighting for a few extra hours a week.

@VioletWings1353 Ай бұрын

Having children just to get child tax exemptions is unacceptable. Not even a funny joke. 😒

@louiseporterbridges2040 Ай бұрын

I keep thinking of a very old movie title: "Father's Little Dividend."

@janetmoquin7828 Ай бұрын

I don't know, guess we were stupid, but we did, one year for me, one year for her father

@totoro9590 17 сағат бұрын

@@louiseporterbridges2040 I love that movie ❤

@valerie362 Ай бұрын

His dilemma is to just leave the kid after school until they call Mom? Also, saying you dropped him off and picked him up several times over 2 months isn't something to brag about. Not saying who the "transportation person" is, is kind of weird. I understand both sides but it doesn't sound good.

@valerie362 Ай бұрын

It was an accident!!! But let me explain why I did it and why I won't change it. Ugh!

@Liv40873 Ай бұрын

Until he gets the order modified, he has to follow the order that’s in place.

@janicefarmer2387 Ай бұрын

Meg, I'm with you, always ready to see Judge Ricky.

@creationrebel9698 Ай бұрын

I am not a fan of this geezer. He wants a pat on the back and money for spending time with his own child!

@hejnye Ай бұрын

"I had to buy a bike to keep up with him...." are you kidding me, this sperm donor places money before human life

@Mortimer_Duke Ай бұрын

Father's tax claim was nonsense. First it was an error by his tax preparer. Then it was due to a provision of the parenting agreement not being followed.

@horatiomh Ай бұрын

Tax agent's will prepare your return based on information provided by the taxpayer

@StephanieSwan666 Ай бұрын

Then he would have amended it but the mum usurped this by taking him to court. Couldn't he have done it anyway if that was his intention.

@Mollypopithelen Ай бұрын

I know it is difficult but the father doesn't seem to fully grasp the fact that his child is even more important than his job.

@JustaMomnFamily Ай бұрын

He claimed kid on taxes on purpose

@pagecinnas8498 Ай бұрын

Who watches the child when dad is at work and the "transportation" drops him off? Or before school after dad leaves for work? I'd bet the adult daughter moved out because dad was using her as free childcare and gave her the old "as long as I'm letting you live here" speech. He just didn't think she'd bounce.

@maggmaster Ай бұрын

Most likely the kid is alone which depending on the age could be either illegal or at least not a great idea.

@Cumdown Ай бұрын

@@maggmasterthere's only TWO options wow what a low IQ take 😅

@chula686 Ай бұрын

The daughter moving out spontaneously, plus the other care provider ghosting him seems odd.

@MearnieToon Ай бұрын

You sound lazy af

@maryland2213 Ай бұрын

@@chula686not odd….common denominator….dad

@k8mcawesome Ай бұрын

Brave to act this way in Judge Rickie’s courtroom…..

@MrDagonOfTheDead Ай бұрын

@17:26 "it was THIS moment, he knew he FUNKED up"...😂😂😂

@user-zl7zr2rt2v Ай бұрын

So is the split 48 vs 52 percent, he is most likely quibbling over a few hundred dollars. That is a level of control i have not witnessed. Mom lost a full year of benefits from the child on taxes, now that adds up quickly.

@louiseporterbridges2040 Ай бұрын

Both these people deserve a hundred years in jail for naming a child Wyatt Watkins.

@amaristhecrow7084 Ай бұрын

Awwww….😂😂😂😂

@user-je4es5lj4v Ай бұрын

Lol

@jupo9928 Ай бұрын

His "I'm correct, you're wrong" patronising voice is damned irritating.

@mmt44y Ай бұрын

Dad is correct that federal tax law allows him to take the deduction if he has the child for over 50% of the time. The judge is right that if dad does not follow the agreement he can be penalized by the judge.

@JustaMomnFamily Ай бұрын

GO JUDGE

@robertnorth1681 Ай бұрын

The part of the judge played by Tommy Lee Jones.

@judyb503 Ай бұрын

The child is the one suffering. The father is choking on his own strong hold. What a prick!

@stanhankins3175 Ай бұрын

Good loving gone bad. 😂

@user-zl7zr2rt2v Ай бұрын

Federal tax returns aren't difficult to amend but some states make it a tedious paper process.

@Nefertiti0403 Ай бұрын

I like this Judge for some reason ❤

@lauraheffernan4295 Ай бұрын

Judge Ricky always looks so sad.

@adamrmoss Ай бұрын

Handsome tho

@gregwessels7205 Ай бұрын

I guess looking at the worst of people on a daily basis has that effect.

@Jim-hj4py Ай бұрын

Wouldn't you be sad being a Family Court Judge and hearing this crap EVERY day?

@jayesimond9301 29 күн бұрын

Guess this guy never heard of filing a motion.

@lawnerd67 Ай бұрын

I love your voice. And yes, I love Judge Ricke too!

@danielx555 Ай бұрын

His voice is really off-putting. He uses the narcissist drone, and he has a really weird downward lilt in most of his words because he's trying to sound dismissive.

@dawnhock4545 27 күн бұрын

There’s that Verizon Service! Unstable

@cattycorner8 Ай бұрын

That poor mother looks as though she is ill and frail. They are certainly an odd couple. I wonder if she looked different when they got married.

@r-aandrew596 Ай бұрын

It seems so strange to hear the school term starting in August. Our schools (Ontario) don't start until September.

@louiseporterbridges2040 Ай бұрын

In farming states like Kansas, the planting/harvesting season for farmers still governs the school calendar.

@Shakaiharp 5 күн бұрын

Some of us who live in beach communities also start in Sept (we never start until after the Labor Day holiday).

@SheaShea71 Ай бұрын

I don't like that the court thinks they can control how often someone moves.

@KaysWorld4 Ай бұрын

Kids need stability.

@pagecinnas8498 Ай бұрын

Unless you're on papers from a court, they can't. You can move every single day if you want. You just can't move your child if the court is in your business and says you can't. That's a pretty good reason to parent like an adult and not let the gov't have to do it for you. And I absolutely do think "be more careful with whom you procreate" is the 1st rule of good parenting.

@user-zl7zr2rt2v Ай бұрын

We worked for the same company, we moved every 3-4 years to keep our employment. Our son did fine over the many moves and it didn't hurt him a bit.

@robertjandorf8125 28 күн бұрын

It is also "verifiable" that this dad is a DB...just saying.

@Jim-hj4py Ай бұрын

I want to know the background for this "parenting plan".

@CrazyCatAER Ай бұрын

👋😻👋

@platedlizard Ай бұрын

If the tax preparer mixed up he could amend it. Also Mom could paper file and challenge it, although that takes a lot longer Btw the IRS doesn't actually care about parenting plans and can get mean about exemptions.

@platedlizard Ай бұрын

Imo I'd go by the parenting plan unless it's grossly illegal (you'd be surprised what I've seen judges order. I saw one final divorce decreed that had the couple filing as joint married couple... AFTER the divorce was final. If it's final they aren't married! I couldn't believe it when I saw that order. I told them to go to a tax attorney because I was not going to sign that return as a tax preparer

@Jim-hj4py Ай бұрын

Depends a lot on which parent can use the child as a dependent, it can't be both of them.

@Jim-hj4py Ай бұрын

Whichever Parent is considered "primary" gets the deduction, however whichever parent provides medical coverage can have that portion deductible.

@seantimmons5900 Ай бұрын

@Jim-hj4py I feel like you didn't watch the video before commenting. They are each include the child as a dependent, one on even and one on odd years. The IRS doesn't care whi does whay as long as both don't claim the same person.

@Texas500 Ай бұрын

Dad file an appeal. She cant keep her kid and get paid for it. Idc what t that order says. I agree with dad. So y'all saying if she has the kid 0 percent of the time just because its ordered she should still be able to file? I dont think so

@djcruiselover3827 Ай бұрын

Right there when you said “I don’t care what the order says “ that’s immediately the moment you lost because the only thing that matters is what the order says. Now you could file to have the order amended in the future but no appeals court is going to help you whatsoever because you violated a court order.