bruh...

Lucky for you I can't fully make this deck :)

So... question is... is Ice Barrier also looks like a Weevil?

We do

@@laythena1 No giga Chads

@@CircePenfield thats a cool comment 🤘🏼

As a stun duelist I disagree. We look like soyjack

His true nature

@@BoogyMushrooms playing stun is the most boring shit ever after playing against stun

Nowadays yes...

@@ivancosta3408get good i guess

@@ivancosta3408Normal summon Celtic guardian; attack opponents set monster; end phase. Also stun.

@@strangevol5264 master in master duel and kog in duel links, how much better i have to get? 🤔 You cant say nothing on the internet nowadays, people will allways assume the worst 🤣

@@daedalus5253 wtf are this comments xD Im not a Yugi boomer, but its kinda true. Ask professional players if they prefer to go first or second :)

Lab Vs Stun is kind of a Cancer Vs Ebola situation. Whoever wins, Good loses.

Firstly, big stats are the opposite of stun - having a monster that threatens to advance the state of the game by removing monsters in combat is the opposite of a stun strategy. Secondly, having one or two individually powerful control tools =/= stun. Granted, a full-combo Drytron or Adamancipator board removes the option to play the game, but the existence of handtraps / non-engine mean there are points of interaction - you just have to successfully exploit them before the game gets out of hand. I don’t think it’s good game design, but it’s not the same as a player setting 3 floodgates + two solemns and offering no counterplay outside of drawing more backrow removal than they have omnis. Floodgate-style effects are healthy in a vacuum - they’re intended to be ways to slow down the speed of the game which you can pivot into if you don’t currently have the resources to go toe-to-toe against a more aggressive opponent; unfortunately yugioh has some of the most insanely powerful generic floodgates of all TCGs, and stun decks by design intend to exploit these and leverage them as their sole win condition rather than use them as supplementary pieces to a balanced strategy. There’s a huge difference between furniture lab searching a 1-of D Barrier vs a stun deck playing 3 copies and activating one after hard-drawing it- the former deck is investing 2-3 cards into a one-turn floodgate which they hope can buy them another turn to start taking advantage of their resource engine, whereas the latter is investing one card into a turn skip and backing it up with 4 similarly powerful and difficult-to-counter cards. Though the outcome *can* be the same in both scenarios, the lab player is taking a calculated risk in searching the floodgate instead of making a more aggressive play by adding a removal trap which offers more card advantage, and they can be punished by an opponent with the means to play through the d barrier restrictions. For the stun player, it’s either a case of them getting lucky and drawing a card that wins them the game, or getting unlucky due to their disruption being unable to stop their opponents deck from progressing the gamestate past the point to which they can keep up.

You can play through a negate or a disruption A floodgate prevents the game from being played Big difference imo I think a good deck should be able to play through at least 1 negate. But good luck playing through "You cannot special summon" without drawing "the out"

You said it in the video lmao

Generic Staples + "Vanity" Cards

NOW

📸

I think this may be him @GungekaCH, guy seems to play Master Duel so the opponent might be him

Yes the first opp was an vtuber and was streaming when that happen and farfa said hi at the end of it

​@@Morgana95can u spill the name of that vtuber?

I am tempted to say "you mean Lady" Kapp

@@timaeus22222 it's the same character okay? It's been a while since I played the deck

@@tcoren1 I was joking lol

@@timaeus22222 yeah me too

@@tcoren1 All good :)