😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

🥱

It was kinda... I work with robots. To do stuff precise you have to slow down. Or the things you work with would be destroyed in a collision. Or like in the clip the braket from the cpu could bounce back if you do it to fast.

yeah... try installing 100 000 cpus and 400 000 ram modules and will see who is faster... you will win at 1000 or maybe 10000 installed mainboards but then you need to go pee, eat, watching netflix because it is end of the shift, then you become ill, be late to work. robotic arm in light load operations in the oter hand requires virtually no maintenance for many years...

@@dodman0907153500 thats 100% right! our robots get maintanenace every 2-3 years vor like 4-8h. that downtime is unbeatable by humans

You can always use the youtube fast forward play options because this is how it works in robotics. Splitting the milliseconds. You can tho use youtubes fast forward play options if you wanna see how it would that robot work fast, you would barely understand anything. This was for video demonstration purposes.

Multiply this speed with a 0-24h work 7 days a week without any break.

@@AttilaBubori don’t forget they will do it the same way no matter what time or what’s going on. Also it won’t force it (thanks to the force measurement tool shown at the end). Add some pattern recognition and it will even be able to flip parts oriented wrong as it assembles.

The flipside is production downtime (and added delays or expenses for a technician) whenever the robot isn't working properly. Maybe the big OEMs like Asus and Dell can afford a bunch of robots on multiple production lines, but most will probably find human labour more productive overall. Especially whenever they issue an ECN, product revision, or new product line - the robots would need retooling and/or reprogramming, the humans could just read the new specs and start work.

@@abj9121 but it's actually needs an operator monitoring the robot, so you are not saving anything

Faster than a human, taking a break.

CPU installation took ~15s, add material handling, downtime and whatnot, another ~15s, that's still million units per year. Sounds fast enough to me.

@@aleksandersuur9475 Then calculate the salary, holidays, sick-leaves, teaching and safety costs, only 8-12 hours of work per day etc. 5-6 days a week etc. In a few years humans won't even be in the competition...

@@fanthomans2 Do you want to compete on a job that consists of inserting RAM and CPU in a mobo socket over and over, for as long as you stay employed at the place? Often a job is simply best left for a robot. Well, honestly there probably aren't that many people that actually do this and only this as their entire job. There are actually less than 300 million PC-s sold per year worldwide, so there really can't be that many people who do this as their full time job, few hundred robots could do the entire world demand for this operation, there are probably comparable number of humans doing this exact thing as their entire job. Few hundred worldwide, total.

@@fanthomans2 That "in a few years" statement makes you look like you have no idea of how time actually works.

But they can build thousands of these and they can work 24/7. Speed doesn't matter if you have the advantage of parallelization.

@@fitybux4664 For 30 grand each + programming + maintainence is still more than a worker from an undeveloped country. Speed is mandatory for robots.

@@raffaele4512 There's so much idle time here. If you wanted, you could crank that shit up to 11. This was just some dude doing it slow for a demo. Granted PCs aren't made to be assembled by robots, so you might lose reliability by speeding up some steps though.

@@21area21 this is reality. someone who pays for this toys wants them to play something serious. otherwise with same money you can pay 10 years a worker sonewhere in thailand to do much better job ( big respect for these poor workers dont get me wrong)

@@raffaele4512 There is definitely a decent amount of patriotic/nationalistic influence in people's purchase decisions. However, I think most times, consumers choose to go with the cheaper product if they are equal in quality. If it is built here, there needs to be some tariffs, a better value proposition, or features to the product that aren't available from the foreign competition.

This makes sense, thanks for clarification!

right but this is nothing to rejoice over. a lot of people will lose their jobs over automation like this.

@Thu Nell Ⓥ overpopulation is a myth, just like global warming. you see a traffic jam you think overpopulation. it's just based on false premises. we can stop automation if we wanted to. we don't have to automate everything there is to do. we can also choose what we want to automate without sacrificing jobs that people need to have a meaningful life. living a "happy life" is based on propaganda you don't even realize it. what will be the point for businesses to operate when nobody is even making money?

@Thu Nell Ⓥ you are too stupid to argue with me. you're like a dog that is trying to do math. it's just impossible.

No, this Agilus is not collaborative, it will happily bash your head in if you don't practice proper robot safety. For collaborative offering KUKA has LBR iiwa.

Then you might look into the robots from BostonDynamics. You have seen nothing, yet.

@@1stSilence I love Boston Dynamics. I've been following them for two years. I think my brain would break if I saw Atlas putting together a PC.

me too (end effector)

since you already wrote the comment, i will just place a +1, :-)

God damn you... stole my comment. Wait or did i steal yours *mindblown*

Agreed

noticed those fine imperfect edge I see

LOL!

There is another robot doing the quality control just like you. Your job is taken man. Lol.

Rival Company's CEO. lol.

1:36?

It is at 1:36 Well, you're rigth. The left clip.

RoboCNC Frees- & Graveerwerk 的

Curva wants to automate his cnc! 🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍👍

Ok, count the hours programming and building. Human would have built thousands in that timeframe and installed them into a housing.

@@mastermnd22 So this becomes relevant if you build more than a thousand PCs...

Or they won't bother make the robot to do it quickly for some reason which they should for a demonstration video

@@thomassmit9944 The cost of the machine and slow production would have to be compared to the wage of an individual that could assemble a larger number units in less time. Personal experience tells me not only could I build the board faster, it would be installed in a case and powered up. And the cost of labor wouldn't be close to the cost of that machine.

@@mastermnd22 So if Microsoft orders 1000 robots, lets them run 24/7 for a year, it will not save time and money this 1 year and all the years after? I don't know where you're from but it sounds like you're comparing chinese labor workers to a robot. When mininum wage exists its 10$ an hour, which is about 3000$ a month average, you would already have saved money in 3 months for a 10,000$ robot. Plus it doesn't require bathroom time, break time, sleep time, off time, sick days. It can run 24/7 12 months a year. Yes, it'll not save money in 1 month, but it will save a company money in 6 months. Look at car manufacturers, they don't have the same tiny brain as you and yet they pull in trillions every year. If you can let a robot do it for you, you should. Let that sink in.

right but that means a lot of people will lose their jobs. not good.

What kind of PC do you use?😂

digikey sells them for over 29k

That's not true. Higher speed correlates with lower accuracy in such systems. They would definitely show it going faster if it were accurate enough.

Guy McShaky hands needs breaks, sleep and a salary.

@@benargee that....is correct :/

Who the balls said anything about faster?

@@benargee come on - just solder cpu and ram to motherboard and not load hummans and robots :)

@@benargee But apparently still needs to be there is the robot has an error. So the win is...one person can monitor a bunch of robots...as long as they don't have too many issues. A human could process more without errors in 8 hour day than this could do in 24. I thr asian labor market, for less than the robot costs to maintain I would wager. They have a ways to go before they are a threat to human labor

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r5xhZZOCtNLXlok.html

They probably killed it in the process. RIP.

@@alexa.davronov1537 Sacrifice a few pieces to get perfect calibration and alignment for the next few million pieces.

They mishandled that CPU big time, totally ruined it.

www.kuka.com/en-ca/products/robotics-systems/software/application-software/kuka-forcetorquecontrol

@@KUKARobotGroup Thanks but I mean the reference of that force toque sensor , i need to download the Cad of this sensor

It does it at the same speed as a human and can do it 24/7.

This is 4 years old and was perhaps 1 year old when posted.. Who knows what the time is today 😉

yes you allways need program it.and funny that dude make it faster than robot. and all those pins uh uh. if robot assemble PC will PC cheaper like 400 bucks? xD or company take more profit. what ya think LOL think apple

it is a chinese company now

Let's put you against Kuka over a period of 24 hours. It would get more done andwith fewer mistakes than you. It would be faster than you.

@@marksimpson2321 Idk why you bother answerinvg to people who dont know how to use the youtubes fast forward play options.