Flamu can you do a budyonny review please?

WG have known about the Dev Strike bug for a while now. They are working around the clock to fix it, i have been told.

That is because it literally is a light cruiser that was accidentally put into the DD category. The ship is based on the German Spähkreuzer designs. Those where very long range cruisers intended to scout ahead of a taskforce to locate convoys for the bigger ships to sink. Think of ships like München (M class) Siegfried (O class) FdG (H class) or the P class that is not in WoWS.

Really looks like like

@@DanielWW2 the Schultz has more in common with Omaha and the British early light cruisers than a DD, they were all what are called scout cruisers, leaders of destroyer flotilla and to scout for a battle fleet

@@DanielWW2 Except Munchen is a better cap contester than these New "DDs"

@@bombvoyage5686 I would not state that. The Spähkreuzer originated from design studies for very large, oceanic destroyers. In concept it is similar to the Omaha, but the requirements are quite different. The Omaha is much bigger, far heavier armed and has more armour. It does sacrifice range, was quite overloaded and not that good of a design in general. Spähkreuzer is fairly lightly armed, has almost no armour, but has enormous range because of its mixed turbine and diesel propulsion. Its machinery was also massive which meant very little room for other stuff inside the hull. It is not that comparable to something like Omaha or the British pre WW1 light cruisers because its role is quite different to the latter and its operating requirements differ from the former. WG also demonstrated their inability to design something fake that makes sense because the magazine of the middle turret on Schultz would interfere with the aft set of boilers and turbines as well as the very long central shaft that ran al the way from below the bridge where the diesel engines where located. Basically they would be no room for that magazine. It needs to be placed aft, but that might have made Schultz a bit too usable by WG standards for anything German.

In Polish language ofc

.-.

I don't think so

@@Kommentierer so, you think he's not good enough???!!!111!!!

Ffs, he is just kicked out bc Flamu blame Wg for horriable CV rework and deadeye.

@@zimuyang4931 no wayyyy! Are you sure about that???

It's pretty relaxing to play. It's kinda like a smoke cruiser, except with even less obligations to perform any real beneficial role besides farming damage. Less relaxing to play with a CV hounding you, more radars and / or any DD that actively tries to kill you though.

I also think one of the problems of the line is that most of the teammates do not understand their limitations and expect you to cap and spot.

Incoming nerf in 3 2 1. Reasons: a) Flamu likes it b) Flamu did a WR in it WHILE liking it.

@ANUBHAV SHARMA it would be interesting with a proper German hydro. If we speak about torps, 55 is still very slow, doesn't change their "tactical" purpose

Not to mention that Indomitable has a very limited amount of planes on deck as well.

more like torpedo need buff, they unlikely buff main battery because WG thinks everyone have lutjens.

well, i actually enjoy my time with könig and bayern

Me too Caleb, me too

*BONK*

WG :mega: FOR ME TO POOP ON!

Blyska is on his team...

Because he is a User. That's got a rename

@@Poctyk Why would he rename it like that? Or is that something the system did? Bear with me I'm new to the game.

@@soopahsoopah if game finds users name offensive it can forcibly rename it to "renamed used" and a string of numbers. So flamu tried to rename his own account to this renamed type to sorta hide it (since WG is too lazy to implement anonymizer in WoWS) so that he would get recognized/streamsniped less. (It didn't really work)

Khaba is still overpovered. You can't even compare the HE DPM, fires/minute and speed.

I think the reason Flamu wanted the CV to spot Oster (as opposed to Flamu himself doing it) was because he could do it without any direct risk to his ship. His planes would eat the AA, sure, but his ship would be fine. If Flamu had gone after Oster, he would've been out-spotted, out-gunned, and out-torpedoed and would've been dumpstered. Same thing for the Caracciolo; the CV's time would have been better spent engaging (and allowing Flamu to effectively engage) Oster, but because the CV didn't, Flamu's only available target was Scharnhorst, besides a few fleeting shots at Oster. The CV could engage (or at least spot) either target at any time with zero risk, whereas Flamu would've been dumpstered if he tried to engage Oster himself.

imagine thinking losing planes is worse than an oster being able to roam and torp freely, instead of risking your planes to spot him and deter him/notify team of torps/shoot him. Good comment everywhere else, but those two points you raised are some head scratchers.

@@RySLz ah yes, spot him for maybe 30s with Indomitable tiny squad sizes when the only ship that's going to shoot him is a Schultz with pathetic DPM. Big brain.

Spotting would be good team play, but it would be bad for your own score. At this point you were likely to win anyway, so going after higher potential score is usually the right play in randoms. I have kept strong AA dds spotted for 3 minutes, losing dozen of planes and my team would barely shoot at them, even if there were several ships in range that could have killed it.

Perfectly balanced, no likes nor dislikes (i think)

@@halowerder3356 Yeah, I saw. Damn it! XD