What is driving particle physics?

  Рет қаралды 124,751

Fermilab

Fermilab

Жыл бұрын

Particle physics research attempts to answer timeless questions - questions first asked thousands of years ago. In this video, Fermilab’s Dr. Don Lincoln gives an overview of some of the most pressing unanswered questions of physics and describes how it is that scientists are deciding which of these questions to pursue. It’s a grand question that draws the attention of the world’s scientific community.
Dark matter:
• Big Questions: Dark Ma...
Complex dark matter:
• Complex Dark Matter
Dark energy:
• Big Mysteries: Dark En...
Quark structure:
• Big Questions: The Ult...
Antimatter:
• What is Antimatter?
Missing antimatter:
• Big Questions: Missin...
Higgs mass:
• Big Mysteries: The Hig...
Unified forces:
• GUTs and TOEs
Proton decay:
• Can protons decay?
Fermilab physics 101:
www.fnal.gov/pub/science/part...
Fermilab home page:
fnal.gov

Пікірлер: 545
@oliverkostanski4079
@oliverkostanski4079 Жыл бұрын
Dr. Lincoln is the physics professor everyone wish they had.
@markdelag
@markdelag Жыл бұрын
I’ve been listening to your lectures for years. I’m now 77 years old and I find I enjoy listening to you just as much as I did in the beginning, which shows that you must be doing something right. Physics IS everything!
@alessandromangiapia7082
@alessandromangiapia7082 Жыл бұрын
I have recently watched Sabine’s video on why she was disappointed with particle physics, and this is the most inspiring and thought provoking answer I have ever seen. Thank you for you work and dedication!
@ozzymandius666
@ozzymandius666 Жыл бұрын
Sabine is a crank.
@gregoryallen0001
@gregoryallen0001 Жыл бұрын
@@ozzymandius666this is eric w. fake screen name
@MarcinSzyniszewski
@MarcinSzyniszewski Жыл бұрын
Sabine has a lot of very good questions and points, but sadly I often find her oversimplifying the issue to the point of misrepresentation.
@Aviopic
@Aviopic Жыл бұрын
Followed her channel for quite some time but not anymore. It was amusing for some time but more and more she started acting like a spoiled child denied a sweety. Sad really.
@101Mant
@101Mant Жыл бұрын
As I recall she was criticising bad science where when the experiment didnt produce results the scientists would go back, change the goalposts and ask for for money. It wasnt that particle physics was inherently bad so much as the approach and behaviour in the field not being good science.
@davetoms1
@davetoms1 Жыл бұрын
Loved this pause to revisit the core driving force behind so much research: _Curiosity._ Great video as always!
@RS-ls7mm
@RS-ls7mm Жыл бұрын
No, from what physicists have actually said its fear of not publishing. They will investigate anything if they can find the funding. I think only the major players are allowed to do any real research.
@ZBB0001
@ZBB0001 Жыл бұрын
I think that if I had seen this simple, direct overview when I was young I would have gone into physics!
@ozzymandius666
@ozzymandius666 Жыл бұрын
One has only to ask, "What is this made of, and where did it come from?" as a child.
@andreweaston1779
@andreweaston1779 Жыл бұрын
IMO the first physics class you take should go over all of the high level stuff, and progressively go back explaing how we got there, until we get to Newton, and then, and only then, should we start doing equations. Because when the students inevitably say why can't we learn the cool stuff, the reply is you have to learn this stuff before you can learn the rest, here's an equation. None of that makes sense to you. That's why you gotta start at the bottom. I am 100% sure that would have interested me in physics instead of what I got.
@brothermaynardsbrother
@brothermaynardsbrother Жыл бұрын
Does your second head agree with that declaration, Zaphod? Or can you only convince noggin’ duex to accept that mindset after a few Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters?
@EeeEee-bm5gx
@EeeEee-bm5gx Жыл бұрын
Would have gone into physics and then would have been kindly walked off physics ❤
@skandagopal2287
@skandagopal2287 Жыл бұрын
Zaphod, I DID go into physics when I was young and I think if I'd seen this overview then, I would have spared myself the pain. Particle physics at its core is highly abstract complex mathematical jiggery-pokery that is ridiculously reductionist and utterly incapable of asking the truly meaningful existential questions.
@sapelesteve
@sapelesteve Жыл бұрын
Another informative & thought provoking video from Dr. Don & Fermilab! 👍👍👏👏
@russtaylor385
@russtaylor385 Жыл бұрын
A new Fermilab video with Dr Don lifts my morning! Clarity and a warm voice - and still rocking the look! Thanks Dr Don and Ian.
@BAROMETERONE
@BAROMETERONE Жыл бұрын
I like this guy. It's refreshing to see Dr. Don describing where we are at with physics in a realistic and balanced way. Humility and open mind instead of being smug and arrogant. This is what we need to find more truth/facts.
@RedNomster
@RedNomster Жыл бұрын
I appreciate all the scientific speakers I've stumbled across. I'm especially grateful when those channels try to tackle deep mysteries of the universe, as science should, rather than tackle other scientists. I've watched dozens of Don's videos, but the production of this one in particular was a class act. I'm subscribing to catch these more often!
@JakubS
@JakubS Жыл бұрын
I'm learning how to write cuneiform on clay tablets, and I'm very surprised to see one of those tablets in the very thumbnail of a new video by my favourite Physics KZfaq channel! Great video as always, Don!
@ashmomofboys
@ashmomofboys Жыл бұрын
Happy to have stumbled across this channel! Thanks for the great video.
@Grandunifiedcelery
@Grandunifiedcelery Жыл бұрын
9:49 I'm afraid it's not Koshiba or Kajita...
@GustavoValdiviesso
@GustavoValdiviesso Жыл бұрын
Dr Lincoln, it's great to hear your words on this. You probably know that one of our physics colleagues, Sabine Hossenfelder, has a public and somewhat negative stance on the current way particle physics works. In my humble opinion, she is being biased , but who am I to say. And that is exactly why you should invite her for a debate 😊 If nothing else, it would be entertaining and informative.
@drbuckley1
@drbuckley1 Жыл бұрын
I picked up on the same thing. Frankly, this video seemed more like a sales pitch than anything else. Sabine's point regards how the finite monetary resources available for research should be apportioned.
@GustavoValdiviesso
@GustavoValdiviesso Жыл бұрын
@@drbuckley1 I understand where she comes from, but unfortunately she seems to be going further then suggesting how to better use taxpayer's money. She picks on the fact that theories or updated to higher energies when nothing is found at current ones. Don here explains how this process isn't random and real thought is put behind financing new experiments, regardless of what one or two theorists might say. The process is not driven by "moving the goal post", as she puts.
@drbuckley1
@drbuckley1 Жыл бұрын
@@GustavoValdiviesso I understand where Don is coming from. Sabine has been consistently critical of CERN and its science. I am unqualified to know which is correct. I do enjoy the debate!
@GustavoValdiviesso
@GustavoValdiviesso Жыл бұрын
@@drbuckley1 Yeah, a debate would be great, for sure.
@diettoms
@diettoms Жыл бұрын
@@GustavoValdiviesso I believe Sabine's criticism of CERN is mainly centered around the FCC - she isn't saying that all particle physics experiments should be stopped. She's saying that there isn't a very compelling reason that SUSY should be correct, so the FCC should be deprioritized in terms of funding.
@Sighhhh
@Sighhhh Жыл бұрын
Great video! I appreciate the explanations of the current work being done and the questions said work are trying to answer.
@williamgatling3205
@williamgatling3205 Жыл бұрын
In a world that thinks it knows everything, it was great to hear a list of the unanswered questions that remain. Time is such a basic building block, but it might be more complicated than we assume.
@the_unrepentant_anarchist.
@the_unrepentant_anarchist. Жыл бұрын
QUOTE- "in a world that thinks it knows everything, it was great to hear a list of the unanswered questions that remain." You *do* realise that you just contradicted yourself there don't you? You stated that "we think we know everything" while watching a video that literally states that we don't. No one "thinks we know everything", trust me. Well., no one outside of Twitter anyway... 🍄
@ozzymandius666
@ozzymandius666 Жыл бұрын
Dubai??? A brutally oppressive religious theocracy, in charge of physics? Stick a fork in humanity.
@leonhardtkristensen4093
@leonhardtkristensen4093 Жыл бұрын
@@the_unrepentant_anarchist. Actually I think he hit very close to the truth. I have seen too many remarks to video's - and videos too - that are very close to postulate that we know every thing. It is usually from people that read and believe everything in text books without understanding it. They memorise but don't verify. They believe that they are very smart and knowledgeble because thay have learned and memorised things that others haven't or have a healthy doubt to.
@the_unrepentant_anarchist.
@the_unrepentant_anarchist. Жыл бұрын
@@leonhardtkristensen4093 You're talking about the general public- idiots- whereas I was thinking more along the lines of scientists, academics, people who know what they're doing. They'd be the first people to tell you that we don't know everything, but if you're talking about ordinary people, then I concede your point- *those* fuckwits all suffer from the Dunning-Kruger effect, and have *vastly* over inflated senses of their own actual ability. Social media has told them that they're all special, and they honestly believe everything they read online and most of 'em wouldn't know what 'research' was if they had to look through a dictionary to find out.... 🍄
@williamgatling3205
@williamgatling3205 Жыл бұрын
@@the_unrepentant_anarchist. You started my quote in a place that left out the operative words "IN A WORLD that thinks it knows everything".
@LynxUrbain
@LynxUrbain Жыл бұрын
What I like about science, is that the answer to a question often leads to many others. Somehow it's totally inefficient, like art, poetry, ... and that's really cool! I wondered if a voluntary and kind of "applied science" oriented approach (P5) is really a positive thing, many discoveries having been made through unconventional methods and serendipity! What an astonishment all of this would be, for some of the physicists of the late 19th century, who had foreseen the "end of physics"!
@rathemis2927
@rathemis2927 Жыл бұрын
I think you are right. By this approach, only the most promising experiments get funded. But "most promising" says who? Of course on the flip side, experiments are getting so much more expensive now. You can't avoid being vetted. This is the state of particle physics.
@hermosafieldsforever4782
@hermosafieldsforever4782 Жыл бұрын
It's true, the delivery of information can awaken higher cognitive understanding when the style of the message and information is given in a way that recognizes everyone's ability to think. What a wonderful way to approach these incredible concepts. Thank you for your open and sincere clarity. I wish you were my graduate professor. Sub'd and thumbs up!
@dtmelanson
@dtmelanson Жыл бұрын
Once again, your videos are just excellent. Thank you.
@johntipper29
@johntipper29 Жыл бұрын
Thank you Don. Another thought provoking video.
@ozzymandius666
@ozzymandius666 Жыл бұрын
The only thing I learned from this is that a brutally oppressive religious theocracy is now in charge of physics funding.
@rollinwithunclepete824
@rollinwithunclepete824 Жыл бұрын
Always interesting videos, Dr Lincoln!
@SlowToe
@SlowToe Жыл бұрын
Take a bow Don. Exceptional video 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
@richardrutishauser4689
@richardrutishauser4689 Жыл бұрын
Great video, Dr. Don! As you say it is important to step back to see the bigger picture. It does not look like there has been much progress in high energy physics unless you take the long and broad view! The reality is that it is interdisciplinary and advances are spun out all the time without the general public seeing or understanding them.
@drancerd
@drancerd Жыл бұрын
I love you sr! Thanx for everything that you do to answer the questions.
@SxWerks
@SxWerks Жыл бұрын
Physics is magical and Dr Lincoln is a magician at helping me to a deeper understanding of reality.
@jerrypolverino6025
@jerrypolverino6025 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for a truly, level headed video. Bravo.
@mrsmiastef
@mrsmiastef Жыл бұрын
Absolutely fantastic! Thank you!
@misterphmpg8106
@misterphmpg8106 Жыл бұрын
You should not forget one important reason why this high end research is important: It gives the best heads of the whole world countless opportunities to really push their theoretical and practical abilities to the absolute possible limits of today's best technical and mathematical achievements and beyond. So in stunning groups of young and also experienced scientists everybody learns from each other and from experiment controlled either by mathematical proof or by experimental data (never by just a selfish boss). There is no better motivation to learn than this. Eventually many of these experts leave university and hire jobs in the free market. And here they are very successful because they have been trained to solve the most difficult problems. So science also is a giant school for experts! And that's an enormous and not payable benefit for society in general. Every cent spent on science comes back hundredfold by this "educational mechanism".
@mattb5816
@mattb5816 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic video. I'm going to use your simple explanation of how scientific theories are created. Your comparison between the theorizing and experimentation was so clear and concise, I must share it! To add: this is a great video for high school physics (or introductory science) teachers to show to their students. Without too much detail it highlights the knowledge-seeking aspects of science which are applicable regardless of discipline. It also encourages thinking and asking new questions.
@Valdagast
@Valdagast Жыл бұрын
Sabine Hossenfelder is one of those who has spoken out against building new particle accelerators. I would love a discussion between Dr Lincoln and Dr Hossenfelder about this. Not a debate, a discussion.
@Wol747
@Wol747 Жыл бұрын
Excellent as usual, Don Keep it up.
@a.lewisraymer7772
@a.lewisraymer7772 Жыл бұрын
Love you videos!! Thank you Dr. Don. You are a reason to not mind paying taxes!
@steinadler4193
@steinadler4193 Жыл бұрын
Wow, that was one of your best. Would like to see this in 20 years and have some answers
@waverod9275
@waverod9275 Жыл бұрын
More specifically dealing with proton decay, some ideas that theorists have have some flexibility to them. Grand Unified Theories (which is where the idea of proton decay comes from) and supersymmetry are two prominent examples. Both have appealing theoretical ideas, which lead to reformulations which are compatible with the negative experimental results.
@JCO2002
@JCO2002 Жыл бұрын
Supersymmetry? It should have been found at CERN. The biggest problem with particle physics is scientists who refuse to accept that they were wrong and just move the goalposts instead. At least you didn't mention string theory, which is another dead horse.
@waverod9275
@waverod9275 Жыл бұрын
@@JCO2002 I agree on supersymmetry, though technically it has never been entirely refuted. As for string theory, there hasn't been a definite enough prediction to be ruled out by experiment, so it's not really in the same category.
@KaiHenningsen
@KaiHenningsen Жыл бұрын
@@waverod9275 String theory is more of a theory failure - after all this time, there's still no useful prediction. Unlike the Higgs, where the prediction had to wait for the right tools to check it, string theory is still writing for the prediction.
@nowymail
@nowymail Жыл бұрын
Stand further away from the green screen, and/or add more side lights. There's visible green hue on the sides of your head.
@malcolmcurran6248
@malcolmcurran6248 Жыл бұрын
And thanks for all the wonderful videos. They helped a lot in getting through some of those dark uncertain days of the pandemic.
@guff9567
@guff9567 Жыл бұрын
"Pandemic"?
@esperancaemisterio
@esperancaemisterio Жыл бұрын
Great video, as always! I'm just sad that was no word about the collapse of the wavefunction!
@rodbenson5879
@rodbenson5879 7 ай бұрын
What a great video. Well done.
@lackinininsight
@lackinininsight Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video and for sharing the enthusiasm and intellectual brilliance of the many who are engaged in these research projects. The only bad vibe came up with the mention of P5. Not wanting to disparage anyone or their efforts, the reality of human relations is that power is as important, perhaps even more so, than the search for truth and doing the right thing. For a group to decide which projects are worthy and thereby influence the granting of funds is scary. But then, that goes on anyways.
@kcrooks7
@kcrooks7 Жыл бұрын
Love your work. Your my favorite modern physics. Your on the level of Einstein. Your a unsung hero.
@kdato774
@kdato774 Жыл бұрын
Another great video!
@carbon_no6
@carbon_no6 Жыл бұрын
Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that no ads are run on this channel? I’m certain it’s not that they don’t meet the criteria. Perhaps they don’t run ads due to it being part of the government.
@TheyCallMeNewb
@TheyCallMeNewb Жыл бұрын
Epic opening and closing cards! Also, I recall Hossenfelder making a stand opposed to the moving goal post phenomenon. Her thinking was that it was bad for science long-term. Unsure whether I would agree.
@dancingwiththedogsdj
@dancingwiththedogsdj Жыл бұрын
I wonder if somehow gravitational waves are able to combine or strengthen in certain situations that cause increased gravity in areas we don't expect because we are still learning how it all works. I just wonder if we end up with the universe being overall simple (once we understand things more) or complicated beyond our imagination..... Probably both. Great video! Thank you for doing what you do! 🍻🌎❤️🌮🎶🚀
@douglasstrother6584
@douglasstrother6584 9 ай бұрын
"Electromagnetic Fields and Waves" by Lorrain & Corson (2nd Edition) contains two problems relating Electrodynamics and Cosmology. Problem 4-22 starts with: "In 1959 Lyttelton and Bondi [Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A, vol. 232, p.313] suggested that the expansion of the Universe could be explained on the basis of Newtonian Mechanics if matter contained a [tiny] net electric charge." A follow-on problem, Problem 10-11, mentions that correction terms to curlB and divE due to the creation of this charge should be on the order of R^-2 where R is on the order of the radius of the Universe, so that the new terms would be negligible at all length scales but cosmological situations. This hypothesis is consistent with the linear velocity-distance observations. Rather thought-provoking questions from an Undergraduate E&M textbook!
@wolfboyft
@wolfboyft Жыл бұрын
Massive respect to all the scientists driving this sort of thing
@brothermaynardsbrother
@brothermaynardsbrother Жыл бұрын
Most groovy shirt, Herr Doktor. Is the tune associated with said shirt “More Than A Feeling About Mass-Energy Equivalence?” Qapla’!
@wicked1172
@wicked1172 Жыл бұрын
Outstanding, Intriguing.
@bryede
@bryede Жыл бұрын
There's a little bit of the suggestion that the remaining questions are finite, and we just need to derive the right test. Just from a layperson's perspective, we have no idea what our vantage point on reality really is. We're only going to be able to observe downwards and outwards to an extent before there's nothing that can be built to go further and we may never be able peek outside of whatever expresses our 3 dimensional world and I'm not sure we could comprehend what we'd find anyway.
@cliveomahoney4096
@cliveomahoney4096 11 ай бұрын
Excellent summary of the current situation in Physics. I think that almost the last thing you said about the importance of small experiments should inform decisions that are going to be made in the near future. The justification for another, even more powerful, collider is questionable at best. The staggering amount of money that this would cost, with absolutely no guarantee of any worthwhile results, precludes this approach, IMO. If the billions spent offer nothing new - a very real possibility, this would have a devastating effect on the perception of physics and make it nigh impossible for funding to be obtained for other projects.
@mrtienphysics666
@mrtienphysics666 Жыл бұрын
this video is so much more than just particle physics, it is all physics, all science
@aanchaallllllll
@aanchaallllllll 8 ай бұрын
0:00: 🔍 Scientists are always looking for better equipment and experiments to answer big questions. 3:25: 🔬 Advancements in particle physics have led to a better understanding of the subatomic realm. 7:01: 🔬 The Fermilab research program is upgrading their particle accelerator complex and developing new particle detectors to address unanswered questions in the standard model and explore historical trends in physics. 10:26: 🔬 Dark matter remains a mystery, and particle accelerators are crucial for physics research. 13:45: 🔬 Scientists are evaluating ideas for future projects and conducting research to answer fundamental questions about the universe. Recap by Tammy AI
@meepk633
@meepk633 Жыл бұрын
Very carefully.
@FrancisFjordCupola
@FrancisFjordCupola Жыл бұрын
There's a drive to understand the world around us. Some people want to guard against it; usually because in order to grab power, they came up with fantasies about how the world should work in their mind. Anyone putting lie to their words they view as a danger. If you love your freedom, it's science that helped getting the oppressors out of your hairs. I don't expect protons to decay; however, I'd love to encourage people to keep looking. Never know what else turns up. As for unification, I think we need a better idea of spacetime to embed quantum mechanics in for something else.
How far is the edge of the universe?
16:28
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН
What does the Muon g-2 experiment tell us?
14:42
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 187 М.
Indian sharing by Secret Vlog #shorts
00:13
Secret Vlog
Рет қаралды 52 МЛН
Pray For Palestine 😢🇵🇸|
00:23
Ak Ultra
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
OMG 😨 Era o tênis dela 🤬
00:19
Polar em português
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
ПЕЙ МОЛОКО КАК ФОКУСНИК
00:37
Masomka
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Mapping Particle Physics - with Jon Butterworth
46:30
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 77 М.
How fast is gravity?
10:13
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
Particle Physics Explained Visually in 20 min | Feynman diagrams
18:43
25 Subatomic Stories: What's smaller than quarks?
13:37
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 159 М.
What Are Particles? Do They ACTUALLY Exist?!
19:35
The Science Asylum
Рет қаралды 271 М.
How cold can it get?
11:27
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 214 М.
Can protons decay?
12:33
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 291 М.
What If Gravity is NOT Quantum?
18:31
PBS Space Time
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
How charged your battery?
0:14
V.A. show / Магика
Рет қаралды 2,6 МЛН
wyłącznik
0:50
Panele Fotowoltaiczne
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
📱 SAMSUNG, ЧТО С ЛИЦОМ? 🤡
0:46
Яблочный Маньяк
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН