Seriously. I just went through a ton of work and trouble shooting to set up a compass on my quad, and now I'm finding out that I can't even get the heading and other related features to show up in the OSD anyway. I've been dealing with--and shaking my fists at--DJI since all they made were flight controllers; so, I don't expect much.

What sort of distance have you covered with the DJI system? I have done 2.6 km on stock antennas (both on air unit and goggles) and I have wondered what sort of distance others have achieved

@@JoseFPVNavarro I change to iFlight Crystal as soon as I got the googles. I have done 4kms on iFlight Crystal and 2 stock antennas with a Caddx Nebula pro

@@josemarb hello bro, I'm following the steps but it doesn't work for me, any idea what I'm doing wrong? Thank you

Trying to follow this intructions on 4.2.11 and this not work maybe it only works on bf 4.3

lols no its not happening because adding hacks too the code base to support what is a dead product just means cleaning it up later... if you don't like it don't fly BF.. want it changed then make DJi ( who couldn't care about you in the slightest ) or caddex who might listen..

@@Sugar_K "dead product" is a weird way of saying "The most popular HD system".

@@ChinaExpatsRC product 100% not supported by its manufacturer.... you Wana know why......

@@Sugar_K First you delete your previous comment, then come in here with some incoherent rebuttal as if we're going to take you seriously at this point.

@@dangerous8333 🤷‍♂️ let’s hope this new outfit actsully listen to its customers

Any possibility on getting this working on 4.3.1?

How did you implement this? I would love to have this functionality for my TX16s using elrs.

NVM figured it out. Thanks.

We are so proud of you!

@@ChristopherF_1971 Huh? I went to your channel, but you have no content? Why are you being snarky at me? Don't covet thy neighbor.

@@nikhayes3396 I don't have content because I don't work for KZfaq and actually earn my money an honest way. So. ....

@@ChristopherF_1971 Huh? 90% of the content on youtube isn’t monetized, nor do most start with any intention of making a living as a content creator on KZfaq. I personally think that its a perfectly legitimate way of making a living, I find your insinuation most disrespectful and uncalled for. Most people simply use youtube as a way to express themselves artistically, or opinions, reviews, archive and share family videos. I just realized that all you are is a troll, you don’t have what it takes to have intelligent discourse, you don’t have the skill or patience to create anything, so you spread negativity and hurtful comments to try and make yourself feel better. I am sorry, if there were anything I could do to help you I would. Perhaps if you approach people with a more graceful, sensitive, sensible demeanor; in the future others may take the time to help you. You have lost the respect I extend to everyone upon initial interaction, from my perspective it sounds like most likely you don’t make any kind of living, you live in your parents basement and collect unemployment and whatever other hand outs you can get out of the gov’t. Perhaps I am wrong, its just how you present yourself, and shouldn’t be received as an insult rather inspiration, for this will be the last time I ever interact with you. There is no need for further discourse or ad hominem attacks, simply go on your way, I won’t bother read a response if you form one, so save the time and do something productive. As a matter of fact I think your “power word” should be “Produce” from now on, in everything you do think; “What am I producing”. If it’s hate, discord, negativity, etc etc, stop yourself. Turn a new leaf and produce Love, positivity, empower people with your words, create something that your grandchildren can be proud of, if not wealth or physical things more important a legacy of positivity and respect. Gods Peace Brother.

How are you confirming it is indeed LQ you are seeing and not RSSI? I cannot get mine to change. It's showing RSSI only and there's not a damn thing I can do about it

@@rbt5785 Find Bardwells video about doing that correctly named somewhat similar => Bardwell LQ DJI

That's what I've been using & works great!

@@rbt5785 in your tracer or crossfire set the channel use to LQ and then just use RSSI on Betaflight side, (betaflight does not know the difference) but what you see will be LQ as provided by the RX Module

@@nullx8 Thanks. I did finally get it to work. I was only power cycling the quad and when I power cycled both the quad and the transmitter I got it to work

4.3 is a night and day difference. You'll love it if you do

HDzero is way to go, resolution is unfortunate a bit worse

@@MrMayex the hdzero looks just like a better analog setup. Analog has snow and static type of break up and as much as that used to be ok, digital is where it's at. Why bother spending money for just marginally better but not actually being hd resolution cause that is where hdzero is at. DJI is digital and actually hd. It is truly nice to look at when flying. So maybe if you race and lag/delay is gonna make the difference between making the turn or hitting a gate etc then sure but otherwise, DJI is way better and the way to go. Guess it's a personal preference but I got much better at flying after I picked up my first set of DJI goggles. No I have 2 so other people can see kinda what I see when I'm flying and j got the analog adapter plate for my v1 goggles so I can fly my legacy quads but legit, way prefer to not even mess with those drones and won't except for rare use cases like a tiny hawk flying around inside

@@twistedsocal oh boy are you mistaken. HDZero is MILES BETTER than analog. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@twistedsocal im in the same boat as you. when you look at the screenshot comparisons it not good enough to get me to switch, i fly really dangerous stupid shit up and down busy streets while im hidden on a rooftop and i have never had a problem once with the latency modulation. hdzero is not even remotely close in resolution and penetration to get me to even try it, ive seen videos of people flying in cities and its got tons of break up in every video

@@dominicklittle9828 exactly, I don't have a ton of wide open space to fly and honestly don't feel like risking a go pro every time if fly just in case there is a freak chance of failsafe somewhere that I won't be able to recover my quad so the DVR from the DJI system makes not flying with a GoPro fully a viable option, if they still made the session 5 I would maybe consider it but again, why? The resolution just isn't there and the analog style signal with static interference and whatnot just doesn't do it for me. Glad I'm not the only one who feels like that. Tell you what though, if DJI wanted to make a ton more money they would sell an OLED upgrade to their goggles. Even though they usually are not as bright the higher contrast ratio etc would sell like crazy

I am always blown away by the penetration the DJI digital FPV system has! CraZy go0d! That's the biggest reason why I think HDZero is still light years away from the the image quality DJI gives us.

@@KOrnhOliO1 👍

What settings on your goggles to get great penetration. I seem to get stutters here and there currently running 50mbs and high qual.

@@James-rc4xz run low latency mode and high VTX power.

@@James-rc4xz I'm at 50mbs, focus mode on (most of the time), low latency mode. I stay away from high quality mode because it adds quite a bit of latency because it's transmitting so much more data. This is probably the cause of your stutters. Also, I've always had good luck with the stock antenna, but currently use some otg pagoda stubbies that help with penetration as well.

I completely agree with you , LQ on a specific AUX is enough for me but more than that implementing rx loss and other critical warning are the base for a correct and complete flight experience and now BF devs cannot get away with it , DJI systems are growing day by day …hope for devs re-thinking

@@Simofly just use ANY BF fork and they've implemented Warnings as Craftname. It's only BF that believe themselves at a higher moral level.

This is a very nice and very easy way to get the same goal accomplished. I don't believe that bf devs should have to take their time to implement and maintain this when it breaks in future releases. They didn't fold and cave in for HDZero/sharkbyte users, so I don't think that they should for dji users. Look at the DJI platforms. Almost all of them, people use some kind of hackey work around to get what they need out of the system. If you buy into dji you should realize that you are buying into a technology that has been abandoned by the manufacturer. And be ready to do stuff like this to get what you want out of the system. 🤷‍♂️

@@JoeMommaFPV they don't have to take time to implement or maintain. The code is already committed, just refused. Works in ALL other BF/CF forks and have never broken. Just like analog osd doesn't break. This is a moral high ground war where BF believe punishing the users of dji fpv somehow makes them better people. This is a perfect example of how theoretical principles that doesn't matter can lessen the product. Nobody wins in this scenario. This is not what this hobby or even open source is about. This costs BF literally nothing yet all dji fpv users have to compile their own version to get warnings. The osd code is already messy with warning logic mixed in with the osd logic. Analog osd doesn't use canvas mode either. The implementation I've been using and the one I made myself that was away less pretty is not even 10 lines of code.

@@KnizzleHizzle well I don't agree with you there. They made a statement. Canvas mode was implemented and made by them to work for this exact reason. And I'll say again. They didn't cave for HDZero and their users. They won't cave for dji and their users either. All these people up in arms about bf devs not implementing this, if all the same kept sending emails to dji and caddx support over the 3 years the system has been out and the requests have been ignored, maybe they would listen. Seems that you guys have a lot of entitlement and high expectations from open source developers. Do you pay them anything? Do you support betaflight or its developers in any way? I gaurantee you that if all the DJI users that wanted this signed up for betaflight patreon and were asking them in their patreon group after hundreds or thousands sign up they would listen and then REALLY they would be dicks for ignoring their supporters. But you guys are out here asking for something that they said they would not do all while offering nothing in return but just constantly complaining. Go complain to the source. Caddx and dji. The ones who DID get your money. Bf developers get non of your money. I have been a patreon of theirs for years now. How about gather all your dji users and massively sign up for their patreon and I am willing to bet they would listen and do what you ask. Put your money where your mouth is and stop crying and complaining about something they already fixed (canvas mode) because they won't implement a hackey work around. Put up your money and ask them then. You buy a betaflight fc that doesn't support the devs at all. So drop the entitlement and use the means that are available. Like this video here. Seems like an easy enough fix.

Yes exactly, we have to rely on Howels or some other dev to fork it, or we have to figure out ourselves how to do it!

Does this not work with 4.3?

Yes this way is better.

I'm wondering why this is better? Giving up an unused aux channel seems much easier and stable, Joshua could you extrapolate on why it's better?

@@georgefuchs3223 In what way would it be more stable? It's just a patch that changes a couple strings. Easier, barely. More accurate than the base workaround anyways.

There's something about running g 8 channel instead of 12 that helps with latency crossfire anyways so it just goes back to potentially having to run 12 channels

This way is better because it reports rfmode which the aux channel method doesn't give you. Also, knowing both RSSI dBm and LQ can be helpful in detecting damaged receiver antenna and other such problems.

DJI is not gonna add a whole new complex functionality after the product release if it doesn't drive major sales. Caddx just said they'd talk to DJI, not to implement it. Maaaaaybe Goggles V3 but I doubt it even then. DJI just doesn't work that way. On the other hand, non-mainstream patches like this are gonna be really annoying. If the patch had a solid toggle to this workaround and didn't stomp on the original craft name, it would be okay to make it mainstream.

@@ed_halley so sad, that dji does not add new features. I guess I would cost them barely nothing. Maybe 10-20 h... You could call this zero support.

​@@sebastiannobody1142 they couldn't even add so you can change between 50 mbit and 25 mbit mode without having to be connected to a video transmitter. your over estimating their programmers :(

@@ed_halley there's a toggle in all the other firmwares, only BF is holding back.

@@KnizzleHizzle its a shitty patch.. and has no place in the main BF repo.. if ya'll hassled caddex to add canvas mode then they should listen because with out FPV they go broke.. its an easy fix the issue is DJi doest give a fuck about FPV or you

SAME NO MATTER WHAT i TRY.. DID YOU GIVE UP?

@@NGAGEFPV got it working great.

@@craigdavidson52 What’s the magic beans dude? I tried this so many times?!

@@NGAGEFPV for me the problem was me 🤣 I downloaded AKK VTX fix instead of the warning and LQ which is about 3rd down the page.

@@craigdavidson52 ahhh damn it. I scrolled back to this very version and just about every one since. Can’t get the damn thing to work. Hahah glad your sorted man! 👌🏼

you can heve constant 50mbps and crsf caput anyways. if you are in a very noise envoiremetn for 900htz and loose crsf signal way before dji 5.8gh

Warnings still work fine. You will need to turn off many of the warnings you don't care about or don't use, because they can potentially display over the new LQ readout. But, others you want will still display, but could cover up LQ while they are displaying.

Im with you, to much to look at in OSD (to be fair i think JB as said this in the past) if you have DJI goggles you not going to have a £40 radio, so just get the radio to tell you ,your not going to miss it then.

That’s absolutely right, I haven’t thought about it , I need to implement it on my tango2

@@dalemurray6834 indeed, osd's are nice to have for long range pilots, or info or warnings that can last seconds...but for freestyle,more than often you are to late if your LQ drops way to low, the moment you dive or do a trick you don't look @ your osd... but if the lady in your transmitter says 55% LQ that's instantly you make the correction.... sinds i use this trick, i had never a failsave. and gives you a smile on your face if you hear 85LQ .....83LQ so you have te time to instantly recover without oeps i didn,'t 'see' it coming.

I would actually prefer it set up this way also, do you have link or know how where i can read to set it up on my taranis instead?

@@serenityfpv tommorow i will make a video about it

i just did it with ghost i didn't have to do that no rebind necessary, did you select all the osd elements JB said, if i missed one it would show static OSD, 100-98 (and working) is the only OSD element i see.