Oh dear god... get back to the cyclops!

are you sure whatever you're doing is worth it

HELL YEAH, I was waiting for a comment like this........ entering ecological dead zone..........

And people say mermaids aren't real. How would we know if they're not real if we haven't even discovered 80% of our ocean?! Mfs wanna go to space and shit looking for aliens and tryna live on other planets. We barely discover and take care of our own planet!

@@tasmeenbaker9912 Mermaids aren't real

we know more about space than our own planet, sad

​@@tasmeenbaker9912I can tell you we've explored most of the ocean when they say 80% they mean humans themselves exploring the ocean not a camera attached to a drone that can survive low depths it's expensive and marine biologists don't do it because they know nothing can live at the bottom of the ocean besides some molecules or plankton other than that its just rocks and its a waste of money just to find more rocks that's what happened when people were trying to find nessie they found rocks and it was a waste of money

And from what little of the ocean we have explored, we’ve already found cool stuff like pits of death saltier than X users and lakes of liquid carbon dioxide. It’s almost as if it’s easier to dream about other planets that may have life than it is to deal with what we’re doing to *this* planet with life

Sounds like a Women's March. Planet Rosie.

Oh they know more than they are telling, you can bet that !

I didn’t know what I knew I didn’t know

We know that we don’t know that much of what we already knew about the unknown

Ditto!

I know what you mean about exponentially knowing less about our perception of reality as a function of more discoveries throughout the universe. I just wish there was a way to prove the moon’s made out of cheese

Thank you so much! Can't believe it's been 60 weeks of this series ✨

@@TheSecretsoftheUniverse Way to go !! ❤️✨🤞

​@@TheSecretsoftheUniverse Enjoy the weekly videos. Keep up the great work. 👍

Correct, pure fiction here.

Just use the Hydrogen and Oxygen combiner 3,000 to make some more!

That's where all our water goes

😂

Poor planet, that's the longest leak I ever took!!!

🤣🤣🤣🤣

What narration? I heard nothing.

I re-loaded it. The audio was there the second time.

Say that again 😮

Liberals do the opposite to me

You may be thinking of toi 1452b. This one - toi 733b- is a very new discovery.

Finding Exo-planets that have Liquid Water in it, and continents are Very Rare.

Finding stars similar to our own are rare to

Thinking about moving to Mons, how is it?

Idk, our solar system’s axis has a 60-degree inclination to the plane of the galaxy

Who knows but it’s quite fascinating to imagine what the animals look like

Kevin Costner would disagree.

. not to mention bikinis all day !

Have you heard ab Mexico city? It's built over a lake, it's been there for thousands of years, but it has been sinking for the past hundreds of years, in the future the mechanisms it has to help won't be able to do the job anymore and it will disappear. Maybe it's not such a good idea to build cities over bodies of water

​​@@tokka7954 Floating cities, not pouring land over the water and then build...

I mean we can't even get a base on our closest moon. Building something on a planet entirely of water is beyond a challenge.

Some parts of the galaxy smells like rum, Captain Morgan must have passed by~🥃👍

I'm gonna stab a reaper to death.

I totally agree, pure fiction. Creative writing 101.

A lot of clickbait. Every single new plant that's discovered it's used as clickbait by selling it as having water, life, Earth 2.0, etc. The greatest thing about JWST is that it's starting to systematically shut down this wild speculation for clickbait. The other day, a planet NASA describes as Neptune 2.0, is described as Earth 2.0 by these clickbait channels.

Yeah I read the title and expected to watch a video confirming we found an exoplanet covered in water............boy was I wrong ;(

😆😆😆🤪

Just say you don't understand Astronomy you weirdo

The planets aren't always in the same line. One is at 3 o'clock, one is at 6 o'clock. They have a tug on their star so we can predict individual orbits using gravitational lensing, etc.

Did you see water world with Kevin Costner

@@alexpowers5117 yes and I remember that there was still land above sea level.

@@palantir135 yeah on Mount Everest

@@alexpowers5117 it still counts 😋

I think they mean it used to be a Neptune like planet that spiraled in close to the star, and then had most of its lighter gasses striped away by solar winds. (hydrogen and Helium). It is slightly possible that this might be how Earth formed. So if this planet really was neptune-like initially, and the very thick Helium and Hydrogen atmosphere got stripped, then that would leave a liquid Ocean of Water, Ammonia and Methane exposed to the surface. With the pressure from the previous atmosphere gone, those would begin to boil off one by one...but not at the same time. Methane would boil first (at earth pressure, it boils off at -160 degrees Celsius) Next Ammonia (-33 at 1bar) Then water at 100°C at 1bar. Of course pressures would probably be much higher than earth as stuff is boiling off, which would raise boiling points. Btw, if you took water to Mars in its liquid form, it would begin to boil regardless of temperature (due to the lack of atmospheric pressure on mars, water physically can't exist in liquid phase there...only ice or gas, it skips liquid stage on mars). If you did that, some of your water would evaporate, and the rest would freeze from becoming cold as the water evaporates (boils). So the same effect would keep this planet's ocean cool for some time. As each of these substances boils off due to the reduced pressure, they'd cool the liquid (reducing evaporation). Plus it would increase the atmospheric pressure, reducing evaporation. Creating a balancing effect to prevent runaway greenhouse effect...for a time. The ammonia, which is NH3, would split when hit by solar radiation. The hydrogen being more likely to be blown away, and the Nitrogen more likely to remain and build up in the atmosphere (just like what we have on earth). Water from the start of the planets existence, in the habitable zone, is actually not a good sign for finding life. Because when water is splits, that produces oxygen. Which is extremely corrosive and would destroy life in the crib. On earth, life had 2 billion years to evolve without oxygen. Then when Cyanobacteria evolved and started pumping Oxygen into our world, it caused a mass extinction. But our life had 2 million years to evolve ways to protect DNA from things that wants to react with that molecule. Oxygen, is the ultimate DNA attacker and we survived it due to having time to prepare for defence against it. But life starting from scratch in an Oxygen rich environment is very unlikely. Plus oxygen reacts with many of the ingredients for starting life, rendering them inert. An entire planet can be rendered inert by oxygen (like ours is now...but at least in our case it happened long after life already started the engine). But in the case of this planet, the Methane and Amonnia boiling off first, would delay the oxygen build up from water vapor splitting into hydrogen and Oxygen.

Oh no...

@@LOOTLLAMA7708 MARBLEMELLONS!!!

Probably

Those stars don't work for the transit method. Only 1 in 200 star systems are aligned in a plane that allows the planets to transit in front of the star, from Earth's point of view.

Detecting multiple leviathan class lifeforms in the region. Are you certain whatever you're doing is worth it?

It could even be a Moon as well that contain water and not just a Planet. Likely far more Moons in the entire universe than just planets as well. However, like you I have an absolute belief that many many planets exist that are full of water.

​@@ardentdfender4116 I agree, could be a moon too. And maybe, just maybe, there is life, but it doesn't exist in the form we are looking for.

There most likely will be other waterworlds out there but the water could always contain harmful chemicals