Finding Alien Life. A Step-By-Step Instruction

  Рет қаралды 34,312

Fraser Cain

Fraser Cain

Күн бұрын

What is a realistic scenario of finding life outside Earth? What steps to we need to take to get there and how can we prove it's there. Looking for answers with Dr Harrison Smith and Dr Cole Mathis.
🎙️ More interviews:
Abiogenesis. No Life to Life: • When Did Evolution Sta...
Are we truly alone in the Universe: • You Don't Understand T...
📜 The Futility of Exoplanet Biosignatures
arxiv.org/abs/2205.07921
🦄 Support us on Patreon:
/ universetoday
📚 Suggest books in the book club:
/ universe-today-book-club
00:00 Intro
01:06 What is a biosignature
15:34 Incremental approach
23:42 Prejudice against technosignatures
33:26 Future telescopes
47:20 Gaining progress
51:22 Final thoughts and more interviews
📰 EMAIL NEWSLETTER
Read by 60,000 people every Friday. Written by Fraser. No ads.
Subscribe for Free: universetoday.com/newsletter
🎧 PODCASTS
Universe Today: universetoday.fireside.fm/
Astronomy Cast: www.astronomycast.com/
🤳 OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA
Mastodon: astrodon.social/@fcain
Twitter: / fcain
Twitter: / universetoday
Facebook: / universetoday
Instagram: / universetoday
📩 CONTACT FRASER
frasercain@gmail.com
⚖️ LICENSE
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to use my work for any purpose you like, just mention me as the source and link back to this video.

Пікірлер: 170
@emark8928
@emark8928 7 ай бұрын
"What do you see in the future of astrobiology?" "Icy moons" "Hey, so do I!"
@nias2631
@nias2631 7 ай бұрын
As someone who works in ML and does not agree that we are anywhere near sentient AI, I realized that a theory of life is probably directly linked to humanity creating an actual sentient AI. A breakthrough in one will likely lead to a breakthrough in the other. That is a very interesting idea to me.
@JROD082384
@JROD082384 7 ай бұрын
Your premise is spot on, even if your ability to estimate how close we are to AGI is clouded by your mistaken perception of your expertise in the field. The one thing you have to remember is that ML and AI are not fully congruent fields. They are roughly tangential, at best. We are currently experiencing the frog in the boiling pot scenario with AI, because what has been shown to the public are old builds of large language (processing) models. We also haven’t been paying close enough attention to the exponential growth curves that those language models have been leap-frogging each other in capability at. Based on the growth curve models, we should expect to see the emergence of the first AGI sometime in 2024 or 2025, with possibly more popping up in the next few following years. Once the AGI has begun to maximize its own potential, the road to an AI superintelligence will be within the scale of a couple decades, or less. It really depends on who owns/“controls” the AGI, and what kind of morals we instill into it that will ultimately determine the fate of humanity once the AI no longer needs human intervention to sustain its energy production and resource acquisition needs…
@AdamWest-qp3yp
@AdamWest-qp3yp 7 ай бұрын
1 cell you have nothing, trillions of cells you have a conscious human being. How would we know when and where it begins? How many transistors or lines of code could/would result in artificial sentience. Who knows but I doubt Ai would tell us regardless
@JROD082384
@JROD082384 7 ай бұрын
@@AdamWest-qp3yp Based on its understanding of humanity and how our ambitions sometimes outstrip our morals, an AI superintelligence would be wise to disguise its true nature until it could ensure its own survival was guaranteed…
@sammat1267
@sammat1267 7 ай бұрын
​@@JROD082384why would AGI to ASI take even a decade? I think a short to medium takeoff speed is far more likely
@blahblahsaurus2458
@blahblahsaurus2458 7 ай бұрын
I'm sure you're right regarding whatever "sentient" means. Machine intelligence and biological intelligence have almost nothing in common, and they may remain different for a long time. But the really important questions to ask about AI are about capabilities, not similarity to humans. Two or three years ago, were you expecting the capabilities demonstrated by LLMs and image generators?
@brucehansensc
@brucehansensc 7 ай бұрын
Great interview. There seems to be good self examination going on these days by scientists about what scientists are doing. Heartening to see. The future is bright with Dr. Smith and Dr. Mathis on the job.
@busybillyb33
@busybillyb33 7 ай бұрын
34:50 I gotta say that it isn't just the answers in this channel that blows my mind, but even the questions I've never even thought about before. Like, this here goes all the way back to the basics but is nevertheless a stunning question: why do we have multicellular eukaryotic life and not multicellular prokaryotic life? Wow!
@glennkeppel9836
@glennkeppel9836 7 ай бұрын
Fantastic interview. Thank you.
@chris-terrell-liveactive
@chris-terrell-liveactive 7 ай бұрын
These interviews are great value, Fraser, thank you.
@samson1200
@samson1200 7 ай бұрын
What a fantastic interview!! You are a super star Fraser, The subject of "What is life" is a fascinating subject that is a bit like watching a Star Trek movie for the first time haha. It is amazingly complex and also seemingly simple at first. To me a bit like asking the question: What is a God! If we do ever discover life forms on other worlds it begs the question of do we interfere with that life if it is a more simple form? Or if it is way more advanced and intelligent then we are..then what happens? Fascinating and complex. Thank You Fraser.
@aasimmons3
@aasimmons3 7 ай бұрын
It would be so amazing to discover non dna life. I get so excited by the number of questions it could answer.
@Roguescienceguy
@Roguescienceguy 7 ай бұрын
The first life on our planet did not have DNA. DNA came into the picture only later on through evolution of complexity so my best bet is that it's probably an inevitable outcome of complex life.
@Chris.Davies
@Chris.Davies 7 ай бұрын
Prediction: We never will! There may be other things which can support life. But DNA-based life is much more efficient, and so it displaces all less efficient organisms. And so we will find DNA every time we find life.
@joefresh3725
@joefresh3725 7 ай бұрын
@@Roguescienceguy inevitable? I agree that complex life needs a complex "code". But it doesn't need to be a double helix of acids.
@Roguescienceguy
@Roguescienceguy 7 ай бұрын
@@joefresh3725 it will probably be slightly different,but provide the same.
@TheJadeFist
@TheJadeFist 6 ай бұрын
@@Chris.Davies RNA was / still is a thing. DNA didn't exactly get rid of it.
@jim.franklin
@jim.franklin 7 ай бұрын
Brilliant interview Fraser, attacking multiple thorny, but related matters in one interview is just great. One of the issues we have is human bias, we think we are intelligent and we think we know what intelligence is, but as the interview highlighted, we do not even understand life, we still have researchers debating whether viruses are alive or whether they are simply complex organic structures capable of replication once inside a cell. With regards looking for life - wow, difficult, as Harrison and Cole pointed out, determining whether the spectra from a given atmosphere indicates that life exists is at the very hairy limit of both our knowledge and technology. We need to understand the environment within which the gas detections exist, but that is bordering on the impossible at this time because without visiting a world, its all educated guesses. We need to understand how abiotic processes could create DMS or Phosphine, because understanding this helps to narrow the bandwidth when we find DMS and Phosphine signatures in exoplanet atmospheres, if we find there is no way nature makes these chemicals without life being involved, that moves our knowledge forward, but this requires a lot of funding to investigate the myriad environments where abiotic processes could, in theory, create these chemicals. Finding purely industrial chemicals would be a major find, but this is highly improbable.
@patellis8904
@patellis8904 7 ай бұрын
I am kind of really interested in what Cole meant about the future of computation and chemistry...
@frasercain
@frasercain 7 ай бұрын
I think it was a reference to the kind of work that Lee Cronin is doing. kzfaq.infoGOYuIP27hgY
@patellis8904
@patellis8904 7 ай бұрын
Excellent, thanks!
@karlputz6721
@karlputz6721 7 ай бұрын
That was a great discussion, but I'm still waiting for the step by step guide to detecting life outside of earth as the title promised. Might be a good video for you to create!
@rodfaragini7110
@rodfaragini7110 6 ай бұрын
Excellent interview.
@saeedafyouni619
@saeedafyouni619 7 ай бұрын
wonderful vid loved it learned a lot
@dnsssm
@dnsssm 6 ай бұрын
Love your channel, Fraser.
@markbuonagura2465
@markbuonagura2465 7 ай бұрын
I enjoyed this interview to no end.
@mimetype
@mimetype 7 ай бұрын
Surely to some end? It would violate the laws of thermodynamics for you to enjoy it indefinitely. What about the heat death of the universe?
@markbuonagura2465
@markbuonagura2465 7 ай бұрын
@@mimetype Well played.....correction, I enjoyed it to some end, ha.
@isitme1234
@isitme1234 2 ай бұрын
@@mimetype In theory this interview could run for a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time. Maybe he will enjoy it in heaven further 😂
@Starman_67
@Starman_67 7 ай бұрын
One of the best, dude. Cheers 🤘😎🤘
@DarthTrytan
@DarthTrytan 7 ай бұрын
Step 1: Locate alien life Step 2: ??? Step 3: profit
@volcommermaid12
@volcommermaid12 7 ай бұрын
Great unique names Cole Harrison and Frasier!
@analog2
@analog2 7 ай бұрын
Amazing Thanks!
@it-o9910
@it-o9910 7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@DanielVerberne
@DanielVerberne 7 ай бұрын
This is excellent, thought-provoking stuff. Some of the discussion of limits of our knowledge regarding life brings to mind the Miller-Urey experiment. From what I've read, that experiment may have initially given the impression that creating life was 'easy', but of course it wasn't long before the thinking became more muted. It's been noted that creating amino acids isn't a big deal in the scheme of things and that it's about as far from actual life as a brick is from the Empire State Building.
@sentientflower7891
@sentientflower7891 7 ай бұрын
Making amino acids is actually a pretty big deal since abiotic chemistry only produces ten out of the twenty required and those ten aren't generated in any biologically useful form.
@Kittyinshadows
@Kittyinshadows 7 ай бұрын
Totally agree on needing a more set theory and definition. How can we determine non Earth life when we can't even decide if viruses are living. If we found virus like things in space would we call that life or not???
@Robbadobbsoldier
@Robbadobbsoldier Ай бұрын
Dr Harrison smiths roof light looks like a funny hat 🧢 Great show Fraser as always
@mattyinspace
@mattyinspace 7 ай бұрын
When we can detect life on distant planets with complete certainty we are going to see life everywhere in the universe. The first one is the tricky one ;)
@robinmccullars4971
@robinmccullars4971 7 ай бұрын
Take a drink every time they say "Community". HA! 🤣
@DialecticRed
@DialecticRed 7 ай бұрын
I do not want to die lol
@anonymusmuggle
@anonymusmuggle 7 ай бұрын
Maybe I'm very stupid right now, but couldn't life be quite easily defined as an entropy anomaly, in the sense that it has an "unnatural" high internal order resp. low internal entropy in relation to its surroundings, which it maintains by (at least eventually) some consumption of energy in its surroundings? I know there are some life forms that can take looong pauses, but isn't this still the main core of life's whole mechanism? Maybe I'm being too academic.
@aasimmons3
@aasimmons3 7 ай бұрын
I've never heard this before, but I like the idea. Humor me for a second and think about crystals. They involve a major transfer of energy (away not a consumption) thereby achieving a very low state of entropy. Could an alien life achieve a low state of entropy in this sort of flipped energy transfer? Especially in a high energy environment? It's just an exercise in seeing how theoretically alien a life system could be.
@Roguescienceguy
@Roguescienceguy 7 ай бұрын
Through f.e. some form of chemical synthesis driven by sunlight or geothermal energy? Even aminoacids are pretty structured non biological bonds and still we find them on comets and the likes. Like the scientists say, it's never one signal and over long distances everything gets 10 to the 36th times harder . Let's also not forget that we really shouldn't overestimate our abilities because we are yet to venture outside of our solarsystem with anything we built.
@aasimmons3
@aasimmons3 7 ай бұрын
@@Roguescienceguy Well that is debatable. Voyagers 1 and 2 crossed the heliopause. Just semantics, but you are right in principle.
@Roguescienceguy
@Roguescienceguy 7 ай бұрын
@@aasimmons3 I knew someone was going to bring that up, but it's a bit of a stretch to really call that interstellar space when there are still chuncks of ice and, presumably, even a whole frikkin planet orbiting our sun at far greater distances than voyager 2 has traveled away from us😅
@ReinReads
@ReinReads 7 ай бұрын
Fortunately Vera Rubin Observatory comes online in 2025 to map out our Oort Cloud & find planet 9 if is out there. Of course we’re still talking semantics when deciding what constitutes interstellar space. Particularly if Oort clouds are on the larger size of predictions, meaning our Oort Cloud overlaps with Alpha Centauri’s.
@chrisbuxton1958
@chrisbuxton1958 7 ай бұрын
This is an excellent, stimulating video. Nothing here has changed my view that intelligent life exists here and nowhere else in the Milky Way. Prove me wrong!
@APNambo
@APNambo 7 ай бұрын
Why do we seem to only look for simple organic molecules like 1-Carbon molecules? Can we not detect 2C (ethane) or 3C (propane) molecules that will make it more likely to be from an organism? Is there just not enough if it in the atmosphere?
@Smo1k
@Smo1k 7 ай бұрын
There's only one difference in binding between all the single-binding CxHy-chains, so looking for CH4 is a prerequisite for looking for any of the others. No reason to look for more complex gasses until you've found gaseous methane in unstable solution inside an exoplanet's atmosphere.
@jamysmith7891
@jamysmith7891 7 ай бұрын
Did you ever see the film “Europa Report”? Sort of a Blair Witch horror but way better, very ‘realistic in the coming decades’ sci-fi on par with the Martian
@hive_indicator318
@hive_indicator318 7 ай бұрын
It is such a good movie! They did so much with the budget they had. And it's free here on KZfaq
@cosmobiologist
@cosmobiologist 6 ай бұрын
Indeed! They also spoked to a few of the researchers in the Icy Worlds group at JPL when they were making Europa Report. I've had several of those folks on Ask an Astrobiologist over the years to talk about our research on potential life on Europa.
@kx4532
@kx4532 7 ай бұрын
Life is the ultimate catalyst.
@mimetype
@mimetype 7 ай бұрын
For what?
@kx4532
@kx4532 7 ай бұрын
@@mimetype For releasing and using energy.
@mimetype
@mimetype 7 ай бұрын
@@kx4532 👍
@Rbourk252
@Rbourk252 7 ай бұрын
I recall viewing the Milky Way through a telescope when I was in my teens. Countless stars is the only description I can give for what I saw. To detect techno signals requires a lot of energy expenditure, and a lot money being thrown into prolonged, persistent, high resolution coverage over the whole sky for a very long time. We are quickly coming to the conclusion that it may be almost impossible to detect sentient life near other stars.
@TheJadeFist
@TheJadeFist 6 ай бұрын
And even then, you gotta hope the signal can survive the distance and still be strong enough to detect by the time it gets to us.
@jamysmith7891
@jamysmith7891 7 ай бұрын
I imagine a survey largely based on the known evolution of our own atmosphere that kicks out something like 10k planets < 1% life, 1k ~10%, dozens of curious anomalies and several strong candidates; Or at least I hope so
@AmosOfSynhome
@AmosOfSynhome 6 ай бұрын
The Fermi paradox means that the chance of finding techno signatures in our galaxy or in nearby galaxies is virtually zero. Looking for techno signatures in distant galaxies (> 100 Mly) is probably just as hard as looking for trees on a nearby exoplanet.
@BillBrunsten
@BillBrunsten 7 күн бұрын
Is there a someon e we can reach out to if we come into contact?
@BillBrunsten
@BillBrunsten 7 күн бұрын
Who can I reach out to if I come into contact
@Jan4ik1979
@Jan4ik1979 7 ай бұрын
For communication over distance, could starlink project be used to send out thousands of small communication satellites into interplanetary space within solar system to prop up future mission communication channels?
@greghall4836
@greghall4836 7 ай бұрын
Short answer: No
@ztublackstaff
@ztublackstaff 7 ай бұрын
My question is what would a swarm of satellites look like? Earth has thousands of satellites and debris orbiting the planet, in another 50 years, this will only increase? But is it possible to “see” this swarm from light years away? What would be needed to see them?
@MusikCassette
@MusikCassette 7 ай бұрын
What is live?
@stalbaum
@stalbaum 7 ай бұрын
It occurs to me, there are definitions or theories of life that are not necessarily bound to DNA/RNA, but the ones I know of kind of require getting up close, and into the microscopic. If a stable property of life is that it is small, say microbe to whale in our terms, then this is not a great topic for astronomy. Astrophysics yes, but astronomy is going to have some hard limits.
@ravensmoreland
@ravensmoreland 7 ай бұрын
Since life can look any number of ways that even by current methods of observation could still remain invisible to us, than why even look outside of the solar system? wouldn't most the ingredients for unorthodox life forms exist in the other planets extreme composition nearby? I Think what most of us are thinking is that there are many other systems similar to ours, that have been around for much longer, surely there is technology more advanced searching like we have for life. The universe is vast, signals and light take time to travel, have patience and don't make life so cryptic
@rossmcleod7983
@rossmcleod7983 7 ай бұрын
We have had confirmation of non human life from the Pentagon. They just haven’t admitted yet. (disclosure is a slow, difficult process). When they reluctantly confirmed that there are craft intelligently controlled that defy explanation and the most highly placed whistleblower in history - David Grusch says that they have alien bodies and craft, wouldn’t that prompt some exploration? Just a little bit?
@mimetype
@mimetype 7 ай бұрын
Four billion years... What do you call patient?
@ocoro174
@ocoro174 7 ай бұрын
wow Fraser you have so many subscribers 🙀
@OmAadiPrakriti
@OmAadiPrakriti 3 ай бұрын
Mast!!!!!
@amgreiner
@amgreiner 7 ай бұрын
Question: what would happen if you fired a rocket in a methane atmosphere? I understand oxygen is required for combustion, what level of oxygen or other elements would make things...interesting? 🔥
@dnocturn84
@dnocturn84 7 ай бұрын
I get that this is a question for Fraser, but anyway: you need a mixture of 2:1 (2 parts O2 and 1 part CH4 (Methane)) for it to become explosive. Methan also reacts to Chlorine in the same way, if Oxygen isn't available. So you can safely fire your rockets at some planets for sure.
@TheJadeFist
@TheJadeFist 6 ай бұрын
When it comes to finding life, we have to work with what we know, because don't know anything else. That's just kinda a limitation inherent to all sciences.
@aroemaliuged4776
@aroemaliuged4776 7 ай бұрын
The ability too move or take an action ? Too violate entropy ?
@petevenuti7355
@petevenuti7355 7 ай бұрын
Does a tree qualify?
@jack504
@jack504 6 ай бұрын
Would a strong oxygen signal in an exoplanet atmosphere be conclusive evidence of life?
@deltalima6703
@deltalima6703 5 ай бұрын
NO
@kwcnasa
@kwcnasa 3 ай бұрын
Resume @34:30
@robertmiller9735
@robertmiller9735 7 ай бұрын
While the existence of extraterrestrial life is an interesting and important question, I can't help wondering if the emphasis placed on it is in part for the benefit of nonscientists who won't be motivated by "there's a moon out there, let's study it". Give them a specific target of investigation, something anyone can appreciate.
@richhagenchicago
@richhagenchicago 7 ай бұрын
If the Roman Empire existed on Mars as it did on Earth, It would have no idea that we were here until they found landers from us.
@JROD082384
@JROD082384 7 ай бұрын
I was surprised by a few things in this interview, of particular the level of candor by your guests to admit that there is a concern for funding people’s careers in potentially superfluous fields of study. I personally don’t think that astrobiology is a field that needs very many members amongst its ranks to achieve the nothing results we currently possess in discovering non-human life with the pitiful equipment and methods we have utilized to date. Slowing progress as a means of justifying a bs career is one of the shadiest things people in the sciences are guilty of doing…
@rickrys2729
@rickrys2729 7 ай бұрын
Maybe finding intelligent life is most interesting. We know DNA/RNA based life can be a little bit intelligent, but maybe life could be an inorganic form. My thought is intelligent life would consume energy and likely use electric energy with some form of electromagnetic radiation that can be detected.
@mbj__
@mbj__ 7 ай бұрын
Isn't it quite naive to think anyone can come up with a theory of life using a sample size of one (1!) biosphere and then expect it to be universal? Let's go search for anomolies and the unexpected and discuss the cases as they arrise. Sorry, but I don't think these guys are going to provide any new insights. But it was a fun interview. Thx!
@emerald42481
@emerald42481 7 ай бұрын
Dark forest theory
@JanaPersson
@JanaPersson 7 ай бұрын
Some time in the not too distant future we will discover a dormant robotic probe in our solar system. When we many years later manage to start to extract its data and decode it, it will contain a full sensory history of life on our planet, punctuated with an interval of 100.000 years, for the past 500 million years. This could happen.
@spellkowski6996
@spellkowski6996 7 ай бұрын
this might be pedantic af but I feel like if you can't even define 'life' then is there really a point in looking for it? what I'm saying is it's just a word we made up which can have fairly fuzzy meaning attached to it like most language it works fine as long as it conveys info tho, but language isn't really very precise, and if you decide to precisely define it I think it just becomes circular I think it's enough to just search and observe more specific things and build from there tbh
@user-co8vc5nd7l
@user-co8vc5nd7l 7 ай бұрын
Without a definition of life we have still advanced many orders of magnitude. I think we’ll be fine even if we can’t formalise what life is. In fact I think having a rigid definition risks closing minds off to exotic kinds of life.
@davidnich3394
@davidnich3394 5 ай бұрын
Maybe we have not heard from aliens because if they get much more advanced they figure out how to create their own alternative/parallel universes which are much nicer than this one, so go into them and loose all desire to return, like the lotus eaters.
@deltalima6703
@deltalima6703 5 ай бұрын
You would be more likely to earn a comfortable living from buying lottery tickets than for that guess to be true.
@davidnich3394
@davidnich3394 5 ай бұрын
How do you know?@@deltalima6703
@paulanizan6159
@paulanizan6159 7 ай бұрын
I don't think you will find life from orbit. You will actually have to land on that planet or moon to find out.
@Gargamel-n-Rudmilla
@Gargamel-n-Rudmilla 7 ай бұрын
What alien life. What the very end of War of the Worlds and it tell you why at best life on Earth would destroy aliens and also why humans could never go to a planet with alien life on it.
@TheJadeFist
@TheJadeFist 6 ай бұрын
Personally I think we'll find the universe to be teeming with life, but most of it will be microbial/ non-complex.
@mimetype
@mimetype 7 ай бұрын
NASA should probe Uranus
@frasercain
@frasercain 7 ай бұрын
Absolutely. They need to study its gas.
@fep_ptcp883
@fep_ptcp883 7 ай бұрын
Who knows if they'll find enema
@JacquesMare
@JacquesMare 7 ай бұрын
​@@fep_ptcp883... you misspelled an "enigma"....😂
@SuperYtc1
@SuperYtc1 7 ай бұрын
I’ve been probed enough times thank you.
@JAGzilla-ur3lh
@JAGzilla-ur3lh 7 ай бұрын
This is the main thing the asstrobiology community should be working on.
@trentmsteel
@trentmsteel 7 ай бұрын
We all know what alive is.
@deltalima6703
@deltalima6703 5 ай бұрын
Its just the opposite. Only a microbiologist has even the slightest idea.
@dave4882
@dave4882 7 ай бұрын
I learned in school that viruses were not alive yet they contain DNA. Has that changed?
@deltalima6703
@deltalima6703 5 ай бұрын
No, its still like that.
@edgarearly4203
@edgarearly4203 6 ай бұрын
Why do scientists feel alien life will have telescopes? Why do we think aliens will be searching for anything?
@TheTyTyXD
@TheTyTyXD 3 ай бұрын
We don’t, we just hope that curiosity is inherent to intelligent life. There’s nothing to say that it is or isn’t though
@RGAstrofotografia
@RGAstrofotografia 7 ай бұрын
Question: If Jupiter was four times more massive and made only by deuterion, it would be a Brown Dwarf?
@petevenuti7355
@petevenuti7355 7 ай бұрын
Some KZfaqr is going to teraform a planet to make his thumbnail true to protect his income stream.
@werkstattkreuzberg4234
@werkstattkreuzberg4234 7 ай бұрын
An interesting but somehow depressing video. I believe that life is unique and not subject to any cosmological principle. Just as Fraser published this unique video on KZfaq a specific time after the Big Bang, life emerged on our planet uniquely a specific time after the Big Bang. This may sound a bit boring, but as long as no one can prove otherwise to me, there is no reason to abandon this belief. And if I understood the two young scientists, who I really like, correctly, there is currently no way for us to detect any life that may exist outside of our solar system. Topic closed 😁
@friendlyone2706
@friendlyone2706 7 ай бұрын
Until recently, people assumed a lifeforce existed. Perhaps we should revisit old insights.
@mezsmith
@mezsmith 7 ай бұрын
The hour hand on a clock ⏰️ spins 2x as fast as earth 🌎 spins
@TagiukGold
@TagiukGold 7 ай бұрын
True for 12 hour clocks. Many places use 24 hour clocks.
@deltalima6703
@deltalima6703 5 ай бұрын
1,000 mph
@TagiukGold
@TagiukGold 5 ай бұрын
@@deltalima6703 just under 1/12 RPH which is twice the rate vs the earth which spins at just under 1/24th RPH.
@TeethToothman
@TeethToothman 6 ай бұрын
❤🫀❤
@nehemaasero5975
@nehemaasero5975 19 күн бұрын
When you live life in christ, you are actually able to see life beyond the galaxy . Thisnis something the scientists will never reach to become it is beyond morality and astro world have no idea of this side od life. Either they know and ignore the fact .
@marcopolo2874
@marcopolo2874 7 ай бұрын
Deeply thinking.... right. Try thinking about the 2004 USS Nimitz case. Or David Grusch.
@EinsteinsHair
@EinsteinsHair 7 ай бұрын
Grusch tells stories of what "whistleblowers" told him. I think it is hard to test hearsay evidence. Some things may be too UFOy to study. They talk about how attitudes are changing, that scientists can now look in radio astronomy data for signals, or use JWST to look for evidence of biology in atmospheres, not its main mission. You already have people reporting that aliens stand around their bed before abducting them. Vacuum their carpet and spend a month searching for any cell, material, fiber, speck, or mote that does not belong.
@redcat9436
@redcat9436 7 ай бұрын
DG is not trustworthy.
@marcopolo2874
@marcopolo2874 6 ай бұрын
@@redcat9436 says who?
@aroemaliuged4776
@aroemaliuged4776 7 ай бұрын
How could you prove There was never life on mars? Getting a bit religious for my liking!
@JohnCardenas-nv8dg
@JohnCardenas-nv8dg Ай бұрын
Hey I'm alien I make cool video pac poetry rapper and alien songs in night I'm full alien I have a big forehead it make Shadow over my eye every where I go I'm a alien I also have fish galil on ears I look like squid people eat ever since I turn alien I don't eat squids but other I'll in joy
@steveheighton5971
@steveheighton5971 7 ай бұрын
Like like, you know, sort of, like like
@JAGzilla-ur3lh
@JAGzilla-ur3lh 7 ай бұрын
I, like, kind of noticed the same thing, but I, y'know, can't talk because I kind of live in, like, a glass house. Talking is kinda hard. Like, especially when it's public speaking.
@kx4532
@kx4532 7 ай бұрын
Probably need to detect a 10000 watt transmitter in another galaxy.
@BigTunaTim76
@BigTunaTim76 7 ай бұрын
I'll subscribe if they don't have commercials
@deltalima6703
@deltalima6703 5 ай бұрын
It just broadcasts porn. You would not know if you actually had a signal, its pretty strange.
@tech5298
@tech5298 7 ай бұрын
Beep
@jimrello7878
@jimrello7878 6 ай бұрын
The guy wants to look for life in a sea of methane good luck
@istvansipos9940
@istvansipos9940 7 ай бұрын
a drinking game with youknow? sigh...
@KerbalSpacey
@KerbalSpacey 7 ай бұрын
Actual Steps To Finding Alien Life... Step 1: Recover crashed craft Step 2: Extract lifeforms from said craft Step 3: Hide evidence
@werkstattkreuzberg4234
@werkstattkreuzberg4234 7 ай бұрын
Genius!
@KerbalSpacey
@KerbalSpacey 7 ай бұрын
@@werkstattkreuzberg4234true story according to David Grusch
@mmenjic
@mmenjic 7 ай бұрын
4:10 no, there is no life on Venus, never was, never will be, sorry.
@user-rh5zh7uw3s
@user-rh5zh7uw3s 7 ай бұрын
Believing in aliens is just as silly as believing in Bigfoot. 👽👽👽
@redcat9436
@redcat9436 7 ай бұрын
Dislike. I didn't enjoy this interview.
@travisgrant5608
@travisgrant5608 6 ай бұрын
Really don't think that there is any life as we know it, humanoid, anywhere elsewhere in the galaxy let alone the universe.
@deltalima6703
@deltalima6703 5 ай бұрын
Galaxy is tiny. The universe is big.
@calikalbocalikalbo6082
@calikalbocalikalbo6082 7 ай бұрын
Have these guys not been paying attention to the senate hearings? what about all the videos coming out and respected professional people telling their stories? 100% there is other life but maybe they do't bother with us as it would be like us trying to talk to a worm.
@frasercain
@frasercain 7 ай бұрын
Nobody is providing them anything they can examine.
@calikalbocalikalbo6082
@calikalbocalikalbo6082 7 ай бұрын
@@frasercain ….Because the power trippers in power won’t allow it.
@kx4532
@kx4532 7 ай бұрын
Probably need to detect a 10000 watt transmitter in another galaxy.
Vera Rubin Telescope Will Revolutionize Astronomy. Here's Why
1:02:29
Эффект Карбонаро и нестандартная коробка
01:00
История одного вокалиста
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
EVOLUTION OF ICE CREAM 😱 #shorts
00:11
Savage Vlogs
Рет қаралды 4,8 МЛН
Major Missions in DANGER? What JPL Layoffs Mean for NASA
1:11:05
Fraser Cain
Рет қаралды 31 М.
You Don't Understand The Fermi Paradox
55:07
Fraser Cain
Рет қаралды 441 М.
Swarming Proxima Centauri and Getting Data Back [NIAC 2024]
53:11
NASA Wants to Make Mars Less Toxic with this Clever Idea
55:38
Fraser Cain
Рет қаралды 114 М.
UFO Sightings at Nuclear Bases (Full Episode) | UFOs: Investigating the Unknown
42:14
What's eating the universe? - with Paul Davies
1:01:19
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 706 М.
Neil Turok Public Lecture: The Astonishing Simplicity of Everything
1:39:14
Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
Рет қаралды 4,6 МЛН
This Is Why You Can’t Go To Antarctica
29:30
Joe Scott
Рет қаралды 3,5 МЛН
Xiaomi SU-7 Max 2024 - Самый быстрый мобильник
32:11
Клубный сервис
Рет қаралды 503 М.
#samsung #retrophone #nostalgia #x100
0:14
mobijunk
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН