I love your vids!

Hi Nic!

It’s most likely programmed to play the evac message 3 times and then loop the code 3 signal afterwards. A lot of Simplex systems are like that as well.

I say to heck with that part of the code: if you ask me manual stations are still very important to have in fire detection & alarm systems, given automatic detection can't always be relied upon.

@@TheCarson116 I mean in new construction they are unnecessary and dangerous. In a school that’s fully sprinklered, has automatic smoke detection where applicable, and has at least one pull station at a main entrance near the office, and where there’s two way communication with the office in each room, what’s the point? Any danger would be automatically suppressed and in the highly unlikely event the automatic detection doesn’t sound the alarm instantly, just call the office and they will do it. I get the short delay, but in modern construction, the delay is perfectly safe.

@@dale4231 "Dangerous" my foot, I'd say it's *more* dangerous to not have a manual means to sound the alarm with than to not have such.

@@TheCarson116 as long as the building meets all of the previous codes, then even if there was a fire and no alarm system at all, no one would get hurt. Modern schools don’t burn down. Modern schools have shooters that use fire alarms to kill students. It’s pretty simple.

Wait till he finds out there’s only 11 smokes

It’s programmed to do 3 rounds of voice then loop code 3

@@FourtyFiftyEighty The same way most Simplex voice evac systems seem to be set up, instead of alternating between a tone & a message (the latter if you ask me should be the standard way it's done, since the occupants will be repeatedly reminded of the reason they're evacuating for).

Message says “there’s a report of an emergency” not a fire alarm so it’s fine

@@FourtyFiftyEighty Well alright. I guess it makes sense since temporal 3 is defined as an "evacuation signal", not specifically a "fire alarm signal" (even though the latter is usually what it's used for), & you'd most certainly want to evacuate a building if carbon monoxide was present in it.

It is in walk test most likely

@@hulktheman232 Yes it was, didn't you see the scene card?

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/atx7mriBrNTZZmg.html

Pretty cool system ngl

Why would he go to jail

@@nics-systems-electric for tampering with fire alarms

If you didn’t read the title, he is testing them, not tampering.

Silent knight

@@FourtyFiftyEighty what model?

@@hilo2-est3-elev I was going to say the IFP 2000ECS however it doesn’t appear to be that from what I can see in the video.