First HAND ON impressions of the new CANON RF 24-105mm F2.8

Рет қаралды 11,547

Күн бұрын

The Canon RF 24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z is an amazing lens because of the big aperture, L quality glass and the amazing focal length coverage.
In this video I will go over my first imporessions of the lens as well as compare it to ma RF 24-70mm F2.8 L IS USM. I will talk about the pros and cons of having one over the other.
00:00 Intro
01:01 Disclaimer
01:22 RF zoom lenses
02:18 Disadvantages of the 24-105 F2.8 Lens
03:10 General Specs
04:07 Min. Focusing Distance and Max. Magnification
05:05 Buttons and Rings
05:41 Diaphragm
05:56 Switches
06:26 Tripod mount
07:10 Conclusions
07:49 Will I switch?

Пікірлер: 29

@guitarintune408 7 ай бұрын

Thanks man!

@juljanskurani 7 ай бұрын

Happy to help!

@JaredHoyman 7 ай бұрын

Just like you I love my RF Zooms, but because you do product photography and require close up shots you should consider buying the 100 2.8 RF L for its macro ability.

@juljanskurani 7 ай бұрын

Thanks Jared! It‘s on the list ;)

@JustinEspejo 7 ай бұрын

Paradise on earth FORREAL! hahaha! you shoulda told me you were going too! we missed each other! I wanted to spend an entire day there hahaha

@juljanskurani 7 ай бұрын

I saw you were there on saturday but I only had time on sunday 🥲

@vladimirchaloupka2922 7 ай бұрын

Thanks for the video, appreciate it! If I may ask, on the new 24-105, is the zoom ring smoother than on the 24-70? Thanks!

@juljanskurani 7 ай бұрын

Glad you liked the video! Hmmm... unfortunately I didn't spend much time with the lens to explore it in detail, but if I remember correctly, I was also expecting the zoom ring to be smoother, but when I tried it I didn't notice any difference. In case it is smoother, than it's probably not by much.

@vladimirchaloupka2922 7 ай бұрын

thank you! @@juljanskurani

@juljanskurani 7 ай бұрын

@@vladimirchaloupka2922 you’re welcome! 😊

@emptyandseephotos7858 6 ай бұрын

Mny valuable info s like for heavy weight gimbal balance internal zoom

@ErisedMediaCo 6 ай бұрын

The 24-105 f/4 isn’t just a compromise on light. The 24-70 is MUCH sharper even wide open than the 24-105 f/4. So overall image quality will suffer.

@locsbcn 6 ай бұрын

I’m sorry but it’s not. It’s slightly sharper not “much”. I’ve got both.

@usahotnews2874 6 ай бұрын

good fast review

@juljanskurani 6 ай бұрын

Thank you!

@simongentry 4 ай бұрын

did they say anything about the dark edges?

@jessetimber1388 6 ай бұрын

but why not make it shorter like 70-200mm ?? or i will purchase this lens

@RCGJR_ 3 ай бұрын

Do you think the new version of the RF 70-200 f2.8 that has been rumoured and said to be internal zoom will be like this? But in white? 🤔

@juljanskurani 3 ай бұрын

It’s very likely in my opinion. It would make sense to be consistent in size and weight so that you can easily switch between them. The trinity lenses for photography are also similar in size especially when collapsed. But let’s see what they come up with :)

@jiasios 7 ай бұрын

You can simply remove the foot but not the collar from the lens

@juljanskurani 7 ай бұрын

Thank you for the info!

@toosas 6 ай бұрын

1.5kg perfect for a gimbal? uhhh

@juljanskurani 6 ай бұрын

Well if you asked me, nothing is perfect for a gimbal no matter the weight because I don’t like using them generally. But with this lens you don‘t have to rebalance the gimbal when you change focal lengths because it zooms internally. That part is what I called perfect for a gimbal.

@locsbcn 6 ай бұрын

Using it with a gimbal 🫤 I need to try… but seems difficult.

@f0t0b0y 6 ай бұрын

I’m getting tired of KZfaqrs talking about lenses being too expensive. Go look up the price of any cinema zoom lens that’s manual focus and tell me this is expensive. For my day-to-day run and gun cam operating work or editorial photo gigs, I can use one lens instead of carrying three.

@bullwaves6681 6 ай бұрын

That's a foolish comment.

@f0t0b0y 6 ай бұрын

@@bullwaves6681 I edited it. You're correct.