Let the lift be with you!

Bidcuitsalive, you is very clever

I agree. don't make too complicated, It's Pod racing!!!

And get sued by the Big Bad Mouse? I don't think so.

@@KCSamurai I can't wait to see these Pods racing.

AHAHAHAHAHAHA good catch how has no one liked this had me dying!!

and 18:22

LOOOOOOOOOOL

If Ryan Seacrest can do it to a real blind guy....

It's not manned. You would have to be crazy to sit in that thing.

@@Ripen3 Not had a manned flight yet but it is designed to be manned.

MuleDrone™ Contact your local Cartel from a burner phone for pricing.

@@lyteyearz5810 nice one!

make load ability to carry operator and distance is no longer a problem?? hang on, sounds like a helicopter to me? bugger there goes the fun with drones :(

@@williamhardes8081 finally someone replied to this comment. For the life of me I could not find it. KZfaq really sucks at relocating old comments you’ve made smh

as long as you have mobile data and a cell signal... you could also use pre-programmed GPS guided flight paths for dead zones... hypothetically, of course

yes

Liam MusicScale filler

Vousie V yeah they conveniently cut the bit where the guy got back out of the seat. But he def wasn’t in there when it flew because if he was they would’ve run over to ask him how it felt.

Thank you

A filipino made a manned drone already

Greg Seewald or mission impossible !!

Yeah I can see this in a bond movie, it's like a modern day version of Little Nellie ! I wonder what Bond would call it ? Little Willie ?

I was thinking the same thing! James bond always had up and coming or in the future Tech - on full display in the books and movies and I think even inspired things!

@@xavtek Tom Cruise just felt a tinglin in his thetans

Greg Seewald Yeah, that would be sooo cool

puts a human that doesn''t know how to pilot it at all. Duh

for travel purposes, not operation.... it's the only actual way we'll ever have "Flying Cars"

Also human: calls it droneuber and gets to various destinations that way, avoiding traffic

Now this is podracing

We should call it Podracing till they make it official.

Animaboo

came down to suggest podracing. It'ss workkkinng it's worrrrkkkkiiinng.

PODRACING sounds incredible

You really think we’re that far off?? 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fOCYhaiKtLGUn6M.html

It's amazing stuff. I wonder about the regulations and laws that will have to be put into place eventually. Imagine seeing 6 of these take off after a bank robbery. 🤣🤣

Id call it the flying kayak

@@newdohl how tf you gonna pull over someone in a drone who can land anywhere 💀

@@juanquireyes6703 Besides having something to interfere with the operation of the vehicle, you're not. Instead, you regulate it to a point where a civilian would have to have certain permits and licenses to operate it.

No it won't. If you have a malfunction on this you die. No matter what you die. On a helicopter you can land by auto rotation and have a chance of survival. With this one not.

@@peterzingler6221 depends, most quad racing is done at 8ft up or lower, if they make a crash cell for the pilot to withstand impacts it should be survivable should the unexpected happen. Also a ballistic chute is an obvious choice.

nighthawk0077 a ballistic chute wouldn’t help at low altitudes, which means even with a crash pot there would likely be stages of flight which you wouldn’t be able to survive a loss of power/control in, which given how unstable the design is means this could still be unsafe

Hydrogen fuel cell is ideal.

It's a re-hash of the E-Hang AAV design. With the right power source this could soon be the new Formula One.

First thing I thought!

Or Mission Impossible

Well... I can totally see this appearing in the obituaries section of the newspapers too...

bond, james bond.

Or the new fast and furious

Loses a blade jams on full auto with tracers

Yes and needs to b3 chasing a blue hedgehog

A minigun would push it backwards considerably

@@MrUnder30seconds I agree that would cause some issues, we need StyroPyro to build it a pulse laser.

@@zachcagley9519 beautiful

Name should be "DCL Viper (F1)"

Do you guys do interviews? I would like to have one of you as the next guest on my interview channel What I Want To Be. Thanks! The video is great!

MEDUSA!!!!! Because anyone seeing it will turn to stone in awe

It should be called the M2 BumbleBee

Clickbait. It’s not manned

FORESHADOWING?

For now, at least. Give it decade or so. Cars were lethal as hell when they first showed up.

It's the birth of something awesome. Give it time.

If it crashes hard enough it'll even bury itself.

Loz M that’s true, but it’s also true that cars still are lethal as hell. Irrelevant.

destiny reference

Sadly this video was posted a year ago, but I really do love destiny

Totally

Still need to bring it back

I prefer Leg Chomper.

And some dumbass got into a head on collision with the others killing at least 20 people

@@oaksynia7353 Not a problem. Put on the propellers the same kind of protective mesh that are on fans.

Cars will be no more. Which can be great.

That's how new York sounds

Christopher Smith people die everyday because of cars and you want people to have the responsibility of piloting a craft?? what the hell have you been smoking?? get a grip on reality mate

It's the people who are not scared that are moving the world forward. When the airplane was invented people thought it's probably more deadly then this. ;)

Drone implies that it is "dumb" not carrying a pilot. Usually this means piloted remotely, but computer advancements have introduced some AI piloted drones. UAV is the term for unmanned aerial vehicle, usually they are synonymous, but sometime differ as in this case.

😂😂

Renard The undead? That give me an idea for a name ... Zom bee

@@mysticdavestarotmachinesho5093 Thats a good one

jman_jd10 that’s already a thing

JT-Kawaii Matthew I mean like manned RC car races

@@jointaimbot55 Please tell me you're joking

The Mythbusters team from Discovery Channel were the first (Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman, Grant Imahara, Kari Byron, Tory Belleci) THAT WAS ABOUT 15 YEARS AGO... You are fast but 15 yeas late XD

Gabriel Bryson ? Joking about what

I hope this becomes the future of transportation. Has anyone ever played the Playstation exclusive called *_Wipeout?_* This drone looks like one of the ships in that game.

it becomes an aircraft.

think about the first automobile, your looking at the Model A for this vehicle, possible applications, well let yourself imagine !!!!

IBrainedMyDamage 😂

Savage AF!

omg hahaha

stevie wonder wasn't interested

Lol

highly underrated comment. Must like more

Wouldn't that be hold my stein?

GERMANY: HOLD MY GERMANY

*Hold my Bier

@@collonellbenered8088 *Halt mein Bier! ;)

Hab schon gedacht ich währe der einzige Deutsche hier

It’s a drone. It wouldn’t be called a drone if the controls were on the inside.

It's a test flight, they aren't idiotic enough to fly in it until it works as expected

Just sit inside with the remote control in your hands. Solved.

@@rambazamba9575 Damn I seriously didnt think about it lol. Now I am feeling dumb :D

Weighs less than built-in controls too, which is important to both flight and racing, so it was probably an easy decision for them

Stewie Pid They’re making a left turn!!

BelgianBush Rc They’re making another left turn

NASCAR? Redbull or Monster. They do this things better.

@@EddyKorgo That's why it was a parody. An attempt at dry humor. "left turn ..." Anyway, enjoy my channel!

No bad idea bad idea

A flying sleigh and a full blown racing drone are two different things. It's like a difference between a go-cart and a Formula 1 car.

​@@floatingchimney i understand as of now a person on the outside with a controller is piloting it, but if a person is inside driving then it is no longer a drone its an aerial vehicle. even if a person is inside just sitting there not controlling it, its still a manned vehicle placing it into another category other than drone. I dont thnk the purpose of this "drone" is to remain a drone but to place a pilot inside and fly. we are getting closer and closer to that concept of alien craft where they can hove in place and take off while having a higher maneuverability than a plane.

josh schreib Yeah except we already have them for some 60 years - they’re called “helicopters”.

@@floatingchimney No it's not the same thing. Similar yes , Same no.

Each prop is doing so many different variations of speed... This kind of flight engineering is in a category all of its own. We know what flies a helicopter with two blades, but the ability to to maneuver a craft like that, and in the stunts that they do...? This is amazing engineering... I believe, six legs, so that is 12 props all working in sequence to balance the craft in incredible increments of timing..

LoL

@Aaron Ennis nope, still wrong... watch the first 35 seconds of the video again... "manned racing drone"

Semantics are hardly relevant to such an incredible accomplishment.

This is true

Manned drone hmmm not a helicopter

No.

@@quattro4468 yes.

@@quattro4468 its going to happen in the future most probably due to the advance in technology.

@@quattro4468 people who rode horses thought the same thing about cars.

God i hope not, or at least hope people get less dumb...

Acc they start earlier

Thanks

Tq I hate much speaking

@@createrroyal986 Me too bro

We are not worthy

That's awesome. Your dad's a champ.

You should definitely do a vid,or a book about your brave father's escapade.

@@russianbot1420 . I wish Could get it translated to English. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ha-AgdOBqdnap58.html

@@aaronthoming8192 thanks. He pass away last month unfortunately

Wow fascinating.

Fully functional flying car?? Looks like a fully functional flying drone to me.. doesn't even have wheels you muppet.

Exactly.

Yes at what point is it no longer a drone. I thought drone meant unmanned aircraft/ vehicle.

Give the pilot a handgun, then we can call it a "Manned combat drone" 😕.........I'm sorry.

It's manned drone because it can revert back to being unmanned in a millisecond!

I strongly agree. To accurately define "drone"; A drone is an automaton or machine tasked with instructions that it completes on its own, whether air fixed wing, rotorcraft, ballon, land, sea or spaceborne. In other words, you don't have any knowledge to operate the craft whatever the vehicle it is, and the flight or operational controls won't let the pilot do anything outside the bounds of its programming. Just tell it where to go and what to do, and it completes the driving or flying, as well as what it does when it gets there and can return without any further intervention from its operator, just like the GPS-guided multi-rotor craft, full-autopilot planes, and self-driving cars, helicopters, ships and submarines. The flight systems onboard RC multi-rotors completely insulate the operator from any need for knowledge or discipline to operate the craft. They are completely ignorant of any rules, requirements, or regulations. Drones are now given to adolescents and adults as a 'toy'. The POV technology now has created fear through stupidity picked up by the media in addition to gross violations of FAA airspace. Those people have threatened the entire RC hobby for the rest of us. They have awoken the FAA beast, who has been peacefully sleeping for a half-century when it came to the operation of RC aircraft. This is the last month to comment on the FAA's proposed ruling on this exact issue, so make your voice heard. www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/12/31/2019-28100/remote-identification-of-unmanned-aircraft-systems

Once it's manned it's no longer a drone.

Fernando V I know right?

Dcl obviously wasny the first. They know that. They improved upon it. The next may come and give us consumer manned multi rotors. Needs a catchy name. Cant do pods racers disney will assassinate ya. Lol. Peter and yhe boys from dcl are doing great things.

​@@ernst7704 I feel like it should be autonomous too, otherwise it's just RC. But the US airforce calling their long range RC stuff "drones" for this long has pretty much nuked that definition.

But it's still click-bait!

we did that here in the philippines 4 years ago,just search it here in you tube.and it was made not by an engineer but a hip hop dancer

You know one of those dudes in the shop has to have taken it for a spin Atleast a low hover under controlled circumstances

Search "Smallest Flying Sports car by Kyxz Mendiola" better than this clickbait, and the guy uses it everytime to entertain people and inspire. he also made it with just a fraction of these guys budget.

It's no longer a drone technically if the person in the air is flying it.

Maneuvers over vehicles and in close proximity to buildings. It's not a good image to present of ones self or their company.

Maxx listen.... nobody cares.

@@animalanimal7939 yes, nobody cares that's why we keep getting unnecessary laws because some people don't care about responsible flying. And now if remote ID pushes, suddenly everybody cares.

Just guessing but the camera angle and the pilot angle may not have been the same for the smoke shot.

I had flashbacks of Kobe's helicopter flying into IMC

Totally !!!

I loved Wipeout

I'm done with fpv let's go wipe out guys 😉

Defo, 👍

@@dthree4496 That was my game on PS1 and PSP 🙌🏾🙌🏾

Lmfao

He does not know what he does, he just does lol

My other car is a drone sticker

Shwifty McVeigh FPV except for the whole car part

U watch too much tv

cwhite1634 you watch too much KZfaq

Andrew Isaacson if it flies you don’t need the car part. Wheels are for suckers

no

I think what you meant to say is *Ahem!* “Now this is Pod Racing!”

@@mynameisray yes

The US Army did this in the late 1950's only theirs use a central turboshaft engine and variable pitch constant rate props. Look up Curtis-Wright VZ-7

Could call it a MAD - Manned Aerial Drone . :)

I think it should be called Racing Quad-Copter, or RQ for short

@@atomicskull6405 that was different though.... wasn't a "drone" & was an aircraft operated from inside the "aircraft", unlike this. No onboard controls & it's controlled remotely or autonomously

meadball1 We have a winner!

I like Vortex Darter :) or Vorpal Darter .... ... especially as Darter is a species of dragonfly :D

So the ibtwy-ram lol

you missed 18:20 ahaha

A beginner aviation engineer would tell them why it will never fly more then 2 or 3 minutes.

I'm really impressed you could follow the whole video! Amazing! Just to be ironic...

beanamonster you are a god my man

@@colinbooker2310 Just doing my part, sir. Timestamp Man AWAYYYYY!

Well maybe eventually it will even get its own classification. You probably could call it sexcopter (six in Latin = sex) but that probably would be quite silly.

@@JackieWelles Multi-rotor Aircraft is already a classification. There were experiments during ww2 with flying disk-shaped thing that was intended to be used as a scouting vehicle. At the time it was deemed too unstable of a platform. It was the same basic concept as this, multiple fans forcing air down to lift a craft into the air, the problem was that a human could not make the thousand of adjustments needed to keep the thing in the air. We now have computers small and smart enough to make those adjustments. The technology has caught up with the concept.

VTOL can be manned or unmanned

@@jimbopg4245 When it is manned, it's not a drone. When it is unmanned, it's a drone. What makes or brakes it being or not being a drone is whether or not there is a person on board. It's not a permanent state of being. IF you fly a 777 passenger plane, empty, with no people on it, it's a drone.

It would have taken you less time to look up the definition of drone than it did to write that comment. I guess you're pretty good at making an ass of yourself but you should really work on your research skills.

@@eamonia "An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) ,commonly known as a drone, is an aircraft without any human pilot, crew or passengers on board". copied and pasted

@@eamonia damn I think you’re the real fool here. A quick search of the term “drone” will show you that a drone is in fact unmanned. In fact, one of the first things that comes up is the Wikipedia page for UAVs.

Rob Smith and spectacular crashes. Would make formula 1 slow as molasses in comparison. The UFC of the air.

100% fatality in crashes 😨😱

Imagine the crazy pilots that will fly with this.

The boomers would never tune into this.

PandaGmail,not necessarily you could start of with a standard race car style track.And also the pilot would have to undergo a lot of training on a simulator,if I were the designers I’d mount a rotor-less version on a flight simulator platform with a giant hi def screen surrounding the entire platform, a dome screen maybe.It may be a while yet but it COULD be done!

and DARPA

It’s in germAny idiot

@@thecaptainnoodles actually, they had to go to Croatia because it was illegal in Germang

You spelled teef wrong

bad design, these guys have no clue, will get racers killed

defo not a million-dollar drone

Crow probably more expensive than ya think I saw a big one at a dronecon and it wasn’t even made for a man it was just really big and cost like over $200,000 imagine how much a manned one would be

Dude that kid I believe is sponsored by Mikado and is or I guess now, was flying a SAVAGE routine using their, 700. So naturally this was right for him. Lol.

Mr.Skin Mirko is a 3D beast on the Heli’s. Nice kid as well. He was close friends with a friend of mine and they have competed for years in the heli scene

It costs about 1.75k-2k per dual motor arm for motor/esc/battery/blades to buy.....cost of fuselage I wouldn't know. Cost of hardware for this build is 16k-30k without buying specialised hardware.

mannequined drone!

Clickbait rules youtube ...

@@vladivizz why? They only but the mannequin in. Do you really think the guy was in there during the photoshoot?

bro that's harsh mannequins are people too

I suppose some people just don't understand satire, sarcasm, and/or potential anymore

damn u livin in the future

Unexpected is accurate. I was expecting a manned drone.

100% sure you'll see that soon.

look at the jetson one and do it now THAT is a great cool flying machine

First I’ve ever heard or seen anything like this. (2years later)

its just a drone, no man in it

Ninilium ikr! Just call it what it is, an electric aircraft.

basically it is not a drone but a copter. A drone is an aircraft, that can fly fully autonomously, which this thing currently is Not capable of.

@@SuicideNeil where are you getting your dictionary definition for a drone aircraft from? Because every source I can find defines it as an unmanned aircraft that can be either remotely controlled or fly autonomously? Genuinely curious, please enlighten.

Ultra-light helicopter.

That's exactly what I thought.

Basically a fancy quadcopter

MAV? Manned Aerial Vehicle?

@@edwardspaccarelli5944 👌

It's not manned, it just has a man in it. The man isn't controlling the aircraft or performing any services for it

The F1 monocoque is designed for airflow passing nose to tail, not for the airflow around a multi-copter, and really doesn't fit well for this usage case. If the motors rotated for forward flight it might be a but more appropriate, but still not ideal. The use F1 monocoque is really about marketing not engineering. It does look cool so it's served it's function.

@derestricted It "might" be impact resistant in this context, it all depends on how it's connected to the main spars and pilot seat/cage. In aircraft design you have to really have to optimise everything for it's specific purpose, aerodynamically, structurally, weight, failure modes. it's very different set of things you are optimizing for compared F1 or any other car. Just taking stuff from a F1 car isn't going to make it optimal for a multi-copter, it'll weight more and function less well. Your aircraft will be compromised because of it.

not good design for the way a quad moves. the back is unnessesary wide for flight and will cause a lot of drag. front is ok.

@@lrz98gaming5 You have fallen for the marketing. No structural component works on it's own, as soon as you take the shell away from the rest of the functional structure it ceases to function as intended., it's not the same thing anymore. You simply can't equate F1 monocoque on the F1 chasis it was designed for to a multi-coptor. demonstrator.

That’s a smart name I like that name they should name it that

Lol juggalos would love that

Truly the Tony Stark we deserve

Evan Okeefe FlyTest: Well im not Peter Sproil

You mean Peter Claus?

"He's not Peter Stripol!"

Is he really named that?

Belly laugh, won’t stop

Sounds kinda like f1 in the early 90's :D I'm wondering if they could design an emergency parachute system for it. even then though pretty dangerous..

@@zestyjobe Pretty sure a chute wouldn't deploy properly like ever from this thing.

Oh, so a little safer than Nascar.

Even better.

SgtSixkilla - That name is already taken. (F-18)

The Wasp

@@bovineone2420 they'll get over it. is just a stupid war toy.

The flying people blender

Vespa Crabro

Formula Air

12x pitch mechanic , is a lot of weight !

Wtf r u doing here?

@@josejulianvaldiviesocamach3683 They're watching entertaining videos...

More like 😳🤢🤮🤮🤮 if somebody were to be the passenger that is

🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀😅😅🙀😅😅🙀🙀🙀

The wasp

Exactly. This was just a very large drone.

I did, but I skipped right to the end like I do with most click bait looking vids

Ok cool why don't you try making a drone that you can control I know you won't cause its to hard to do

Why don't you try make a drone in general

Thanks. Glad I didn't stay for more than a few seconds.