there's a difference between disagreeing with him and crying about his opinion, don't act like they're the same

@@anomaly3215 do you disagree?

@@anomaly3215 opinion, seemed mostly factual

@@anomaly3215 what's your rebuttal to what he's said?

​@anomaly3215 So.... just to be clear.... you had no examples, right?

No doubt

You want scary look up the 2005 SCOTUS decision were they declared law enforcement has no duty to protect a PRIVATE citizen or property, now you know why law enforcement was largely ineffective during all the civil unrest in the US in recent years. You know who law enforcement does have a duty to protect politicians and celebrities as they are only limitedly private under the public persona matrix used to distinguish between public and private individuals in civil litigation. the same goes for property if its public or government land they have to protect that as well unless told not to by the politicians. SMDH. Yeah unpack the logic of that cause it's a mindbinder.

@@jericho1-4 That's not scary to me at all, no human being should be legally obligated to put their lives on the line protecting that of another regardless of who employs them. Imagine being jailed simply because you didn't want to die etc... that would be ridiculous... fired sure whatever but legally obligated to protect hell naw. Nobody should be legally obligated to protect the others mentioned as well so if that is the case it should end no different.

Oscar winning performance holding up those chucks too

And he used that to help push an agenda.

I wonder if he lectured Biden when he went to the white house about leaving hundreds of thousands of military issued firearms in Afghanistan along with over $80 billion in advanced military hardware in the hands of terrorists. That tells you exactly what they care about.

@@nahnotforme9819 The hall monitors at youtube ghosted your comment in the thread. I can read it and reply from my notifications, but when you go to the thread it isn't there. So tired of shadowbanning bs.

@@saddletramp5000 🤷🏽‍♂️ I guess they gotta run protection on Biden's administration every place they can being there's zero marks on things his clown show has gotten right.

You mean like the guns that were put back on the streets under Obama like "Fast and Furious"? People seem to forget how often our own "Government" has been caught doing this. Load the streets with illegal guns and call for "Gun-Control".....

they definetly are, every single one of them, i don't really know what are you declaring, that everything that aligns with your world view, or the way the world should be is the right thing/truth/common sense? if it is unconstitutional the the constitution needs to be changed, as simple as that, after all the 2nd amendment is not a physic law or anything unchangeable, it is a principla thought in a very especific era with very especific conditions that not only doesn't apply since +a century ago, but with the current structure and number of the current society is a problem more than anything else

Gun Laws help no one but Government and Criminals, leaving good people defenseless. Criminals dont care about law and Government thinks they are above law, law only applies to the people that follow and obey it. Criminals continue to break the law regardless of what laws are written. People with intent to harm others will still harm others no matter what sign is put out front or what measures are taken...CA, WA, OR, NV, NM, CO, and FL have the strictest Gun Control measures implemented...Chicago City is a "Gun Free" City in a heavily regulated State and they all still have the same issues after implementing those "common sense gun controls"...a continuous rise in murder/crime. There isnt a single example anywhere in the world at any point in time where gun control made a dramatic positive change for the people, it has only helped criminals and government. In the USA where 400 MILLION Firearms are in the Hands of 100 Million Gun Owners (1/3 of the US Population) you would think that there would be more than 12,650 of Deaths by firearms per year (excluding suicides), especially when most household and daily use objects kill many more times the amount of people per year. Most of that 12,650 Deaths are from Gang on Gang Violence, Police Kills, and Accidental Deaths, less than a 3rd of those deaths are from Legal gun owners using them against others and there isn't a single Law that could be imagined that would actually change it for the better but the legislation proposed and implemented creates defenseless victims adding to those numbers as criminals prey on those that cannot defend themselves. 100,000,000 of 400,000,000 Armed and less than a 3rd of 12,650 deaths attributed to those that obey the law - that percentage is insane when the media constantly floats "Gun Violence" (nonsensical term) so often. Hammers, Fists, Knives, Chainsaws, Toothpicks, Cosmetics (Make-Up), Food, Cars, Alcohol, Smoking all kill many more people per year than all firearms combined and Doctors are the 3rd leading cause of Death in the USA (250K) but you don't see any of the movements the firearms industry sees to ban them or regulate/restrict them. What is also crazy is that people think police should have firearms and not gun owners, they fear gun owners but studies have shown that firearm permit holders are 30% more law-abiding than the police. Guns save 250K-3 Million people per year in defensive use against violent crimes (Rape, Muggings, Robbery), many times not even firing a shot. A report of prisoner interviews in 11 states, said that 40% of all those interviewed had not committed a crime "on at least one occasion" because they saw a gun. They had then decided to not commit the crime they had intended because of the increased risk. If that is not crime prevention, and proof of guns saving lives I don't know what is. Is there any other object that SAVES so many people per year? That takes such a small percentage of lives? That is as demonized as firearms? Now on to Mass Killings, these people are MURDERERS...and murder is against the law, yet they are still doing it, they use all types of methods to commit these atrocious behaviors but when its not firearms its usually not reported by the media. There have been 38 Mass Killings with Knives alone since 2006 and the average death count is much higher than the average death count of firearm-related Mass Killings. There are many more with Bombs (Already regulated heavily and Illegal to own without permits), cars, baseball bats, and other objects but when have you seen a report within the USA about these Mass Killings? There is a agenda and a narrative, whether you believe so or not, there is no other reason for the selective reporting of information. They paint a terrible picture on the media that certain guns are worse than others, some are "military assault weapons" (false made up term). They say the AR15 is one of them but the AR15 is not military and nor does it have select fire. Its a tactical looking hunting rifle and have been used in just a handful of Mass Killings, most are committed by handguns and rifles that shoot no more than 5 rounds before reloading. The firearm isnt important, the persons intent, mental stability, and nature is, especially when every Mass Killing has a trend that can easily been seen if you look. All Mass Murderers have been medicated with Psychotropic medications, have mental instability issues. They go to areas with little resistance (Gun Free Zones) that are largely populated, why restricting the access of more people to firearms will only lead to more defenseless victims.

Tom is a phony. Listen to Dear Tom by Topher.

This late but we don't stand with HOG. Only guts that stand with HOG like and take dic...

Blows balls!

No, it's the lack of parenting. That and single moms which goes directly back to the lack of parenting. The stats on the development of children with single fathers versus single mothers spells it out in black and white.