Well done!😎

❤

There’s no emotion…. Editing the secondary vocals are a hack move. The instruments did a great job.

¡YOU'RE AMAIZING!

Audra your vocals are 100 percent phenomenal and you rock guys ❤️❤️❤️

my mom can sing much better than her.

Fantastic comment. You perceive sensitive details, husky vocals and rhythmic driving smile and at the same time you sense that the lyrics contain deep meanings. Could you share what you think they mean?

I get shivers on the low vocal notes, lol.

Thanks for your compliments. If I don't immediately understand what a song is about, I either listen to it a few times or look up the lyrics and read them separately or look at the lyrics while I listen to the song again. If I still don't fully understand what a song is fully about, I type in "[insert song name] lyrics meaning" into Google and either read a music website or the Wikipedia article on the song. If you look up the original song on Wikipedia, you will find out like I did that "losing my religion" is a southern US expression meaning losing one's civility and this is song is about unrequited love.

@@kiwichrix Thanks for your detailed explanation. One of the qualities that I most appreciate about Art is its interactive nature. When someone perceives a work created by another, they can recreate it in their own way according to their imagination, sensitivity and subjective emotions. In a way, this connection can awaken creativity in the other person who is no longer a mere passive spectator. We see a very clear example in the work of the actors. The same script can be interpreted very differently by each actor who, if he is good at his job, knows how to reinterpret the role, bringing his own vision to the character, his way of living it and making it believable. It happens in all forms of artistic expression and of course in music. That's why I love many F211 Covers, because they are not a strict copy of the original but rather they arrange and reinterpret the songs with their personal touch. And that is why I do not read the comments that only applaud and do not contribute anything of their subjective perception and instead I value opinions like yours in which you shared details of how you perceived this Cover by R.E.M. But that creative reinterpretation can not only refer to formal details of how you feel their music, but also about the meaning of their lyrics. Obviously the first step is always to try to understand what the author means, and if it seems confusing or too encrypted, it is advisable to resort to Google or personal interviews in which the author explains specifically what he is trying to say with his song. But then one can understand it from one's own perspective according to one's own ideas and experiences. That's why I was asking you if you had any additional interpretation to what Wikipedia provides according to what it could mean for you,

@@cesardelcastilloyurrita9344 I don't have any additional interpretation over what the original R.E.M. songwriters intended - that is how I generally enjoy songs because it is getting to know the singer/band a little bit more because they wrote the song to share their feelings about something. Yes, I agree art can be interpreted in different ways. Some songs are overinterpreted - the most famous example I can think of is the Beatles' "Lucy in the sky with diamonds" (this overintepretation annoyed John Lennon) and some songs are misinterpreted - the most famous example I can think of is Bruce Springsteen's "Born in the USA". This said, if a song particularly resonates with a personal experience then I would sing it with the memories of the personal experience that the song matches or at least listen to the song with the memories of the personal experience.

Naw it was lifeless. No vocal inflection and flat…. Sorry but she did a D- in the whole thing. Layering the highs towards the end only made it less special. It was a flat experience. Listen to the first one and compare the vocals. The instruments were on point…

@@413xxx86 I heard the original version many times before....but Audra really nailed it... A Michael Stipe song is already very hard for a female vocalist as the vocal ranges contradict(baritone to contralto, mezzo-soprano,soprano)...despite the difficulties Audra made it her own.

Good softer acoustic cover, agreed. If you want to hear a good(IMO) cover in the opposite direction, Lacuna Coil did one..

​@@413xxx86It's her style

I agree! The band is really great too.

''If i can do it'' part really got me

Its on spotify and thats all that matters spotify is king

@@Mitch-wc9zx far from it

😂😂😂

Weird Al should have done a parody of this song.

Lol 😅...

I agree, I'll take her over taylor swift any day of the week. The best part of the video was the leather pants.

The best cover is from Gravewom. This one is too happy

INDEED.