Fiscal Policy and Stimulus: Crash Course Economics #8

  Рет қаралды 1,973,662

CrashCourse

CrashCourse

8 жыл бұрын

In which Jacob and Adriene teach you about the evils of fiscal policy and stimulus. Well, maybe the policies aren't evil, but there is an evil lair involved. In this episode we learn how government use taxes and spending influence the economy. Sometimes the government gives, and sometimes it takes. And the giving and the taking can have a profound effect on how economies behave.
Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at / crashcourse
Thanks to the following Patrons for their generous monthly contributions that help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever:
Mark , Elliot Beter, Moritz Schmidt, Jeffrey Thompson, Ian Dundore, Jacob Ash, Jessica Wode, Today I Found Out, Christy Huddleston, James Craver, Chris Peters, SR Foxley, Steve Marshall, Simun Niclasen, Eric Kitchen, Robert Kunz, Avi Yashchin, Jason A Saslow, Jan Schmid, Daniel Baulig, Christian , Anna-Ester Volozh
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - / youtubecrashcourse
Twitter - / thecrashcourse
Tumblr - / thecrashcourse
Support Crash Course on Patreon: / crashcourse
CC Kids: / crashcoursekids

Пікірлер: 1 200
@user-kf8fj2mc7u
@user-kf8fj2mc7u 8 жыл бұрын
*Main outtakes of this lesson* 1) _Recessionary gap_ - a situation wherein the real GDP is lower than potential GDP at the full employment level. 2) _Inflationary gap_ - the amount by which the actual gross domestic product (GDP) exceeds potential full-employment GDP. 3) _Macroeconomics_ - the study of the entire economy as a whole rather than individual markets. 4) _Fiscal policy_ - the way a government adjusts its spending levels and tax rates to monitor and influence a nation's economy. a. _Expansionary Fiscal Policy_ - stimulates the economy during or anticipation of a business-cycle contraction. b. _Contractionary Fiscal Policy_ - enacted by a government to reduce the money supply and ultimately the spending in a country. c. Classical theories assumed that the economy will fix itself in a long run, and that government intervention will, at best, lead to unintended consequences and, at worst, cause massive inflation and debt. 5) _Deficit spending_ - the government spends more money than it collects in tax revenue. a. _Crowding out_ - where increased public sector spending replaces, or drives down, private sector spending. b. Keynesian economists maintain that _crowding out_ is only a problem if economy operates at full capacity, where all workers are employed and we're producing as much as we can. 6) _Austerity_ - raising taxes and cutting government spending to reduce debt. In crisis of 2008 was main policy of EU, which led to worse results than deficit spending policy in US. 7) _Multiplier effect_ - the initial increase in government spending of 100$ might turn out to be 175$ worth of actual spending in the economy. a. When the economy is booming, multiplier is close to 1x. b. When economy is in recession, the multiplier is around 2x. c. Spending on infrastructure, and aid to state & local governments , also seems to have fairly high multiplier, about 1.5. But general cuts to payroll and income taxes seems to have a multiplier of about 1:. If the government cuts 100$ in taxes, the economy is going to grow by about 100$.
@maksimilianryschkov5913
@maksimilianryschkov5913 8 жыл бұрын
+Сергей Галиуллин Thanks a lot, man! Спасибо большое!
@bradley6357
@bradley6357 8 жыл бұрын
Austerity isnt raising taxes its just cutting the budget. Secondly it didnt bring worse results... the German and Dutch economies are growing and are healthy whilest the Greek, French and Italian economies suck due to the lack of austerity.
@Ananta9817
@Ananta9817 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@victoriakatherine5571
@victoriakatherine5571 7 жыл бұрын
Сергей Галиуллин thank you!:)
@duyvunguyen6012
@duyvunguyen6012 7 жыл бұрын
oh my god, thanks, this eps is harder than other and it confuse me a lot
@feludaify
@feludaify 8 жыл бұрын
At the beginning I was looking for the skip ad button...
@solonbonifaciofernandes2661
@solonbonifaciofernandes2661 8 жыл бұрын
heheheeh...me too
@BabySemtex
@BabySemtex 7 жыл бұрын
feludaify me too loo
@florencewhits7251
@florencewhits7251 7 жыл бұрын
lolzz..xame here
@vibratingbee
@vibratingbee 6 жыл бұрын
I swear, they're so extra. And I love it.
@prarthanakhot331
@prarthanakhot331 4 жыл бұрын
The lady is cute!
@bingobangobongo5
@bingobangobongo5 4 жыл бұрын
Sitting in quarantine trying to learn more about the economy... interesting how this video aged
@stevietv420
@stevietv420 4 жыл бұрын
I’m watching rn and before she said riots, I was thinking how we’re all unemployed, and getting mad 😂
@ryanowens5539
@ryanowens5539 8 жыл бұрын
Hey Crash Course, can we get a "why are we learning this" series? I'm a middle school science teacher and my kids always ask this question. Many times I am able to relate material to life but sometimes it's a struggle and I know it is for other teachers in science and other subjects as well. It would be fantastic to introduce a subject with a short video explaining different layers of importance of certain subjects as well as specific topics within them.
@TheSignetGamer
@TheSignetGamer 8 жыл бұрын
+Ryan Owens That'd be awesome Inorganic Vegan will have a good comment on this in the future.
@jordansim6776
@jordansim6776 8 жыл бұрын
+Ryan Owens It's in the first video I believe. It's pretty simple to me. You're learning about money. Everyone needs to learn how to deal with money.
@WaterMelonFan1
@WaterMelonFan1 8 жыл бұрын
+Ryan Owens Well, of course most stuff you learn in school is only the theoretical and doesn't directly translate into real life applications. Just because i know calculus i don't necessarily know how to build a car. But, and that's the point, have you ever tried to do so without calculus? It would of course never work. That goes for sciences as well as any other subject. From my experience this is one of the best explanations to show students why school education is important for their very lifes. Where i come from teachers are supplied scientific journals (the schools pay for them) so that teachers can expand on the real life applications of their subjects and get the students interested. It is a shame that this doesn't happen everywhere, but that's how it goes, i guess.
@JonathanBondu
@JonathanBondu 8 жыл бұрын
+Ryan Owens For physics I have a technique. the first who ask why they learn physics, just throw something in their face and comment with "you learn physics to understand what just happened" and then you may talk about Newton's laws of inertia !
@frankschneider6156
@frankschneider6156 8 жыл бұрын
+Ryan Owens Man, you are a teacher, it's YOUR job to cope with this. But the easiest answer would be: If you don't learn it, I'll make sure you get bad grades and you'll not graduate at all or don't get into a good college (or non at all) as a result you'll have to work as a stripper or some other shitty jobs, being bossed around my morons, for the rest of your miserable life and die early and in poverty. You are competing here with the others, and those who loose this competition this early will be the bottom of barrel of society for the rest of your lives. Society disdains and punishes uneducated idiots. Even most middle school kids understand this kind of logic, and if not, there's no hope anyway due to lack of intellectual capacity. Don't waste resources on those, where it is wasted, focus on those that have potential. Oh yeah, you might want to add, that most NFL pros are bankrupt 5 years after career end, due to their inability to handle simple maths (=money) and drug dealers tend to have on average a rather short life span and model career won't work with that face, so these are no alternatives either. Not nice, but it's true and will work at a lot better than trying to make up a reason, why it would be essential to have a grasp of a Bose-Einstein condensate or fluid dynamics.
@MK.5198
@MK.5198 8 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised you didn't make more use of that really expensive looking under ground lair set.
@mihailung1720
@mihailung1720 8 жыл бұрын
+Hen Barrison They literally just introduced it and we're not even halfway through the series. The stuff from the intro video was footage from this episode. Wait a couple of months before coming to conclusions.
@teddyharris
@teddyharris 8 жыл бұрын
+Hen Barrison Pretty sure that's a KZfaq Space set, not a specifically designed Crash Course one. Think I've seen it in a few other YT's video's.
@BiggDoggJake
@BiggDoggJake 8 жыл бұрын
+Ted Cullen (Twister) Yep, was used in a Warp Zone video as well.
@BiggDoggJake
@BiggDoggJake 8 жыл бұрын
+Ted Cullen (Twister) Yep, was used in a Warp Zone video as well.
@robthehitmanrude
@robthehitmanrude 8 жыл бұрын
+Hen Barrison Thats not a set, that's Stan's bedroom.
@basemmattel7901
@basemmattel7901 7 жыл бұрын
I've learned more watching 11:53 minutes of this than the whole semester at my University.
@JacobAClifford
@JacobAClifford 8 жыл бұрын
Let the economics melee begin!
@orange1903
@orange1903 6 жыл бұрын
ACDCLeadership We need the belt
@sophiashcherbakova2867
@sophiashcherbakova2867 6 жыл бұрын
Cheers for this, been searching for "recession proof shares" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Have you heard people talk about - Teysaiah Recession Stopper - (Have a quick look on google cant remember the place now ) ? Ive heard some awesome things about it and my mate got cool results with it.
@ThePranavR_swe
@ThePranavR_swe 6 жыл бұрын
It's good to see you on crash course, bud! I watch your videos on your channel and now they're here! :D
@sudeepjoseph69
@sudeepjoseph69 4 жыл бұрын
You talk super fast
@SexualPotatoes
@SexualPotatoes 8 жыл бұрын
GIVE US CRASH COURSE PHYSICS, DAMMIT! ..nice video, by the way.
@FilmBuffBros
@FilmBuffBros 8 жыл бұрын
+Sexual Potatoes FYI: Hank updates a Physics playlist on the Sci-Show channel. But I agree, a Crash Course series on the subject would be great.
@IsYitzach
@IsYitzach 8 жыл бұрын
They need about $8k more per month to have the funds for it. See their patreon page.
@scoutofthe107th
@scoutofthe107th 8 жыл бұрын
+Sexual Potatoes cc english please!!!!!!!
@MustangBananaBus
@MustangBananaBus 8 жыл бұрын
I want a crash course computer science.
@scoutofthe107th
@scoutofthe107th 8 жыл бұрын
Zach Glover nah you need to be able to practice that right after you hear it go to khan academy
@Robert-qq9em
@Robert-qq9em 8 жыл бұрын
I would love to see sources on Crash Course videos. Just a "we used these papers for sourcing" type deal. Allow some of us to dig deeper if we want.
@koellekind
@koellekind 8 жыл бұрын
As you said, Keynes also said that in inflation times - when the economy is running well - the government should increase taxes and decrease government spending. The problem is that many countries do not do that, so their debt rises and rises. That's one of the main problem many countries nowadays have in my opinion.
@thekaxmax
@thekaxmax 4 жыл бұрын
Friedmann=anti-Keynes=wrong
@dantesdiscoinfernolol
@dantesdiscoinfernolol 6 жыл бұрын
"Maybe it's about that thing you didn't have in sixth grade: *confidence* ." Gurl, please. It's been years since then, and I STILL don't have that!
@carlaae1563
@carlaae1563 5 жыл бұрын
i am watching your videos for over an hour now, which is literally saving me from failing my macroeconomics test tomorrow morning. you explain that stuff way better than some profs in university as your videos are perfect to understand mathemetically complicated theories! Greets from germany and lots of thanks for all the work :-)
@CRPNW
@CRPNW 7 жыл бұрын
@CrashCourse, I would really appreciate if you guys had a recap/ summary of the main points we've learned at the end of all your videos like how Hank Green does on his SciShow videos. Thanks for putting this together!
@viktorlindh6440
@viktorlindh6440 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Spent over 30 hours reading through material for my pre-course and this channel explained it in a much easier way in under two hours.
@harunsuaidi7349
@harunsuaidi7349 8 жыл бұрын
"Maybe it's all about that thing you didn't have when you are in 6th grade: confidence." I still don't have it by now.
@ohheywhatsthat7664
@ohheywhatsthat7664 4 жыл бұрын
I normally would've found the idea of an Economics crash course being co-hosted a little ridiculous, but these two are just so dorky and engaging and adorable. Love the work!
@crazyskullkid
@crazyskullkid 5 жыл бұрын
This helped me grasp this concept SO much easier. I was lost and thought I'd fail my essay. I am extremely grateful for this video and the rest of the economics series. Keep up the great work.
@ergomate9092
@ergomate9092 8 жыл бұрын
Now I can make informed decisions while making my opinions on government policy AND better manage my economy while playing Galactic Civilizations 2 and the like.
@idnyftw
@idnyftw 8 жыл бұрын
+Michael Turner I just put space malls everywhere I can put 'em :)
@frankschneider6156
@frankschneider6156 8 жыл бұрын
+Michael Turner throw a coin.
@JediBearBob
@JediBearBob 8 жыл бұрын
+Michael Turner GalCiv 2 and the like have unfortunately limited economic models. Bonus: You don't have to deal with recessions.
@PrivateAckbar
@PrivateAckbar 8 жыл бұрын
Not until you study the critics of Inflationism and mercantilism. Read Bastiat, Hazlitt, Hayek, Mises, and Rothbard, or watch the "Keynes Hayek rap" on youtube as a good pop introduction.
@barrygormley3986
@barrygormley3986 8 жыл бұрын
The fallacy that government spending creates jobs is hardly older than the rebuttal to it. While it is true that even a broken window helps the glazier to get some cash, the person who pays the glazier would otherwise have spent that money elsewhere. This means that no new capital has been created. Only the direction of spending has been altered. The same principle applies on a national scale; as the money used to build a road or a bridge isn't conjured out of thin air, but is simply a redirection of where that money would have been spent. So not only have you not created jobs, but you may well have destroyed some. All this before we get to the problem of national debt and inflation.
@hillcon45
@hillcon45 8 жыл бұрын
+Barry Gormley What? every dollar spent on roads or infrastructure will bring back and least 2 dollars back to the government on the long run. It also injects money in the economic loop when it's freeze by economic pessimism. Windows break, there is a demand for window repairs. Cars break, there is a demand for car mechanics, it's all part of money circulation, but if money circulation is slow, there's no one better than the government to start it back again.
@analyticalmindset
@analyticalmindset 8 жыл бұрын
+Barry Gormley Expansionary fiscal policy IS the altering of the direction of where money is spent
@barrygormley3986
@barrygormley3986 8 жыл бұрын
+hillcon45 At least two dollars that would have been spent anyway, just not in the same place. Again, broken windows do increase demand for window repair, but only because you need a new window more than you need a new suit, or to eat in a restaurant or countless other things that you could have spent that money on. This means that all you've done is swift demand toward one industry at the expense of at least one other (and I do mean "at least"). Of course economists who advocate government spending will only point to the increase in employment within the window fixing industry, and this will keep their readers/students/employers from realising that there hasn't actually been a net increase in employment over all.
@hillcon45
@hillcon45 8 жыл бұрын
Barry Gormley A grocers window breaks during a storm, the grocer pays a glazier to repair it, he pays his suppliers which than pays its employees which goes to the grocers to buy their lunch. It's a loop, it's 1000x more complex, but it's what it is.
@barrygormley3986
@barrygormley3986 8 жыл бұрын
hillcon45 A grocer's window does not break during a storm. The next day the grocer goes to a tailor and buys himself a new suit. The tailor pays his suppliers who then pay their employees who go back to the grocer to buy their lunch. Same thing. And yes, I'm aware that the materials to make the suit probably came from over sees, but we're keeping it simple.
@saikumarsonkamble7175
@saikumarsonkamble7175 7 жыл бұрын
Love u Adriene , your teaching ! Thank you all for making such videos which are very helpful in understanding economics .
@pixo6016
@pixo6016 Жыл бұрын
Very relevant right now!
@mgs1398
@mgs1398 8 жыл бұрын
Loving this series so far, you guys are doing a great job, I was skeptical at first but keep it up guys!
@mmedrano21
@mmedrano21 6 жыл бұрын
mgs1398 You should remain skeptical. This is little more than pro-Keynes ra ra nonsense.
@brianwheeler4322
@brianwheeler4322 4 жыл бұрын
I get more out of these CrashCourse presentations that just about any other resource I'm provided with. I've written entire papers with the material from a 10-minute video. NICE JOB!!
@Loathomar
@Loathomar 8 жыл бұрын
The comparison to the US and EU policy did not take into account the massively different interest rates those countries where paying for debt that the effect that expansionary spending would have on the interest rates of new debt. Greece is the most extreme, with the interest of 10 year loans getting to over 40%. Meaning if had an expansionary spending where government debt spending was 10% of it's GDP, after 3 years interest on ONLY the new loans would be 12% of GDP. No one believes that Greece would ever get the growth that would allow them to pay that debt, so the debt rate only goes higher. US debt interest on the other hand was only ~2%, so the cost of expansionary spending was very low for the US. You can't cover everything, but that was a big key when comparing US and EU spending. Also, the main reason the US did not see much growth in spite of spend $800B, is that when government debt went from 70% of GDP to 100% of GDP, private sector debt when to ~260% of GDP to 200% GDP, causing a net loss of 30% of total debt over as a percent of GDP over ~6 years.
@99thTuesday
@99thTuesday 8 жыл бұрын
Sure, but it's hard to compare economies full stop. When you want to, you have to comprimise. The US compared to the EU is never going to be perfect but it's not the worst comparison and it was convenient to explain fiscal policy as they used different ideas of economics to respond to similar crises.
@isphus
@isphus 8 жыл бұрын
+99thTuesday Actually, any comparison involving the US and another country IS the the worst comparison. After 2008 the US turned on the money printers and let the rest of the world who uses dollars (including th EU) pay for their spending. If the EU got to take money from the US instead im sure they'd have grown more and the US less.
@PajamaMan44
@PajamaMan44 8 жыл бұрын
+Loathomar I don't think they were trying to say the EU made the wrong decision or who made the correct one, but rather they tried to show the difference in how those actions affected growth. We just want to learn how the money works.
@koellekind
@koellekind 8 жыл бұрын
+PajamaMan I think you are right, and yet I agree with Loathomar that the way the numbers were presented gave a somewhat misleading view of the situation, or let's say one that does not factor in all possibly very relevant circumstances. I would have found it better to look at some countries in the eurozone individually.
@Loathomar
@Loathomar 8 жыл бұрын
PajamaMan Learn how money works is great, but it means compare apples to apples. The US could do expansionary spending where is the results of expansionary spending in Greece or Spain would have been bankruptcy. The comparison for the US and Germany or the UK is fine, as those countries did not face a high interest rate but much closer to the US at less the 4% interest.
@prasadpawar7027
@prasadpawar7027 4 жыл бұрын
Everyone is economist on twitter.
@r_ad
@r_ad Жыл бұрын
10:49 dam bruh she rlly got us there
@UnknownXV
@UnknownXV 8 жыл бұрын
Unemployment is at 5.1%, but the labor participation rate is at an all time low. The way Unemployment is calculated doesn't really tell the whole story. In deficit spending, you're borrowing money to (possibly) enhance the economy now. But at what cost, really? It's intergenerational debt. The debt we have now will never be repaid in any of our lifetimes. That seems like extreme taxation without representation. Literally a tax on the unborn. Hardcore.
@frankschneider6156
@frankschneider6156 8 жыл бұрын
+UnknownXV Which is in principle not THAT bad, as the money is used to create value. The next generation doesn't only inherit the debt, but also the assets (e.g. infrastructure, universities, laboratories etc.) created with this money. So you need to balance the debt with the assets. Making debt ain't bad in principle if you invest it and the ROI is higher than the cost of capital. The only problem here is, that we all know, how efficient governments work, as their resource allocation is not based upon maximizing efficiency, but maximizing the politically intended effect.
@juandipong1266
@juandipong1266 8 жыл бұрын
Actually, the real unemployment rate is like 11%.
@UnknownXV
@UnknownXV 8 жыл бұрын
Frank Schneider It's more that this decision is made without any representation for them, given they literally aren't even alive yet. Deficit spending doesn't feel moral if it's accumulating so much debt that it can't be repaid in the generation of those who accrue it to begin with. Especially given there's no guarantee there will be any value from it. We had a lot of deficit spending during wartime. In fact, this made us less safe. We spend money to create a negative. It's rare that deficit spending is directed towards infrastructure, which is one of the few things which probably yields a positive result.
@frankschneider6156
@frankschneider6156 8 жыл бұрын
UnknownXV I am not a big fan of deficit spending either, but it's not as black and white as you painted it. All the money spent went somewhere, including sensible investments, like schools and universities etc, which ensures our current state of living. But I certainly do not negate the fact, that a lot of this money was certainly wasted.
@Sgman1991
@Sgman1991 8 жыл бұрын
It's easy to say that economic policy by the fed helps regulate the business cycle, but historically, it hasn't had a measurably positive effect on the economy. Since the creation of the fed we've had larger depressions, not less. It's easy to say "Oh, it could have been worse," but that can only go so far when it's always the answer to failures.
@Loathomar
@Loathomar 8 жыл бұрын
+Sgman1991 In the long term, it would be amazing if there was no measurably positive or negative effect on the economy. In the short term it is somewhat measurably, but you are always measuring theoretical economy. This theoretical economy can be reasonable estimated by comparison it to other economies. Not just the EU, but China, Japan, South America, ect. If all economy are doing bad, and your economy is doing OK, it is likely that what you are doing is good. If all over economies are doing great and you are see reasonable growth, it is likely that what you are doing is bad. Also, even though government debt jumped from 70% of GDP to 100% of GDP, private sector debt when to ~260% of GDP to 200% GDP, causing a net loss of 30% of total debt over as a percent of GDP over ~6 years. If we had just shrunk 60% of US GDP worth of debt over 6 years, it is reasonable to say it would have been worse.
@lio123mombach
@lio123mombach 8 жыл бұрын
Thats right but it also makes sense, since you have to make sure that there is a cash flow to run the economy
@monkey314159
@monkey314159 8 жыл бұрын
+Sgman1991 "Since the creation of the fed we've had larger depressions, not less" Ha ha ha ha ha ha, no. Seriously, did you just spout the exact opposite of what history says is the truth?
@99thTuesday
@99thTuesday 8 жыл бұрын
You need the fed to regulate the supply of money unless you want the gold standard again which historically couldn't survive crises.
@AdamHamdan1
@AdamHamdan1 8 жыл бұрын
+99thTuesday I'll take the gold standard over fiat currency and 0% interest rates all day
@RappingManualYT
@RappingManualYT 5 жыл бұрын
I love how extra the intro is
@elindanielsson7913
@elindanielsson7913 4 жыл бұрын
Who else is watching in 2020
@Fionaguoguolu
@Fionaguoguolu 4 жыл бұрын
This is so helpful during crisis to understanding what's happening out there.
@dienekes4364
@dienekes4364 7 жыл бұрын
This is such an awesome series. Keep up the great work, guys!
@benjaminmclaren8782
@benjaminmclaren8782 8 жыл бұрын
I love Evil Stan Voice. GIFF ME MOAR!!!
@lgmmrm
@lgmmrm 8 жыл бұрын
One major problem with the US unemployment rate: Most of the drop of unemployment has resulted not from people finding jobs but from people dropping out of the labor force whatsoever and quitting their search for a job.
@ajx9747
@ajx9747 7 жыл бұрын
it's good to see informed Americans
@dansilva1529
@dansilva1529 5 жыл бұрын
According to who? According to the BLS the number of jobs in the U.S. has increased by 4.5% since 2014
@IkeOkerekeNews
@IkeOkerekeNews 5 жыл бұрын
Source?
@benaaronmusic
@benaaronmusic 8 жыл бұрын
Awesome underground lair set!
@karthickraja2436
@karthickraja2436 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this Wonderful Course Team!
@brixnnxsimmxns3739
@brixnnxsimmxns3739 4 жыл бұрын
“Lower costs leads to more production then makes more jobs and the economy is back.”
@Luckybawdy
@Luckybawdy 8 жыл бұрын
Yes crash course :D
@kevincarthos8889
@kevincarthos8889 8 жыл бұрын
This was great, awesome job!
@edwinifeanyianyigor9513
@edwinifeanyianyigor9513 4 жыл бұрын
@ Adriene I love your sense of humor and the way you look at Jacob when he talks makes me laugh 😂
@sangwaraumo
@sangwaraumo 8 жыл бұрын
Yeah, can't say I wholy agree... The big problem is that this tool is cursed to fail by design, since it's usage will be always tending towards improving political agendas then fixing the economy.
@JediBearBob
@JediBearBob 8 жыл бұрын
+Sangwa There is no evidence to suggest that this is the case. In fact, this looks a lot more like a political talking point than a serious economic hypothesis. Funny, that.
@mmedrano21
@mmedrano21 6 жыл бұрын
Robert Richter In other words, you disagree but cannot articulate, much less formulate, the reasons for your opinion.
@JoaoBenoSchreinerJunior
@JoaoBenoSchreinerJunior 8 жыл бұрын
Hayek FTW! Make a video about Hayek theories!
@mampedidorothydinala4468
@mampedidorothydinala4468 7 жыл бұрын
what a great presentation, it all makes sense now. thanks
@jedrzejprzykaza6345
@jedrzejprzykaza6345 7 жыл бұрын
Great intro and ending!
@Alverant
@Alverant 8 жыл бұрын
The thing with tax cuts is that they're not created equal either. Cutting taxes on those who don't have much would have a greater multiplier than those who do. But you acted like everyone is taxed the same.
@TheSignetGamer
@TheSignetGamer 8 жыл бұрын
+Alverant They didn't specify, theres a difference ;)
@NavaidSyed
@NavaidSyed 8 жыл бұрын
+Alverant tax cuts are always beneficial. In one case they increase spending and other case they increase investments. Both result in jobs creation.
@noricoco4695
@noricoco4695 4 жыл бұрын
They literally said that the multiplier is much lower when taxes are targeted at higher incomes, that are more likely to save rather than spend.
@kayleeshook1593
@kayleeshook1593 8 жыл бұрын
Crash Course Sociology? Crash Course Tale of Two Cities?
@sheetalproag4092
@sheetalproag4092 7 жыл бұрын
Awesome video !! You guys are awesome teachers :) Thanks
@pranavmishra7760
@pranavmishra7760 4 жыл бұрын
Mind blowing content with case study.
@austinpike3992
@austinpike3992 8 жыл бұрын
Uploading this when the GOP debate is on... you win this round Green Brothers.
@Germanuos
@Germanuos 8 жыл бұрын
Is she crying at 10:56? Great video anyway, loving the series.
@alihaleem8264
@alihaleem8264 8 жыл бұрын
thank you for the wonderful lesson :)
@903koolaid91
@903koolaid91 8 жыл бұрын
love yall, great energy!!
@mzGLEElvr
@mzGLEElvr 8 жыл бұрын
Who else is here for the ib Econ test?
@TheAmbasador99
@TheAmbasador99 7 жыл бұрын
Keynes: Y'all mind if I BREAK SOME WINDOWS???
@syraphimgaming6281
@syraphimgaming6281 6 жыл бұрын
Great review. Really helped me before my exam thanks :)
@GentrifiedPotato
@GentrifiedPotato 8 жыл бұрын
This is something I learned when I played Civ V - build infrastructure before you do anything else. Your army might be awesome, but it'll be a pain to move and supply if you don't have roads. Oh, and don't fuck with Gandhi.
@Kaalyn_HOW
@Kaalyn_HOW 8 жыл бұрын
I feel like this debuted about a month too soon. ....was intended for Halloween and got a little too stimulus and jumped the gun.
@TomHasVideo
@TomHasVideo 8 жыл бұрын
This comments section: people who can't handle that economics is largely Keynesian.
@Jokkkkke
@Jokkkkke 8 жыл бұрын
+TomHasVideo *New Keynesian No one analyzes economics through purely Keynesian models anymore. Check out DSGE models
@Greyghostvol1
@Greyghostvol1 8 жыл бұрын
+The Revolution Even though it's taught fairly regularly in sch.... Ya you're right, no one will remember it.
@Iznikroc
@Iznikroc 8 жыл бұрын
+TomHasVide Schools of economic theory change over the course of history. think of economic theories like fashion trends. fur will be in vogue until something new comes around to replace based on someone wearing it well. all it take is the successful execution of another school of thought to change the dominant school.
@TomHasVideo
@TomHasVideo 8 жыл бұрын
The Revolution It would be silly to assume that economic models shouldn't change. Iznikroc I completely agree, with the most obvious example being Austrian economics. It's not that Austrian economics became completely discredited, it's that the merits from Austrian economics became incorporated into the currently mainstream synthesis.
@Jokkkkke
@Jokkkkke 8 жыл бұрын
TomHasVideo Well, I think because macroeconomic models are only about a century in development its definetly silly, but not because models have an inherent transient quality to them.
@yacinegaci6402
@yacinegaci6402 6 жыл бұрын
Great video and great series! By the way, I really like those laughs!!! They were really funny
@xxxenricop
@xxxenricop 8 жыл бұрын
I am pleasantly surprised by the fact that you are actually getting the hang of it. Nice vid.
@TheKickingKangaroo
@TheKickingKangaroo 7 жыл бұрын
"In the long run, we're all dead" LOL
@princeofexcess
@princeofexcess 8 жыл бұрын
raising taxes is not part of austrian economics. So you cannot compare Europe to US. (at least not to say which school of economics works better) And you cannot judge how the program has worked until you stop the stimulus. So far fed raised rates by 1/4 point and the market is already freaking out and heading towards another recession. We will see if the keysian ideology has worked when we are back at normal interest rates. Before than its like saying that operation was successful before the patient woke up and is off the life support.
@danielaj9917
@danielaj9917 7 жыл бұрын
THIS HELPED ME FOR MY GLOBAL ECONOMICS! Keep up doing the good deeds :) Liked & subscribed
@PrivateAckbar
@PrivateAckbar 8 жыл бұрын
Other than the writings of Hazlitt, Bastiat, Mises, Rothbard, and Hayek available in free pdfs on Mises.org, a good place to start when thinking about the economic history of these neo-mercantilist experiments is with the financial analysts who spelled out how the 2008 recession would occur. Peter Schiff, David Stockman, Jim Rogers are a good place to start.
@NimW
@NimW 8 жыл бұрын
Here's an idea - low taxes, low govt. spending.
@ashersapir1461
@ashersapir1461 7 жыл бұрын
To prove that deficit spending is preferred than austerity, you gave the example of the U.S. vs. the Eurozone after the 2008 crisis, where the U.S. did spending and its economy grew, while the Eurozone had austerity and its economy contracted.I don't think you can compare them both. It's oranges and apples. U.S. has a strong economic structure, and only experienced a server debt crisis, but overcame it... on the other hand, Eurozone has very shaky political and economical structure, and the fiscal policy between Eurozone countries varies... so I don't think you can compare them. And besides, the U.K. and Germany both did austerity after the 2008 crisis, and yet their economies grew, and their unemployment was less than in the U.S.... As economists, please be more carful when you draw conclusions between two economies, and especially when it's about a hot political issue....Anyway, I still very much enjoy your videos, keep'em up!!Thank you
@kappyfulliness
@kappyfulliness 8 жыл бұрын
I love this series!!!
@alandouglas96
@alandouglas96 4 жыл бұрын
Marshall & Lily teaching you life lessons!
@qhack
@qhack 8 жыл бұрын
Keynesian economics is the mechanism that fuels Crony Capitalism.
@JediBearBob
@JediBearBob 8 жыл бұрын
+Q-Hack! Nonsense.
@AdamHamdan1
@AdamHamdan1 8 жыл бұрын
truth.
@jacklovejoy5290
@jacklovejoy5290 8 жыл бұрын
maybe
@EanBHfjDTHQYKnHLRYvfKQ
@EanBHfjDTHQYKnHLRYvfKQ 8 жыл бұрын
+Q-Hack! Do you believe in evidence at all, or are you just in the baseless accusations business?
@qhack
@qhack 8 жыл бұрын
+Jesse Weber The evidence pretty much speaks for itself. The very definition of Keynesian economics allows the government to spend money where they think will do the best good. Sometimes the government will get it right. Most of the time, not so much. The whole system plays right into the hands of those who can afford lobbyist. Ever wonder why Washington DC has some of the richest people living there? Hob-knobing with politicians can be quite profitable.
@SexualPotatoes
@SexualPotatoes 8 жыл бұрын
Jacob, you speak too fast. STAHP! D:
@Ghostworld_
@Ghostworld_ 8 жыл бұрын
+Ali Haleem is it haram are you going to decapitate him
@SexualPotatoes
@SexualPotatoes 8 жыл бұрын
Ali Haleem It's not inappropriate, it's just a name. I am a very sexy set of potatoes.
@abo0od1996
@abo0od1996 8 жыл бұрын
+Sexual Potatoes they both speak too fast !
@SexualPotatoes
@SexualPotatoes 8 жыл бұрын
Ali Haleem It's ok, bb
@alihaleem8264
@alihaleem8264 8 жыл бұрын
+Jay Crunchy sorry
@martinezperez4e
@martinezperez4e 8 жыл бұрын
Every time I love Crash Course Economics a little more. I wish my teachers were like them hahaha
@ioan_jivan
@ioan_jivan 6 жыл бұрын
hilarious opening and ending
@F3V3RDR34M
@F3V3RDR34M 5 жыл бұрын
at 7:05 I was like "I thought u.s. debt went over $10t already, what happens to the clock?"so I googled and, guess what, another digit is added to it. that is so sarcastically convenient as how congress raises the debt ceiling
@michaeldeng1981
@michaeldeng1981 8 жыл бұрын
it's a bit fast...hard for beginners to catch.
@liamcullen3035
@liamcullen3035 8 жыл бұрын
Great episode!
@rahmanonimisi2917
@rahmanonimisi2917 11 ай бұрын
You guys are doing a great job 😁
@UserNameAnonymous
@UserNameAnonymous 7 жыл бұрын
Did she just compare laissez-faire economics to bloodletting and Keynesian economics to modern medicine? Wow.
@feynstein1004
@feynstein1004 7 жыл бұрын
Erm do you have a problem with that? It was a good analogy imo.
@UserNameAnonymous
@UserNameAnonymous 7 жыл бұрын
This is supposed to be a non-partisan educational series. They're flirting with the line between presenting unbiased educational facts and pushing a political agenda. The theory of modern medicine is based on scientific and clinical research. They study the effects of treatments using control groups so they know what happens when they do and don't give patients the treatment. Bloodletting was an idea that someone made up and it seemed to work so they ran with it for hundreds of years without ever really examining the evidence or testing their hypothesis. Bloodletting is a dead idea not worth spending any more time researching. This is what people mean when they make that comparison. Both Keynesian economics and laissez-faire capitalism are theories which can and have Been empirically tested and each has been found to have its own merits. There is lots of debate as to which is better and in what circumstances. I personally think that the evidence speaks for itself unequivocally, but research is a never-ending process. We need to keep studying both and testing hypotheses in the pursuit of improving human life. Comparing laissez-faire capitalism to bloodletting is asserting that it no longer needs to be looked at seriously and can be dismissed as quackery. That is far from the truth and only serves to deter people from giving it any serious thought.
@feynstein1004
@feynstein1004 7 жыл бұрын
UserNameAnonymous Perhaps you're taking it too seriously?
@UserNameAnonymous
@UserNameAnonymous 7 жыл бұрын
Feynstein 100 - Yes, I take it very seriously. The spread of false information like that can affect millions of lives.
@feynstein1004
@feynstein1004 7 жыл бұрын
UserNameAnonymous Lmao that's overreacting a bit. But I do agree that false information shouldn't be spread.
@FieldMarshalFry
@FieldMarshalFry 8 жыл бұрын
yeah.... taxes were only raised on the poor and working classes here in the UK, since they don't vote much, the Tory's cut the taxes of the super rich and corporations
@jacklovejoy5290
@jacklovejoy5290 8 жыл бұрын
+Field Marshal Fry baaaaa
@lordrockable
@lordrockable 8 жыл бұрын
Great videos as usual.
@michaelvanuytven3072
@michaelvanuytven3072 4 жыл бұрын
I had to watch this for school but I left a like for the Empire strikes back/Phantom menace joke. Nice one!
@kitsunekyubino9345
@kitsunekyubino9345 8 жыл бұрын
Don't ever put Empire Strikes back and... that _other_ movie in the same sentence ever again.
@rocko0214
@rocko0214 4 жыл бұрын
Keynes model worked great for Argentina... oh, wait...
@NickGhale
@NickGhale 6 жыл бұрын
so mindblowing!
@paxdriver
@paxdriver 6 жыл бұрын
Added to favorites lol well done
@makdaddybigmac1574
@makdaddybigmac1574 7 жыл бұрын
HAYEEEEEK
@josephang9927
@josephang9927 8 жыл бұрын
When the government tries to decide for the transactions of millions of citizens with different opinions, who know what is best for themselves, something get wrong.
@thekaxmax
@thekaxmax 4 жыл бұрын
but they aren't saying that. That's North Korea, and pretty well no-where else
@thenorseman8546
@thenorseman8546 8 жыл бұрын
Love this!
@kailebrogan447
@kailebrogan447 4 жыл бұрын
thank you for making this video
@alexfido2935
@alexfido2935 8 жыл бұрын
Yes, you can speak for the Eurozone, being "less successful". But that's the Eurozone, with it's massive problems such as, ooh, I don't know GREECE, and SPAIN, and ITALY, and their massive debts. The UNITED KINGDOM's GDP, however, is also growing, by 2.6 in 2014 and our unemployment in 2015 is 5.4%, a fantastic measure. And that's under 5 years of limited austerity under the coalition government. That's with 1 hand tied behind our back. This government is going to bring in more economic policy which will decrease unemployment even further, and reduce taxes, whilst reducing spending, and the economy's going to get even better in this country, whilst reducing the national debt.
@99thTuesday
@99thTuesday 8 жыл бұрын
You make a good point about the UK being a better comparison to the US than the EU for structural reasons, however the US is growing faster and has a smaller budgetary deficit than the UK which suggests a benefit to deficit spending.
@johanjarvinen
@johanjarvinen 8 жыл бұрын
+99thTuesday Or a stronger economy to begin with. For what it's worth, Germany has a 4.7% unemployment rate and grew their economy by 3-4% during the austerity years. They've since plateaued, as the Greek situation hit German banks especially hard, and they've been funneling money to bail Greece out. End of the day the comparison used was patently misleading and unfair. There's a case for the government to make use of cheap labour to build infrastructure during economic downturns, but overall Keynesian policies just sow the seeds of new bubbles.
@99thTuesday
@99thTuesday 8 жыл бұрын
+Johan Järvinen There's certainly a case about the risk of new bubbles being made out of the attempts to fix the old. However, I've always attributed this to the expansion of credit through monetary policy to address crises rather than fiscal policy responses. I appreciate your reference to the benefits of using cheap labour and would add that the 'parable of the broken' window suggests at least some benefit to Keynesian policies. The problem I have with using Germany as a comparison is that it had an artificially lowered currency through the crisis and were able to export their way to growth. It's one of the same reasons I wouldn't use China as a comparison
@99thTuesday
@99thTuesday 8 жыл бұрын
+99thTuesday Sorry, I meant to say the critiques of the broken window.
@johanjarvinen
@johanjarvinen 8 жыл бұрын
The broken window is used to imply that destructive practices can be beneficial to the economy, which honestly isn't a very solid position, nor very relevant. What I was trying to get at was that there are always certain infrastructural needs which in general have to be fulfilled by the government, but which will be beneficial to the economy afterwards. Conducting these works during a recession is both cheaper for the government and helps create a better basis for new growth (for example if the IT infrastructure were improved on). Or it could address lingering issues, such as the disrepair of bridges in the U.S. (which funnily enough the U.S. Recovery Act only spent less than 5% on, with infra spending as a whole being around 110bn of what ended up being a 830bn stimulus).
@quantroots
@quantroots 4 жыл бұрын
Something tells me the intro was over budget
@protoname_
@protoname_ 8 жыл бұрын
THANK you SO MUCH!
@BioHazardCL4
@BioHazardCL4 8 жыл бұрын
That beginning and ending though.
@j.s.m.5351
@j.s.m.5351 4 жыл бұрын
Just one error to point out (behavioural economics): a musician wouldn't save 50%
@kozzy18
@kozzy18 8 жыл бұрын
>EU >Austerity Yeah, Okay. The only EU country that had any semblance of austerity was Estonia, and the multiplier effect is just a Broken Window fallacy. To add to that Hoover was not laissez faire in any sense.
@uhohhotdog
@uhohhotdog 8 жыл бұрын
You're a joke. The EU did go austerity very much. It was big news for a long time and many protests.
@uhohhotdog
@uhohhotdog 8 жыл бұрын
You don't understand what the broken window fallacy is. Spending money on useful things is not a broken window
@Flying_Scorpion
@Flying_Scorpion 8 жыл бұрын
+orayole I agree Broken window fallacy isn't about disputing whether or the multiplier effect is real. If anything, it's more about whether or not destruction or war is good for the economy. .
@frankschneider6156
@frankschneider6156 8 жыл бұрын
+orayole The EU did go Austerity ? I guess this is why public debt in most countries rose by roughly 20% in 2 years. You call that Austerity ?
@isphus
@isphus 8 жыл бұрын
Not a single country actually reduced its spending. They all, Greece included, spend more money today than they did in 2008. How is that austerity? Growing less is not shrinking, regardless of how loudly local governments claim it to be.
@jamesturner7603
@jamesturner7603 7 жыл бұрын
During the 'great moderation' in the 1980's Thatcher and Reagan hated fiscal policy!
@claytillman2227
@claytillman2227 8 жыл бұрын
Graph at 2:00 can be described as riding a bike. We started to study economics, we learned how to reduce our periods of decreased GDP, but that didn't mean we had learned how to ride our bike over a pot hole and not crash.
@weekendreads_
@weekendreads_ 8 жыл бұрын
Jacob needs to talk more slowly
@GuyFromTheSouth
@GuyFromTheSouth 5 жыл бұрын
Yes im from the south and i can not follow him at all 🤣
@teddytechilo
@teddytechilo 7 жыл бұрын
Honestly, you guys speak way too fast, you have to realize that people come to your channel to learn and retain information.
@chrishoffman5938
@chrishoffman5938 7 жыл бұрын
In the settings you can slow the speed down... also pause and re-watch as necessary.
@mthlay15
@mthlay15 7 жыл бұрын
take notes and rewatch the lecture.
@aurelian3268
@aurelian3268 7 жыл бұрын
speeding down is funny
@thomaswinkler9610
@thomaswinkler9610 7 жыл бұрын
but the next slowest speed is 0.5 times aaannnnddddd tttthhhhhiiiiiisssssss iiiiiiiiiissssss wwwwwwwaaaaaaaayyyyyy tttttttooooooo sssssssssllllllooooooooowwwwww
@the_jaded_rabbit
@the_jaded_rabbit 7 жыл бұрын
it's called crash course for a reason.
@ray1983able
@ray1983able 5 жыл бұрын
Recessionary Gap , Inflationary Gap , Macroeconomics , Fiscal Policy , Expansionary Fiscal Policy , Contractionary Fiscal Policy , Deficit Spend , Crowding Out , Austerity , Multiplier Effect .
@suleimanhashimibrahim4095
@suleimanhashimibrahim4095 4 жыл бұрын
Well understanding lecture
Deficits & Debts: Crash Course Economics #9
7:31
CrashCourse
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
Macroeconomics- Everything You Need to Know
29:58
Jacob Clifford
Рет қаралды 3,3 МЛН
Sprinting with More and More Money
00:29
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 59 МЛН
Miracle Doctor Saves Blind Girl ❤️
00:59
Alan Chikin Chow
Рет қаралды 47 МЛН
Black Magic 🪄 by Petkit Pura Max #cat #cats
00:38
Sonyakisa8 TT
Рет қаралды 24 МЛН
ДЕНЬ РОЖДЕНИЯ БАБУШКИ #shorts
00:19
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
The Difference Between Fiscal and Monetary Policy
7:47
Professor Dave Explains
Рет қаралды 76 М.
Why Automakers Are Invading Your Privacy
14:23
CNBC
Рет қаралды 247 М.
Market Failures, Taxes, and Subsidies: Crash Course Economics #21
12:12
Y1 30) Fiscal Policy - Government Spending and Taxation
8:15
EconplusDal
Рет қаралды 343 М.
Inflation and Bubbles and Tulips: Crash Course Economics #7
10:25
CrashCourse
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
How it Happened - The 2008 Financial Crisis: Crash Course Economics #12
11:25
The Multiplier Effect- Macro Topic 3.2
5:35
Jacob Clifford
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Sprinting with More and More Money
00:29
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 59 МЛН