Simon, will you be testing this product personally? If so can you share your results

Simon we need DTU March 8 1994 Michigan Please make it happen

They only ship inside the US - how useless is that?!

@@davidmaxwaterman It’s great if you’re not in the US, you won’t get ripped off with a shady product.

Won't this just cause people to drink more? It might break down the toxins but the alcohol will still damage the liver, kidneys etc. A hangover is your body's way of telling you you've had too much.

That's my go-to line also .. very appropriate, it seems.

To more advanced life forms humans probably look like a train wreck. They know if they come we will try to kill them.

Why would aliens wanna visit a bunch of stupid monkeys fighting over shiny rocks and skin color?

Aliens that fly past earth roll their windows up and lock their doors, this is a dangerous side of space.

@@rossigrace5031 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 And the ones disregarding the warning broadcasts regret it. They end up in alien autopsy vids on KZfaq.

It is hard to get funding for Magic Pushy Stuff… Much earier to dark matter investigation 😂

It's incredible but also makes me feels like astrophysicists and astronomers could hear someone say "the universe is the inside of an infinite basketball" and just be like "bitch it might be" bc of how many unanswered questions they have

Oh cool the same rehashed video made surely for the ads. The fuck I'm making this comment and mans still talking about snake oil biotics. Channels dead fam

@@sa.8208 then don't watch or comment? Leave it to those who do enjoy it.

@@archstanton6102 S A T U R A T I O N

Thank you for the timestamps!

@@archstanton6102 I enjoy sci-fi too. It's as real as dark matter. These vids are well done, I like 'em.

Truest comment ever.

Yea, humans are so good at killing ourselves the population just reached 8 billion. If it's "in our nature to destroy ourselves" we're not very good at it. Oh that's right, man-made climate change. "Most" scientists agree, and yet none of their predictions come true.

@@ezrareviewshisalbums2735 You being a cynical A-hole, pretty much confirms it. How does reproducing have ANYTHING to do with NOT killing each other? If anything, it only increases the chances. You didn't think this through, did you? LMAO!

That’s genuinely the truest statement in humanity it’s like we have all these questions we want to go explore we want to meet a different species but we don’t try and it’s sad because I think majority of humanity can agree we are embarrassed of ourselves the fact we didn’t show any form of war or violence when we sent out the only evidence of our existence as a species and what we’ve done kinda sad

@Rusty Shaklferd Make no mistake: "we" (meaning me at least) already understand(s) these phenomenon. Don't mistake "authority" for "science". I've told you and other about this for years. In a static universe with virtually "contracting" content (objects and time scales), dark matter is "rescaling", as is "red shift", "time frame dilation", "nonlocality", "or "favorable genome selection". Rescaling is a generic property of mapping and a function holding between any two states and among all states (of reality, at any level of mapping).

Nice, when watching these kind if videos I often think: what someone who knows their stuff about be topic thinks of the video.

Indeed considering his main focus was odd things in news or history, very impressed with how well he understands it all and the scripts seem just punchy enough to attract those totally new, yet also a little depth for those who know a bit more. For those who want to learn more, I highly recommend PBS Spacetime for theory and speculations, and Anton Petrov for observations and things currently being puzzled over. Sabine Hosssenfelder is also great but I've not seen much of her stuff yet. Just glad she calls things out like the Religious Zealotry of people obsessing over the unfalsifiable multiverse concepts. It could be true, so what? Cannot ever prove it. Cannot ever get there. I personally am not convinced by the CDM Hypothesis, but I would be happy to be proven wrong. I do think perhaps MOND might have a little truth to it. Our perspective on how gravity works has been entirely Earth-centric until more recently. Also disagreeing measurements over the rate of expansion of the universe causes me to question Dark Energy, which is believed with almost religious fervour. I'm no professional at Physics or anything at all, except I am actually the logical thinker that many think they are, because their egos and emotions tell them they are. Constantly challenging my own assumptions, beliefs and trying to minimise the Confirmation Bias we all have, including me.

@@TheHorseshoePartyUK ty will look up spacetime and Hossenfelder! I to really like Petrov so am glad to get some new people to be amazed at😂. Btw I love your last paragraph! I feel the exact same. I have put an effort into digging deep into others' believes and love to be proved wrong, (eventhough many think I don't) it just means I learned something new! Makes working with my employer kinda complicated though. Found out after 2 years he is full on creationist who hardly knows the bible, didn't know who/what Besos, Musk, Amazon or Wallmart (&many more) are. I did suddenly understand better why he doesn't use, think or listen to logic.😏 lol this comment was supposed to be just a thank you😅.

@@Iris_and_or_George Tell me you're ADHD without telling me you're ADHD :P

😂😂😂😂

Cool! I was too tired to make this comment about "Dark" "Matter" only being "Something" that we infer or observe as having a Gravitational Influence on Fermionic Matter. As much as I truly love Simon, sadly, he shouldn't keep making Physics Videos, because he's so truly out of his depths that he conveys information that is misleading. Some things might appear to merely be minor nitpicks, but let's be real: everytime there's a Physics video, there are always issues with the very fundamentals... And this, for anyone scientifically oriented, is simply unacceptable, as it's the whole foundation upon which anyone who listens to this thinking they're learning stuff that is faulty and will fail them or make them fail at some point... I used to believe that Simon could present ANYTHING on ANY SUBJECT, but no. These things take Physicists to explain. With the extremely important added bonus that they'll be talking about their passion, about what moves them and fuels their lives and dreams! Such as NDT! Simon still has almost every other subjects available to him!

Energy (acceleration) also produces "gravity."

Mass is just energy with no momentum. Matter usually means fermions. Right handed weak bosons could mess that up.

@@DrDeuteron "Resting" mass, perhaps, but special relativity shows that nothing is resting; everything is moving relative to something else.

So glad you shared this! It gave me another great perspective

But there’s no reason to think the process takes EXACTLY as long as it took for us every time. Also, the Fermi paradox applies very well to our own galaxy, not just the rest of the universe. That is hardly looking “back in time” at all.

Add that our radio bubble at it's widest was maybe 25ly across(it's currently less than 10 and shrinking) Outside of that we would just look like a slightly noisy star. The only signals likely to be picked up at a distance are extremely directional, which has other issues. And our meti efforts like the aricebo are basically going to be some other civilization's version of the 'wow' signal.

What's your point tho? FP doesn't bother you and then you talk about speed of light(basically). It's like two half thoughts merged into one.

Yeah, time is the ultimate hurdle. Entire races of intelligent life have time evolve into and out existence within a blink of an eye on a galactic scale. The odds 2 races could evolve close enough to mutually detect each other within the span of their existence is remote. Even the human race is likely to evolve into some form of crab within the next millennia

Same here with one gripe; Fermi's paradox. An advanced alien civilization will not be using radio to communicate over vast interstellar distances. It's ridiculously inefficient and ridiculously insecure (even with encryption it still gives away your general location). We've already begun using lasers to communicate with satellites in orbit due to the increased bandwidth it offers. E.T is going to be using lasers or some other crazy technology we haven't discovered yet. And if E.T is not using radio, then we haven't even begun looking for aliens yet -- hence there is no paradox.

Actu7ally he gets the Big Bang wrong, so yeah...

He is neither nor wrong nobody knows what dark matter or it would have an actual name

@@con.troller4183what about it does he get wrong?

@@con.troller4183 so did Einstein, so I might just let that one slip 😂

I'm not sure anyone can actually grasp the concept of nothing. I mean, nothing, after all and by its very definition, simply does not exist. The word is literally the conjunction of the two words "no" and "thing." It's like dividing a whole number by two again and again and again, forever. No matter how many quadrillions of times it's done, you'll still be left with a number each time. In my opinion, infinity (whether or not it is a real thing) is a much easier concept to grasp than the concept of nothing. I would therefore conclude that there is very obviously no such thing as nothing. Given that, how could anyone possibly grasp a concept that is obviously impossible? To put it another way, if one claims that they CAN grasp the concept of nothing, they clearly haven't thought the whole thing through.

There is nothing magical about dark matter. It has effects, many different, independent effects, and those effects need an explanation. Some form of matter is the most likely explanation.

1. Antimatter gives a distinctive signature when it interacts with regular matter. Space is full of dust. If there was any bunch of antimatter, it would light up as it annihilated from the intergalactic dust. 2. Any mildly advanced(we're not) civilization would give off a distinct signature just from the amount of energy they would use. Simple thermodynamics dictates that any large consumption of energy should show up as strong infrared sources. Hiding this signature would be incredibly difficult and would require deliberate effort to mask their existence. Any civilization that would have access to this kind of energy would be able to fully populate an entire galaxy in short order. 3. The Dark Matter phenomenon is an objective measurement that cannot be explained. Dark Matter as a thing is anyone's guess. We're about as sure of Dark Matter existing as gravity existing. Neither can be properly explained. My analogy with gravity is more apt than you think. 4. Far away objects are moving away from us faster than light. This cannot happen because nothing can move through space faster than light. One of the few options remaining is that space itself is expanding.

The main problem with postulating antimatter galaxies or galaxy clusters is that 1. intergalactic space isn't empty, and 2. galaxies aren't fully self-contained. There is matter in intergalactic space, a thinly spread veil of hydrogen and other atoms. And if you had a galaxy made of antimatter, then it's antimatter will inevitably come into contact with the matter in intergalactic space, and the two will annihilate, producing gamma rays. And we would be able to detect this as a faint halo of gamma rays coming from the edges of every antimatter galaxy. Indeed, because of 2, it's even worse than that. Because the material inside galaxies doesn't necessarily stay inside galaxies. Galaxies are constantly ejecting bits of themselves out into intergalactic space, through quasar jets, supernovae explosions, or simple gravitational interactions ejecting asteroids, planets, or even full star systems. All of this material ends up in intergalactic space, to mingle with all the other material ejected by all the other galaxies. Antimatter galaxies would do exactly the same thing. Which means that, if antimatter and matter were equal in amount as theories predicted, then there should be equal numbers of antimatter galaxies spewing antimatter into intergalactic space as there are matter galaxies doing this, and there would therefore be equal amounts of antimatter and matter in intergalactic space. And this of course, means a continuous stream of antimatter-matter encounters with mutual annihilation, producing gamma rays, and we would observe all of intergalactic space positively glowing with a faint shimmer of gamma rays. Which of course, we do not. And even more spectacularly, galaxies and galaxy clusters sometimes merge. And if there were equal numbers of antimatter galaxies as there are matter galaxies in the universe, it should mean that half of all observed in-progress galaxy mergers would involve an antimatter galaxy merging with a matter one, with galactic levels of matter-antimatter annihilation events, and that should be one hell of a spectacular sight which would be utterly impossible for us to miss here on Earth. And we see nothing of the sort.

"Distant objects travel away from us faster than c" This not actually true in ANY reference frame. The reference frame people use when they say this is some sort of a nonlocalised reference frame that does not exist in real life. What we actually see is stuff redshifted into being so dim we cant see it anymore, with the CMB forming an opaque wall behind it all that only LIGO can see through, and LIGO has insufficient resolution to do the job.

​@@BenjaminCronce on point 2, you are presuming that we have full knowledge of how heat and energy work. Thats the main problem with the second law of thermal dynamics argument. Its true, provided there is no more knowledge to be understood on the subject. And to me, that spells arrogance.

👽We are the aliens 👾

Your theory, here, is exactly my own. Dark matter is nonsense, it's just matter.

One problem with that.....black holes. If gravity stacked through parallel worlds would make black holes strong enough to tear galaxies apart.

@@craigh5236 But doesn't that assume that the black holes in various dimensions perfectly "overlap"? If they were at different spatial coordinates in different universes, the gravity wouldn't "stack" perfectly. I know I'm phrasing this weirdly, but it's difficult to communicate these ideas.

This theory is one of the long lasting reasons why gravity is weak.

Maybe we just stack... In a dimensional sense. When enough mass is accumulated you push on another dimension or parallel universe. That way it would be severely weakened. Kinda like stacking trampolines. I mean that's my theory unless they actually observe the particles somehow

Your subscription will be assimilated. Resistance is futile

Because if it is one thing Eastern philosophies are known for, it is their tether to reality.

Never took physics...this video made me not remorseful of that fact.

Even so, it is somewhat disturbing that we have never seen any even moderately plausible evidence of technological activity from anywhere else, in this galaxy or any others (we have seen a few, very weak pieces of evidence that you could just stretch to accepting if you are willing to go down to "Ancient Aliens" evidentiary standards, but no credible scientist is). It may turn out that at least part of that is because we don't know what we should be looking for, and thus have not recognised evidence that we have seen, and/or that our instruments just aren't good enough yet, but really, neither of those should have been remotely possibly true for at least the last 20 years, minimum. On current evidence, only 2 conclusions are possible. Either we really are alone (as far as technologically advanced species go, at least), or we are the first, or very early at least, and will become the Ancient Aliens...

At least with the soybeans you know you're getting the good bacteria... and you get a meal. You gonna run a test to see if all your pills are true? Decisions, haha.

@@ungoyone Yeah I'm just trying to hype up my man Simon in case by some chance the company checks out viewer feedback in the comments cause I like him getting that sweet sweet advertiser cash 🤩 I've tried natto once straight up and honestly I couldn't finish it, but it's something I've always wanted to enjoy 😅 If I can find the right recipe or way to make a meal with it that works for my tastes i would be very satisfied. I happily acknowledge it would be a super beneficial food to add to my regular diet.

I'd say on Decoding the Unknown, he's more saying that aliens haven't landed on our planet - not that they don't exist.

they will prove they cant rule themselves they need God the alien. hes alien to us and watching

Thx :) (oh, lol, not me...)

Nope. At the beginning of the universe, everything was infinitely small. Essentially everything was touching everything and matter and anti-matter annihilated in massive amounts. Unless there was some reason that anti-matter and matter weren’t spread out pretty evenly, this theory wouldn’t work

Agreed. Basically, one of these two things are theoretically true. A) ETs or ET drones have already interacted with us here on earth (and for how long, I wonder?) Or B) World authorities (meaning authority structures somewhere in the world, not like "world authorities") currently possess a higher understanding of physics than we are told. There really isn't much if any room for neither of these to be true.

@@JELazarus III) The govt has been long-conning us for, at this point, multiple generations.

The "Corridor Crew" channel of VFX professionals debunked either all or just about all of those "UAP" shots. What the "former" UFO-hunter who leaked them failed to mention, was that the IR (as in infrared) camera being used was newly installed, uncalibrated, and operated by pilots rather than camera experts. "black body radiation" of a fellow jet, a trick of perspective of the "capsule", etc. were the MUCH more likely explanations.

@@Vaeldarg I'm not sure I'd call that a debunk. I just watched the whole video. They do offer up what appears to be some plausible explanations (I don't have the VFX know-how to argue or challenge any of their points effectively), but it seems far from conclusive. A challenge to be sure, but definitely does not rise to the level of a debunk.

See machs principle.