I like the way you think

import fizzbuzz fizzy = fizzbuzz.Fizzbuzz() fizz = fizzy. fizzbuzz(start=1, stop=11) print(fizz) 1, 2, fizz, 4, buzz, fizz, 7, 8, fizz, buzz, 11 easy :-)

lmao painfully accurate

I kept looking for that "Read More" button and never found it.

FYI - I've chuckled at this joke every so often for at least a year.

Or a proffessor at a university...: "The verification of this proof is left up to the reader"

@@aurelia8028 🤣🤣🤣👍🏻

@@aurelia8028 trivial

Not really a JavaScript programmer at all but to save on if statements: for (var i = 1; i < 100;i++) { var output = ""; var division_test = {3: "Fizz", 5: "Buzz"}; for(var key in division_test){ if (i % key == 0) output += division_test[key]; } if (output == ""){ output = i; } console.log(output); } it's relatively trivial to fix, there is likely a more elegant solution for the whole problem, but meh it works and solves the repeating code problem.

@@deathZor42 nice

"When I wrote this code, only God and I understood what it did." "Now... only God knows."

@@zainmushtaq4347 That's me after I come back to an old project.

That scene from LOTR comes to mind in Moria, "I have no memory of this place...."

"What moron wrote this??" -> sees it's you on git blame -> "Oh.."

It sound extravagant to write code that defends against a determined opponent who knows everything about your code and how best to conceal errors from you; until you realize that opponent is you six months ago....

And it's often read by the original writer long after they've forgotten about how they wrote it

Yep, I think the person who wrote the code reads it more times than anyone else, at least in my industry.

If your code doesn't look like deranged notes of a schizophrenic cultist can you even call yourself a programmer

Yep, I'd rather write code spread over a few lines, with each one doing a clear function, than doing some fancy operation all in one line then trying to figure it out 3 months later :D

@@azuralmusic Messy code takes your mind away in the matter of hours. You write something, you write something else, come back, AAAAH WHAT IN THE WORLD WHO WROTE THAT (me)

This guy does too many things. :3

Enke796 😂

Dan Cojocaru you should see what he can do with Matt.

as*

Yeah. Someone else is future him in most of the cases. Greetings

"Repeating yourself like this is a sign of dodgy code." This is a personal and unwarranted attack on my way of life sir.

@@jamesfoo8999 "Repeating yourself is a si

@@ejgoldlust @UC1OdUjZdTpo85Umes5LMVkg^^^^^^^ What they said. Hey, repeating what someone else did is just efficient.

A little DRY humor? (OK, I'll be quiet now.)

never before have i so been so deeply offended by something is entirely agree with XD

This itself comes from mathematics, where sums over numbers is done with regards to the INDEX number, hence i.

@@jackismname That's how I learned it as well, and x,y,z are just brought over from mathematics. "foo" and "bar" are fascinating, though :D

@@jackismname The origins go back to Arabic algebra (as opposed to Greek), i has nothing to do with index, at least not in the way you're thinking

@@julianbrown1331 Got it, I realize I made a big/ erroneous assumption here!

I always assumed - probably incorrectly - that i meant integer.

especially considering that you can use a logger that just wont go to the line except if told to.

Also what if the interviewer asked them to change it so it said "Pop" on multiples of both? Then you're back to that repeat.

@@sploofmcsterra4786 Can't you add an exception that if the print is "FizzBuzz" change it to whatever or something?

@@Miscio94 sure, but then you're running the same tests again on the output, which was the original problem with the if else statements

@@sploofmcsterra4786 I'd say that diverges far enough from the initial assigment that it can require redoing the code. Since combining words on multiples of more than one "key number" is an integral part of the game

True legends code only in scratch ✌️

I was wondering if there's a good way to do it on the Micro:bit :)

Tynker all the way

I learned python so that I could code my own macros.

Y'all using scratch? Noobs. Real legends know that logic gates are the master coding system

Using a hash/dictionary/js object/map/whatever it might be called ``` (1..100).each do |number| options = { 3 => "Fizz", 5 => "Buzz", 7 => "Whatever" } output = " " options.each do |factor, word| output += word if number % factor == 0 end output = number if output == " " puts output end ```

​@@0colorad0 Here, I guess the answer to "I'll leave fixing that problem to someone else" is: function replace(double number, double divisor, String replacer){ if (number%divisor=0) return replacer; return ""; } function fizzbuzz(int end){ for (i in 1 to end){ String output=replace(i,3,"Fizz"); output+=replace(i,5,"Buzz); if (output=="") output=i; print(output) } }

@@0colorad0 what is that programming language? Ada? C?

@@ananttiwari1337 looks like ruby

Math textbooks in a nutshell.

That's scarily accurate considering I did the entire problem and forgot about printing the leftover numbers

I'd blame the interviewer for not giving me clear requirements and ask if they are in charge of hiring BAs?

That's a very interesting anecdote. I'm the kind of person that enjoys interviewing for a job and I'm always a tiny bit excited when I come across challenges like that Thanks for the insight!

I don’t get it. It’d be obvious you did things wrong when you just see fizz and buzz on screen. The interviewer would be a real jerk if they don’t let me compile and debug (which is a huge part of programming), and then blame me for making that type of mistake

@@michaeltan7625 Are interviewers meant to accommodate? No.

Id just generate a list from 1 to 100 and replace random numbers with "Fizz", "Buzz", or "Fizzbuzz" and tell them to run it until its correct :D

@@Nagol93 how does your program know when that is?

@@spitalhelles3380 Thats the user's job

that actually isn't _too_ bad of a solution

@@sebgamingkid i guess it’s kind of dependent on what the OS is optimized for but i feel like usually writing to arrays is a significant bit slower than integer division

The quickest way to code something is often to look up on the Internet if someone already did it. You managed to have already done that before you were asked the problem, so really you are more than qualified for the job.

Anne Aunyme Papa Bless KZfaq recommendations... (for today)

I saw this video a couple weeks after my interview, this questions came up.. I didn't get the job. Wish I'd cheated

In real life everybody looks up stack-overflow anyways

So, has your ability for code prognostication extended into the tasks you've been asked to do? There's a huge market for people who know what to look up on Stack Overflow before they're even given a task.

dragmire3D I had to code a shift-tac-toe instead of tic-tac-toe. Try doing that with if/else statements...

We got a project to make a simple atm machine as a freshman and I made it in around 600 lines of code. It did work then, but now I don't even understand what the hell I did and how tf it worked. Later when I got some good understanding of the language(C++), I decided to do it again and this time it took about 200lines of code to do it. and most of the lines were just empty lines with braces to keep a clean readable code.

I wanna see that code

I am a freshman and I'm basically at the stage you guys are describing. I bodged my way through converting simple C code to python in around 700 lines of code and it hardly works 😓 we were asked to write it in C.

@@anushakabber2709 C as a freshman ? Your teacher is a sadist, or do you mean C++ ?

Do you mean failed as programmed it the not optimal way or did not manage to even give a working solution?

@@MrJuzzi3 I mean failed to give a working solution at all. Interestingly one candidate from UCSD solved it in like one minute. It just demonstrates to me that programming is about problem solving and having only knowledge won't get you very far.

@@moonlifeSW Wow, that is surprising, well this does give me some confidence in my own skillset!

Work smart; not hard.

@@WinterSnowism very true. Don't copy paste deep learning AI code and then expect people to just not talk to you about it.

I recommend you avoid the field of quantum computing then

Most of the time I can write a solution as good as that, but would take me hours of fine tuning. Or I can read one solution online, say "that makes sense to me" and go on with my life. I copy the solution, not the code itself, even if I copy the code.

@@fieldmarshal7298 i dont think you understand the word "smart"...

But what if you want 1000?

@@HandledToaster2 must.. copy.. and paste.. HARDER!

Interviewer: "no do it for 1 to 10 million

@@GameCyborgCh THIS IS GOING TO TAKE SOME MORE COFFEEEEEE

now instead of 5 and 3... make it 12 and 10 :) i think coffee wont be enough anymore

@@inigo8740 I cannot consider an OS with a kernel created by the person who thought git had a sensible user interface. And really the issue was trying to get clang to work. Basic GCC I got to install with mingw super easy. Windows feels very much not a priority for the clang project

@@inigo8740 From my point of view Windows is the dark side!

@@inigo8740 I'm running Gentoo, so it was kinda important for the compiler to already be installed.

sudo apt install build-essentials :)

You could probably just use arduino C

Not... Integer?

@@Palewhitegamer Actually because in the earliest programming languages it was called an iterator. Short i

@@TrenteR_TR this makes _way_ more sense than 'hex 69'... Thank you!

Usually in mathematics you use i as the index in an addition

I've always thought it was short for "index"

const numbersToReplace = [ [3,'Fizz'], [5,'Buzz'] ] for(i=1;i !(i % replacement[0])) console.log( r.length ? r.map(result => result[1]).join('') : i ) }

@@1414fritz you have misunderstood the problem. It's multiples of 3&5 (so 6,9 etc) not simply replacing 3 or 5

@@1414fritz tf is this 😵

@@1414fritz you need an exorcism

@@MrOod67 you have misunderstood his code, that is what it does, just not in a very clean way.

​@Shreyash Adappanavar If you're the only person who knows what your code says, if your company wants to fire you, whoever they get to replace you will have to figure out your garbled mess.

Spaghetti code can easily be avoided by rewriting it and using comments.

I swear the whole "I'm the only one who can read this" doesn't ever work out. Most companies will just hire a contractor to rewrite your code, but with comments. Companies don't care about you or your code, they just want the end product to work.

I was working in a relatively new position at a company and their database was total crap so I built them a new on and transferred all the data over. I'm kind of worried about what it looks like now since it's been 3 years since I left and I think I was the only one in my office who knew how to design a database in Access.

@@stevenhart6788 I did something similar with a recurring seasonal job. Their detailed data on over 12,000 people was in one humongous, messy spreadsheet, which was almost impossible to search or query quickly, and full of repeats and errors, whereas my replacement database was a fraction of the size and fully relational. It looked almost identical to the old spreadsheet to users, but was far quicker, more intuitive, and above all, more reliable. Every time I returned, after 5 months' absence, someone in the IT Department had reverted it back to a huge, messy spreadsheet which I had to sort out before I could do my job. This went on for several years, after which I discovered that the problem was that nobody in IT really understood the advantages of databases. I expressed my incredulity in clear and succinct terms, then left them to their own devices. Turns out that after 6 or 7 months, their 'improved' spreadsheet had been deleting data during each save, until, finally, someone noticed that there was something wrong. They lost almost half of their data, because a mistake in their spreadsheet, which I had pointed out at the beginning, had been re-introduced. It cost them a lot of money. Only then did they decide that a database would be better than a spreadsheet. In fairness, they did apologise to me when I was doing an unrelated job for them, several years later. Sometimes you cannot teach people; they have to learn for themselves, and, all too often, they learn things the hard way.

It took me a good 15 minutes to read and understand that.

That's a good one.

@tr3v0r Line 1: Dictionary containing the word for each multiple Line 2: Start of for loop Line 3: Uses a set comprehension to create a tuple that contains whichever part evaluated as true. For any i in the iteration it will check if i%val == 0 is true for either val = 3 or val = 5 (the two keys in the dictionary), and if so it will put the corresponding 'Fizz' or 'Buzz' in the set. From there whatever is in the set (could be either 'Fizz', 'Buzz', both, or nothing) is joined with the empty string that was initialized right before the .join Line 4: If the string created in line 3 is an empty string that evaluates to false so it will output the number i, otherwise it will output whatever output string was created in the previous line

@@Rgriffproductions You took the time. You are commendable, friend.

good one bro

Or an older you, but in my case I guess that's the same thing.

ChevronTango They probably are.

They will become so

It's funny, they often are.

It's "murderer".

It's true. I've had to go back and change my code just a few months later and I sit there, scratching my head and wondering, "what was I thinking?"

If you want an easy life, always work on new projects.

I've had this nightmare of an experience as the poor sod fixing bugs in 10,000 lines of repetitive code. And not just one source code, but multiple 10,000-lines of repetitive sources. A simple bug fix would take days to accomplish because the variables were scattered absolutely everywhere, in multiple huge files. Ended up just refactoring everything as I went along. Eventually having to take just 5 minutes to fix a bug with the newly refactored code because the fix would require me to just change ONE thing instead of HUNDREDS.

Well you will probably have to modify others code, so show some courtesy and do what you expect of others.

There are those rare times when I come across a piece of five year old code and think "Past me was a genius!" Not all the time, mind you, but I like it when I used to be smart...

Just Monika.

Thats the beauty of coding, when you figure something out and it works. That's why I do it too.

Nice

So? How are you doing 3 months later?

Monika, are you scheming something?

Dong Huang now do it for 1-1million

Duh! Obviously!

Dong Huang i hope you are joking

@Exter It's easy, make a program that writes each line of code for you.

That's a pretty girly way to do it

🤜👊✌️🖖🤜🤘👍🖖👍👉🤜🤘👍✍️🤚👎🖖👋✊👌☝️

really?

@@kipchickensout r/woooosh

@@mapelaanjakoodaansuomeksi3432 r\woosh

@@kipchickensout do you even know what that means

tom's just that good at teaching m8 😊

I'm a computer science major. I wound up getting a job in civil engineering pls help

Python is both an easy language to start with and a good one. JS is not.

actl with py experience its p ez to start basic js because its almost the same just with slightly different syntax

@@jujuProductions python has radically different syntax to JS

@@Flackon like basic basic js

Imo js is the worst beginner language

I would do it exactly same and I am not linguist. This problem is about words not so much about algorithms.

When I was learning programming we were taught to always start with suedo code in plain english as it made it much easier to understand what the code was supposed to be doing For example if I've written "When count is greater than 7 output a message box saying limit reached" and then I write "if varx

Do you even know what ur saying or just picked something up from a lecture at school?

@@michaelscofield2652 yes I know what I'm saying

Yeah we were told to pseudocode but I've found it's largely a waste of time for most problems. The only time I ever really bother is with recursive algorithms

You are hearing this again and it is just now clicking. You understand because of our college professors.

I know you're telling the truth. I feel sad and angry about this! This is from an online article about James Altucher (chess master and best selling author) . It said: Altucher says he ended up taking on "massive" debt to go to Cornell, where he majored in computer science. He then attended graduate school, though he dropped out before finishing the degree. He says he still didn't have the skills needed to enter the workforce. *"When I finally got a job, I was so bad at computer programming they had to send me to remedial classes for two months so I could be good enough to do the minimum required at my job," he explains. "So I'm not sure what I went to college for."*

He taught you how to make a hello World loop your professors taught you more important stuff I’d hope

I try to avoid else as much as you can. Using break/return statements to bail out of nested places when possible.

In C++, why not use SWITCH? Way easier to understand and expand. IF should only be used for decisions with two possible outcomes. (yes, they compile to the same, but a bunch of IFs stringed together gets confusing fast)

Agreed. At a month into learning programming you're just fine playing with loops and if-then-else statements. You're doing great; don't worry about the advanced stuff.

Hello if else fellow, I did it too👋🏻👋🏻

@@LRM12o8 You also can get stuff too long for a switch statement, in which case you probably want to do it dynamically if you can

[laughs in Go’s switch-statements]

[laughs in LittleBigPlanet2 selector blocks]

[laughs in Scrap Mechanic logic blocks]

[laughs in Minecraft Command Blocks]

[laughs in OCaml almighty pattern matching]

But now you’re still repeating yourself. Instead, consider putting the ‘3’, ‘5’ etc rules in a little list, with their expected outcome, and you get a generic solution, without repetition. Make those rules an argument to the function, and it becomes composable.

Iterator although it could be index if you are working on arrays or something

Iota is another meaning. In fact languages like c++ have a function called iota which will fill array with sequentially increasing values starting from a value you decide.

Index is the best way to think about it. There are iterators in other languages and they are a bit different.

I assume it's originally from math... xyz and ijk are common variable/dimension names. When not using xyz coordinates, ijk is the more available set of short variable names, and thus eventually became the convention.

Integer best suited

sounds right to me, I was told it stood for integer but I believe your explanation more.

I thought of it as "iteration", "index" or "increment" depending on what the loop was doing.

"i" for iterator.

I just used i because it had no meaning, because i is a temporary variable

@@launchsquid n stands for integer in general. i, j and k are used for iteration. Sounds familiar? It's also used to represent vectors in math, but in C, it's arrays.

Maintainability also becomes a thing, especially when it comes to potential future changes. Will multiple matches always append words or is FizzBuzz for 3&5 actually a special case where appending just incidentally works? Should conditions be evaluated in a specific order? Will there be negative conditions (like with leap years)? Non-modulo conditions? Etc. There's at least a dozen good solutions depending on what the goals are, which makes this problem a lot more profound than it initially seems.

Its mod 3*5 elseif mod 3 elseif mod5 else i

totally wrong. If they ask you to do it you do it. I wouldn't hire you

@@toxic_narcissist I wouldn't work for you then

@@toxic_narcissist good luck hiring someone nice and competent (username checks out)

That probably explains why my dad used to write Sinclair BASIC progs with i and j (and occasionally k or even l) as the variables for his FOR-NEXT loops... before he ended up in management his gruntwork was a string of programming gigs on industrial mainframes that used that kind of hoary old language. Always thought it was a bit odd, and that maybe he was "leaving space" to use the lower letters for other purposes or something... (hey, I was like five years old, I knew nothing)

i stands for index.

^"i for index" comes from math, as do j and k. Current Fortran specs implicitly type variables starting with various initial letters, but you can disable them. Fortran is still in extensive use because of its performance in vector arithmetic, interestingly enough. It's not particularly hard to write in, once you get the hang of it.

The implicit integer variable names in fortran were those that started with i j k l m n. Or i to n, or the “in” crowd as I used to remember them. “In” for integer if you prefer. As a default I preferred “k”, because it doesn’t look like the numeral 1 or the lower case L. K was my kounter. This habit has persisted for 40 years.

For some reason I use k. And if I have a second for loop in a loop then I use c.

Yes please

Definitely

is that 3,5,7,11,13 or something?

Have a different word for each prime number less than 1000

bruh

@@arlingtonhynes how do you propose someone learns to code, if tutorials are not allowed

@@ammyvl1 Programming tutorials are usually written by bad programmers who don’t understand the material. Learning something wrong is not the same as learning it right. If you can’t grasp that, go away. Then again, if you didn’t understand my comment, you’re a hopeless idiot.

@@arlingtonhynes snob.

@@mohit_panjwani Getting it right actually matters. Clown.

What would you do instead of modulo?

Yea FizzBuzz would be printed but also all the other numbers that comes after a "Fizz" because you didn't add a " " so not a correct solution

Programming is just putting logic into words and symbols. So long as you can think, you can code.

@@KingUnity22 Not to mention, once you can speak the 'language' all you're doing is googling your problems.

I just learnt something

i is for integer 'nuff said.

This would help understanding how FORTRAN ended up with i to n as integer naming initials, so far great. I was not aware of of 19th C conventions. My guess is that engineering/scientific programmers of my generation brought up on 14" Winchesters, punched tape, music ruled paper and teletype terminals developed some rigid habits through the use of FORTRAN. IBM FORTRAN was '56 maybe, I cut my teeth on FORTRAN 77 on a Perkin-Elmer, K&R came out '78? My money goes on FORTAN for 'popularising' it and their fore fathers for insping/informing them.

I j k and are actually used in linear algebra to denote the values of a vector so it’s still very common

i means iterator. this isn't a mystery. it's common knowledge.

*mind blown*

it's also the "i"ndex

When I was a youngin', I associated the i with the practice of "i"ncrementing

nah it's from integer

No it was because really old machines needed to be as efficient (short) as possible. I believe it started with machines that used punch cards as storage. Proper physical memory

What a nice teacher...

Did you prove him wrong?

@@brooksgunn5235 nope, can't use a computer for anything other than word and video games...to be fair there's not much need of a smith who codes

I had a similar experience with, but I did end up as a computer programmer.

Son, that should be a dict. rules = {3: "Fizz", 5: "Buzz"} for i in range(1, 101): output = "" for divisor, word in rules.items(): if i % divisor == 0: output += word if output == "": output = i print(output)

@@JonMW That's also an option

Very cool

​@@JonMW The results should be pre-calculated and put into a dict as well. Takes less time to multiply the special cases than to check every number against a logic statement with division in it. ----------------- low, high = (1, 101) # if you don't understand the following two lines, look up "list comprehension" fizz = {i*3: "Fizz" for i in range(low//3, high//3)} buzz = {i*5: "Buzz" for i in range(low//5, high//5)} for i in range(low, high): # dict.get defaults to returning None if key doesn't exist # None checks as False in an if-statement if fizz.get(i) or buzz.get(i): # The default return value from dict.get can be changed with a second argument print(fizz.get(i, "")+buzz.get(i, "")) else: print(i) ---------------- Trying to add the idea of a rules dict makes it into list/dict comprehension city! ----------------- low, high = (1, 101) rules = {3: "Fizz", 5: "Buzz", 7: "Duzz"} results = {rk: {i*rk: rv for i in range(low//rk, high//rk)} for rk, rv in rules.items()} for i in range(low, high): # if the key doesn't exist, no list index is created. Meaning the list length will equal the number of keys found. resultList = [results.get(r).get(i) for r in rules if results.get(r).get(i)] # an empty list checks as False if resultList: # join is a string method which joins all strings in an iterable with the target string print("".join(resultList)) else: print(i) ---------------- This code can then be wrapped in a while loop where low and high is increased by 100 to make the game work infinitely.

mine is quite traditional : for i in range(1, 101): if (i % 3 == 0) & (i % 5 == 0): print(i, ": FizzBuzz") elif i % 3 == 0: print(i, ": Fizz") elif i % 5 == 0: print(i, ": Buzz") else: print(i)

then you find out it is a duplicate

Love this.

Tom Scott this was cool! Quick question: I could have easily solved this with my single semester of Python coding that I took in college this year. Is that normal? It seems this test is a bit easy...

Tom Scott Always assume that the person who will maintain your code after you has violent tendencies and knows where you live.

AnXplodinTurtle Yes this test is easy. I've only seen it as a warm-up question before moving on to harder questions, usually as a quick filter when it's suspected that the interviewee can't code their way out of a paper bag. It's super useful for that!

AnXplodinTurtle It's supposed to be easy. It's not just about "Can you solve it?" (if you cannot, why are you applying for a coding job?), but also about *how* you approach the problem. Are you writing something that works and calling it a day? Or are you planning, weighing pros and cons, preparing for future needs?

I don't think it's just about someone else taking over your code, though... I've definitely looked back at code I wrote six months ago and had no idea what the hell I was doing.

These function names made sense at the time, but what the hell does preArgCheck do? Or initSetFolow? What was I thinking?

If you get hit by a bus tomorrow better to have messy code that works than pretty code thats unfinished.

My Algorithms and ADT's professor told the class if that they got nothing else out of her class, at least make sure to provide documentation.

There's always someone else to pick up the slack and finish the work though, that's a great deal easier if the code is easy to follow and continue than it is to work through a spaghetti of mess. Bigger picture and future planning vs more immediate results.

Make it work on 7s instead of fives, and run it out to 500! You've got one minute to make the edits.

@@1ax i mean, no

@@1ax oof

Zeldagigafan let me just pull out this random flash drive I have that coincidentally has the file for that

@@1ax This is super true, I used to be an active roblox developer using proper programming techniques, and... To say the least, HOLY CRAP ROBLOX LUA DEVELOPERS ARE SO TERRIBLE 99.99% OF THE TIME, People would get me to work on a project because they couldn't find someone else to do it, so I'd help them out just to see that another dev had been there, only just to dump thousands of lines of spaghetti and garbled bad techniques. I'd just delete all of their code and script objects and do my job after that had been revealed to me. So glad I don't work with roblox development anymore. Apologies for any grammar errors, im too lazy to fix em

No, you can't use a switch statement, because you're not testing the same value against multiple possibilities where it can only be one of the possible values. A switch would be for something like "press 1 for English, press 2 for Spanish, press 3 for Sindarin..." In this code, you only test each value (i mod 3, i mod 5...) against one possibility.

5 years? A couple of weeks is all it takes me to forget nowadays!

Try 40 years.

If you want to keep your job, you have to write code that noone else understands. This way they can t replace you cause you re the only one who can maintain the code ;)

Julian Meier :(

@@julianmeier5235 i had a co worker who does that

Or iguana for that matter. But the only correct answer is integer. Learn your Fortran already

Or the square root of -1

I use x, I feel like I'm weird

@@looserty819 simple algebra thought process, it's not weird. you just thought, "well i need a letter to represent a number, and everyone just uses "x" for that"

I usually use a word. in this case could be "index" or "iteration" (instead of iterator) because sometimes you are going to use that variable inside the loop, so I do that for the sake of readability

Quite rare a comment makes me laugh hard!

Go full programmer on them. Print fizzbuzz 100 times, like they said.

@@zach7482 python 3 print ("FizzBuzz "*100)

Print "FizzBuzz one hundred times?"

100.times { puts "fizzbuzz" }

I came up with this in java script: const fizzBuzzObject = { Fizz: 3, Buzz: 5, Pop: 15, } const fizzBuzzArray = Object.entries(fizzBuzzObject).sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1]) for (let i = 1; i

swift for i in 0..

If I = "fizzbuzz" I = "pop"

Problem is for loops and if statements are very slow for computers. I did a comparison in python. The arrays method took 0.2 seconds to do a million numbers, and the for loop with conditional statements took 66 seconds for 1 million numbers. Here is my code. import pandas as pd import numpy as np import timeit() def fizzbuzz(n): array = np.array( range(n) ) fizz_buzz = array[ array % 15 == 0 ] buzz = array[ array % 5 == 0 ] fizz = array[ array % 3 == 0 ] array[fizz] = -1 array[buzz] = -2 array[fizz_buzz] = -3 df = pd.DataFrame(array) df = df.replace(-1, 'Fizz') df = df.replace(-2, 'Buzz') df = df.replace(-3, 'Fizz-Buzz') df.iloc[0] = 0 print(df) def fizz_buzz(n): df = pd.DataFrame( np.array( range(n) ) ) for i in range(n): if i % 15 == 0: df.iloc[i] = 'Fizz-Buzz' if i % 5 == 0: df.iloc[i] = 'Buzz' if i % 3 == 0: df.iloc[i] = 'Fizz' df.iloc[0] = 0 print(df) start_time = timeit.default_timer() fizzbuzz(1000000) print(timeit.default_timer() - start_time) start_time = timeit.default_timer() fizz_buzz(1000000) print(timeit.default_timer() - start_time)

out.replace("FizzBuzz", "Pop"); gang gang

Oh it's Jabrils! Cool! I'd say Tom should do a video on machine learning but that's more your style!

if "Tom Scott" > 25 and "Tom Scott" < 50: print("True. Tom Scott is {} age".format("unknown"))

@@ivan-1876 Yes, except... Why are your variables strings?

@@TypicallyThomas I'm not creating a Tom Scott variable because then I would need to add a _ in place of the spaces and it would look bad haha that's the whole reason

@@ivan-1876 Python I see?

@@wateryagarvideos5186 It's the only language I've learnt if you don't count scratch

Yes it made my fingers twitch too.

it took me 3 minutes.I am not even in college just in school. class IX

@@pravinrao3669 You are blissfully unaware of how you are the butt of many jokes. It's easy to tell from your narcissistic and braggy comment.

same dude

@@pravinrao3669 Doesn't count without source :-)

would be cool to stick a little clicker on each of the LEDs and let it run

I'm also imagining it running a bicycle wheel somewhere with a card in the spokes.

attach a piezo buzzer and a couple of 555s plus the appropriate discrete components (one set for a short duration one-shot pulse, the other tuned to oscillate at a certain frequency different from all the other nearby ones) to each one? Beepboop city.

Kreditworks 😂 I love it.

Is there a JavaScript version of the Obfuscated C Contest? That looks like it would belong in it.

I think that's certainly the shortest way. I think this would win in "Code Golf" but it's not easy to read.

That's nice. At least for "code golf".

Very nice job, only complaint would be that it starts at 0 and goes to 99 instead of start at 1 and go to 100 :)

I'm glad someone else remembers that!

ijk are also hella common mathematic iterators

No, those are much older than that.

@@IngeniousIgneous literally almost as common in maths as xyz. Also related, lul.

But that just moves the problem on a step: why was I to N chosen as the default integer range?

Filip Hendrik sounds like a children's game for young programmers 😂😂

Or, a drinking game where you add a couple more conditions to replace numbers and require consumption of a shot upon a mistake!

And a less fit company that could be sunk by smaller issues. (so don't try this at a start up)

Not if you work in an environment that has code critical reviews and/or quality assurance. You get found out pretty quickly.

In my experience, it instead leads to pressure to have someone else rewrite and scrap the offending code. So instead of creating job security for yourself, you are creating opportunities for others to replace you.

If you can't be replaced, you can't be promoted.

"No no, you don't understand, Brainfuck is THE BEST programming language to solve this particular problem!"

Honestly id rather work on code like this than just about any other, assuming you put some comments in to explain the weird or difficult to understand bits of logic

amen

That is how I do it for uControllers, Arduino or when doing a quick proof of concept in Processing.