I love it when one ex-spouse doesn’t even need to say anything and they just let the other talk and dig themselves a deeper hole. It’s so satisfying

Sarah Leyva Pike was arrested in Maine and extradited to Amelia County, VA on charges of solicitation of the murders of circuit court Judge Joseph M. Teefey Jr., his wife, attorney Brooke Teefey, and Amelia Sheriff Ricky Walker, making a threat in writing, and another threat to bomb or burn a public building. In Nov 2023 she requested a jury trial. At that hearing, the case was continued to Jan 25 and 26 for the trial. --> And that is how she is doing right now. Father has the children; they are safe, happy, and loved. She has no contact.

The fact that she's been charged with solicitation for murder against a judge and their family is just wild. This woman is more dangerous than I could have imagined

This just popped up today, watched the whole thing then looked her up. She was charged with soliciting murder (2 counts) among other things and extradited from Maine to Texas in November 2023. Today she plead guilty to some of the lesser charges in a plea deal. CRAZY!

That smile just proves she enjoys this so much. She loves being on stage. It’s not about her children.

The fact that she interrupts almost every single time someone else is speaking is evidence that she cannot control herself .

This Karen has pointed out something she thinks is wrong with everyone but herself and yet she’s the one who had her kids taken away.

I don't think she's a sovereign, but someone who watched too many movies and wants to play "Erin Brokovich" 😀

I just love it when people start talking over the judge and begin their statement with "With all due respect your Honor" when "due respect" is the last thing on their mind.

The amount of privilege they're giving her with interrupting this court proceeding is outrageous.

A remarkable demonstration of the famous "idiot for a client" rule.

I love it when this judge said he is denying the motion to recuse the "honorable Judge Wells"

Her statements “your Honor, you know what’s going on here and Ms Borum knows what is going on here” is such infuriating gaslighting. What a manipulative, miserable person

I absolutely love how the father just sat there quietly and let his attorney do all the talking and his ex show how crazy she is.

I'm a law school graduate but couldn't hurdle the BAR exam, I randomly came across your videos after not caring much about law for well over a decade. Somehow several of your videos have peaked my interest so much haha.

This woman doing all this and she don't even have her kids????? 😅😅😂😂😂

If she put half the effort into being a good mother as she did filing false claims, accusations and taking up the courts time she probably wouldn't be in this mess 🤣🤣

Can you imagine having her as your mother? If those kids haven’t seen her in a year, it is now in their best interest to keep it that way until they are 18. She is unbelievable.

WAIT! WAIT! WAIT! SHE'S not comfortable with HER address being public?!!!

The fact that this person can disrspect the court and not go to jail shows they have no control...LOL

Every day her kids are separated from her is a gift to them. Can you imagine having to live with this woman?

The irony is that every single one of her Judges are actually TOO kind and lenient (to a fault) is the most bizarre part of these sham recusals.

She is currently charged with soliciting for the murder of a judge, his family and others in Texas and was extradited from Maine.

So this Karen files a motion at every Judge who rules against her? She must REALLY get off on this. Sign of a complete sociopath. I see why she lost her children.

It's so aggravating when you find yourself in the presence of someone that cuts everyone else off and then spews like a sphincter set on blast.

Let’s all say a prayer for the significant other and children in this ridiculous woman’s life.

Holy crap… Cases like these just make me scared of all the things that can happen if you have kids with the wrong person.

The scariest part is she has supporters that have no idea about the case and are just going off of her crazy theories.

I wish the judge would be harsher with her when she interrupts because she’s not got any consequences except for the judge telling her to let the prosecutor talk. That’s not enough

I don't think she is so much a sovereign citizen as she is an "amateur lawyer." She did some research, maybe consulted some online legal sources, and she has made what she feels is a cognizant and coherent argument. She also has an ulterior motive to prevent the case from being sealed. I think the motive is somewhere along the lines of vindictive public shaming of the father. She is attempting to set up a "gotcha" scenario but is doing so unsuccessfully. God Bless 🥰

I feel very frustrated when a Judge will allow a woman like this to drone on and on and attempts to take over the meeting.

From the video's I've seen on theses types of channels: when the Judge let's you interrupt and "run the show", it's not because you are winning. It's because you are going to get hammered and the Judge just doesn't want to give grounds for an appeal.

She's the type of person who is used to getting her way by talking over people and trying to intimidate them into silence. She doesn't realize that only works at the grocery store or with friends and family. But court is DESIGNED to disallow that to happen.

This judge does not have control over her court and it drives me crazy that she doesn't immediately shut Sarah down when she interrupts

If she spent the night in jail for contempt, at least the lawyer would be able to finally serve her! 😅

She thinks she’s another Lauren Boebert. She is a whole joke. She is a whole joke.

She is so manipulative. That whole, "We all know," spiel is straight out of the narcissists playbook. And that fake cry at the end is absolutely hilarious.

When I saw her smiling reaction to the judge’s ruling it gave me a sense that she may love the fight for her children more than having them. The “Cause” gives her purpose and meaning which is reinforced by the approval of her friends, accolades from activists who use her and notoriety on social media. Toss in animus toward her husband and any judge or attorney that dares to defy her it is a pretty heady cocktail. Dopamine on the rocks with an adrenaline chaser.

Notice how no one interrupts Blondie when she talks. But she can't let anyone else speak without her butting in "Objection, Your Honor: Nuh uh".

She simply has a problem with anyone that doesn't agree with her. The charges she faces are serious and she needs to go away for a VERY long time!

As someone whose job it is to work with trafficking survivors, it makes me so angry when people throw the word "trafficking" around as a buzzword to make things sound salacious. That said, this lady is beyond the pale. I cannot believe she doxxed people in legal documents. SMH

I'm guessing her ex husband saw this a million times to be able to sit so quietly without laughing.

We really need to get folks back in the courtroom.

I am retired from almost 25 years of working child protection. I had to change my home phone # numerous times & had special security for my family at least twice. But the best story was an alcoholic father that belonged to a pre-sovereign citizen group. He would email the group leader w/cc to the rest of the group before hearings & after hearings. BUT... Somehow he got my work email mixed up in his cc list! So I got a copy of every email he sent out! And he was telling them some magnificent whoppers about what was said in court, what he'd done to comply with orders, and how the foster family was trying to steal his children by lying to the court! He had 3 children & failed to mention that 2 of them were over 16 and in independent living group homes and apartments, not in foster care w/foster parents who wanted to steal them. 🙄 The 3rd pre-teen had transferred to supervised relative care with a maternal aunt where disabled mom & her little dog, too, were also living. There was a no contact order between Dad, the children & their caregivers because he'd been arrested many times for being violent when drunk - which was most of the time. Finally even his group leader started questioning Dad's stories & offered to go to court w/him. Dad refused saying it would make the judge & caseworker (me) mad & we'd stop his supervised visits (which he never showed up for 😒). He was very surprised at the next court hearing when I testified we'd have no problem with his "friend" coming to court with him! His attorney asked why I'd mentioned that fact. I advised that he'd sent me an email stating he was afraid we'd stop his visitation if his friend came to court to support him. He called me an f-ing liar & said he'd never sent me an email! Therefore we got to enter the string of emails he'd been sending into the court file! The judge was definitely unhappy about the lies he'd been telling about court & persons involved. Also his not taking any responsibility for ANYTHING! I never got another email! 😅 Sadly, his children never re-established a relationship with him and their mother passed away a few years back. But they are all living successfully on their own now - the oldest girl is now a surgical nurse at a large children's hospital. Not bad for kids whose parents used to send them to the grocery store w/a shopping list, no money, and told them they'd have to sleep on the streets if they came home with no food. 😊

With people like her, there is no wonder our courts are so backed up. Talk about filing every baseless motion!

Catherine Borum is nothing short of a role model for attorneys. How she handled all of this was beautiful.

They should have put her on mute the moment she started interrupting everyone. I've seen other judges do it, and it's frankly the only way anything got done with people like her who can't even wait to hear an entire sentence before objecting. (also the fact she objects before they can complete a sentence is very telling about her motives and innocence; if you can prove you're innocent why would it matter if they finish speaking? she's not aiming to refute them but silence them, probably the same way she kept her husband oppressed in the household.. shouting over him and telling him he's wrong and has no place to say what he does) You can tell she has no respect for the court system and just wants to see how she can use it to demand respect for *herself.*

"I am your honor, I'm taking notes, because I cannot remember all of the lies in my brain!" -Flame Thrower Karen Whiskey Tango Foxtrot 🤣🤣🤣

Her kids are lucky that they've had a year free of her poisoning.

If she would put the same energy in to improving her parental skill as she does into getting even with her X she would be mother of the year.

She's in prison for trying to kill a judge absolutely wow

You can tell she’s memorized certain phrases without understanding anything about the legal principles.

I have no problem believing this woman violated the terms of her custody agreement based on her behavior towards a judge and during court proceedings. She reeks of "I does what I wants!!"

Her seeking judge after judge after judge looking for her desired outcome is tantamount to asking her way up the manager chain.

That was a good speech but you still are not getting your kids back...😂

I feel like I am watching a high school debate team member show up in court to defend themselves. And fail miserably.

This broad is absolutely terrifying. She comes off as vengeful. It seems as though she will say and do anything about others to harm them in pursuit of her vengence. Nicolas, how did you find this gem? My sympathies. I pray for you, sir.

I don’t see why judges don’t take advantage of the online hearings and mute people when they keep talking out of turn.😂

As a retired prosecutor, I've had to deal with people representing themselves......thinking they are qualified after watching 4 episodes of Law and Order. One guy kept telling me that the testimony by the victim is not evidence. 🤦‍♂️so I told him verbatim thr definition of evidence and he still didn't believe me. So, I told him to ask for a public defender. He was reluctant. But I finally convinced him to let people who do this for a living do their job.

The fact that the judge keeps allowing this woman to interrupt is making me crazy😖

From the outside looking in….what I’m not sure she realizes is that accusing everyone around her of not understanding or being wrong only makes her look worse. 😬

Imagine what kind of argument her kids have had to go through every time they ask for a drink or an ice cream.

This woman's fake cry behind a HUGE smile (s) and laughing!!! OMG

If she’s not a Scientologist, she’s a skilled sovereign. It’s almost as though she’s obsessed with trying the case/the fight rather than having access to her children.

I love the look on the judges face when she says "you know exactly what's happening." When she says "trafficking children" she means taking them away from her. She really has no idea what chid trafficking actually is.

She doesn’t feel safe giving her address but is fine doxing court officials and attorneys…smh…

The judge needs to order her a psych exam immediately

“However, when I did a little research …” A little research is a dangerous thing

That woman should’ve been arrested for contempt of court, liable, slander, harassment, and suspicion of child endangerment. Put her in general population and accidentally let it slip that she’s here for crimes against a child or children. I doubt anymore would be heard about her, not a loss

Wouldn't it be fun to watch HER and Darrel Brooks have a debate!? 😵

I can see why she needs to hide, the number of people looking for her for making illegal allegations against them must be long.

I’m sure every judge she appears in front of has the same concern “Today is the day my clerk/stenographer walks out of the job”. What a headache of a human being 🤦🏽‍♀️

“I object to anyone saying anything before the court that I do not like!!”

I know this is old but that affect you're referring to, she's trying to sound as if she's upset and distraught over her children but what comes through is her rage at being challenged and defeated over and over. It's narcissistic rage. And she knows enough to know she needs to sound and look upset about the situation but her ego keeps her from being able to perform that act. Her entitlement, the idea that what she says isn't being automatically believed, is just boiling inside her. I bet she screams and throws something when the camera is off but then immediately becomes very stilted and not calm but bottled, and starts to plot on her next move.

Why does the court warn multiple times but allow Leyva to interrupt w/no consequences? The lack of action after warning Leyva over & over to stop interrupting will make others follow her poor example. Follow through people.

Catherine Borum's rebuttals are *chef's kiss*. She shuts this Karen down in every way and I love every second of it.

When a judge lets you keep talking, they have most likely made up their mind and are just letting you prove you are plain WRONG! love watching professionals stay focused when against someone who thinks they can just annoy and talk their way into being right.

She absolutely should be held in contempt. Because they don’t is why the courtrooms have become a circus show in some.

This is the first video on this channel I've seen and at first I was like who's this guy with the blue background laughing and talking in court lol

Dude, this is the best, I love Pro Se litigants when they think they are smarter than the attorney who went to school and practiced for years.

Why does the judge allow this girl interrupt like this. I lose respect for the judge.

When people pop off like this, do they ever get called on public defamation? Shouldn't She have drawn a contempt charge at least?

Take control judge!!! These judges “allow” her to go on and on and on with comments that are not pertinent to that day’s court proceedings.

I feel bad for Nicolas Leyva. I can’t even imagine all the manipulation and gaslighting he’s been through with this loon.

When a Karen think she knows better than a person who has a Law degree. 😂

When someone mischaracterizes and defames you, it is hard not to interrupt. The Judge understood that the derogatory comment triggered an instant response. Lawyers without integrity say crap fast, so there is a lot to respond to. Saying she absconded with the children DEMANDED an immediate response. The lawyer is not hurting children, but she is just as dirty, lying to the court that she kidnapped her children. Both sides are despicable!

The crazy lady’s disrespect for the court by constantly interrupting whoever is talking. She should be charged every time she does it. She’s doing it purposely.

She's incriminating herself right in front of the judge. She's digging herself in a bigger hole than she already is.

I googled this woman and she is a horrible person! Thank goodness she is in custody!

I have lived in the rural “South” near small towns my entire life. I know every notary within about 100 miles! What they do carries no influence on content in the document other than verifying whose signature it is.

She seems more invested in fighting in court than actually getting her children back. I bet she never spent this much time and energy actually being a mom when she had her children, otherwise she would have never had them taken from her. She’s more focused on identifying herself as a victim of the court system than identifying as a mother.

She, as a non custodial parent takes the kids to another state. Then claims corruption when TX child services goes all the way to her new location, takes her kid(s) back to TX.

She was on a podcast and said people should “take their guns to the court and make the judges stop”

Putting there home inf is beyond evil. If any harm comes to any of them she should be charged with it.

The way she blends nutbag and reason is very very dangerous.

I am so annoyed that the first judge didn't even give a contempt warning for that chick constantly interrupting and talking over the other lady

All you needed to know is that this woman refused to take the husbands last name. Fellas, if a woman refuses to take on your last name in marriage that should immediately disqualify them for consideration.

She went in there with a fire in her belly, and she thinks she's right and that any other version of the scenario is malicious, perjurous(made up word, I know), and possibly treasonous.

For what it’s worth - from Reddit: “Hi. I am a KZfaqr who did a deep dive on Sarah's case for the purposes of supporting her I contacted her via email for a copy of the evidence folder she advertises on her TikTok and she provided it to me. Her story was extremely compelling however once I reviewed the documentation I dropped the entire project as I could not frame this in any way that would make her look good without lying about what I found. The Texas family court has a pretty bad reputation when it comes to seperating children from thier parents. A lot of these stories are absolutely heartbreaking. This is not one of those cases. The hardest part of sorting all of this out was figuring out how the things Sarah was saying during the hearings related to what was actually going on. She has a tendancy to skip steps in her thought processes which makes it difficult for 3rd parties to follow along. There is what she is saying, and there is what she means and the two do not always align unless you've studied the timeline, the court videos, as well as her social media posts. I will do my best to elaborate. For example, one of her videos is a hearing is to force the recusal of the judge overseeing her case however during the video she does not provide any legal justification for the recusal of Judge Wells. She instead attempts to retry her child custody issue starting from the arbitration agreement. That is not the purpose of this hearing but she believes that going higher up will get her the results she wants, but it wont. She keeps refering to the "irrevocable mediated settlement" that she claims gave her the right to take the children out of state. Sarah has provided this to me directly upon request via email and she is incorrect. Everything that followed stems from that primary fundamental misunderstanding. Had she clearly states her intentions the arbitrator would have advised that they cannot grant it as a matter of law. She believes a personally requested addendum written in vague language that she requested be added to the arbitration agreement supercedes Texas state law, which it doesn't. No child custody arbitration agreement allows one parent to take a child out of state without the other's knowledge or permission. She is wrong about this and refuses to move forward on anything else until a court agrees to this which will never happen. What she refers to as "perjury" from child services is thier "unwillingness to admit that she outsmarted the texas family court system" by adhering to state law instead of the vague language addendum she requested. She has also conducted herself in a mannor which a reasonable person can only presume to be bad faith. In addition to constantly interrupting the proceedings and threatening to have her ex husband shot when he drove to virgina to see the boys, she attempts to include family court employees home addresses in her filings despite having zero relevance to the case. Whether this was done for the purposes of harassment or not, it would facilitate the harassment of family court employees. She has shared the courtroom zoom link with another activist in her circle, who was completely unrelated to the case, so he could actively disrupt the proceedings. I also suspect that she was involved in a DDoS attack on her ex husbands lawyer's office in another effort to disrupt and deprive him of his lawful representation during a hearing beefore a judge. There are steps she can take to regain access to her children. She simply refuses to engage with those steps or take any action to get them back through the system which is why her original attorney quit. I have a copy of those texts as well provided to me by Sarah herself. She now believs that her former lawyer is also a part of the conspiracy against her. I have reviewed every document and I can only reasonably conceive of two possible scenarios: Scenario 1 - Sara Pike is extremely intelligent and dangerous person who has found a way hack the court system to harass her ex husband, as well as the court staff who have rightfully sided with state law, while falsely interjecting herself into an activist circle with legitimate grievances in order to garner personal attention and build a career as an activist. Scenario 2 - She is mentally ill and is being enabled by strangers online.”

A child custody agreement is never "irrevocable" as the circumstances can change at any time which could require a change at any time in the best interest of the children which is clearly evident since she has had no contact with the children for a year