Crazy Reason Why US Spend 1 Week Maintaining B-1 Bomber After Each Flight

  Рет қаралды 332,409

Fluctus

Fluctus

8 ай бұрын

Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel for a discussion about the B-1 Lancer, one of the highest-performing and most maintenance-intensive aircraft in the U.S. fleet.
Fluctus is a website and KZfaq channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
We publish 3 videos a week on our KZfaq channel and many more articles on our website.
Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
/ fluctusofficial
Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

Пікірлер: 209
@uuzd4s
@uuzd4s 8 ай бұрын
I worked as a Mechanic & Maint QC Inspector for a U.S. Major Airline for decades and have just recently retired. I can honestly say that former USAF trained mechanics were easily among the best we had working on our A/C. The other interesting note along this subject is that former Marines made the best supervisors IMHO. The levels of intuition among skilled Aircraft Mechanics tends to be well above average in my observations. You were pretty much figured out, as to your integrity and aptitude, by management soon after you began employment w/ this group and placed on critical jobs accordingly. Upper management was always careful to hire & place managers that were approachable & had experience from the ground up. This made communication Much easier and therefore, fewer error's were made. Good People, Gr8 Job, Good Times !
@stevetaylor5290
@stevetaylor5290 7 ай бұрын
“error’s” 😮
@niklasf25
@niklasf25 8 ай бұрын
Calling Airbus a french company @8:42 got me laughing :)
@haweater1555
@haweater1555 8 ай бұрын
As a comparsion, the fastest drag racing cars, the "top fuel" class, require complete engine and powertrain teardowns and certain component replacements after every run. Each time about 30 seconds of idling and low power and 5 seconds of full power. Total miles on the engine before complete replacement is only 1 or 2.
@richardt1792
@richardt1792 8 ай бұрын
Some years back, I saw, heard and felt one of these take off at Long Beach Airport in California. It literally shook the city. Loudest thing I have ever heard.
@aaronlarson4358
@aaronlarson4358 8 ай бұрын
They come to my local airport sometimes for some touch-and-goes, and they haven't used any afterburner the last couple of times, but once a few years ago they stopped by at night and used afterburner, and we knew one was stopping by when our entire house started shaking and then very loud afterburner noises started happening.
@alevans51
@alevans51 8 ай бұрын
A pleasure to maintain. Reliable because we make it that way.
@canlib
@canlib 8 ай бұрын
Too expensive because we made it that way
@usaturnuranus
@usaturnuranus 8 ай бұрын
For some rough comparison, I had a friend in the 70s who was in an armored unit at Ft. Sill, OK. He said that for vehicles like the large battle tanks, the maintenance averaged out to roughly 8 hours for every 1 hour of operation. So considering the massive complexity and sophistication of just about any military aircraft, I'm not at all surprised at the downtime and expense involved. The US military establishment hemorrhages money, as it has been since over a century ago with the advent of mechanization.
@chrismair8161
@chrismair8161 7 ай бұрын
I'll go with rough. Tanks go...50 mph ish? This sucker is doing almost MACH 1 catching tree branches in the underside of the fuselage as they roam just 50 ft off the deck. I know it is an old video but they still keep them! I wonder why...
@marckhachfe1238
@marckhachfe1238 8 ай бұрын
The B1 must be the most beautiful plane in existence, after the Concorde
@NonFlyiingDutchman
@NonFlyiingDutchman 8 ай бұрын
and the Concorde entered service 10 years earlier, did regular trans Atlantic flights without having to maintained between each flight, carried more pay load and flew faster....
@marckhachfe1238
@marckhachfe1238 8 ай бұрын
@@NonFlyiingDutchman HA! Very true my friend, very true.
@CJMajesty
@CJMajesty 8 ай бұрын
@@NonFlyiingDutchmanMilitary planes do things civilian airliners dont/cant do.
@iAPX432
@iAPX432 8 ай бұрын
They both take-off with afterburner on! What a spectacle!
@NonFlyiingDutchman
@NonFlyiingDutchman 8 ай бұрын
@@iAPX432 I used to drive regularly on the M25 motorway near Heathrow airport. If you drove past when a Concorde took-off you're really new it! the noise was incredible.
@thelegendaryblackbeastofar39
@thelegendaryblackbeastofar39 8 ай бұрын
The pilots get lot's of glory and rightly so. It's a shame that the ground-crew, those men and women who work tirelessly in the background, don't get enough credit. Imagine keeping such complex machines ready to take off at a moments notice, a Herculean task!!!
@ChainDragGONE
@ChainDragGONE 8 ай бұрын
The B1 bomber at Warner Robbins aviation museum is a beautiful sleek black guard of the past. It may have been a maintenance nightmare, however it did show if American might wants something no one could think possible, American inginuity will build it. It is the most beautiful of the planes along with the F111. I'm sure some of the pilots that flew the B1B think dam what a time to been in the seat!
@stanstanly3812
@stanstanly3812 8 ай бұрын
Had the pleasure of working on the Bone for over 30 years. She's a beast of a jet for sure but we had many flights on multiple days without 1 week of maintenance? They do take a lot to keep flying...that's for sure. They do their best when they fly regularly. Let them sit for a while on the tarmac and you'll be in for a lot of maintenance to get them airworthy. I will tell you this - When this jet is flying well, fully loaded, has you targeted and you are the enemy.....You can kiss your ass goodbye.
@-108-
@-108- 8 ай бұрын
Love it!
@philipparker9437
@philipparker9437 8 ай бұрын
I had the pleasure of helping to bring the BONE online and heartily agree with @stanstanly3812. The more they flew, the better. Let them sit, and problems galore. We flew the heck out of them 7 days a week. @stanstanly3812 last statement is absolutely true.
@stanstanly3812
@stanstanly3812 8 ай бұрын
Were you at Palmdale? @@philipparker9437
@dmc9791
@dmc9791 8 ай бұрын
Damn right!!!
@jimheidl1272
@jimheidl1272 8 ай бұрын
So you are saying that that 1st comment was crap?
@garymiller5937
@garymiller5937 8 ай бұрын
Quite informative. Thank you.😊
@mickyday2008
@mickyday2008 8 ай бұрын
Top bomber. Went to see the four B1s that arrived at RAF Fairford on Sunday. Awesome
@grimreaper7198
@grimreaper7198 8 ай бұрын
An F-100 driver told me years ago that the F-100 required 40 hours of maintenance for every one hour of operation.
@TheGor54
@TheGor54 7 ай бұрын
😂
@veitkoss2603
@veitkoss2603 8 ай бұрын
Absolutely gorgeous aircraft.
@godbluffvdgg
@godbluffvdgg 8 ай бұрын
Awesome Aircraft~ Just missed them - USAF 81-85, But I did see the F-15 issue...:)...
@paulmakinson1965
@paulmakinson1965 8 ай бұрын
The supersonic airliner Concorde probably didn't have the high maintenance the B1 required or it would have been even more of a financial black hole. Nevertheless it was twice supersonic and bigger than the B1. It had a larger pressurized volume for passengers (vs. only the cockpit for the B1). It also had 4 afterburning turbofans (Olympus). Evidently, the Concorde never needed to do high G maneuvers, so probably, the structure didn't get as stressed.
@toomanyuserids
@toomanyuserids 8 ай бұрын
Concorde had turboJets not turbofans. It sucked fuel like nobody's business. The Concorde was heavily subsidized by the French and British governments
@reneegudjon3204
@reneegudjon3204 8 ай бұрын
​@@toomanyuseridsHad enough fuel to go over the pond plus reserve , didn't it?
@mostevil1082
@mostevil1082 8 ай бұрын
@@reneegudjon3204 When it was designed fuel was cheap, then OPEC happened. Also the US blocked it from various airports and profitable routes ostensibly on noise grounds.
@reneegudjon3204
@reneegudjon3204 8 ай бұрын
@@mostevil1082 Sure. But changing economics had nothing to do with the airplane being an engineering marvel in a thousand ways and it's technology advancements were put in good use in other ac
@hmartinspliff
@hmartinspliff 7 ай бұрын
Concorde didn't just break the sound barrier, it broke American ego as it rolled in and out of JFK like a boss. Concorde gave the Americans PTSD of those dark, dark days when they woke up to find that the Soviets had put the first satellite and first person into space and put to the test the idea of American exceptionalism. Concorde got the Americans covering their ears and complaining about noise 'cause they don't like the sound of non-American thunder streaking across their skies.
@panam747
@panam747 8 ай бұрын
Beautiful aircraft to fly!
@jeffpuras7501
@jeffpuras7501 8 ай бұрын
The same reason it takes only 20 minutes to get a Cessna ready for another flight.
@timeless6964
@timeless6964 8 ай бұрын
The B-1 Lancer Is My Kind of Bomber!!!
@salimchoudhry7426
@salimchoudhry7426 8 ай бұрын
Good maintenance system..
@leeebbrell9
@leeebbrell9 8 ай бұрын
Omg look at the size of those engines wow
@denverwynn4
@denverwynn4 8 ай бұрын
This was written and narrated as if it was a highschool student reading their essay.
@Discretesignals
@Discretesignals 8 ай бұрын
92-96 Bone armament systems technician 28th and 9th bomber squadrons. Maintenance intensive is definitely under rated.
@Clonefiles
@Clonefiles 8 ай бұрын
Very Good Videos
@tomm1109
@tomm1109 8 ай бұрын
Its got to be easier than the B-36. 370 spark plugs to change every other month!
@gretareinarsson7461
@gretareinarsson7461 8 ай бұрын
It’s such a beautiful airplane.
@overbank56
@overbank56 8 ай бұрын
If it's maintainance intensive then maybe it's not worth it
@mitchellthor6129
@mitchellthor6129 8 ай бұрын
I think the capabilities it brings make it worth having, to a point.
@getl0st
@getl0st 8 ай бұрын
@@mitchellthor6129 In war you'd be wanting to deliver it's capabilities 2 or 3 times a day.........
@samspade8612
@samspade8612 8 ай бұрын
The great Money Pit. A maintenance nightmare. A Sitting Duck without stealth. Who are they kidding? Someone made a lot of money off this mistake.
@hoghogwild
@hoghogwild 8 ай бұрын
It was designed with a reduced radar cross section. Size of B52 at 1% the RCS. Reduced exposure measurement from minutes to seconds.
@JoRoWi83
@JoRoWi83 8 ай бұрын
Such a waste that it was directly ripped off by those Northern threats
@bobgroves5777
@bobgroves5777 8 ай бұрын
So, what is 'crazy' about the B-1 bomber?
@c130comm
@c130comm 8 ай бұрын
That's one bad ass aircraft
@colinamwilliamson
@colinamwilliamson 8 ай бұрын
Airbus isn't "actually" French.
@rockpadstudios
@rockpadstudios 8 ай бұрын
My first job out of college was EMP Testing for the Air Force and The B-1B was the plane I worked on. I've been in every bay on that plane.
@stanstanly3812
@stanstanly3812 8 ай бұрын
AEB, FEB, CEB...LOL me too.
@socaljarhead7670
@socaljarhead7670 8 ай бұрын
The big one has been since the day at energy service, maintenance nightmare. It is consistently had one of the lowest Mission capable airframe rates of any aircraft in the United States Air Force inventory for the past for decades.
@jonathan_careless
@jonathan_careless 8 ай бұрын
It's Huge!
@cuba3433
@cuba3433 6 ай бұрын
Buenísimo el video thank you
@VisionCommunications
@VisionCommunications 8 ай бұрын
That bird is worth the maintenance!
@torehaaland6921
@torehaaland6921 8 ай бұрын
Doesn't really sound like that. In a real high intensity war, that bird need flying more than just once a week.
@joyl7842
@joyl7842 8 ай бұрын
7:30 the patch on that man's jacket says "B-2 Flight Test" not B-1.
@heinzkobel5961
@heinzkobel5961 8 ай бұрын
Nice and large. No problem for new designed airfighter jets and drones wich are armed with new types of rockets!😊
@I.M.A.Panther3619
@I.M.A.Panther3619 8 ай бұрын
When the Pentagon asks for more money, Congress asks, “how much do you need?” The Pentagon says, “ more, more, more, more and a lot more.”
@BazingaTing
@BazingaTing 7 ай бұрын
B1 is more like a big F111 than an F14.... 👍 Shes a high maintenance beauty 😁
@Journeyman1642
@Journeyman1642 8 ай бұрын
PLEASE SOMEONE GIVE THESE POOR CHILDREN A MILWAUKEE IMPACT!!!
@thumbstatetransparency8643
@thumbstatetransparency8643 8 ай бұрын
What the he** does the Airbus maintenance program procedures have to do with the B1? Half the video was a commercial for Airbus. Just asking!
@4kjanko
@4kjanko 8 ай бұрын
Fluctuating always does that. They’ll put the focus topic for the first half, then play something completely different or unrelated.
@Guruwalker
@Guruwalker 8 ай бұрын
Yes bro I was mailed them wrote a teet to them but they still doesn't care about it at all they always miss leading the content in every video they think it's normal and all people who watching their video are dum stupid it was so annoying when they keep doing the same in all videos
@bradhayes8294
@bradhayes8294 8 ай бұрын
I think the B-1 Lancer looks like a big goose.
@PASKEN458
@PASKEN458 8 ай бұрын
As a former Master Officer Airman Sergeant First Class Grade 1 Enlisted Warrant Brigadier 3 Star Purple Heart on detachment to the MAJESTIC 13 Nuclear Security Forces Seal Team Alpha Red during the Space Force campaigns to recon and destroy the Lunar Big Foot after being released by the Secret Gray Alien United Nations Police, I can confirm this is a plane.
@aaronlarson4358
@aaronlarson4358 8 ай бұрын
It may be expensive, but I don't care who you are, it is the coolest aircraft flying. I don't know if I would say ever because ever is a very long time, but it is close.
@rustonluff
@rustonluff 4 ай бұрын
Perfection, but for next years model all in on all available upgrades price for perfect is just right
@billpotokar360
@billpotokar360 8 ай бұрын
... 9:02 ...ps ...all the plames designed to replace the C 130 are parked at davis monthan ...
@tomstamford6837
@tomstamford6837 8 ай бұрын
Strictly speaking isn't it the "B1-B"?
@hichammouaddib7762
@hichammouaddib7762 8 ай бұрын
Have a good day to.
@nigelwatkins558
@nigelwatkins558 8 ай бұрын
right at the intro : B1B is not supersonic
@skyking6989
@skyking6989 8 ай бұрын
How many freaking bombers do ya need? F117, F111, b1b, b52, b2, i mean its crazy
@user-gl9iz1bp1r
@user-gl9iz1bp1r 8 ай бұрын
Cost/Benefit analysis. Can a society afford it? I would like my roads fix, safe cities, and nice parks/trails.
@tomsear1
@tomsear1 8 ай бұрын
Oh, nice. I used to live and work near that Aussie range. Funny stories warries. 😅;)
@christopherhill3067
@christopherhill3067 8 ай бұрын
Imagine a B1B super intercepter
@droL_si_suseJ
@droL_si_suseJ 8 ай бұрын
The engines with the Mx guys in the still pic used as the cover photo do not look like B-1 engines. The engines look too big.
@aperson9460
@aperson9460 8 ай бұрын
those are b-1 engines.
@drjamespotter
@drjamespotter 8 ай бұрын
With that level of maintenance required, I wonder how many aircraft are ever available?
@shenmisheshou7002
@shenmisheshou7002 8 ай бұрын
They run about 51% availability (last report I saw) but some of this is because some number of aircraft are always out for extended periods for upgrades. The cockpit upgrade many years ago took 240 days per aircraft. I am not saying that the B1B is a bad airplane, in fact I think it is a very goo d airplane. The problem with the B1B (and the F-35 as well) is that it was simply too expensive to buy and operate, which limited the numbers that could be purchased and the amount of time they could be flown for practice missions. For the B1B though, it could never really be used as a strategic bomber, which was what it was supposed to do when congress raised the program from the dead after Carter dumped it. Carter was right. In the end, we spent far more on the B1B than we ever got out of it. It would have never carried a nuclear weapon in war because the war would be over before any B1B could reach a target.
@AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc
@AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc 8 ай бұрын
F14 Tomcats retired because of 80 man hours maintenance per flight hour.
@shenmisheshou7002
@shenmisheshou7002 8 ай бұрын
The maintenance Man Hours per flight (MMH/FH) our for the B1B is in the mid 70s, but to be fair, the B1B is a large four engine airplane, but then again, the MMH/FH for the B52 is only 62 hours by comparison. The B2 is about 45 hours, but that does not include the maintenance to the special coatings and low observable materials. One could expect the B1B to need more maintenance as they age, but the reality is that the B1B is almost worn out and will be phased out of service by the early 2030s. Now the B1Bs dropped a lot of bombs during Desert Storm, but it used none of its high tech features to do so. In other words, a far less complex and expensive bomber could have done as well. The low level penetration was not useful, and the speed was not useful. A fixed wing subsonic replacement for the B52 would have been money better spent.
@stanstanly3812
@stanstanly3812 8 ай бұрын
The B-1 went through an extensive mod starting in 1996 called the CMUP program. We realized the jet was no longer useful for its intended purpose as you stated. That did not make it unwanted! As a matter of fact - right now it's the most conventional mission capable aircraft we have. We had many briefings during the Afghan war from pilots and ground controllers praising the B-1's capabilities. Generals were asking for B-1's all the time. Ask any Army grunt in the war what his favorite plane was. There were reports of Taliban fighters waving white flags after the B-1 had simply flown over their heads! Your 51% availability is sadly correct. It is a big complicated, maintenance heavy aircraft for sure but hardly the disaster you describe. @@shenmisheshou7002
@stanstanly3812
@stanstanly3812 8 ай бұрын
The B-1 dropped zero bombs during Desert Storm. It's not almost worn out and it's still the best low level maned aircraft we have. Please get your facts straight before you post. @@shenmisheshou7002
@Phil-D83
@Phil-D83 8 ай бұрын
Bigger flying turkey than the f35..damn
@jenwright2577
@jenwright2577 8 ай бұрын
The bone!
@ghtwghtw7197
@ghtwghtw7197 8 ай бұрын
so in essence like the f35. a great white elephant
@kshepard52
@kshepard52 8 ай бұрын
No wonder the damn things are so expensive.
@jaynicew
@jaynicew 2 ай бұрын
I wish Congress and the AF would approve a brand new B1R to back up the B21 when Stealth isn’t as needed… - 4 F35 Engines allowing for Super Cruise - Sensor Suite all over the airframe turning it into a mobile command center like the F35 but with 4X the range - Long Range Air2Air Missiles allowing it to be a missile truck - Improved structure, components, open architecture, avionics, and diagnostics allowing maintenance costs and time to be cut in half SUPER BONE 🖤 Super Bone sounds inappropriate and i apologize 😭
@TheDaveRout
@TheDaveRout 7 ай бұрын
Why’s it crazy, it keeps them operational
@MohammadSadeqBozorgnejad-mv7rr
@MohammadSadeqBozorgnejad-mv7rr 8 ай бұрын
The fuselage of the Rockwell B bomber is very similar to the fuselage of the Concorde airliner
@jamesosullivan7030
@jamesosullivan7030 3 ай бұрын
What a nightmare trying to maintain something that was manufactured 40 years ago. If you need 100 they should build 200
@dukeofgibbon4043
@dukeofgibbon4043 8 ай бұрын
The production B-1B is subsonic. Why not make the A400 its own video? These videos need better plotlines.
@mrFalconlem
@mrFalconlem 8 ай бұрын
Why is there an A400 in my B1 video, I’ve been hijacked
@ThomasHaberkorn
@ThomasHaberkorn 7 ай бұрын
By the builders of the space shuttle
@hichammouaddib7762
@hichammouaddib7762 8 ай бұрын
🤗👍
@nexpro6118
@nexpro6118 8 ай бұрын
GE Engines are so much better than the P&W Engines, in my opinion. I could be wrong but, the P&W engines get thrust based on how much more heat the engine produces which causes more maintainance and causes there to obviously be less cooling capability for the aircrafts avions/radar and other hardware components and also will not be able to reach peak thrust performance for long periods of time because obviously tons of heat for long periods of time is bad for the engines and tye aircraft itself.
@TrevorSachko
@TrevorSachko 8 ай бұрын
The reason is not at all crazy. However, saying it is could quite possibly be so....
@blairmiller3863
@blairmiller3863 8 ай бұрын
For all those bit**ing about the number of maintenance man hours needed for each hour of flight on a B-1, please tell me how many man hours of maintenance a B-777 or A-330 requires. Now describe the difference in those aircrafts missions and explain to me the reason there might be a higher maintenance burden on the B-1.
@grandcrappy
@grandcrappy 8 ай бұрын
We need to curtail military spending in lieu of trimmung the deficit in a planetary kinda way. We more ghan adequate weaponry for say, four or five budget cycles, with drone & robot tech. How else we gonna do it, other thancut SS & Nedicare, abd most if those folks need & deserve it,
@rupertchappelle5303
@rupertchappelle5303 8 ай бұрын
Our enemies appreciate your valuable information about the limitations of our over priced hardware.
@sasapopadic384
@sasapopadic384 8 ай бұрын
Dont worry, they know its paper duck...😂😂😂😂😂
@gregoryf9299
@gregoryf9299 8 ай бұрын
Don’t worry, their’s are just as bad!
@imresomodi4961
@imresomodi4961 8 ай бұрын
AI created Video?
@JohnFender
@JohnFender 8 ай бұрын
Crazy reason? GOOD reason you mean! Gekke reden? GOEDE reden zeker!
@blurayneblurayne8569
@blurayneblurayne8569 4 ай бұрын
As I watch I'm wondering how much of this info is useful to China . They may already have the blueprint
@shenmisheshou7002
@shenmisheshou7002 8 ай бұрын
Jimmy Carter was right to cancel the original B1 bomber. Congress saved it because they wanted the jobs in their states, but they changed the mission to a low level penetration missions, *which it has never really had to do in combat*. It was too expensive in its day, and they could only afford 100. It cost $61,000 an hour to fly the B1B. It was a huge mistake to build it and Carter was vilified for actively working against the program, but he was a military veteran and he knew this kind of plane had limited use. The Air Force has big dreams, and the F-35 is another aircraft that was way to expensive and should not have been built. It is $38,000 per flight hour, and currently, it is only running a bit over 50% availability. The Marine AV8B averaged over 90% during Desert Storm and Iraq. Congress likes pork. When the contractors promise to have some parts made in their states, they simply can't say no to a bad contract.
@jimmythrift1983
@jimmythrift1983 8 ай бұрын
Quite simply the F-35 IS JUNK ! I SHOULD KNOW !
@calvindavis7591
@calvindavis7591 8 ай бұрын
That’s one reason we’re 30 trillion in debt
@djpalindrome
@djpalindrome 8 ай бұрын
Rubbish. Giving Carter the sack was the sanest thing the American voter ever did. God bless Ronald Reagan for restoring our defenses and defeating the Evil Empire
@djpalindrome
@djpalindrome 8 ай бұрын
@@calvindavis7591 No, the reason we’re in debt isn’t because of our defenses. It’s because politicians love to bribe their low-IQ, low-information voter base with free stuff. Tax and tax, spend and spend, elect and elect.
@wkgurr
@wkgurr 8 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for your comment. Your are of course absolutely correct. I will always remember P. Sprey who when asked what the F35 was actually good at replied with: "It's good at making money for the manufacturers. That's the only thing it is good at". This observation applies to the entire military - industrial complex. It is good at making money for those who own and operate it. In contrast to the civilian sector where producing and selling useless goods is also common but has little consequences applying this approach to the military - industrial sector will result in an army unfit for combat.
@oguzcan815
@oguzcan815 8 ай бұрын
sup
@Hand6108
@Hand6108 7 ай бұрын
Wearing squadron hoodies now!? Jealous
@user-zq1wl2br8l
@user-zq1wl2br8l 8 ай бұрын
変えないから、カレーパターン柄、
@velik06
@velik06 8 ай бұрын
Feet???? Pounds???? What's this??? Start using metric system!!!
@user-py6bo1jz2m
@user-py6bo1jz2m 7 ай бұрын
As opposed to one hour on the Russian bombers.
@billotto602
@billotto602 7 ай бұрын
Well, what do you expect with an airframe made by a company known for automation with engines made by a company known for light bulbs (that always fail) ? Grumman builds the best bombers in the world & Pratt & Whitney makes the best engines in the world !
@Dr.Pepper001
@Dr.Pepper001 8 ай бұрын
Jimmy Carter did something right? Oh c'mon.
@thetom1309
@thetom1309 8 ай бұрын
Heh speaking about A400 "maintenance technology" demonstrated by "hacker" screens with DJI ? "Repair solutions" - sounds like reasonably priced quality repair service ? Yeah right - of course fixing an aircraft takes just a few clicks on a tablet. "Complex machines need constant attention to perform at their peak" == "we must spend millions to keep it flying"
@rconger24
@rconger24 7 ай бұрын
This tone of accusation is pointless.
@spitfirekid1
@spitfirekid1 8 ай бұрын
I love the comments from the wannabe engineers and who have ZERO IDEA what it costs to make an aircraft and especially a military jet.
@northyland1157
@northyland1157 7 ай бұрын
I'm seeing face diapers... Video ended for me as there is no evidence that face diapers do good.
@nickmcalinden5661
@nickmcalinden5661 8 ай бұрын
Is no one going to mention the terrible photoshop job of the people next to the engine in the video thumb nail? There is literally no way the VEN is almost 2.5 metres diameter. 😂😂😂
@simplemechanics246
@simplemechanics246 8 ай бұрын
That can use only against weak countries. War against Russia will ends badly, like Germany lost the WW2 by fäncy toys. Too little and too hard to maintain.
@Dr.Pepper001
@Dr.Pepper001 8 ай бұрын
An EMP would take out the avionics in these powerful aircraft.
@socaljarhead7670
@socaljarhead7670 8 ай бұрын
No, it was designed as a nuclear penetrator so it is fully shielded.
@canlib
@canlib 8 ай бұрын
​@@socaljarhead7670It's equipped with many layers of tinfoil
@hajotge12
@hajotge12 8 ай бұрын
Feet?! What is a feet in metric units? Please, please, please get a good citizen of the earth and adapt the metric system (before Myanmar was the second last)!
@guywhite1004
@guywhite1004 8 ай бұрын
We’re American and we like feet and pounds!
@TheGor54
@TheGor54 7 ай бұрын
Afourhundredlookslikeacseventeentome....
@RelativeWind
@RelativeWind 8 ай бұрын
United states's lmfao
@thackara79
@thackara79 7 ай бұрын
I hate to bitter about videos like this, but the money we spent funding this could've saved your Aunt, Grandfather, and so many other people in your family. North America is a geographically isolated nation and no other countries have a true blue water navy. No country has the capability of invading us, so why not spend the money on ourselves.
@hansjurgenochsenfahrt6176
@hansjurgenochsenfahrt6176 7 ай бұрын
to that b1 bomber... a beautiful plane.... but - put in construction as real monster flying high with more than mach two... the carter administration took it as oblolete and canceled it - for more than one reason... and there was a real believe in the equal of powr... and there were ties to shrink the overkill capacities together with sowjetunion..... carter at the end with his efforts to make peace in middle east got to the most hated presidents..... had only one turn... if the by military industrial complex sponsert kongress people habe to decide.... they get all promises... and at first - how expensive is the use of the jet... and how many hours the teams on the ground need to get it in the air again... they always sold science fiction..... b1 is now the compromise... and every loss weights more than hundrets of bombers in second worldwar bomging german towns and facilities.... at the end a dilemma of the ongoing inflation.... time when tornado was ordered from eu international work... build in modules the resistance against in parliament was gigantic..... the last fighter jet - for german airforce... the piece price doubled over a couple of years... they were forced to buy the crap.... to the replacement of tornato and herkules - nato forces all countries to buy the shit... to sink the costs per piece.... Ursula von der leine involved in the project... always smiling and giggling state actor... the was captured with korruption.... creeds cannot get enough.... and the quality of the plane was horrifiing... and this at the end dempends more on the building modules everywhere in eu and usa... braindropping all over the place.... a project never getting finished.... in this oeconomic and environmental catastrophy.....
@pongokamerat8601
@pongokamerat8601 8 ай бұрын
This is BS!
@garydman2
@garydman2 8 ай бұрын
Oh look, it's high treason week on You Tube. 😂😂😂
@dmsdmullins
@dmsdmullins 7 ай бұрын
The B1's were so bad in the 2000's at Red-Flag they would send 4 planes just to try to get one airworthy for one mission. B1's are garbage.
@copuis
@copuis 8 ай бұрын
I really hate flag wavey, BS, poorly researched thngs, like this what really really made me hit stop, write this comment (then leave) "what separates this from all the bombers before it, is it can travel at super sonic speeds" removing thte fighter bombers, like the f111 how about the b-58? for a start, and thats the US things thats before counting on USSR stuff
@floycewhite6991
@floycewhite6991 8 ай бұрын
Modern sound detectors -- including those in offshore buoys and on ice floes -- easily pick up and identify the sounds of aircraft engines. Not to mention satellites, infrared heat detection of jet exhaust, and lidar. The Soviet solution to stealth was to put plain old civilian radar all over the place, so an aircraft can't avoid flying directly over several. Then of course, good old-fashioned human observation can detect a sonic boom. There's nothing particularly important about flying at 900 mph as opposed to 600. Ground-to-air missiles can hit you all the same.
@copuis
@copuis 8 ай бұрын
@@floycewhite6991 unsure your point to this my point is, there had been a number of supersonic bombers before the B1, like the b-58 (also the A-5) from the US and a number of them from other countries like the US
@floycewhite6991
@floycewhite6991 8 ай бұрын
​@@copuisRight, the Hustler. Poorly researched. My point is that flying a little faster just isn't all that big a deal -- and the planes must be sturdier and carry much more fuel if going supersonic at low altitude. There's a good argument against heavy bombers in modern warfare.
Insane Speed and Power: The B-1 Lancer Story
19:19
PilotPhotog
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
UFC Vegas 93 : Алмабаев VS Джонсон
02:01
Setanta Sports UFC
Рет қаралды 200 М.
Climbing to 18M Subscribers 🎉
00:32
Matt Larose
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
The Most Powerful Bomber Ever Built | B-1 Lancer
21:43
Sam Eckholm
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
B1b Lancer Vs Tu-160 Blackjack - Which Is Better
9:17
Military TV
Рет қаралды 47 М.
US Pilots Fly Gigantic B-1 Lancer So Fast the Cockpit Starts to Shake
15:52
The Daily Aviation
Рет қаралды 3,5 МЛН
Great Planes   Rockwell B 1B Lancer
48:55
illusive 0ne
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
Finally! US Air Force Declared SR-72 DARKSTAR Is REAL!
18:51
Hyperspeed
Рет қаралды 231 М.
UFC Vegas 93 : Алмабаев VS Джонсон
02:01
Setanta Sports UFC
Рет қаралды 200 М.