yea man! need those motor and adjusting the ramp lower.

Ouch. Sorry to hear that. Get from the official store to get taken care of www.fmshobby.com/products/fms-1-24-fcx24-max-smasher-rtr?ref=a9YWP_lM4SMsxT Fairrc ship from china right? it's not a good idea to ship it back to China because it will definitely be taxed. and fxdex suck!

You are right bro Yes it's probably safer to charge with a better charger cause those USB charger could have different batch/supplies but i trust FMS quality and I've not seen any bad things happened with those usb charger even the non FMS ones.

@@EdwardChew At how many amps can I safely charge these lipo batteries? I'm currently charging at 0.3 amps.

Yea that's because there is brake

Update, I've bought the High Roller version. I love it! Add shock oil, foam inserts, diff fluid and it's awesome! Currently waiting on 180 motor swap, hopefully it'll be fast 😁

What did you changed? It's a RTR with fixed linkages and stuff....

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bLyEiL1oydbPm5s.html

Yeah!

Have spoken to FMS ystd, mine is actually the 2nd batch. So customers units for global will most likely be the 2nd batch as well.

I just got my second truck and it came with the one he's showing, I'm a little disappointed. The one with the dip switches for drag breaks, battery sellection and motor break also has truck battery telemetry and dedicated light switch and hard plastic wheel with a sticker by the trigger that has V3 for version 3. I don't like the fact that the other version has less buttons and a foam covered wheel. I haven't used the other version yet.

Wokay will do tomorrow

@@EdwardChew Thanks, I hope it's true

@@jeffreysauline3674 I have shot the video this morning but then I have some shocking findings now. 😅

@@EdwardChew I can't wait to see what you found... I'm waiting to determine whether or not to buy two of these, one for me and one for my daughter for Christmas

@@jeffreysauline3674 Video is out kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eKqgjMJ01rW3ZJc.html

Yes same question...any answers please?

@@alexlechner8010 2nd batch. “Supply chain issues” has made them have to use a different transmitter.

Thats really sad foe everyone thats buying it now....kinda scam

Sorry :-( but it's about retention on youtube's algorithm game. if audience find the video slow, they click fast forward, or simply stop watching, youtube will not promote it. for this video, even at 12min, i find it too long-winded.

U guys enjoy video where the presenter talk slower?

@@EdwardChew I understsnd. Indeed, attention span of viewers has gone down a lot since the invention of the internet. Itbid really not about the speed itself, every person has a different tempo that is natural to them. But if they try to talk faster then that it becomes noticeable. Taking out the natural tiny pauses (which everyone does in their own way) puts more strain on the viewer - at least that is my personal impression.

@@matusknives Yea. I don't watch long video unless I'm eating I see. Yeah. Unfortunately that's the KZfaq's game Actually i dont find this video fast. There are faster one on my channel haha. Which minute and sec you are referring to ya?

​@@EdwardChew To give you a honest feedback I just watched the whole video. Let me start with saying - it is very informative and I found it helpful to learn more about the truck. Thank you. Also let me say right away - I don't have a problem with your taking tempo at all. It is not slow, but it sounds like you natural way to talk and it is just perfectly fine. I only meant the cutting out the sub-second long pauses. Let me call this 'pacing' (I really don't know what the proper term is). I assume that this was done with a help of some software as it would be a lot of work to do by hand. Listening to the whole video - this 'pacing' was most pronounced in the first few minutes, later in the video it basically disappeared. There were two cases of 'pacing'. One ís when you connect short video snippets. I found this less of an issue. I only found it a little disturbing when the pauses were cut out from a longer continues single video/sound stream. This breaks down the continuity of the spoken word. This techninque is not by definition 'wrong' - it can help (e.G. in an introduction) to make a video more 'catchy' when used with a more 'active' way of speaking and is not used for too long. At least that is how I feel about it. I guess I went a bit too 'far' with all this, but I appreciate you were open to discuss it. And yes, I am aware that very most of your viewers probably won't notice (or care) quite as much about this. I guess I am getting old and pick 😋