I'm totally in line with you. Science and History is always fascinating.

​@Gary Allen As more and more facts are gathered, most prior assumptions and theories fall like ten pins. Ancient DNA has blown away much of European early "history" and the casual assumptions of "who I am and who we are". "Germans" are really "Russians" who were once "Greeks" and "Palestinians" who most likely walked out of "Africa". Virtually all of the real early Europeans died off and our DNA isn't their DNA yet a strong Neanderthal component remains. Our "history" must be redone from scratch and simply await more facts.

That ain't Science Sally. Just goes to show, it isnt about "Truth".

Exactly what i have been saying. Look at the biloxi river. Sandstone prints of man and dino at the same strata.

Lt Dan - science has always been a series of challenges - it is never settled - that's what Thomas Kuhn meant by "paradigm shift"' - scientists come up with a sensible idea (eg "clovis barrier") - it becomes the paradigm - newer discoveries challenge it - until the proof for those new ideas is substantial enuf to overturn the paradigm (eg "radiocarbon dating of white sands footprints") - and the consensus shifts to the new idea - - fact is - the clovis barrier had been unsettled for a long time - in 2011 a survey of anthropologists revealed that most no longer considered the clovis barrier as the paradigm - but it's taken 10 years to back up that conviction with concrete evidence

Careers have been destroyed over the clovis first doctrine. Much unproven is assumed in the name of science.

@@michaelevans6599 - scientists are human and get touchy if you spoil their favorite themes - however science eventually overcomes the pettiness of scientists - as the white sands dating did - proving what has long been suspected about the clovis barrier

This comment demonstrates a lack of understanding of the scientific method where everything is questioned rigorously.

They're still there!

Its called an educated guess, there is a good chance that they are close to what they believe is true.

@@robertallan6373 Thankfully, guessing is not good enough in rigorous scientific research. And for Joe E. Watkins, I think it's pretty clear it's wishful thinking. And he didn't even qualify his statement, just presenting it as if it is an established fact instead. Without solid evidence, it's a blind leap of faith...

@@lawrieflowers8314 If what you said is true then yes I do agree.

@@robertallan6373 Well they dis believe the Bible's Creation account, so how smart are they?

@@grassroot011 I for one don't believe in the bible so called creation account, the stories in the bible are just metaphors like it or not.

The sarcasm in your remark doesn't come through very well tho. 😏 Some might think you were serious about shoes and "evolution" of feet.

@@cindyknudson2715 who said "evolution"? Feet get much bmore broad if you don't wear shoes, try it for a couple years and you'll see how big and strong they get

@@nmarbletoe8210 You. "...feet have evolved..." Not a big deal, I just had thought you were kidding in using that word. Thank you for your cordial response.

@@cindyknudson2715 thanks lol.. i apologize, I can't see that comment of mine anymore, but I sure might have said that! Correction, the feet adapt. The wide toes are especially noticeable in the prints. I've had friends who never wore shoes and their feet were really different looking, due to thick skin and padding. I went for a month without shoes once, I could feel the padding get thicker and thicker under the skin.

It was a child, carrying an infant. The oldest one was about 8 years old.

I agree with you’re thinking, regarding coastal people reaching these continents shortly after they reached Australia, there’s still genetic evidence for that in Brazil. There’s also genetic evidence for a northern path taken eventually, later on. Using dna and archaeological evidence that has been denied since before dna was available, I think it’s safe to say that people have been here since people learned there was more world to be discovered. Too bad laws have stopped this sort of traveling.

the coastal migration theory is part of the beringia theory - the genetic evidence points to beringians doing the populating of the americas - therefore - the coastal people were from the bering straits land bridge

@@johneyon5257 that evidence also points to a population described as x, it is not known who they are yet, but the dna is older and was already present here when beringians mixed with with population x to produce first nations people, ~ 17k/15k y.a. These footprints could be those people.

I'm with you on the boat theory.

🤔 In my expert opinion, there are 2 logical theories of the age of the Earth and human history. They are: 1). Science tells us that the universe is 14 billion years old, and the earliest human migration to North America was 23,000 - 26,000 years ago. 2). The Bible tells us the Earth is just over 6,000 years old, the age of the entire universe is much older, approximately 6,000 years + 1 day(because God created the universe first, then created Earth the next day)... So, the REAL answer is somewhere between those 2

@@HighlanderNorth1 A lot of the bible is allegory. A day in the context of Genesis could be over 100 million years because everything from before man is written from God's perspective, not ours.

@@tylerstannard4670 Yeah, I was joking. Obviously the universe is older than 6k years.

@@tylerstannard4670 What does an eternal deity care about time?

@@HighlanderNorth1 Everything originated in the America's and migrated from there.

Graham also says there were advanced civilizations capable of advanced megalithic construction. Yet these people are running through the mud barefoot. Life's a garden. Dig it.

I'd like to know where dinosaur and human prints are together. I think you're thinking of megafauna. Humans did not exist with dinosaurs.

The first people here, are not related to the native Americans who came later

@@danimotherofchickens479 - True. The first people here were the first people anywhere.

@@danimotherofchickens479 Native Americans are the only proof of existence to this land first. There’s proof of that!!! The white colonists didn’t kill all of us!! We’re still here. These footprints are most likely indigenous! Until they find a skull to date back to prove otherwise. Native Americans are the true inhabitants to this land!

The last mass extinction was 55 million years ago. Located next to Bellingham Washington at the 46th latitude is an ancient sandstone Quarry. Embedded in the sandstone was petrified Palm fronds. 55 million years ago was a mass extinction event that was caused by carbon dioxide emissions. It overheated planted earth and all tropical plants that could eventually migrate between 5 to 10,000 years migrated North into the Arctic. Modern day Bellingham Washington was probably just a stopover for alligators or a species of alligators and tropical plants that eventually migrated into the Arctic. The rest of Earth became uninhabitable due to extreme temperatures. Humans are emitting 100 times the CO2 level of the palacin eocene thermal maximum

@@thetechnicanwithaheart1682 Greta, is that you again?

There is no evidence that the descendants of the humans that made those prints survived to present day. There is no evidence yet of continuous habitation of the Americas from then to later times. For all we know they died off with the mega fauna of the day. It is possible that the people living here when the Europeans discovered the Americas were descendants of later population events. It is entirely possible that the Americas where peopled multiple times, and then those earlier population suffered extinction in the western hemisphere. Continuity needs to be proven.

The Natives of the Americas have been here for much longer than u know, and DNA has been studied very well. We r NOT from Africa as so many of these Afro culture vultures claim. The DNA, so far, is solid! The Aboriginals of Australia r not from Africa either, they identity as Afro, and they have the right to identify with whoever they want, but their ancient DNA, places them in Asia/Polynesia. Afro culture vultures need to read a science book on non Afro genetic groups, and realize that what drives the color of skin, is where ur ppl lived for centuries. USA is ridiculously obsessed with skin color. Dark brown skin isn't exclusive to Afros. So scientificly ignorant!

It's not over your head.. the 'accepted' explanation just doesn't make sense and is wholly inadequate.

Even Native Americans WERE NOT NATIVE!! So why do we give them special rights and call them as such? They came by small craft or walked and Europeans came by boats. Just because they were here before us doesn't make them native!

@@larryw5429 after 100 generations or more maybe just call the people "locals" if the word native deserves all caps and 2 explanation marks, what special rights are you suggesting these local natives have? certainly no more special rights than the eurocentric pioneer pilgrim settler & johnny come lately exploiters that occupied then desecrated their rightful homelands in a single generatiion.

Someones jealous 🤷🏿‍♂️. BTW, there’s ancestral genetic evidence going back 25k years. Read a little.

@@ollimekatl Generations being here is still not native..

@@larryw5429 So according to your thinking, you’re not really European since no one is native to Europe. So why call yourself that?

The Ice Age has been ongoing for two million years in fact we're still in it just currently in an inter-glacial.

@@johnmaccallum7935 But Greta Thorn-in-my-sideberg says the ice age is over and it's our fault. How dare you.

@@seeharvester In the 1960s we had been in a few decades long colder spell and the "experts" were saying a new Ice age was coming. Mother nature has the final say not we parasites.

Also consider the petrified foot prints of men and three toes Dinos in a river bed in the Paluxy river in Texas. Still being denied by Mainstream Science as it doesn't fit their narratives. Would mess up all their text books already out there.

The video does not mention dinosaur footprints. It mentions the footprints of mammalian megafauna that existed at the same time the human footprints were laid down. Animals that were mentioned: Mammoths, Giant ground sloth, Saber tooth cats, Dire wolves. Dinosaurs (mostly) went extinct 66 million years ago. The ancestors of modern birds survived that extinction and belong to the theropod group of dinosaurs (like T. rex).

I must have missed the part where the archaeologist said that these people landed at the New Mexico spaceport. Time stamp>?

Dang! What a treasure that would be if you still had it! But who knew..?

@@freemind.. I look at it as one of the stupidest things I did in this life. It was about 4-inches (plus) long and I always thought it was a spear point because it was about the size of iron spearpoints I'd seen. I was living on a farm in Pa. and swinging on a wooden plank swing between the barn and the house and my eyes just 'focused' on it laying there in the yard. I'd looked for arrowheads (there were lots of them to be found in this area) but never found any myself. Everybody else but me seemed to find them. Anyway, there it was! And I just picked it up. I ended up trading it for a "glow in the dark" military thing that another kid had. That turned out to be radioactive and had been stolen from a warehouse at Fort Indiantown Gap, so there was some state police involvement that came about, too. Anyway, when it was all said and done, I was out the 'radioactive reflector thing' and my Clovis knife (or, spear point) whatever it was. The reason I didn't think it was 'special' at the time, was because it just didn't look like the other arrowheads and stuff the other farm kids were finding in their freshly plowed (and then rained on) fields. It wasn't until about 40 years later that I stumbled onto a picture that looked just like my 'spear point' and it was from the Clovis People. My luck, I guess. But, here's yet another 'oddity.' I bought some meteorites at a farm sale about a year ago and -- as they were being auctioned -- it was announced that they came from "this farm down yonder..." And they were pointing at my farm! So, somewhere, I have a bed of meteorites -- if I ever find them! There are a couple of other 'mysteries' here, too. I'll be posting them on my channel as I get them filmed.

@@yepiratesworkshop7997 - Wow!! Seriously great story, and super-interesting! I had no idea who the Clovis People were until about 6 years ago, and I'm convinced they were not only the first inhabitants of North America, but that they were Pre-Flood people who were erupted out by the biblical deluge of Noah's time. If you're not a believer, it is STILL an incredible archaeological find, and if you DO believe in the Flood, it only adds to the significance! Either way, their arrowheads and spearheads were considerably more advanced than those of modern native Indians.

@@yepiratesworkshop7997 - The meteorite thing is another amazing development! I wonder if you could survey your property from above with Google Earth and look for circular anomalies to pinpoint the impact site?

@@freemind.. Yes, to a degree the Google Earth photos work pretty good. But, remember, this is a farm, so much of it has been tilled, flattened and smoothed down to a depth of about a foot. The best times (and ways) I've found for trying to "read" the land, has been by airplane, a few weeks afte the frost kills down the tree leaves and grass. There are a number of sudden drops (like an ancient waterfall) and karsts in this area and limestone caves are scattered here and there. I've also been able to track down a couple of the finders of the meteorites and got pretty good (and consistent) locations of where these folks found them. It is an area about the size of two football fields and is currently in grass (for hay) as it's been for about 20 years. I'm debating whether to sacrifice a few bales of hay and plow up that area. But, there are two other areas of the farm that hold great mystery to me. One is an ancient ditch that was dug -- about 7 feet deep by 10 feet wide and probably 300 to 400 yards long that was already in existence on the farm in the 1930s when a man I talked to lived there. He said it was an "old work" even back then and was a mystery as to why someone would have gone to all that effort. I've found that the ditch stopped when the diggers hit a spring and tried to dam up the water intrusion without much success. The other area is adjacent and comprises about 25 acres of "bottom land" that used to be an ancient river bed. I've found some rather interesting stuff there, but never made too much effort to dig it. During a major flood in 1972, most of the topsoil had been scoured off by the flood waters and I'm told that a lot of Native American artifacts were found there. So, I've sort of got my own "Oak Island" treasure ditch, a meteorite area and a huge alluvial deposit of God only knows what. In addition, this place was one of the original pioneer farms, so there is probably a lot of metal detecting that could be done, too. Those were some of the things I wanted to make videos about as I found the time to do them.

We all came from the same place, but it was Mesopotamia.. NOT Africa - though those of African decent are absolutely part of our family.

@@freemind.. LOL That is false all humans came from about 50,000 people living in Africa 200-100 thousand years ago. People migrated from there to the middle east.

@@StanSwan - Not true at all. I am aware that what you claim is what is taught, but it was proven wrong before the turn of the century by geneticists in the 80s and 90s. Previous to that, it was widely held that the first humans lived in Africa between 1-2 million years ago. Evolutionists kicked and screamed at the idea that they were wrong and their timelines were massively inflated due to assumptions and inference rather than observed evidence. Subsequent genetic studies have shown that Mesopotamia is the Cradle of Civilization, and that from there sprang all 3 people groups and languages, all just over 4,000 years ago. Every person alive today can trace their ancestry back to 1 of 3 women around 4400 years ago, and then back to the first mother of all humans around 6,000 years ago; the one referred to as Mitochondrial Eve. *You don't have to like it, but facts are facts, and Science doesn't care if you like it or not.*

@@freemind.. I posted the facts humans did not evolve in two places dingbat.

@@freemind.. Bible thumper thinks we all all inbred from one woman? lol

I know that for a fact. My elders pass this information on to me that is what happened. In short, "We were always here. There were visitors who migrated from foreign lands from the north Asia, but we are were always here" Then this migrating stopped, we saw no new migration . And yes, these folks assimilated with some of the original people. But of course I'm going to get scuffed down by detractors simply from hate and or fears. But you think their simpleton beliefs and theories matters. No, this is my history taught by my elders which was pass on by the elders and so on So you are correct sir.

@@diegofortuna3923 thank You. I have all ways said this I too am. Also part native. To turtle island.

Native Americans are the only existence of proof to this land before the white colonizers arrived! So they’re most definitely indigenous footprints. All brown people were all over this entire continent throughout Canada and Mexico all indigenous people! Zero whites!

@@laetitia9652 yeah, so? I think the fight you're trying to pick is up there^^^^ I said nothing about Clovis or pre-Closis being white... in fact, there were no "whites" until the early bronze age, after the Yamnaya mixed with the Neolithic farmers. And they certainly never made it to the America's. That said, we only have Native American DNA going back 11,000 years. For all we know these footprints could be Neanderthal.. thats all I was saying. So you can pound salt and pick fights somewhere else.

There is zero proof of “Neanderthal” but there is proof of native Americans the real inhabitants! You whites have NO proof but theories! You all lie through out history, the lying Holliday thanksgiving and Columbus Day is all BS! Like I said the million indigenous people that were slaughtered is proof of existence and whites covering it up!

Talk to the natural history museum or contact the Archeological dept in a University near you as they would be interested to have a look.

It sure sucks if you're a "Young Earth Creationist," right? I can hear the arguments now, oh God just made the footprints appear older then they really are. Dating methods sure are "forbidden archeology," as you say. Meanwhile, science moves on.

You still need evidence before you can say for certain..

@@kennyw871 those are the footprints of noahs great grand children exploring the world and it was mud from the flood proving young earth

@@kennyw871 Meanwhile in a galaxy far far away the truth of Humans and Earth's true history has been and is recorded and someday when we ascend beyond this existence we may retrieve it.

@@kennyw871 Go have a look at Gobleki Tepi ,you might learn something

Impartial fact checkers say..."True!"

"Fact checks can be checked because they're checkable by checkers." ---Albert Einstein

Guess...

stratigraphy, from the indirect info provided in the vid

Verify what the oldest accepted claims are, then claim that these are older in order to secure yourself a spot in the hierarchy.

These "speculations" r culture vultures BS, and everyone knows it even they know it! Those heads have been explained MANY times, they just refuse to accept it, such desperate wannabes! Ever seen Fernando Valenzuela? Those head pieces those heads r wearing, r uniquely Americas Natives. Those head pieces, r what Natives put on newborns, it is a new born baby, and all newborn look different than what they look like even a week later. The head pieces also resemble the head dress the Natives wore when they played the first form of soccer. These head pieces are not found any where else but ancient America.

@@teresafernandez9849 So you are saying that massive heads 10ft tall are of newborn babies?... and you have proof of that, or is that also speculation?... don't care if the headdress is unique to the Americas or not... who said they had to, or would have, copied where they came from or how long they had been there before they became a "Civilization" and began to be unique... it's still all speculation until you can definitively prove it or disprove it with actual DNA...

Science is not science-fiction.

They were.

The footprints showed that the man walked with a limp and the boy was known to stretch the truth. Did your dad have a gimpy leg?

@@seeharvester Sure did. And I can stretch anything.

@@bdh3949 ha ha 😃

One that presupposes a 13.8 billion yo universe in which is consistent with the rest of their unobservable theories.

_"Siberian nomads replaced the Clovis people..... and that's a fact."_ *That is hardly a fact. Where is the empirical evidence?*

We, the Natives, will call ourselves whatever we want! So far, science has not found any other DNA except what is classified as Native. There are several ancient human fossils of the Americas first inhabitants, they looked hard into the DNA, but so far, that's the way it is. I think science should not b totally disregarded especially now, there is a whole campaign of culture vultures trying to take our place in the Americas and erase our history. It is the science of DNA that will help us. ALL ancient ppl leave footprints, so far, only footprints of Native ppl found. By footprints, I mean, oral or written history, oral or written language, a tribe, spiritual connection to other tribes. Food is culture, how u eat, is telling of who you are and where you come from. Native ppl, still eat exactly like our ancestors. Corn, corn tortilla, beans, squash, peppers, avacado, cactus and cactus fruit. The tamale, has been around since forever! So far, science and archiologists, especially genologists r pretty sure of who the Natives of the Americas are.

Good point,but there are a few. Proof local for me...Horn Shelter north of Waco,TX,plus the well known sites near Florence,TX.

In other words, why do archaeologists ignore archaeologists? They don't. They are them.

And those peoples are mostly from the west and northwest area of North America. Where the first refugees/immigrants from the next continent to the west would/could have lived in for a much longer time than the peoples of the southern half of North America. Depending on where the footprint makers arrived from. There is also the possibility that those prints were made millennia after humans had begun living there !!

Pigmy Mammoths existed on the Channel Islands off of So-Cal which is along the kelp Hwy I wouldnt doubt that a small mammoth would be welcome change up from the dominant sea food diet along the coast

Complete unsubstantiated Proto-crap...