The Berthier After World War One

  Рет қаралды 123,933

Forgotten Weapons

Forgotten Weapons

Күн бұрын

Get the shirt here: shop.bbtv.com/collections/for...
/ forgottenweapons
In the aftermath of World War One, France would face the need to replace virtually all of its small arms, because nearly everything it had been using was either a wartime stopgap (like the Ruby, Chauchat, and Berthier 07/15) or had been obsolete before the war began (like the Lebel and Mle 1892 revolver). The first focus of the rearming was a new light machine gun, which would be adopted in the form of the Chatellerault M24/29. Plans were made to develop a semiautomatic infantry rifle and bolt action support troops' rifle (both in the new 7.5mm rimless cartridge), but these would not prove to be as quickly realized. As a result, the Berthier Mle 1916 carbines would remain in major frontline service right up to the outbreak of World War Two.
During the twenty years between the wars, the Berthiers would see a series of changes and upgrades including:
- Sling bars replacing swivels
- Revised handguard profile
- Raised sights
- Removal of the clearing rods
- Adoption of the 1932N cartridge and associated rechambering
- New metal finishes
Production of new carbines in fact continued all the way until 1939, with at least 160,000 made in 1919 and later. Many of the alterations made during this postwar period are evident on examples found today, and there is a collecting premium on guns that do not exhibit these peacetime modifications. So, let's have a look, shall we?

Пікірлер: 207
@Ctulhu911
@Ctulhu911 7 жыл бұрын
Patch 4.11 --- Clearing rod removed Accuracy improved Bug's with stock craking fixed
@ethanspaziani5269
@ethanspaziani5269 4 жыл бұрын
XD Fallout 4 mod page
@Theonederboy
@Theonederboy 4 жыл бұрын
EThan spaziani right handed bolt
@aries_9130
@aries_9130 7 жыл бұрын
The more I learn about french firearms, the more fascinating I find them to be. Until you started this series, I had almost no interest in these rifles. Thank you.
@Zorglub1966
@Zorglub1966 7 жыл бұрын
So i was. Frankly the Berthier system didn't interested me before. Indeed this system deserves an comprehensive presentation, and Ian deserves to be warmly thanked !
@Chaosrain112
@Chaosrain112 7 жыл бұрын
Ditto. Ian is converting me to a Francophile.
@Frankdude72
@Frankdude72 7 жыл бұрын
Like for the Devin Townsend Project logo
@aries_9130
@aries_9130 7 жыл бұрын
Haha, thank you.
@thibaudduhamel2581
@thibaudduhamel2581 5 жыл бұрын
*Once you go French, you won't go anywhere else* HONHONHON
@danschneider9921
@danschneider9921 3 жыл бұрын
One of my earliest memories of handling a firearm is opening the bolt on a Berthier Mle 16 carbine. There used to be a shop in Arvada Colorado called "Stan's Military Guns" that sold militaria and milsurp guns. I Started collecting helmets around 10 years of age, and he had a few of these carbines at any given time before the Renaissance of these guns recently. This would have been around 1995 and if I remember they were like $125. SMLEs were not much more.
@b.hessing1182
@b.hessing1182 4 жыл бұрын
"A modern army should not be using a rimmed cartridge" *Great Britain has left the chat*
@zchen27
@zchen27 4 жыл бұрын
So did Russia
@HectorGonzalez-fz6ws
@HectorGonzalez-fz6ws 8 ай бұрын
Russia didn't have a modern army
@ronalddunne3413
@ronalddunne3413 6 ай бұрын
@@HectorGonzalez-fz6ws BS! USSR had a modern military starting in 1941-42. Hitler bit off a WHOLE lot more than Germany could chew. It wasnt the failure of Russian military power that ended the Soviet occupation of eastern Europa.
@coldstarter5
@coldstarter5 7 жыл бұрын
Draw me like one of your french guns
@Chaosrain112
@Chaosrain112 7 жыл бұрын
*honhonhonhonhonhon
@TheMrPeteChannel
@TheMrPeteChannel 7 жыл бұрын
john hancock You win everything.
@jmdenn3000
@jmdenn3000 7 жыл бұрын
john hancock (honhonhon in gunfire)
@nicksmith2680
@nicksmith2680 7 жыл бұрын
I have read that these Berthier carbines were still in active use with French police departments well into the 1970s.
@Zorglub1966
@Zorglub1966 7 жыл бұрын
They were in service in the CRS (Compagnies Républicaines de Sécurité) until the 80's they've been replaced by Ruger AC-556 (Mousqueton AMD 556) then since 2008 replaced by the .HK G36C The buttstock was efficient on protester's faces, but it's above all because the muzzle grenade launcher (Tromblon Lance Grenade)used to throw tear gas grenades
@thegoldencaulk2742
@thegoldencaulk2742 7 жыл бұрын
Congrats on recently reaching another Patreon goal! You earned it!
@BigVanillaBlast
@BigVanillaBlast 4 жыл бұрын
Hey there
@AssasinTacos
@AssasinTacos 7 жыл бұрын
The Bayonet is as long as the barrel
@cybercat1531
@cybercat1531 7 жыл бұрын
sufficient
@nindger4270
@nindger4270 7 жыл бұрын
We're not compensating or anything like that, honest.
@aixPenta
@aixPenta 7 жыл бұрын
Germans are pretty thicc
@brabhamfreaman166
@brabhamfreaman166 6 жыл бұрын
AssasinTacos Dude, when you’re conscripted to effectively *poke* a man to death with a pointy thing, separation is everything.
@troy9477
@troy9477 7 жыл бұрын
Very interesting to see all the mods and improvements. Pretty interesting series of rifles and carbines. Good example of maximizing the utility of what you have while developing something else. I think the ammo change was to use a longer, heavier bullet with a slightly different nose for machine guns. I guess we will see that in the forthcoming video. Great video as always. Thank you
@ArmednSafe
@ArmednSafe 7 жыл бұрын
if you want to confuse the shit out of an average gun guy, tell them you have a Tulle made M16.
@ArmednSafe
@ArmednSafe 7 жыл бұрын
OK?
@ckl9390
@ckl9390 Жыл бұрын
And confuse regulators with a fixed magazine bolt action using a woefully outdated cartridge sharing the same name with the M-16 a quintessentially modern rifle.
@IIDeCkArDII1
@IIDeCkArDII1 7 жыл бұрын
...again ye upload anither great vid, Ian, whit a wealth o' knowledge ye are, a' love it!
@TheLoxxxton
@TheLoxxxton 7 жыл бұрын
another interesting video! thanks Ian
@torycsummers7328
@torycsummers7328 4 жыл бұрын
Just pick up one of this Petite beauties. I love it. Ty for all the info. Love your content, Thank you Gun Jesus.
@Wambi45
@Wambi45 7 жыл бұрын
The French were still using/producing Berthier carbines in 1939, but let's talk about Lee Enfields, 1906 Sprinfields, Kar-98s, mozins... Every major military started WW2 with bolt action rifles anyway.
@tillmannfischer
@tillmannfischer 7 жыл бұрын
It's not so much about the bolt action, but more about the specifics of the gun in question. Combine that with a general misunderstanding of modern infantry doctrine by especially France (which is kinda ironic, considering that basically all the theoretical development of the combined arms concept came out of France and the UK), and you have a rather big mess. These technological differences only really start to make a difference when you get into a war of attrition where your enemy not only gets to outproduce you (and get that production to the front, because superior supply networks), but also manages to be a step ahead in terms of technology.
@havoc3742
@havoc3742 7 жыл бұрын
actually America started the war with the Garand, it was just still being issued when germany touched poland and everybody's knickers finally got twisted. problem was, the version they were producing was the gas trap, which we all know was later revised into a direct gas port rifle. so they had to bring them all back to the factory for tinkering.
@lavrentivs9891
@lavrentivs9891 7 жыл бұрын
Mirdarion France and the UK stood for a lot of theories about Combined arms. The leading country in armoured warfare during the interwar period was the Soviet union. It was from them (still during the interwar period) that the germans learned how to set up a armoured brigade and there was a lot of practical experimentation between the two (that took place in the Soviet union as Germany was prohibited to have tanks by the Versailles treaty).
@tillmannfischer
@tillmannfischer 7 жыл бұрын
+Lavrentivs The Soviets had no clue about combined arms though, that was something they painfully learned from the Germans during the war (the Soviets were stuck with the idea of using tanks like traditional cavalry at the start of the war, which the Germans quickly abused as soon as handheld AT weaponry like the Faustpatrone became available - it was only then that the Soviets combined their armoured divisions with infantry supplements). The idea of combining air force, infantry, and cavalry (tanks) into cooperating groups of units that supported each other was developed by Britain and France during the interwar period, which is what I referred to as ironic, because the French military didn't keep up with their own strategical theories, unlike the Germans.
@fdsdh1
@fdsdh1 7 жыл бұрын
Mirdarion the Soviets pretty much invented Blitzkrieg. They invented the whole operational command level. The Germans copied the Soviets not the other way around. Every nation had combined arms tactics but some doctrines were better than others
@elitearbor
@elitearbor 7 жыл бұрын
I never knew how much I didn't know about WWI and interwar French cartridge rifles. Fascinating stuff!
@ericb.5092
@ericb.5092 2 жыл бұрын
Trés bonnes vidéos trés précises. Thanks.
@brucemccreary38
@brucemccreary38 7 жыл бұрын
As Dr. Sigmund Freud would say, I zink zat Mr. McCollum has a developed a fixation around the Berthier carbine.
@lendzhugashvili1907
@lendzhugashvili1907 6 жыл бұрын
9:37 "not going to rewrite this" That made me laugh a good deal. Long story short kids, always have captions on!
@hazakdds7366
@hazakdds7366 7 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ian.
@maotisjan
@maotisjan 6 ай бұрын
Looks nice and compact, something I can appreciate
@alanvonify
@alanvonify 7 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ian
@demonprinces17
@demonprinces17 4 жыл бұрын
So good watching again
@jamesvatter5729
@jamesvatter5729 4 ай бұрын
The "Pregnant Guppy" has enough odd features, I think it deserves a spot in the collection.
@eVVigilance
@eVVigilance 7 жыл бұрын
This Berthier series continues to educate and delight. Will it be followed by the same treatment of Lebel, Chassepot, and Gras?
@rabbischlomoshekelstein451
@rabbischlomoshekelstein451 7 жыл бұрын
Hey, Ian. Thanks for all the great videos. Do you think you can connect the bayonet when you have it available? Especially whenever it comes to French rifles, i'm sure there are some people out their who don't realise how long their bayonets where, when connected to the barrel. Thanks.
@mikellwehrer
@mikellwehrer 7 жыл бұрын
Your presentation and verbal presentation are really showing a lot of improvement. I could not care less about French riffles, and yet I've watched every single one of these videos. Bravo, sir.
@matrixthechosenone1312
@matrixthechosenone1312 7 жыл бұрын
Bless me with Your knowledge Gun Jesus!
@CaptainGrief66
@CaptainGrief66 5 жыл бұрын
I love Berthiers, I really wish to get one when I'll have a weapons permit.
@confusedcapitalist2242
@confusedcapitalist2242 4 жыл бұрын
TheOtakuComrade did you ever get it?
@ShawarmaFarmer
@ShawarmaFarmer 7 жыл бұрын
"Totally obsolete/Should not be using a rimmed cartridge"- where are my triggered Mosin fanboys at?
@matthayward7889
@matthayward7889 7 жыл бұрын
Tequila Cured Salmon Carpaccio With Vodka Foam or British .303!
@markshul03
@markshul03 7 жыл бұрын
Just so you understand, just because the Russians used it does NOT mean it isn't outdated. Outdated describes the Mosin in general for 99% of its service life. Let alone its cartridge.
@troy9477
@troy9477 7 жыл бұрын
Tequila Cured Salmon Carpaccio With Vodka Foam - Don't forget 303 British. And Siamese Mauser. And i believe 7.7mm Japanese is a virtual copy of 303 Brit, and their 6.5x50 mm is rimmed too
@Luthtar
@Luthtar 7 жыл бұрын
Troy Ortega 7.7x58mm is rimless and even 6.5x50mm is only semi-rimmed, meaning that rimlock can be overcome with a firm shove of the bolt.
@ringowunderlich2241
@ringowunderlich2241 7 жыл бұрын
You got it wrong 7.62x54R is not "rimmed". It means royal and the rim in fact is a crown.
@Targetpopper
@Targetpopper 7 жыл бұрын
Man my Mle 1892 is sort of a mutt. It got some of the upgrades such as the sling bar and clearing rod and balle N stamp but it missed out on a few of the others. Excellent series!
@jamess662
@jamess662 4 жыл бұрын
Mine is as well, just picked it up today. Has the cleaning rod channel filled, no stacking rod, and 3 round magazine.
@yves-mariesellin6026
@yves-mariesellin6026 7 жыл бұрын
Merci !
@k4rest
@k4rest 7 жыл бұрын
Very informative. When were the long arms phased out? Was the rebuild program the same? I have a rifle that displays most of these modifications. No sling cross bar, "A" marked sights and gradient relief. All other modifications are present.
@ExUSSailor
@ExUSSailor 7 жыл бұрын
Any videos coming up on the excellent MAS-36?
@terrybailey9621
@terrybailey9621 4 жыл бұрын
Here's a strange one I got a carbine built on a chatelaraut(can barely make out anything there) mle 1892 that is missing only the 1927 wooden insert. Got a date on the barrel of 1919 but it's force matched.
@adityanugroho528
@adityanugroho528 7 жыл бұрын
nice shirt!!
@isthatafamas
@isthatafamas Жыл бұрын
My March of 1918 1892/16 carbine still has the cut out for the stacking rod, no SN cut out in the handguard, no N marking, and matches 100%, I’m curious where it went
@KVW22
@KVW22 6 жыл бұрын
Very cool
@Diebulfrog79
@Diebulfrog79 7 жыл бұрын
After WW 2, a lot of people would hide a lot of guns in Attics, basements, closets. A Breither carbine was one of rural folk favorite's. It was. Small, a good deer rifle. In small conflicts, people would still use this over AKs and ARs in dirty and dusty climates. Taking pot shots, sniper, getting hit by this round would put you down for good. What the use of this carbine was the lack of clips, unlike the Italians, who mass - produce their clips. The French supply was slowly dry out during the 60's. Between the movies, French police, and micro wars, the clips were gone.
@ziem7065
@ziem7065 3 жыл бұрын
smartness and knowledge. ...
@ducomaritiem7160
@ducomaritiem7160 7 жыл бұрын
I learned so much, I really consider joining the Patreon, but first I need a job.
@wheresmyirishwhiskeytullam4326
@wheresmyirishwhiskeytullam4326 7 жыл бұрын
That's one of the weirdest stacking rods I've ever seen at 12:23. I wonder if it was curved to prevent snagging on stuff in the jungle.
@krfoss
@krfoss 5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for posting. I have a Berthier that i've been trying to learn more about! I found the serial on the barrel and the stock are the same, but the bolt is different. Would it be common to have the bolt replaced?
@romainlapie6362
@romainlapie6362 4 жыл бұрын
Quite common, for damaged gun in WW1. He told it in the precedent video.
@Andyman-bg8jv
@Andyman-bg8jv 5 жыл бұрын
Hey Ian, with Berthier rifles how common is it to find one with most of the upgrades such as the sliver of wood where the cleaning rod wood go but still remain in 8mm lebel after ww1? I just bought one and is able to chamber an 8mm blank with ease, but had a tag that said it was chambered for 7.5.
@ForgottenWeapons
@ForgottenWeapons 5 жыл бұрын
They are usually found with the 1920s and 30s updates. The only ones that are in 7.5mm are the M34s, which are quite distinctive once you know what to look for. I have a video on the M34 as well, which will show you all of it.
@JohnDoe-vq9ck
@JohnDoe-vq9ck 7 жыл бұрын
Wow the auto gen subtitles are actually pretty good.
@vidyaorszag
@vidyaorszag 7 жыл бұрын
Ian finally pronounces Chauchat properly and it's beautiful. Also, no M1934 Berthier? Or are you leaving that one out for the 7.5mm video?
@brandonkathman2859
@brandonkathman2859 5 жыл бұрын
My own MLE M16 Berthier has me puzzled, as it is completely devoid of serial numbers anywhere on the gun. It is chambered for 7.5 French and has no manufacturer's mark. I don't suppose anyone has any thoughts?
@frankperkin124
@frankperkin124 7 жыл бұрын
I have a 1892 carbine that was a WW1 bring back that received a black paintjob sometime before 1918 when it was acquired by my GGrandfather.
@frankperkin124
@frankperkin124 7 жыл бұрын
The metal was painted black, like in the one in the vid. The stock was given a heavy brown varnish. This was done by the French themselves. The rifle has been in my family from WW1, and the only modification that was done was to recrown the muzzle back in the early 1950's. My father used it to hunt deer, and back then it had no collector value. What I'm trying to point out is that these rifles were given paint jobs much earlier than the 1930's.
@RedDoggo
@RedDoggo 7 жыл бұрын
Hello, any chance to see the Berthier Mdl 1907/15 M34 in 7.5 French ?
@ForgottenWeapons
@ForgottenWeapons 7 жыл бұрын
Yep, that one is coming.
@jacklucking691
@jacklucking691 9 ай бұрын
I have a 1917 with M I F stamped on the barrel. Is a Chatellerault M I F 4892 My uncle brought it back from World War II Thanks for any input.
@servicerifle16
@servicerifle16 7 жыл бұрын
Thinking of adding a French rifle to the collection, Berthier, MAS36 or MAS49/56?
@ScottKenny1978
@ScottKenny1978 4 жыл бұрын
Only one rifle, the semi auto. But if you can get more, I would get all three.
@williammichaelsexton
@williammichaelsexton 7 жыл бұрын
Next up: The Lebels!
@JoshuaNicoll
@JoshuaNicoll 7 жыл бұрын
wow, the french really couldn't decide what to do, they keep adding shit and changing it, I bet armourers never had any free time.
@MrReded69
@MrReded69 5 жыл бұрын
Prime example: Around 1932 instead of replacing their Hotchkiss M1914 machine guns they developed a higher pressure 8mm Lebel round and rechambered the guns for it (Balle N). As opposed to rechambering them for the new 7.5mm MAS cartridge and converting them to belt feed. To add a further level of wasted funds and resources, they also modified Berthiers and Lebels to use the new Balle N. All this after the 7.5mm MAS was adopted.
@AM-hf9kk
@AM-hf9kk 4 жыл бұрын
@@MrReded69 Even crazier is that they had ISSUED the RSC 1917 self-loading rifle already at the end of WWI. They had over 20 years to develop and deploy a semi-automatic standard infantry rifle.
@MrReded69
@MrReded69 4 жыл бұрын
What's crazier than that? They took all the surviving RSC 1917 and 1918 rifles and instead of modifying the RSC 1917s to the 1918 standard that fixed most of its flaws, they plugged the gas systems and issued them to Colonial troops as straight pulls!
@fuzzydunlop7928
@fuzzydunlop7928 5 жыл бұрын
Seems like more effort went into deleting and patching the cleaning rod than needed. Might as well leave it and allocate resources to more important endeavors.
@joewilson3575
@joewilson3575 7 жыл бұрын
"Learn Colors for Kids with Color Tire Educational video for Children Songs for Babies" is in you're recommended videos, that educational category isn't doing you many favours...
@tillmannfischer
@tillmannfischer 7 жыл бұрын
I get a load of recommended educational videos in Persian... O.o
@mugwump58
@mugwump58 7 жыл бұрын
I've started using the "Not interested" drop down. Time will tell if that will eliminate them in the future.
@misfit4816
@misfit4816 7 жыл бұрын
I see it too rip
@illuminatus3125
@illuminatus3125 7 жыл бұрын
But imagine the education the kid who clicks on Ian's videos will get.
@ahettinger525
@ahettinger525 7 жыл бұрын
Start teaching kids history early, that's what I say!
@alfonsobriones8504
@alfonsobriones8504 7 жыл бұрын
Are you going to discuss the berthier rifle Indochina and long berthier redesigned by the 1930s prior to ww2?
@zacharyp10
@zacharyp10 7 жыл бұрын
Please review a chatellerault!
@micahreid5553
@micahreid5553 7 жыл бұрын
I think that all of the cartouches he showed us in this series have a November acceptance month
@sparviero142
@sparviero142 7 жыл бұрын
Question that may be stupid. why replace a functional bolt action rifle like the Berhier with a new and Born-obsolete gun like the MAS 36? why not just give in the program the old rifle at the support infantry and focus on the developing of a new semiauto rifle?
@CommaV9414
@CommaV9414 7 жыл бұрын
The French government went out of its way to refurbish every rifle but did they ever think to preserve some in original condition for a museum or something?
@Zorglub1966
@Zorglub1966 7 жыл бұрын
Some of them escaped to refurbishment in private collections, and also in regimentals collections. Before 1939 french firearms regulation was pretty cool, any legal age people without criminal record neither tutleage nor guardianship, could own such a weapon, or plenty :D
@jakeh6988
@jakeh6988 7 жыл бұрын
hey man, do you like Berthiers?
@cbroz7492
@cbroz7492 Жыл бұрын
I have an almost pristine 1917 (IIRC) Continsouza...withba three round magazine...
@williamprince1114
@williamprince1114 7 жыл бұрын
Did they try to rechamber the Berthiers to 7.5?
@ForgottenWeapons
@ForgottenWeapons 7 жыл бұрын
Yes, the M34 model. I will get to that one too!
@Meeko1010100112
@Meeko1010100112 7 жыл бұрын
Forgotten Weapons *MORE BERTHIERS*
@LuxsDeluxe
@LuxsDeluxe 7 жыл бұрын
Hey ian, do you watch scholagladitoria at all?
@colonelsanders104
@colonelsanders104 7 жыл бұрын
Next step the Berthier M34.
@minuteman4199
@minuteman4199 7 жыл бұрын
Why did en block clips fall out of favour? There were many types when bolt action rifles were invented, but non of the major WW11 types used it. They seem like a great idea to me to speed up the loading process.
@Zorglub1966
@Zorglub1966 7 жыл бұрын
The internal parts in magazine's stripper clips fed rifle are more simple and less expensive to manufacure?
@ilyapeganov7409
@ilyapeganov7409 7 жыл бұрын
Minute Man Maybe because en block clips are also capable of making a whole rifle unreliable. These clips themselves act as removable feedlips for the gun, so if a clip bends out of shape it at least might be not able to be loaded, or it could potentially cause unreliable feeding. In charger-loaded guns the stripper clip can not affect the feeding unless it breaks or bends something in the rifle, and that I think is rather unelikely. That's my assumption inspired by the issue of Gevehr 1888 that was discussed in a video made by C&Rsenal
@matthewspencer5086
@matthewspencer5086 7 жыл бұрын
Ian. Hotchkiss barrel LENGTH? did you mean Hotchkiss barrel LIFE by any chance. That would seem to me to be a better reason for changing the cartridge.
@minutemanqvs
@minutemanqvs 7 жыл бұрын
Did the british also use a black paint on their enfields at some point? I remembrer seeing that and I wondered if a bubba had painted the gun or if it was original.
@fdsdh1
@fdsdh1 7 жыл бұрын
yes, on No. 4 certainly, not sure about No.1 Mk. III's though. Tropical or damp climates eat blueing and other finishes for breakfast
@webtoedman
@webtoedman 7 жыл бұрын
Late (post WWII) production Lee-Enfields were phosphated and then stove enameled with a paint called "Suncorite". It's extremely tough, but it looks a bit crude compared with earlier finishes.
@rossmum
@rossmum 7 жыл бұрын
My No.4 has it but my No.4's stock can also be used to signal passing aircraft and it came with a No.5 backsight on it, even if all the serialised parts match. Most unaltered wartime No.4s don't appear to be painted. I'm not sure what happened to mine but if I had to guess I'd say it was refurbed from parts postwar, maybe for cadets, maybe by a private owner. Still functions like a charm.
@fdsdh1
@fdsdh1 7 жыл бұрын
rossmum I always assumed all No.4 were painted. But in any case it could have been painted in post war service as quite a few Mk1 got upgraded. The No.5 rearsight is weird that won't line up at all, are you sure it is a No.5? They only go to 800yds. Non-matching rear sights are not uncommon, as they are a component which could break, and they could easily be swapped in and out for target sights, which is what you see quite often on rifles which found their way into the cadets.
@frankperkin124
@frankperkin124 7 жыл бұрын
My Ishapore 2A also has a black paint job on the metal.
@desroin
@desroin 7 жыл бұрын
Actually if you look at the last iteration of these rifles... did they have any downside? I mean what can one expect from a bolt action rifle but I seriously wonder how they stack up to something like a Karabiner 98k which was afterall the main infantry rifle of the Wehrmacht throughout WW2 :/
@Luthtar
@Luthtar 7 жыл бұрын
Why didn't the French rechamber the Berthier to 7.5x54mm? It seems like it would be a sensible thing to do when one came in for repairs since the military wanted to shift from 8mm Lebel to 7.5mm anyways. Was it bureauocracy or were they just not expected to remain in service for very long after 7.5x54mm was adopted?
@Luthtar
@Luthtar 7 жыл бұрын
Google lead me to finding the Mle 07/15m34. It looks like the gun had to almost completely be reworked to fire the 7.5x54mm round, so you are correct. I initially thought it would be a matter of a new bolt head, new barrel, and new clips. However, the cartridge geometry of 8mm Lebel is very different from 7.5mm, so I suspect that it necessitated essentially an entire rework of the rifle. It isn't like going from 5.56 to .300 Blackout, that's for sure. :P
@forest6110
@forest6110 9 ай бұрын
If it goes ‘pew pew’ it isn’t completely obsolete.
@davidmbeckmann
@davidmbeckmann 4 жыл бұрын
Why did they not upgrade to a non screw-on bolt?
@theapatheticprepper8044
@theapatheticprepper8044 7 жыл бұрын
My wife may be tiring of competing for my attention with you.
@walterkurtz4360
@walterkurtz4360 6 жыл бұрын
Why would you not be building/producing this rifle in 1939 this is an awesome little bolt action carbine I wouldn't want it in a full sized rifle configuration but as a carbine its badass I like it more than any other bolt action carbine of the time period other than the shortened smle's that retained the nose cap and I really like the m38 mosins too but there's just something about the way a 5 round berthier carbine looks that makes me really like it and they're just damn small and handy I want one really bad
@calebfaires9782
@calebfaires9782 7 жыл бұрын
I find it kind funny that you said in 1919 a military shouldn't be using a rimmed cartridge and the British used one until the late 40s early 50s and the Russians still you 7.62x45 rimmed to this day. just an interesting thing to think about.
@matthayward7889
@matthayward7889 7 жыл бұрын
Caleb Faires pretty sure we were still using the .303 up until the 1960's and the Canadian arctic rangers still are!
@rediius
@rediius 7 жыл бұрын
Matt Hayward The Canadian rangers and Indian police finally let go of their Enfield rifles in various patterns.
@ScottKenny1978
@ScottKenny1978 4 жыл бұрын
The Russians really should have gotten around to making a rimless cartridge. But logistics happen.
@CrysResan
@CrysResan 7 жыл бұрын
That trigger looks incredibly uncomfortable
@tehgreatvak
@tehgreatvak 7 жыл бұрын
That whole Gras Rifle made in the 1870s, converted to 8mm in 1914, then converted again to the balle N during the interwar period is still some of the thriftiest thing I ever heard.
@tehgreatvak
@tehgreatvak 7 жыл бұрын
yeah but how does it relate to my bad post?
@ScottKenny1978
@ScottKenny1978 4 жыл бұрын
Machine time is relatively cheap, at least for reaming a hole really lightly and quickly. Much more expensive to have to make a whole new receiver.
@Daniel-bi5ci
@Daniel-bi5ci 3 жыл бұрын
9:35 not going to rewrite this private company
@Rochb63
@Rochb63 7 жыл бұрын
When you talking about Saint-Quentin Suiza, i think you made an error. There was a private company called Hispano Suiza who made multiple things for the french army like canon, motors, etc....
@Zorglub1966
@Zorglub1966 7 жыл бұрын
Hi, The name of the company was "CONTINSOUZA" not related to Hispano Suiza
@Rochb63
@Rochb63 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you i've misunderstood the english accent on french word and i taught he was talking about hispano suiza.
@Zorglub1966
@Zorglub1966 7 жыл бұрын
You're welcome.
@yazadpardiwala687
@yazadpardiwala687 Жыл бұрын
Maybe this is a cynical take, but I could not help thinking "big arms re-development program. A whole slew of changes. Only 3.5 of them (the 2 sight upgrades, the barrel change for ball n, the black laquor finish) are functional. A bunch of em (painting the serial number on the hand guard, then cutting a slot in the hand guard, then plugging the cleaning rod slot) seem completely pedantic & trivial. Somehow the pedantic & trivial ones got the most attention & focus" To be clear I can see how such a thing happens ; I make the exact same sequence of "beaurocratically being more concerned with trivial details than things that actually matter" constantly, & I imagine that proclivity to beaurocratic stupidity only gets amplified when looking at a large, old military organisation. But damn
@heldaneurbanus5135
@heldaneurbanus5135 6 жыл бұрын
The updates be ball'N (I'm so sorry but I had to).
@unhippy1
@unhippy1 7 жыл бұрын
I am simple man...i see Gun Jesus has new video...i like....then i watch to see what todays sermon is about.....have never seen one that i have had to un-like
@johnnyz1781
@johnnyz1781 2 жыл бұрын
Rimed rifle cartridge obsolete - laughs in 7.62x54R still in use in 2021.
@undertheeaves5974
@undertheeaves5974 6 жыл бұрын
No tromboncino m28?
@ForgottenWeapons
@ForgottenWeapons 6 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pbqEZrmey9uRXas.html
@undertheeaves5974
@undertheeaves5974 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks mate!
@michaelking8483
@michaelking8483 7 жыл бұрын
if the majority of arms in germany in WW1 were destroyed does that mean that most german WW1 rifles etc are rarities
@erichvonmanstein1952
@erichvonmanstein1952 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah,Germans began from zero after Hitler came into power.They had not huge quantities of weapons from WW1 unlike French.
@gunner678
@gunner678 6 жыл бұрын
French reserves were still using the Lebel 86 in ww2.
@Brzcastas
@Brzcastas 4 жыл бұрын
Not long obviously...
@fmjsteelcore4397
@fmjsteelcore4397 7 жыл бұрын
Not the most accurate compact rifle for sure but the funniest of all ! Fire it at night it's a flametrhower ❤️
@geraldgriffin8220
@geraldgriffin8220 7 жыл бұрын
With the exception of the "balle N" modification this seems to be a whole lot of expense and fidgeting around with an outdated system with little actual improvement - in my humble opinion..
@richardelliott9511
@richardelliott9511 6 жыл бұрын
Max $$$$$ was the reason. You must remember that WWI devastated France. Not only was most of the fighting done on French soil, they lost practically an entire generation of their young men and the country came out virtually bankrupt. Whatever these small arms updates cost it was nothing compared to the developement and manufacture of all new guns. In another of Ian's videos , I believe the MAS 36, he explains their post war new gun developement plans. They did have a plan, it just didn't have the highest priority. Heard of the Maginot Line? Good idea or not, most of France's defense budget went there. And then that little thing called The Great Depression, came a long. If you have been following Forgotten Weapons for a bit, you will know that most of the major European countries were fiddling with semiauto rifles just as WW1 broke out and none went into major production or were really followed up on after the war. All about $$$$$. Rebuilding their economys came first.
@pikeywyatt
@pikeywyatt 7 жыл бұрын
more more.
@ph5832
@ph5832 7 жыл бұрын
What will we do when we run out of Berthier's to review? Who is having Berthier withdrawal?
@crossbow1203
@crossbow1203 7 жыл бұрын
The idea of retrofitting rifles is to save money and improve what you already have. Why would they go through the expense and trouble of filling the knocker rod slot and the front band replacement instead of throwing away the knocker and replacing it with a cleaning rod that was needed any how? Quick, Simple, Cheap. The 3 words governments love.
@rednecksniper4715
@rednecksniper4715 7 жыл бұрын
Why didn't they build off of the RSC 1917 design
@Zorglub1966
@Zorglub1966 7 жыл бұрын
It was mostly because it was cheaper at short and middle term to to refurbish the tremendous quantity of rifles available. As a lot of european countries, France was economicaly almost bled dry, and the most north east territory's part (where coal mines and steel industry were concentrated ) in ruins. The RSC modèle 1917 was so poorly designed that J.C. Garand didn't even try to take any inspiration on its feeding and operating system. But honnestly, even you're right about some flaws, it was designed in emergency, in a economy of war context and so on... It was not a total failure.
@OsomoMojoFreak
@OsomoMojoFreak 7 жыл бұрын
"Getting close to the end of the story of the berthier system" - 20 or so videos left I'm guessing?
@Sseltraeh89
@Sseltraeh89 7 жыл бұрын
"Modern army should not be using rimmed cartridge" Meanwhile in Russia: T-14 Armatas, MiG 35s, (limited supply of) AN-94s... and standard full-powered rifle cartridge is still 136year old 7,62x54R, one of the first smokeless spitzer rounds in the world :D
@RukaSubCh
@RukaSubCh 7 жыл бұрын
Wow the French did all that development and work just to loose so quickly in WW2. Damn that was how effective Germany were in their tactics and development compared to everyone else.
@Zorglub1966
@Zorglub1966 7 жыл бұрын
Such effective indeed. Look at the results. The myth of German's managing and technical superiority survived the historical facts. It's amazing.
@asadunbar3324
@asadunbar3324 7 жыл бұрын
if the germans were so smart and effective, why did they lose the war, twice? i've been to europe many times, german doods are just as squirrely as french ones. (the french have better manners) it's easy to win a fight when you come up from behind and sucker punch someone, which is excatly what happened when they invaded, and they still lost. seems like a classic case of the germans beliving their own bullshit. tsk tsk
@RukaSubCh
@RukaSubCh 7 жыл бұрын
Asa Dunbar to clarify I mean they were so effective at the start of the war, despite loosing WW1 they managed to rebuild enough to execute their over the top holiday though Europe in 1939, it's clear why they lost again but it's still interesting to see their initial success.
@exploatores
@exploatores 7 жыл бұрын
It´s the tactics and strategy more then the weapons. some. anyone who planed their defence for a war like the great war, would have a nasty suprice and not much time to think when they hade to defend their country from a blitzkriege.
@dreamingflurry2729
@dreamingflurry2729 3 жыл бұрын
"...they won.." - HALT! Nein! The British and the US carried them to victory! Without that support Germany would have won!
@powaybob45
@powaybob45 7 жыл бұрын
Is Tulle related to the Russian Tula? (Facetious comment)
@TheWozWizard
@TheWozWizard 7 жыл бұрын
In your opinion why did the French "reinvent the wheel" with regards to small arms post 1918? With such rifle cartridges as the .30-06 and the whole family of Mauser rifle cartridges why WASTE money developing a new cartridge. Why WASTE money developing a new bolt action rifle when you could have all the Mauser Model 98 rifles you wanted simply for the taking? Just would like to hear your thoughts.
@Kevin-mx1vi
@Kevin-mx1vi 7 жыл бұрын
TheWozWizard you really don't understand the French, do you ? Their egos won't let them adopt anyone elses systems so they *have* to invent their own, no matter how wasteful or stupid that may be. Drive a French car (preferably a Citroen) & see how long it takes you to find controls that fall instantly to hand in any other vehicle. ;)
@TheWozWizard
@TheWozWizard 7 жыл бұрын
Kevin, I thought that was the reason but I just want some independent confirmation that I was not being unfair to the French by thinking that. To a lesser degree the U. S. military also suffers for "not invented here" disease.
@asadunbar3324
@asadunbar3324 7 жыл бұрын
there is an advantage to using proprietary ammo for your country. if the germans and french used the same ammo, then the germans could just capture it and use it for themselves. i forget who, may have been one of the scandinavian countries that used 7.62x53r cartridges, i can only assume, for this very purpose. same reason today why russian guns aren't chambered for nato cartridges.
@asadunbar3324
@asadunbar3324 7 жыл бұрын
just read up 7.62x54r and the 53r are actually the same cartridge, finns rounded down when russians rounded up. still tho, it makes sense not to use the same ammo as a neighboring hostile country.
@goodmaninastorm4617
@goodmaninastorm4617 7 жыл бұрын
Asa Dunbar but that argument goes both ways; sure the Germans could then capture and use French ammo, but then the French could also then capture and use German ammo!
@MrReded69
@MrReded69 3 жыл бұрын
So in 1932,instead of converting the carbines into the new rimless cartridge standardized in 1929, they converted them to the rimmed cartridges meant for the heavy machine gun? French logic at its best!
@TheStewieOne
@TheStewieOne 7 жыл бұрын
So France had to learn the hard way.
@brillenfux4687
@brillenfux4687 7 жыл бұрын
The Berthiers also still look quite fashionable when carried in both hands, above your head.
@EvilMaleficus
@EvilMaleficus 7 жыл бұрын
huhuhuuuu, dem burns.
@Loutral
@Loutral 7 жыл бұрын
I see what you did there... So it doesn't get rusty when you gotta cross that river. You gotta stay classy in every possible situation.
M34: The Berthier Converted to the 7.5mm Rimless Cartridge
14:55
Forgotten Weapons
Рет қаралды 105 М.
French Rifle Ammunition: 8mm Lebel and 7.5mm French
18:39
Forgotten Weapons
Рет қаралды 271 М.
Gym belt !! 😂😂  @kauermtt
00:10
Tibo InShape
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
KINDNESS ALWAYS COME BACK
00:59
dednahype
Рет қаралды 166 МЛН
100❤️
00:19
MY💝No War🤝
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
Meunier A6: France's First Semiauto Battle Rifle
17:00
Forgotten Weapons
Рет қаралды 187 М.
Model 1892 Berthier Artillery Musketoon
15:35
Forgotten Weapons
Рет қаралды 112 М.
Converting the Lebel to 7.5mm: The M27 Lebel
16:13
Forgotten Weapons
Рет қаралды 117 М.
Modele 1890 Berthier Cavalry Carbine
12:51
Forgotten Weapons
Рет қаралды 95 М.
MAGAL: A Galil in .30 Carbine for the Israeli Police
14:41
Forgotten Weapons
Рет қаралды 40 М.
MAS 44: The French Adopt a Semiauto Rifle
18:49
Forgotten Weapons
Рет қаралды 472 М.
Hotchkiss 1914: A French and American WWI Heavy MG
21:25
Forgotten Weapons
Рет қаралды 320 М.
MAS-36: The Backup Rifle is Called to Action
28:11
Forgotten Weapons
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Mle 1866 Chassepot: Best of the Needle Rifles
23:18
Forgotten Weapons
Рет қаралды 472 М.
Shooting the RSC-1918 and RSC-1917 French Autoloaders
12:32
Forgotten Weapons
Рет қаралды 483 М.
Gym belt !! 😂😂  @kauermtt
00:10
Tibo InShape
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН