Oh stuff it

He safe trust us

EXACTLY! Right out of my mouth.

AMEN

The first thing Boeing whistleblowers should tell the press is "I am NOT depressed, am in great health and have NO intentions on EVER taking my own life."

Police official investigation first whistleblower was suicide. Note was in his hand writing, second one medical issue. Go by evidence not feelings. Not trying to defend Boeing. CEOs need to go to jail.

​@alexrebmann1253 jobs can literally kill people from stress. Why did that person commit suicide?

@@alexrebmann1253you think his suicide had no cause? Of course Boeing is responsible

@@alexrebmann1253 Yes because murders are never covered up to look like suicides....let me guess you work for Boeing.

@@rooster1012 No I do not work for Boeing. I worked for Yellow Freight. A company that closed doors last year because of CEO greed

Watch your mouth mate. They are now hiring hitmen to delete any blow back

I briefly worked QC at a place that I soon realized only treated *some* parts they made for planes with aerospace standards; half of the machinists' personal tools weren't even numbered in the gage & tool traceability system, a *requirement* for aviation manufacturing. The machine tools and gages were, but even someone's personal screw guns and stuff are required to be traced, too. The products were just cabin interior cosmetic stuff for some SEA luxury commuter service, nothing structural or otherwise related to flight, but still. Had to leave, & scratched aviation QC off the list over the general vibe it gave me. It's pretty sad when electronics manufacturers are more exacting and accountable about even something as minor as a spring clip, but Boeing is over here just literally putting nonconforming parts into planes.

Fr Boeing acting like this tier 3 auto manufacturer I worked for, we totally just wiped some parts down with a shiny spray and sent it. They were mostly just aesthetic panels for the interiors of cars lmfao. Boeing is insane

@@HanTheProphet Basically every cabin trim piece we made. lol

You’re assuming this is true. The guy was fired, his credibility is shit.

Not necessarily true, in theory they should know but that’s only if they are actually following procedures

Ya but the CEO makes 45 million a year

Nope, another whistleblower said they pressure employees not to log faults and violations on paper/emails specifically to avoid a paper trail.

Becau$e of rea$on$.

CREAM

To increase CEO's salary by 45%.

Not just Americans, this country was stolen and colonized on greed LoL

Yeah, like this doesn't happen all over the world 😂😂😂. Grow up, kid

​@@RomanesEuntDomus. Shalom

​@@RomanesEuntDomus.No it does not. Poor deflection

We can’t do that. This is a government sanctioned company that feeds the United States so much money and gives the USA a great deal of the power we are able to wield around the world.

trump says we need less oversight ....nothing to see here lol

First, we believe in innocent until proven guilty and second you can’t shut the entire company down even if they were guilty and liable you would have to ask yourself what damages were suffered. You would have to look back over the companies entire history and say how many aircraft have fallen out of the sky because of this, and they have a great record. Don’t think about it in that capacity because of the events that have made the news but how many times has an airplane taken off and landed and there was nothing to say but see you when you get back from vacation. Also, you can’t shut the company down for one reason guess what they make for us that we all use every day they make military grade aircraft and they do it specifically for the United States we don’t let any other company do it because we only want an American company doing it . If you shut them down who’s going to make your military aircraft you don’t want China to do it.

It’s a case of Too Big to Fail

Shutting it down is nuts. Boeing would cause economic disruption around the world. It needs to be taken over, not shut down.

Yup, like the bolts that “fasten” the door to the plane. Good old CNN

It's all about the Almighty Dollar! Disgusting!

THIS IS AN ATTRIBUTE OF EVERY COMPANY NOWADAYS NOT JUST BOEING

​@@brokentobuiltAirbus does not have these problems...

@@frankstollar8492 tell me airbus hasnt cut overhead costs in order to stabilize their company in the recent years and then prove it

@@frankstollar8492 airbus has morals

Airborne? More like Airdead.

So what planes will you fly in? Is there an airplane manufacturer you trust?

@@dm-31024 For now I dont trust Boeing and that is what matters to me.

@@dm-31024 Airbus is the world leader now.

​@@dm-31024Airbus is top notch.

And HUGE severance packages.

The supplier is Boeing itself; these were parts sent away from Boeing's plant in Everett for scrap processing at another plant. So recycling what can be (sorting out metals to be melted back down and stuff), and destroying what can't. I've heard of things getting sent to the MRB and getting accepted by the customer even if they aren't perfect, but I've never heard of something literally sent off to be scrapped as being brought back. Scrapping would usually happen after being failed in MRB, or if it was inspected in-process, it was so clearly bad off the line that the inspectors, or one of the project managers, just sent it straight to scrap. So... Somebody was going outside the process to take those parts back because of some failed quota. This sounds to me like something went wrong in one of the production lines, like one of their machines started slipping into nonconformity or breaking parts, or the machine itself broke down. Then, the fix to the machine was probably taking too long for their deadline and they were going to miss a quota, and somebody was likely already on the hook for that happening more than once. So... They went for any parts that they could find. This was some higher-up trying to save their own skin at the cost of everyone else.

No, not the inspectors. This was likely engineers/quality managers being "told what to do" (read: threatened) by people above them. If this was MRB'd, then used, it means the customer knowingly accepted nonconforming parts.

@@Knight-Bishop I heard the Charlestown assembly line is .. too small to be a nation yet too large to be an insane asylum

The first one literally said if I die it’s not suicide then cause of death was suicide

The US is way behind in high speed passenger rail it's essential to give substandard airlines and Boeing a wake up.

If it's Everett, it's Boeing themselves.

@@Knight-Bishop ok. Boeing engineers decide what scrap is and isn't and they can change their minds if they want to.

@@Wolfcamp555 They can't do it on a whim and usually they can't just pull something being sent to scrap back to go back into production. If this was done through their MRB, there would be a paper trail of people who signed off on this, and it wouldn't have even gotten all the way to the scrap facility before being taken back. Unless for some reason they have an MRB cage at the scrap site, which would be the weirdest and least efficient logistical choice. In the text they highlighted, Quality seems to be in conflict with management, likely sales directly. And they seem to be talking about axles; idk if this is referring to landing gear, or some internal mechanism, but that is not something an engineer would just be fickle with, especially on a plane. This is what happens when a machine breaks before meeting a quota, the fix to the machine is taking longer than the deadline for the order, and somebody's already taken the heat for missing deadlines before, so they go over/around quality auditing and tell somebody to use these bad parts they scrounged up just to hit their numbers. In other words, greed.

​@@Wolfcamp555This is NOT how this works in aerospace AT ALL!

@@Knight-Bishop salesman don't have authority to do anything. Engineers do.

US Capitalism won't tolerate a fix along those lines. A few aircraft falling out of the sky and killing hundreds of people or random door plugs blowing off is just the price of doing business.

Is a Felon a Bad Person ‼️

JUST to CLARIFY. That was manufactured by Mc Donnell Douglas not By Boing … Also. What’s your source regarding engine having defective fan blades on it ?? Possible but Not likely .Commen knowledge fan blades sometimes develop hairline cracks that go undetected by maintenance crews working for Various AIRLINES.

@@ca-dz9vb Thanks for the correction on the airplane manufacturer. The fan disk that failed had the same serial number as one that was supposed to have been disposed of at the factory. I lived close to Sioux City and followed the news quite closely. If I remember correctly, the failed fan disc was found in a farmers cornfield when he was harvesting in the fall. His farm is located near Holstein, Iowa which is about 30 miles east of Sioux City Iowa.

Doesn’t meet quality standards.. so basically not safe

A part that doesn't meet technical specifications is tagged non conform. It can either be fixed or not. If it can't be fixed, it has to be scrapped

@@citizenychoux My thought is that in some cases a part was declared scrap and then upon further inspection was declared safe with a superficial or cosmetic defect. I'd assume a paper trail though, which either didn't exist or the internal complaint handling system couldn't be bothered to find it and demonstrate to the whistleblower that the parts were indeed suitable for use.

The top Boeing executives names are ALL listed in business publications.

What about it?