Рет қаралды 14,845
Penal substitution is theologically problematic. In this video, I criticize the theory and its claims about God. This is part one of a three-part series examining why I think penal substitution must be rejected on theological and biblical grounds. Part two will examine the scriptural basis for this, while part one establishes the theological framework for that critique. Part three will suggest a few of the ways we might interpret the cross apart from this theory.
Enjoy my work? Buy me a coffee: www.buymeacoff...
Part 2 (a biblical critique): • Forsaking Penal Substi...
Part 3 (If not PSA, then what?): • Forsaking Penal Substi...
Suggested reading:
Darrin W. Snyder Belousek: "Atonement, Justice, Peace" - amzn.to/32geCBU
Thomas F. Torrance: "The Mediation of Christ" - amzn.to/3tAzDTK
Thomas F. Torrance: "Atonement: The Person and Work of Christ" - amzn.to/3uUFGmB
C. Baxter Kruger: "Jesus and the Undoing of Adam" - amzn.to/3gm9yUG
C. Baxter Kruger: "Across All Worlds" - amzn.to/3e4qOLH
Karl Barth: "Church Dogmatics II/1 & IV/1" - amzn.to/3x20V7G amzn.to/3adjvQy
"The Nature of the Atonement: Four Views" - amzn.to/3wZQxxy
Fleming Rutledge: "The Crucifixion" - amzn.to/3mSWWWz
John McLeod Campbell: "The Nature of the Atonement" - amzn.to/3mPP08m
My books related to this subject:
"T. F. Torrance in Plain English" - amzn.to/2QwrL77
"Karl Barth in Plain English" - amzn.to/3snkG6i
"We Belong: Trinitarian Good News" - amzn.to/3drARvj
**Please note that all Amazon links are associate links, wherein I receive a percentage of your total purchase.