Really creepy yes

What arrogance? He doesn't appear arrogant in any of the videos I've seen. In fact, he rarely ever says anything. The one big interview he gave he stated that he thought she was still alive. If you've seen arrogance then please post a link to it; I'd like to see it.

UNDER CONCRETE JOB SITES PEOPLE

I truly believe if murder charges are brought against both of them, Michelle will roll on him. Hopefully.

I don't know that he is guilty. It could be his girlfriend, it could be him, it could be an ample number of motivated people that were connected back to her father. She may not be dead. There's so much doubt in this case that slinging innuendo seems counter productive for everyone.

theresa selman the girlfriend knows but is scared to come forward.. but if they press hard enough she’ll talk

@@cisnerosmedina954 - What does the girlfriend know and how do you know that she knows?

Derek Boyt she knows that he killed his wife!!!

Michelle probably was a puppet. What's her job anyway?

I'm pretty sure Russia was involved

jensing77 🙈😂

Yep! 😂

I love a man in a turtleneck. They're timeless and classic. He always looks sharp/well-dressed.

Me too, so chic! ​@@janicemetzger6338

As in, a dumpster fire? Ok perhaps not that bad. He spoke a lot of smooth sounding words, but said very little.

@@mjdelaney1 not really, the state doesn’t have enough evidence to make a conviction today, the case is actually falling apart completely today. Even though he died the current suspects are released on bond and the judge is demand more evidence from the state or they will more than likely drop the charges

I agree Attorney Smith and everyone associated with Attorney Pattis are the "cream of the crop" of defense council in the State of Connecticut.

This didn’t age well 🫤

Not fancy, he is good at spinning lies.

Sarah Prosse Creative Bullshit which is a +1

He did use some interesting metaphors. The state said that a warrant was issued and therefore it was tampering. I'd be interested in knowing how that applies and if the state has to prove he had awareness of the warrant. If he did destroy evidence then I would assume that it was done fairly quickly in relation to the alleged murder. If that is correct and they are suggesting that he tampered with it; do they have to prove the tampering was prior to the warrant? If not then do they have to prove that he was aware of the investigation and warrant. I can see why the defense would proclaim that the state isn't wearing any clothes since they really don't appear to have sufficient evidence. They don't appear to have evidence because I believe they haven't disclosed details of their investigation. I don't think the state wants to provide all of the information about the investigation because they don't yet have enough to proceed with a murder charge. That's why this tampering charge is underway while they continue to investigate and search. By having this lesser charge in place the state can maintain a higher level of control over him while they investigate. When the tampering charge is completed, then the state will have to file any additional charges or release him to go about his business. If I were the defense then it seems like a request for an expedited judgment would be wise; by not attempting to expedite then that gives the appearance that they believe he is truly innocent and that there is no worry about the murder investigation. Does anyone else think this tampering charge is a way to control him and keep him in the state or is there any real tampering that can be demonstrated without disclosure of the investigation.

There is soooo much evidence and video. The only reason this being drawn out is no body found.

2005deluxe - Have you seen the evidence? Do you have inside knowledge? I believe if there was that much evidence then they would have charged him.

Raymond Burton oh noes research

Connecticut.

Derek Boyt .. because her body is cut in parts and Scattered at his job sites under concrete

@@cisnerosmedina954 - And you know this how? Which job sites? Or, did you just make up that theory as something that may have happened?

flipped already she's think I

Cathy Newell because they are not admissible in court. Also they are not 100% proof. Also I have seen where one was done and person passed, was told that he failed and his attorney was told that it was undeterred. Legal system is corrupt no matter where you are!!!

Guess that’s why he killed himself 🤷🏽‍♀️