Parem de dobrar os vídeos periódicamente no mínimo nuvem toda a série sou de Portugal pelo amor de Deus gente você é ridículo dublado periodicamente eu não sou vidente para saber quando é que não vai ter

I understand your need for a sponsor, but Wargaming, who makes World of Warships, is not a good company. They regularly abuse and ignore their community. They only care about new players who are willing to spend money, and once they've bought what they can, they're disregarded.

You really ought to at least mention the tribes' actual names, even if you're primarily using the settler terms for them. It's the Hodnashone, not the Iroquois, the Onodowaga, not the Seneca.

I guess the saying stands true, "Watch Out for the Quiet Ones."

​@@paulceglinski7172 I disagree

He did. How about you?

I've read Lee still had British leaning sympathies.. After his being held in captivity by the British Regulars after being taken prisoner by Banestre Tarleton at a New Jersey tavern where he had been drinking and carousing with 304s.

”But there’s so many of them!”

“I’m sorry is this not your speed?”

Hamiton! ... Have Lafayette take the lead!

Did he miss his shot? Certainly not the one who shot him mwhahahahahah!

@@odd-ysseusdoesstuff6347 Easy there, young Lafayette would have charged the entire British army head-on ! :p

isn't Robert E Lee a descendant of his too?

Different Lee - You're thinking of Henry Lee III

@@gamebawesome thanks for answering

This fact doesn't seem very fun.

Oddly, these intelligence eventually gets outdated by the end of the wintering in Valley Forge

Given Washington's customary aloof nature, that must have been at least a year's worth of repressed frustration and anger being unleashed in a veritable dam burst of expletives and implications as to Lee's parentage.

​@eldorados_lost_searcher in short Washington made it a point to make lee understand how small and incompetent he was and lee understood where Washington wanted him "lee" to "go"

If memory serves, correspondence between Charles Lee and the British has been uncovered, which kind of shows that Lee was a British agent. Staggering.

The writer here: It's outside the scope of this series.

@@TheReaperEagle Will it appear in the long form video?

@@bfdiepictennisballbfdi2359 Probably not. Adding the Canadian campaign is the priority and will eat up most of the extra space. The Gulf campaign is a bit much for the remaining space, though if there's enough interest maybe it will happen down the line.

@@TheReaperEagle Understandable, will look forward to the release of the remaining videos :)

​@@TheReaperEaglevery typical in US History after 1823. Galvez, the Spanish governor of Louisiana, negotiated with Thomas Jefferson his support to the 13 colonies and expelled the British from the Southern flank of the colonies, the Gulf of Mexico. In recognition, the Congress gave honorary US citizenship to Galvez and several places in the USA were given his name, as Galveston. But the memory of the strong is weak.

yeah i can see that, it is a great step up from all these years. Good Work Team KnG!

canadian detected

​@rhs5683 I don't know why but you made me laugh

@derekv Spain did much much more than that! Spain through the Gardoqui family sent the very first foreign weapons for the American Revolution in February 1775 to Marblehead Massachusetts! 300 Spanish rifles or muskets and 600 Spanish pistols to start things off! The British that came at Concord and Lexington came to disarm the Patriot militia, most likely knew of the Spanish weapons and came to retrieve them!

The writer here: Correct.

@@TheReaperEagleoh okay and just saying but I loved how you mentioned Molly pitcher and just letting you when it was showing the battle of Rhode island Monmouth was in the top right corner I just thought you should know.

​@TheReaperEagle I enjoyed that part about "Molly Pitcher," I'm a history geek (to the point that i watch these videos & channels like people binge watch Netflix shows lol) and didn't really know about that/her, so that little inclusion is one of those fun facts that I really enjoy. Keep up the good work! I find you and other KZfaq historical documentarians are far superior to most "professionally" (not to say you guys aren't professionals, im just referring to the documentaries that you would see on cable TV or something) written/produced/advertised/shown/etcetera.

You literally took the words out of my mouth.

the first man to come up with the idea of putting meat between two pieces of bread .... no seriously.

Funny, i just watched a video of his descendants talking about the mansion of his they inherited. I guess it took 25 years to get it back into the family. Britain apparently likes to take inherited mansions from families only to neglect them lol

The writer here: Stanwix is a fascinatingly controversial treaty. The bottom line was that it cleared the way for legal European settlers in modern West Virginia and western Kentucky, but the circumstances around the negotiation are murky, convoluted, and controversial. The British thought they were buying all the Haudenosaunee claims, only to find out during the negotiations that they weren't. The Six Nations intended to keep using all the territory they'd conquered down to the Tennessee River as a hunting reserve as they had for decades. They just wouldn't settle there or contest Virginian settlers moving in. It also isn't clear if the British knew that the Shawnee, Lenape, and many other small tribes had never given up their claims on the area (and in some cases still lived in the region). You can argue that they should have known, but the Six Nations were representing that they'd conquered and controlled the region to the exclusion of other tribes, so they didn't need to listen to the other tribes. This would have been prohibitively difficult for the British to investigate, so it was one tribes' word vs the others. It highlights the really difficult problem of figuring out which actually held what land and had the rights to it as America expanded.

@@TheReaperEagle thanks for taking the time to explain! Treaty interpretation is certainly a controversial topic anywhere, but especially in American Indian Law! Fair point on the British! They’d definitely lose on the “should have known” argument today, but we can’t delude ourselves by holding 18th century imperial powers to that level of scrutiny 🤣

The reason is that Lafayette was with them while the Spanish fought on their own. Also, Spain entered the war on the request of France and to get back at Britain, not out of solidarity. It was not a formal ally of the US and distrusted republicanism. And after this, it’s not like there was full friendship. John Jay, the first U.S. ambassador to Spain, was not formally received at court and Spain also used the natives to block U.S. expansion. At some point Spain even blocked the Mississippi to the U.S and it had pursued claims on Georgia and West Florida. It wasn’t all negative of course, but it wasn’t rosy either. Spain had antagonized the US long before the Spanish-American War, so there was no “betrayal”. US and Spain relations were that of love and hate up until Spain joined NATO more or less.

@@LuisBrito-ly1koFrance also joined to get back at Britain.

i noticed a certain Anti-Hispanism in your words however if the Americans and Spaniards got among so badly because they bought Florida with money with Russia and Alaska . They could declared War as happened with the Mexicans and more of facts that dismantles your thesis Bernardo de Gálvez hinself was appointed and the War received by Washington and they saw each other many times during the War and named Gálvez Honorific Citizen of U.S founded localities in honor to Gálvez in Texas.and in U.S is known with the "Pensacola Battle Hero" this title Honorary Citizen no given to many foreigners . The President Biden in visit in Spain Talk to Bernardo de Gálvez and the help of Spain to U.S in War of Independence ; in fact Gálvez portrait is in the gallery of Founder Fathers if U.S in the Capitol . Do you think that the French did not also have the same or more anymosity towars the English than the Spanish . Spain not fight alone there were númerous joint interventions . what with the remains of Viceroyalties ( Spain had territories abroad to 1.976) the War of Independence to American-Spanish War passed a century and its a " long time " many many facts in history passed in many less time . Its also not true Spain will get among badly with acounting and both be in the same organization; with Franco the thaw of the U.S began and these are time likes in all sides

​@@LuisBrito-ly1koIts a absolutly nonsense say for this Word the French fighting with help for Americans lol the French fighting with minimum equal hate agaisnt English than Spaniard not know this is no learn nothing in básic history ; Spaniard fighting with U.S Army in" permanent conexión" in fact in Pensacola Battle is one of decisión of U.S ask Spain for help

@@Benito-lr8mz I think misunderstood what I said. I didn’t imply that the French did. I said the French did fight alongside Americans on the field, while nothing of the sort happened with Spain. Not that France fought to help the US in particular.

@ATH420 Bernie was the best and most successful tactical and strategic commander in the American Revolution! No one compares to Bernardo de Gálvez! Bernie never lost a battle and or skirmish against the British! An absolute win for America!

We already now since he talk about the "great chevauché" and the "Vicious french plunder" that KG is not really objective but that's fine nobody is

Nothing like a route for a christmas gift

Although the American revolution is portrayed as a war of the meek against the mighty, One must never forget that besides British taxation, the other primary motivating factor behind the American rebellion was slavery, that is the British Empire's gradual move towards abolition even though they were still one of the biggest slave colonizers of that time. This gradual move towards abolition by the british crown "Pre-declaration of independence" Is believed to be the main precipitor towards the American Declaration of Independence, not just taxation, and was motivated by two key British decisions: 1. The 1772 Mansfield decision rendered by Lord Mansfield Which held that a person cannot be held as a slave in England, even though he may have been previously enslaved elsewhere in the British Empire, and 2 Lord Dunmore's proclamation of 1775, The Royal governor Virginia, who in no uncertain terms,stated that any black person in the American colonies who rose up against their masters and went over to the side of the British would be granted their freedom. It was these two decisions that caused as much uproar in the american colony as taxation and prompted them to declare their independence in 1776, even referring to Lord Dunmore's 1775 proclamation In the "Declaration of Independence" as having caused an insurrection amongst them. Needless to say that thousands of African Americans headed Lord Dunmore's proclamation and fought alongside the british for their own freedom. It is also interesting to note that over 300 blacks fought on the side of the Americans at Minmouth, but none of this is mentioned.. Perhaps the most interesting of these unmentioned facts is that a runaway slave from Shrewsbury., a man who would later became known by the name of Colonel Tye, would fight alongside the British at the battle of Monmouth, and so formidable.was his fighting force that his men (Known as the ethiopian regiment or "black brigade") would eventually strike more fear into the heart of the American colonists than the British army itself. Colonel Tye went on to participate in several battles and skirmishes in New jersey Including Monmouth and Hunterdon where he captured several high-ranking members of the American militia. He and his men went on to conduct several successful raids and skirmishes in jersey, looting plantations and freeing slaves along with their livestock. He eventually succumbed to gangrene after suffering a gunshot in the leg during a raid on a Patriot's home in Tom's River. This is all needless to say that slavery had a more promirole in the American revolution than mere taxes. Look at the fact that General Washington, one of the most prominent figures of the revolution, was one of the biggest slaveholders in the 13 colonies along with Thomas Jefferson. Needless to say that if america's war of independence was really about freedom, Then once Lord Dunmore, Royal governor Virginia, issued his proclamation in 1775 declaring all blacks free who fought along the British, the Americans could have easily countered in 1776 by stating the same in the Declaration of Independence.Although the American revolution is portrayed as a war of the meek against the mighty, One must never forget that besides British taxation, the other primary motivating factor behind the American rebellion was slavery, that is the British Empire's gradual move towards abolition even though they were still one of the biggest slave colonizers of that time. This gradual move towards abolition by the british crown "Pre-declaration of independence" Is believed to be the main precipitor towards the American Declaration of Independence, not just taxation, and was motivated by two key British decisions: 1. The 1772 Mansfield decision rendered by Lord Mansfield Which held that a person cannot be held as a slave in England, even though he may have been previously enslaved elsewhere in the British Empire, and 2 Lord Dunmore's proclamation of 1775, The Royal governor Virginia, who in no uncertain terms,stated that any black person in the American colonies who rose up against their masters and went over to the side of the British would be granted their freedom. It was these two decisions that caused as much uproar in the american colony as taxation and prompted them to declare their independence in 1776, even referring to Lord Dunmore's 1775 proclamation In the "Declaration of Independence" as having caused an insurrection amongst them. Needless to say that thousands of African Americans headed Lord Dunmore's proclamation and fought alongside the british for their own freedom. It is also interesting to note that over 300 blacks fought on the side of the Americans at Minmouth, but none of this is mentioned.. Perhaps the most interesting of these unmentioned facts is that a runaway slave from Shrewsbury., a man who would later became known by the name of Colonel Tye, would fight alongside the British at the battle of Monmouth, and so formidable.was his fighting force that his men (Known as the ethiopian regiment or "black brigade") would eventually strike more fear into the heart of the American colonists than the British army itself. Colonel Tye went on to participate in several battles and skirmishes in New jersey Including Monmouth and Hunterdon where he captured several high-ranking members of the American militia. He and his men went on to conduct several successful raids and skirmishes in jersey, looting plantations and freeing slaves along with their livestock. He eventually succumbed to gangrene after suffering a gunshot in the leg during a raid on a Patriot's home in Tom's River. This is all needless to say that slavery had a more promirole in the American revolution than mere taxes. Look at the fact that General Washington, one of the most prominent figures of the revolution, was one of the biggest slaveholders in the 13 colonies along with Thomas Jefferson. Needless to say that if america's war of independence was really about freedom, Then once Lord Dunmore, Royal governor Virginia, issued his proclamation in 1775 declaring all blacks free who fought along the British, the Americans could have easily countered in 1776 by stating the same in the Declaration of Independence.

An update.. Actually I had read about the Carlise commision.. I went back and looked it up in the index of David Ferling's WHIRLWIND. I had highlighted it, but that book is so full of important data I'd forgotten it. I highly recommend his book to anyone drilling down into the period of 1763 to 1783.

The actual Battlefield is located in Freehold New Jersey. I visited the site many times and participated in numerous reenactments at the battle site.

That suppose to be Camden NJ lmao

C'est si beau à l'oreille.

France had a much larger population though and it makes sense an island nation couldn’t one v one the main continental power on the continent.

2:32

@@fredbarker9201 doesn't change anything since uk was able to form as much soldiers as france duding most of the middle ages (not when Napoleon arrived )

@@lecrabesavant4435 That was only possible because England owned half of France. The Population of England was tiny compared to France but it was in-fact French dis-unity that allowed England to even contend against France. France had far too many powerful dukes that didn't care much for the King. Usually when England Invaded Via Normandy/Flanders etc it would be hard to spot a French Soldier from Southern France because they were so independent. Gascony Troops made up a large portion of the English army because without them the English would have been severely outnumbered. Even Henry the V's army was considered large for its time because its not even the issue of finding manpower, its the issue of supplying such a large force in hostile territory. When Scotland invaded while a English army was in France, Thomas Howard raised like 25,000 Men from all over the country. 25k in England and 9k in France.. Meanwhile France raised 30k men like it was nothing from only the Northern territories and also had Tens of Thousands of men along its massive borders with Spanish nations, Italian States and German lords.

Ooh, that would be cool but I think it unnecessary to make it solely focused on one person. Neat ancestry.

They already did cover that

Brandywine was in the last video.

To this day, hispanics still hardly get any credit for helping USA get their independence. Your welcome. I am a hispanic and very proud to be an american born in USA.

they will never find me. But good point

The Writer Here: Would you have preferred: "The Battle of Rhode Island was the last major _independent_ engagement of the Northern theater. Washinton and Knyphausen would continue to poke at each other across New York Harbor for two years without really accomplishing anything. Indeed, many of the 1780 battles can be seen as distractions to keep Washington from coming south to confront Cornwallis?"

@@TheReaperEagle Sorry for being pushy. I live right around the corner from where the battle happened and have visited the site many times.

@@TheReaperEagle If you visit Springfield, the town sign says "Site of Forgotten Victory." It is seen as preventing the British from seizing the Hobart Gap and marching on Morristown, where Washington was still headquartered.

Theyre French they never win anything decisively.

@@TGBurgerGaming lol, are you american or british ? if you're american, your country exists thanks to France. If you're british, your country is just a former french colony that turned weird.

yeah, taxes were instrumental, but far from being the only stake. Another decisive factor, was the decision of the british crown to forbid the expansion of anglo-saxon settlers beyond the Appalaches, to keep good relations with both natives and french-canadians. Also the fact that after one or two generations of settling, in North Amercia ango-saxons settlers had lost their national attachment to Britain, and didn't feel anymore as part of this nation. Only the threat of the french kept the settlers and the british crown tied together. Once the french threat was removed, the settlers didn't need the british crown protection anymore.

@@bretonneux3389Not a French colony. Colonies provide resources and share the same head of state as the coloniser. England had Norman and French kings but they were separate from the king of France. Even though they may have been vassals in theory, through Normandy not England, in reality they waged a lot of wars against their apparent overlord.

@@fredbarker9201 well, kings of England were paying homage for the domains they owned in France. Meanwhile, the english royal court spoke in french, the whole english nobility had french as its native language, and a significant share of english lands was owned by french lords. "colony" here is indeed not much appropriated, but the virulence with which sometimes englishmen spit on France, let it guess there is an inferiority complex. I noticed that in the british politic life, the british seem to be far more obsessed with the french than the french ever think of the british.

The writer here: The Battle of the Saintes will be the last one we cover in this series.

I came here to chime in as well. As someone growing up and still here, it's was extremely odd to see Philadelphia in New Jersey 😂😵‍💫 though that could've been fixed if Philadelphia was labeled on the opposite side of the Delaware River (DR) and Camden labeled where they put Philadelphia, instead. The Schuylkill river connects with the DR at southern Philadelphia but it is not shown on the map which runs southwest from Schuylkill Haven, PA area. You're correct that the DR does run further north, all the way to Hancock, NY where it branches east and west there. It may be helpful if they were to label the Susquehanna River to help alleviate some confusion. But most likely they may have enough of a resolution, per se, for not showing the full length of the DR for the aerial view compared to ground movement which may better paint a picture. So for it to "terminate" just south of Trenton, not shown, is a bit fair on their end.

@@rickseffrin3160 Good points also I've read the Schuylkill was choked with over growth to the point when the swedes and English first came into Delaware bay and the Delaware river you couldn't see the mouth of the Schuylkill so I imagine it was far less navigable then it is today after dredging and riparian clearing. So that being said if this map were truly accurate that river should be a thin line and the Delaware should be thick