Bumrah.

@@rishabhsethi29 ugly action tho

So how does he generate that pace

@@talkswithvigy7860 Depends upon how you see it.I think it's the beauty behind his bowling.

Cough... cough...ever heard Malcom Mershal anyone ?

wasim akram was a grt bowler not because he can deliver six ball differently infact he was a grt bowler cos he can deliver six bowl on similar line n length consistently, variation is overrated control is d most important thing in fast bowling !

@@k-lalit I don't agree with you. McGrath was better at bowling 6 balls at same line & length. Akram used to bowl 1st ball inswing, 2nd ball straight, 3rd ball outswing, 4th cross seam, 5th bouncer & 6th Yorker ! He also developed bowling slower Yorkers afterwards

Six balls with the simillar action, so batsman cannot figure out what is comming.

@@hritikpawar2534 record.kiska.better h tuje pata hoga

@@arishsheikh3000 dono ka

Then he would have hardly bowled within the wickets and most of his wickets would be caught at slip, because of pak fielders he had to change plans and try to get lbw

200 Extra wickets

I would double wickets Pakistani fielding was rubbish then

emagine, he had bowled more than 70 to 80 matches played in austrlian or england conditions :D

Then, Imagine he played with the warne, mcgrath and Lee. Then have 100 lesser wicket compare what he have as Aussies are so good in hunting in packs there's no lone wolf.

There will never ever be.... Lethal weapon

Also if Australia was his home. In those Australian bouncy pitches he would have taken 300 more wickets but he played most matches in Pakistan's flat pitches 😅

@@mohibahmed2737 true

Yes it was always a sign of great batting technique to survive a bowling spell from Akram.

Good point, even the keeper was catching batairs. I guess that is why Waqar, Shoaib turned out to be such a attacking bowlers as they might not have enough confidence in fielding. But Wasim bowling is still an art form to me. To bad next gen. did not pick it up.

@@karan200590 I don't agree..sachin was not a great bowler nor a great captain..wasim 257 not out in test innings is highest than sachin highest in test innings.. Moreover, pak won 92 world cup because of that wasims over..so sachin is nowhere near wasims greatness..just check sachin score in the two world cup finals he played.. Sachin was a media hype..sachin was never a match winner in his early days..

@@karan200590 You are talking without any knowledge..wasim being a frontline bowler used to lead from the front..you can see the confidence when he used to bowl and inspire fellow bowlers..was definitely a better choice as captain as compared to sachin who resigned from captaincy because of pressure on batting..so wasim outsmarts sachin here..just check the number of test matches captained by wasim and sachin..you will get the answer.. It was determination of Imran which helped pak to win world cup..permutations and combinations are always there in any world cup.. Regarding 2019 world cup, it was not luck but sanghi thoughts of shastri and kohli when India lost intentionally to eng to drive out pak from semi final race..

@@karan200590 Again you are wrong..you need to see the the world cup 99 to see what aggressive captaincy is when wasim was captain of pak..not to forget pak tour of India when pak won nail biting chennai and Kolkata test..chennai crowd even gave standing ovation to pak team for their exemplary win under wasim.. You are talking without any knowledge..check your facts before commenting... Wasim was a great captain while sachin was pathetic..

that was by Mark waugh and brian lara too

@@karan200590 I hope your last comment was sarcastic and an attempt to stop this guy from talking more non sense.

well, that was Miadad, who was the most senior player of the team along with Imran Khan so wasim had to just turn around and walk back to his mark.

Anybody will be angry..... MacGrath could convert even half chances into wickets due to the top class fielding of Aus

Fast bowlers are entitled to do that lol.

that was part of team strategy it seems

NASA sent people to moon by then

More about good sun

🤣🤣😂

You are dead right

bro in 1990 i think u should telecast

Now they have women commentating.

@@DubSalvation yah women commentory is so irritating

@@heisenberg9584 specially that isa guha with forced UK accent....

Old commentary is racist. "That's the closest to a hat-trick you will get, my boy"... That's not a polite way to mention an international cricketer. Especially in the case of Australian or British commentators of 80s/90s, just notice the difference in tone when they are mentioning South Asian players versus when they are mentioning white-skinned players. Commentary these days is much more respectful and civilized. And it's a good thing that women are being encouraged to commentate.

@@shankhoneel I don't think so. That might be your perception but old commentators were awesome. They were there because of their commentary skills while today every ex player is a commentator. No one can match richi benau or Tony Greg.....

Thank You ICC for joining the comment party

@@devdesigns3830 Fake account. LOL!

Icc = pcb 🤣😂

King of swing

We all love Wasim

If only they taught their boys how to catch.

The comment was about how close to the edge the ball was in the hat-trick dilivery rather than a comment on the ability,

നിങ്ങൾ മനസിലാക്കിയത് തെറ്റാണ്

The commentator, my friend, was the late, great Richie Benaud - Much respected cricketer, commentator and human being. Amazingly fair man and an admirer of Wasim Akram. What he is saying as figure of speech is, “That is as close as anyone can get to taking a hat-trick” (he is NOT saying that Akram will never take a hat-trick).

@@whakjob that makes sense. I also got it wrong.

He even got a double century

he fixed too :D

He tampered ball too.

😁😁😁😁

😂😂😂😂

True

😂

Exactly 😂

😅

underrated comment.

hhaahaahahahah

I agree with you, coz I myself was left arm fast bowler in the same era and I used to swing in and out and I tried to copy his action but never get close.

His guru the great Imran had a wonderful action

Nilav Sengupta he is not only best left arm fast bowler he is the greatest skill full bowler of all time : by glen mc

@@Ahsankhan-qg2ky Agreed 💯

Not only left arm. He is all over greatest bowler of all time.

@@arandomguy8648 nice joke 😂😂😂😂

The greatest fast bowler to ever play the game .

They said it’s Hadlee, but it’s alway Wasim for me!

Don't lie....dumb ass....watching video and commenting....,😁

@@saddeshkumar9380 this is the video of old matches you dumb ass but not the video of todays matches

my favorite was always Akram. His run up, action and bowling were a treat to watch. Not to mention his lower order hitting. In fact he is one Pakistani cricketer who is really liked by Indian public. somehow I never liked Waqar and Akhtar as bowlers though Shoaib was quick, probably the quickest bowler I have seen play. Afridi had great potential as an all rounder but he never developed his game properly and he was way too inconsistent and showy as a player, especially in his later years. I liked Anwar and Inzamam but he became too fat in his later years.

No u r wrong bro the good talent is present in Pakistan team like Shaheen shah Afridi shahnawaz dahani

Not probably rather surely

Why there is such a hesitation. He is what u saying so

No Trent Boult is greatest left arm bowler

@@gagagagaagagag8436 lol

@@gagagagaagagag8436 He is nowhere near Wasim.

Greatest fast bowler in whole international cricket history.*

@@irigm6132 Wow.

@@irigm6132 no names Anderson has more Wickef Anderson is greatest fast bowler

@@gagagagaagagag8436 Anderson is nowhere close to Wasim, and yes Anderson doesn't have more wickets than Wasim. Wasim has total 916 wickets and Anderson has 880 so Akram is greater than Anderson. So don't talk rubbish without knowing stats. And Compare the fielding of Pakistan with England, If Pakistan fielding would have been like England, Wasim would have got 200 wickets more. But still he is ahead of Anderson. And Yes Wasim is lethal in any condition, he can do magic on any pitch, on the other hand Anderson is only effective in England pitches.

@@gagagagaagagag8436 🤣🤣🤣 anderson is fan of mohd asif and you are comparing him with wasim🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂

I think you should watch Wasim's 'Six killer delivery' on youtube. and you watch wasim's bouncer to David Boon from the round wicket.. That was the best of the best.

watch above link and keep an eye on no.5

it goes both ways.. if we had better fielders then maybe they would not have those deadly yorkers and reverse swing!! to take the fielding out of equation. i would take bad fielding for the rest of the cricket playing days if it unsures we get great bowlers who can bowl yorkers and mind bending reservse swing.. what a treat to watch..

@@kkjcid Well, that's an over-optimistic way of looking, isn't it? At the start of an innings when there are more catches to the slip as the bowlers safely bowl good length balls to assess the pitch for the bounce and carry, that is a damn important time to hold onto catches, especially those knicked by the top order batsman. It cannot be a replacement to wickets from yorkers. A yorker is like lightning, can't overuse it too many times in an over.

@@KarthikVijapurapu i was talking about how wasim/waqar/shoaib were produced. You will not see a deadly fast bowlers like them again who master yorkers and reverse swing if u dont have the conditions and problems that they faced! Dead flat pitches and fielders who cant hold on to simple catches.. see waqar and wasims interviews. Theyve said it many times themselves..

Just what I was thinking

That's no excuse. Kapil Dev must have alone lost around 150 wickets in his career since he was a genuine outswing bowler and except Gavaskar every other Indian slip fielder dropped innumerable catches

Are you satya?

@@rahilpandhre No..

LOOOOOOOL

lol...

True!!!!

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Lmao. Ditto! 😂

Yaa...80s 90s legendary bowlers faced the real talents like Tendulkar, Dravid

@@rashidsiddiqui5972 bumrah has played 12 test matches only and he is already injured. Can't compare it to 100 test match greats.

James Anderson has an average of 26+ while playing 90% of his matches on swinging English wickets. Chalk and cheese if you compare to old greats

@@rashidsiddiqui5972 For Anderson, you have refuted your own point now. His career average is 26, does not matter what he has done recently. You cannot compare him to past greats.

@@rashidsiddiqui5972 I didn't say Shoaib or Lee were great. Don't lie at least

Helicopter chala r tha. Ball andar hi ghus gyi lund pe 😂😂

@smokinjoe11 🤣🤣

You are right

absolutely right

Ashish Dwivedi agree

Definitely agree with you.

Totally agree

Agreed but only if they would have played for India.

@@abdullahashraf8141 No bro, India's fielding also sucked before Dhoni came...

MALCOM MARSHALL,JIMMY ANDERSON,TRUEMAN ALL DAMN GOOD.

@@king_has_no_clothskul8635 Yes, but we're talking about Akram. Why wouldn't you mention Michael Holding, Dennis Lilley, Richard Hadlee and Shoib Aktar? Bwahaha!

@@michaelgpartridge2384 THE FOLKS I QUOTED ABOVE ARE ALL ARE BEST OF THE BEST AND YOU HAVE TO SEE IN A CONTEXT. WASIM HAD DISTINCT ADVANTAGE AS HE WAS A LEFT ARM BOWLER BOWLING TO LOT OF RIGHTIES. AND HE WAS ALWAYS AWKWARD WITH HIS ANGLES. HOW MANY RIGHT HANDERS HAVE TO GET PEOPLE OUT? HARDLY ANY UNLIKE AKRAM AND ZAHEER AND NOW STARC WHO DO ON REGULAR BASIS. EVEN BHURMA DO NOT GO AROUND AUTOMATIC. --------- THOUGH HE HAD EVERYTHING IT IS STILL DIFFICULT TO PUT HIM ABOVE MALCOM MARSHALL. ---- SO RIGHT HANDER YOU WOULD HAVE MARSHALL. LEFT HANDER AKRAM IN TOP 11. THAT ALSO MEANT YOU ARE NOT VOTING FOR MCGRATH AND NOW JIMMY ANDERSON AND FRED TREUMAN, HOLDING. ALL WERE TREMENDOUS BOWLERS. ---------------- NO ROOM FOR WAQAR WHO HAD BETTER STRIKE RATE, STERYN SIMILAR, DENNIS LILLE ALL THE TIME GREAT. WI SHARED WICKETS AMONG THEM: THEY HAD FOUR ALL THE TIME AND NO COUNTRY DID SO MANY AT ONCE. -------------- AND I LEFT OUT SYDNEY BARNES( MARSHALL REPLACEMENT). RECORD? 27 TESTS, 189 WICKETS AT RIDICULOUS AVERAGE OF 16.5!!! SAME WITH HIS FIRST CLASS. HE WAS UNBELIEVABLE. THIS CAME UP LONG TIME AGO AS WELL WHEN I CAME TO KNOW ABOUT BARNES. TAKE A LOOK FOR YOURSELF. ------------- WASIM AWESOME BUT THERE ARE OTHERS TOO!!

I am an Indian and that is an insult to Wasim bhai. Wasim Akram is the best bowler in the history of cricket. He is not just the best Pakistani bowler in cricket.

No other bowler from West Indies, Australia or Pakistan can compete with Wasim.

Not one of the greatest. He is the greatest bowler in the history of the game.