Thanks for you kind words! I'll keep it up! If you have any questions I intend to doing Viewer questions regularly where I give deeper answers to my viewers questions. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ntKkmaugz5-sdIk.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rsqAgpOesJ7Sdas.html

@@Kim_Alexander v8

Solid reasons it always comes down to personal preffrences when I come to chosing a camera. When I got my first X-pro3 I had an XT4. Awhile later my X-pro got stolen and a was missing it so I made a trade for a X-pro3 against my XT4. The X-pro series of cameras have a certain feel too it, that makes me enjoy shooting with it much more than I ever did with my XT4 or any other camera.

I totally agree even though I don’t owned either of them but I did tried x pro 3 in the Fuji shop last year it was the best experience I ever had with camera.

there 8s a difference however this is nothing the I paying attention to they both does the job for me

If you dont shoot any video i think the X-Pro2 is the better choise

You have been around of awhile, I started making image with a polaroid that my parents gave me at an age of 9 im 36 today. Have made my living as a photographer for 16 years. Hmm... The thing is that you don't use the screen but the view finder on the X-pro3 I would say X-pro3 gives more of an analog experience. But X-pro1 is the king if we look on colors. Im deeply in love with the X-pro3 since the screen is out of the way, but if I would use it folded out I would feel embarrassed too! :D Im the kind of photography who would love to shoot with Leica M-D Typ 262 without any LCD, X-pro3 is an option that I can afford :D

The X-Pro2 is *signifcantly* better with the XF50mm which I feel don’t work that well with X-Pro3 since it only have a single magnification unlike X-Pro2 which has two magnifications. I don’t see why the X-Pro2 should be much worse with the XF23mm as it works very well with the wide magnification.

Härligt att höra, mitt fokus ligger på själva användandet och hur saker funkar i praktiken 🙂

Thanks for your comment!

Thanks for your comment! Glad you enjoyed the video. Finding the right sound have been a long journey for me trying and endless amount of microphones and pre amps. I thing I finally nailed it, but on this older video I didn't nailed the sound yet.

Nice! I started to feel that i want an X-pro2 as well there is no logic reason for it tho.

awhile ago i said that the X-trans5 detrones the X-Trans1 as the best looking Fuj sensor, Perpahs you should keep rokcing your X-pro1 until we get an X-pro4 The X-pro3 is however a fun camera to use :D

I agree with with the hidden lcd but I truly enjoy the af and eye af. just having the option to use a Zeiss Planar with Af is just awesome.. but it's also fun to trow on some leica glas on it an focus manually. there is some Chinese manual lenses that are small and nice as well. looking forward for the xpro4 I hope the get rid of the small lcd and make the gap of the rear lcd smaller and less vissable. and ofc the xtrabs 5 sensor that one is really good I truly enjoy the look from my xt5

That would be a good topic making a video about. But you get an ap that allows you to batch change the camera metadata from Xpro2 to Xpro3 Open the images in capture one or. Light room who now things the camera used was an xpro3 and allows you to use the film simulation that the xpro3 have

There’s reports of users saying the shutter doesn’t take the shot sometimes

7 houers after you comment i made that film: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i99lfNqIkrnWY3k.html i hope you enjoy it :D

@@Kim_Alexander THANK YOU SO MUCH ♥

Dude we are talking about 6000 x 4000 VS 6240 x 4160 what's that a 3,9% difference? It makes no difference In practical use. I never hade any issues with my viewfinder on the X-pro3 it's a different design compared to Pro1 & 2 (if you look at the very first frame in my film your see that it covers all the glas witch the older one don't) I pretty sure that all X-pro modes are made in Japan, at least my X-pro1 & 3 are. I don't own the pro2 any more. The XT models seams to be made in China. Fun things with camera problems, I been making my living out of photography for 17 years, and never had any problem with any camera (knock in wood) I hope you are more lucky with you cameras in the future. My wife hade some issues with her X100T where the LCD got stuck, and I had to tap the body to get it lose.

@@Kim_Alexander I still think it made a difference with the 26 megapixels. The only reason I say that is from cropping, a lot of images in street photography. My pictures have better resolution, I can’t tell you why. Either way I’d rather have the 26 than the 24. 🖖

​@@simon359 less than a 4% difference ;) I don't think the difference you see is due to the megapixel. I came across this @pal2tech film yesterday: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f7pom6yQp8vSqXk.html He compare XT3 against the XT4 I was surprised about the difference considering that it's the same sensor. There is also this link: mirrorlesscomparison.com/preview/fujifilm-xpro2-vs-xpro3/ Where they compare XT2 (X-trans3 sensor) vs XT3 (X-trans4 sensor) Where the X-trans3 performs bether on noise performance at higher Iso. However if it reduce more noise in camera that could result in a softer image when you crop. I think what you experience is a combination of this things rather than megapixel count. Same goes for some sensors that have anti aliasing filter witch soften the images slightly however fuji X-trans don't need anti aliasing filter To be really picky the X-pro2 have 24.3megapixel with makes the difference 1,7

@@Kim_Alexander I don’t doubt what you say, I just notice the difference when I’m editing! Remember, I came from the pro2 to the XT4🖖

@@simon359 I'm not sure how I would handle a change from a X-pro body to an XT for street photography. Whet I like with the XT4 tho is the fully articulated screen, so that I can hide it! Shooting this films with an XT4 it's a nice camera tho..

that's highly subjective. personally I take the x-poro3 over the xpro2 I had one xpro2 2 go bad in the rain never had any issues with xpro3 in that regard.

The X-pro is a niche product after all. I always liked the pro3 more than the pro2 mostly for the screen and the back button focus.

Buying an X-pro2 makes a lot of sense its still an camera that is highly up to date and an amazing camera. It would by no doubt make it on my top 10 best cameras to buy for photography in 2022

@@Kim_Alexander Thanks!

I have XT1 with me on holiday. At home my workhorse cameras are XPro2 and 3. In order to improve focus speed significantly over the XT1 you need the XPro3, not XPro2.

no, get better lenses. 16mp is quite enough.

Bummer!

Noooooooooo

without doubt The Fuji XE3

@@Kim_Alexander.. thaņks for answering....its good .but no ibis...i was looking at fuji xe4 or a6600( poor lcd scŕeen resolution) for street photography...hard ďecistion. Subscribed

@@ciudadanosdelcosmos thanks! I had a a6600 for a short while as well. I believe that Fujifilm provide a photo experience that not many brands can do. Because of its design with dials and it's color reproduction If we are talking street photography I would say fuji in almost any situation. I really like the xe4 but prefer the xe3 because of the focus mode switch in the front I use that a lot! Ibis is slightly overrated keep in mind that even if the camera is stable the subjects you shoot are still getting blurry.

@@Kim_Alexander thats true..still gx9 has better ibis than 6600...i am wachting pros anď contras each other...and taking ýour aďvice thanks!

@@ciudadanosdelcosmos the micro 4/3 sensor in the Lumix is in the size where things starts to get boring and where you are missing out on alot of character that are associated with the filed of view that you are shooting with. Aps-s size just works great it is after all a super 35 siza that been around in the move industry for decades.

I use back button focus that's enoght reason for me. besides that I also like the lcd on the pro 3 more

yes it is

most likely, there's generally always improvements on newer models

I never tried the 1.4 35mm wr how I ever I use viltrox 23mm 1. 4 that is in a similar size isch. It's not annoying it works but it makes you realise how nice the small size of the f2 fujinon is

@@Kim_Alexander i hesitate between the 1.4 and the f2... since i like to shot with low light... i'd like to test them both)

@@etctera2611 i never had any issues with f2 in low light situations where you have light like in the city and so on. Say that you come into a dark bar then that extra stop of light is quite handy. but at the same time a small lens on a bar is quite nice. today we. can push the iso slot. back in the days we we could push the film to 1600 and still took pictures in low light.

@@Kim_Alexander exactly !!! The f2 looks nice)

@@etctera2611 you get the f2 and a viltrox 1.4 for less money than the fujinon 1.4 wr only compromise is that you don't have wr at under f2 but that seams like a small compromise.

I think it is but nothing I thought to much about.

Easy solution is to not use the screen :) Some of them indeed have issues I had two houses probably made 100k images no issues

@@Kim_Alexander Yeah that could work haha. I think i just got very unlucky with mine.

@@photomorti perhaps bit it's that's a well known issue with these there's even a law suit in usa going on. I think what worked for me is that I never use it with the lcd folded down. I think if the cable get replaced the risk of getting this issue is more less gone

@@Kim_Alexander Yeah i think thats why Fuji doesnt seem to make new Xpro3's anymore if im correct. This is what im doing at the moment i only flip it down 50% and never all the way anymore after its been repaired. So i hope i can enjoy this camera for a few more years.

yet you watch and commenting!