Do I have a Fuji? No. Can I use this lens? Well, no. Do I want to watch Chris and Jordan? Yep!
@seantomlinson33203 жыл бұрын
Me too! I just like their style.
@ogonzilla3 жыл бұрын
"Grate" job!!
@Clint_the_Audio-Photo_Guy3 жыл бұрын
Ba dum tss....
@darunabei76413 жыл бұрын
Where ever I go I always see you😭
@TheLordmehr3 жыл бұрын
@@darunabei7641 Exactly :))
@PalavraVivaUSA3 жыл бұрын
Hope I get to see a video of You testing this lens! :D
@SovietLensReviews3 жыл бұрын
The brilliant colours, even in video, really strike you with this lens. I think Fuji did a banging job, creating a near-perfect modern APS-C prime!
@09goral3 жыл бұрын
I don't even have a Fuji but I still watch these videos b/c you guys are awesome!
@koolkutz73 жыл бұрын
Same here!
@GrandHuevotes3 жыл бұрын
it’s amazing how fast these and other lenses go from rumor to leaks to actual reviews. the fuji 33 1.4 is coming next. can’t wait.
@AmaxterPlays3 жыл бұрын
By the time this stuff leaks out of Japan it’s probably nearly finished development and entering manufacturing, so I’m sure the actual R&D process behind these lenses is a whole lotta iceberg we don’t see. It’s exciting times though!
@RichardStroffolino3 жыл бұрын
Glad to see Fuji filling out the "pro" level fast prime at this focal length, but personally it'd be more useful to get an update to that 18mm f2. I love the tiny size, and the optical quality is good enough, just wish it had that linear motor (whatever motor that lens has sounds like its constantly breaking). Hard to justify the 18mm f1.4 for the price (for me at least).
@fwfeo2 жыл бұрын
They need a 9-10-11mm fast prime to compete with 14mm f/2.8 on fill frame brands. Or at least a 16mm equivalent. How can you shoot cropped 4k video for real estate for example? 8-16mm f/2.8 is the only option. Fast wide primes and bad video focus are two handicaps of the system.
@scott21003 жыл бұрын
this video asked and answered every question I had about the 18/1.4, well done, also beautifully shot
@TrevorSuarez3 жыл бұрын
Wow! Got on this one quick, guys! I was looking forward to this! Thanks!
@stuartcarden13713 жыл бұрын
Always love it when Camera Store TV and DPReview are right next to each other in my feed! Nothing like a double dose of calgary camera goodness to start the day!
@truecuckoo3 жыл бұрын
The overall tone is always beautiful in the episodes shot on Fuji. More please! Lens looking nice. I guess I expected it to be just a hair smaller compared to the 16mm. Nice though. Real nice.
@xmeda3 жыл бұрын
Not even close to Pentax K-01
@ansonrey92343 жыл бұрын
Instablaster
@_o__o_2 жыл бұрын
sad
@triplescale3 жыл бұрын
Looks very interesting! I own the 16mm 1.4, I love it, but I always feel it`s a bit to wide. The only thing wich I can´t understand is why it has to be $999 for a 1.4 APS-C lense (again)
@vaibhavpisal3 жыл бұрын
DAMN Jordan is looking happy. He should be using the Pentax.
@y34r3 жыл бұрын
18mm f2 has always been my favorite, this is another must buy
@thecrazyanchovy92183 жыл бұрын
Ooh. So , can we do a Fuji X Pro 3 Vs Leica q comparison now. I want to see if I can save some UK pounds. Lovely reviews as always. Alot of work goes in to videos that seem effortless. X
@bitronicc18873 жыл бұрын
I guess the car in the reflection at 0:19 really wanted to test their reverse skills that day
@ramoftherose3 жыл бұрын
Hoping that this is a sign that they'll update their 23/35 1.4's 🤞🏼
@samilwatan3 жыл бұрын
I know because the other third party manufacturer is catching up.
@AlexanderBischof3 жыл бұрын
they will update 23 and 56 next year. See fujirumors
@meme4one3 жыл бұрын
They already have made a 23 f2, so a third would seem overkill but who knows.
@AlexanderBischof3 жыл бұрын
@@meme4one fujifilm officially said they are working on the old lenses for newer versions. It will come for sure.
@lysolboss3 жыл бұрын
That transition at 0:58 was fantastic
@khun-sing3 жыл бұрын
Great review as always! Let’s all put pressure on Fuji to please release updates to their 23mm, 35mm, and 56mm lenses! We want WR and fast autofocus!
@nafthalene3 жыл бұрын
6:22 nice colour palette : )
@stephenelliott70713 жыл бұрын
A lens I've been waiting on. I feel the 23 (35 in FF) is a bit tight and 16 (24 ff) is a bit too wide for my photography style. Plus it's smaller with a 62mm filter size over the 16 f1.4's 67mm which is quite large for a mirrorless system IMO. Close focussing not quite so good as the 16 f1.4 though.
@ReZShot3 жыл бұрын
damn did homeboy dirty at 00:48 LMAO
@theob35153 жыл бұрын
Great to see some more Fuji content on the channel. Fantastic review as always!
@Paul_Rohde3 жыл бұрын
Fantastic! Using the same lens for filming the segment and for the photography. Please do the same when reviewing cameras. Well done!
@problemat1que3 жыл бұрын
Alas I can only upvote this once, so I'm commenting.
@AlumarsX3 жыл бұрын
Your samples are much more representative of real world use than the rest of the dpreview gallery. Cheers eh.
@nekoneko9173 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the review! Hit all the points I was looking for
@thegrayyernaut3 жыл бұрын
One big advantage of the 16mm f/1.4 is the Nano-GI coating.
@PatriceWillow3 жыл бұрын
the colure and contrast looks so mazing & cinematic by the walk around in the city! nice 👍🏻
@DavidDarrow3 жыл бұрын
Yet another great video! Thanks for the insights!
@Ingrampix3 жыл бұрын
Please fight the '1000 is a reasonable price' trend. I need a small 18f2 without the purple fringes and a pocketable 60f2 or close. Plastic will do. Like the 35f2. We're not trying to be Cartier Bresson. We'd just like to be discreet and stay solvent, while taking acceptable pictures properly. The 23f2 is no good, the 16f2.8 isn't what we needed. Been Fuji exclusively for years, leaving right now unless they change tack. The lenses are lauded, but they are the problem. We waited a decade for Nikon to do the compact-wide-and-tele-prime thing for APS-C then gave up. Thanks, always enjoy your reviews.
@AcidicDelusion3 жыл бұрын
I'm also jumping....been waiting too long for an xh2.....what system are you going to ?
@Ingrampix3 жыл бұрын
The dpreview team say they influenced Fuji's decision to make the 16f2.8. If they'd used their voice instead to promote an 18f2 without the fringes, I'd feel better. Even more so if Fuji replaced the disappointing 23f2 with something far better like the X-100V lens. I don't think it's about manufacturers, really, they all make good and less-good gear. The commonalities are that it's getting more expensive and the lenses are growing in size and cost (a trend that may not last). Though I admire, conversely, what Fuji are doing to break ground with 100mp and an MF system. I hoped Fuji would deliver on early promise, and offer improved small primes and reliable, small cameras. MFT offered the small lenses, but not the same stills IQ. Leica has always offered all this, but beyond most people's idea of proportional cost. I've reverted to an X-T20 plus 27, to consider next move.
@Kingpotter893 жыл бұрын
4:07 The short focus throw is not just an issue with the 18mm f1.4 but also with all other lenses that don’t have a clutch focus ring. It happens with the 16mm f2.8, the 23mm f2, the 35mm f2, the 50mm f2 etc. This issue occurs when you are in AF-S mode, you are in linear focus mode, you stop down the aperture ring and you try to manually focus by using AF+MF. The more you stop down the aperture, the shorter the focus throw. I really hope fuji fixes this in a firmware update soon cause it is very annoying, especially for a company that brands itself as a camera manufacturer that offers an almost full analog experience with all the physical dials (compared to the likes of Sony, Canon etc). Focus by wire is already a huge compromise, fuji please at least fix this issue 🙏🏻
@skach-v3 жыл бұрын
Great review for a nice piece of gear! Still, I would like it compared with 18mm 2.0. I understand they are completeley different but my bag is not of an infinite size and some primes have to be smaller than the others.
@robmcd3 жыл бұрын
I do not have the 23 1.4 as I’m a WR snob, so this 18 will be going into my bag to cover between my 16 1.4 and 35 F2.
@AcidicDelusion3 жыл бұрын
If you already have the 16 I don't see how the 18 would be that much different a focal length to warrant a purchase
@arghyadipsen24293 жыл бұрын
Now only one left to desire is a Fuji 12mm f2.
@1barnet13 жыл бұрын
Samyang makes that one. spectacular good value and manual focus on 12mm isn't too bad.
@jamesburns6793 жыл бұрын
The video is gorgeous
@NoahBershatsky3 жыл бұрын
I was noticing that too... looks better than their usual videos.
@marturomano3 жыл бұрын
XT-3 and a good lens, baby
@JenniferKlinger3 жыл бұрын
Good looking video! So crisp and clear, that's a lens to consider.
@dr.b4ll4293 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the speed comparison between 16mm and the new 18mm! I'll stick with my 16 then.
@DLCSpider3 жыл бұрын
For me it will always be D' Preview
@enregistreur3 жыл бұрын
« One of the gratest » nearly spit my coffee 😂
@jimee9983 жыл бұрын
Thanks for giving the X-T3 some love instead of the X-T4! Both are great but the 3 is historic.
@jimee9983 жыл бұрын
Why would someone get this over the 16?
@4Kandlez3 жыл бұрын
@@jimee998 The different focal length?
@jimee9983 жыл бұрын
@@4Kandlez that's a minor difference.
@4Kandlez3 жыл бұрын
@@jimee998 Not if you prefer 18 (28)over 16 (24)
@joopsmiranda92193 жыл бұрын
were these shots edited or straight out of camera? they all look so pleasing to the eye and wonderful. thanks guys
@ChimaChindaDev3 жыл бұрын
I think they should have made this an f1.2 lens. That would have been the only convincing factor for me to want this over the 16 1.4. The 16 is wider, has similar bokeh or maybe even better bokeh since you can get even closer to the subject (15cm v 20cm)
@venom2k2 Жыл бұрын
In which way would a 18mm lens benefit from f/1.2? Why would you need such an aperture? Excuse the noob Question 😅
@chandlerchhem21283 жыл бұрын
I’m a huge fan of the 28mm focal length, however I can’t justify selling my 16mm f1.4 for almost the same focusing speed.. I also think the 18-55 focuses much faster and more versatile for street. Is this the successor to the 16mm f1.4?
@jorgepietersz3 жыл бұрын
anyone know the reproduction rate of the lens with fuji extension tubes?
@jcblum15073 жыл бұрын
hey guys!!! nice review as always!!!
@saiyan_princestudios97903 жыл бұрын
its pretty cool especially for 18 prime fans but idk not for me i already have the 18-55, 16-55 and 23 1.4 i don't really need this one.
@kazimierzkiekowicz53672 жыл бұрын
You should use Fujifilm as default camera. Looks amazing!
@RhawiDantas3 жыл бұрын
woah that transition
@AntsAasma3 жыл бұрын
For first wide prime I wouldn't take this, 18mm f/2 makes way more sense being so compact, much cheaper and almost as capable.
@mavfan13 жыл бұрын
Good for you!!!!
@drakedoggy1033 жыл бұрын
No where as capable...
@AntsAasma3 жыл бұрын
@@drakedoggy103 really? Nowhere? What can you do with the f/1.4 where the f/2 would seriously struggle?
@Lurreable3 жыл бұрын
@@AntsAasma F1.4 is twice as bright as F2, so major boost for low light.
@AntsAasma3 жыл бұрын
@@Lurreable on my experience rarely is a 1 stop reduction in ISO something that makes or breaks an image. Useful increase for someone trying to get every last bit of quality, sure. But worth it to recommend a twice as expensive, 3 times as heavy lens as the first wide prime? Not in my opinion.
@johansphoto Жыл бұрын
Focus has to be tested much more thoroughly. It is with moving subjects and in low light that you see a BIG difference between the old and the new Fuji lenses.
@IsobarBrokenFlame3 жыл бұрын
Weather Resistance is a great addition. I will probably buy this lens for the weather resistance and quite focusing. I would have loved to have seen, an f1.2 or OIS in this, as I shoot mostly in low light conditions; dusk, night, and indoors. Just anything that could have given me a slightly sharper image for handheld shots, in low light condition (yes I have a tripod and a flash, but I just don't want to use them all the time).
@mstuartkendall2 жыл бұрын
Would that make any difference if you used a camera like the XT4? Would the stabilization of the XT4 make up for the lack of OIS in the lens?
@IsobarBrokenFlame2 жыл бұрын
@@mstuartkendall I own two X-T4. That’s what I use to shoot my KZfaq videos. OIS in the lens works with the IBIS to enable further stability for low shutter speeds, when taking photographs. It can make a considerable difference to sharpness at low shutter speeds. As the X-T4’s dynamic range starts to fall off rapidly above ISO 800, I try not to go any higher into the ISO range. This often means longer shutter durations. I often shoot at 1/60 of a second handheld.
@coreytomsrealtor30723 жыл бұрын
My next lens. Thank you!
@chris45773 жыл бұрын
After 6 minutes I think to myself .. "I don't have a Fuji camera" .... hmm ... it doesn't matter ... it's Chris & Jordan ... fixed date 🤣 Another great video, greetings from Vienna, Christian
@Ryezn50573 жыл бұрын
Crazy price
@eightbitJuan3 жыл бұрын
Glad I'm not the only one who lost the sync port cover!
@martysender55393 жыл бұрын
you introed you were going to use the lens on an XT3. But then we saw you doing it with an XT4. no big deal. video from XT4 (or is it 3 in Jordans hands) is GREAT. thnx Marty Sender You Tube
@thatjordandrake3 жыл бұрын
The video was shot on an X-T3, the photos were taken with an X-T4. Thanks for watching!
@davebot19693 жыл бұрын
Surprised (and disappointed) not a word was said about how the new 18 performs compared to the original version.
@realitytunnel3 жыл бұрын
Do we have an idea of how much the linear motor affects accuracy and particularly noise and smoothness of tracking focus when using it for video?
@jakej7223 жыл бұрын
I might get torched for this... but I do like the 28mm focal length - so much so that I have no problem using my smartphone.
@M_freedomOfSpeech3 жыл бұрын
I wonder how the FUJIFILM 18mm f / 1.4 compares vs SIGMA 18-35mm f / 1.8 (selecting the 18mm)
@andretim753 жыл бұрын
This lens looks to be quite nice - but as Jordan points out is not so great for video use ! So it is a bit of a bummer for this who want to use this for video and photo all the same. Otherwise sharpness, bookeh, low weight and compactness are there. Only problem - the price is quite steep for a 18mm 1.4 APS-C lens. Compare to something like FF 24mm f 1.8 , which is more versatile ( and even more so if the sensor enables to crop easily ) , then once again I wonder ....
@seantomlinson33203 жыл бұрын
Surprised you used the X-T3 not X-T4 for the video. Anyway, a lovely video as usual for a nice addition to the Fuji family.
@thatjordandrake3 жыл бұрын
Chris had the X-T4 for shooting stills, so I used my wife's X-T3.
@janosb59533 жыл бұрын
Yeah.. Everyone knows only loosers shoot video on the XT3. Serious digital content creators must upgrade to the XT4. This video is unwatchable. @Jordan Drake please don't do that again. We want to watch KZfaq videos in 55k8millionp.
@sven41293 жыл бұрын
How can you leave out a comparison to the og 18 f2.0? There are certainly things to say here.
@jlwilliams3 жыл бұрын
I still don't see why Fujifilm thought they needed both a 16/1.4 and an 18/1.4 in their lineup, especially considering how similar they are. It seems like hair-splitting. If somebody asked one if you guys, “How do I decide which one to buy?” what would you tell 'em?
@ponglong3 жыл бұрын
I bought the 16mm f1.4 and sold it because it was slightly too wide for me. I love the 18mm focal length for some reason, and ended up buying a Ricoh for that function. This is tempting me.
@thegrayyernaut3 жыл бұрын
18mm is a favorite focal length among street photographers so I understand why they make this lens.
@Rob-zz4qj3 жыл бұрын
I've been wanting an 18mm 1.4 for years personally, 16 was too wide for me
@turgayak20473 жыл бұрын
If you don´t know the differences, than maybe it doesn´t matter which one you choose.
@Paul_Rohde3 жыл бұрын
@J.L. Williams I kinda agree, I'm glad someone said it. Jazz it up a bit, make it a 1.0 or 1.2 or something before doing a near identical lens. It seems to loose on 'macro' a bit too compared to the 16mm.
@ewenjam3 жыл бұрын
there are some great measurement systems in here
@SaxonSuccess3 жыл бұрын
Love the "Ugly" image... Good work.
@SwitchbackGuitars3 жыл бұрын
Looks nice but when I saw that it was an LM lens I was hoping for video AF performance that was at least as good as the 18-55 and 16-55. So that’s kind of a bummer. My only complaint about the 16/1.4 is the AF noise in video. Hopefully they will tweak it in firmware and not have the same issues with the 33/1.4 which is the one I’m really interested in.
@tsenkov2 жыл бұрын
Has this been fixed?
@thevlife3 жыл бұрын
Hi, may I know the name of film simulation mode (or color settings, or way to obtain that color tone on Fuji camera / XH-1) of the clip? Thanks.
@hankroest68363 жыл бұрын
2:22 Fortunately! I grew up using standard Canadian public school rulers... For just about everything. ;-)
@miam10742 жыл бұрын
looks like a great lens
@MaxPhotoGraphic2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this content. Can the 18mm be hendheld for a vlogging? I want to choose which buy for hendheld walking footage facing the camera, without a tripod, is the 18mm too near? 18mm or necessarily 16mm? I have a Sony a6600 and I want to choose between a 16-55 and a 18-105 I would prfer the 18-105 if it could be used for a head talk while walking without a tripod, is the 18mm too near? do you know if there is some content about this around? How to you look shooting your self with a 18mm or with a 16mm holding it with the hand? Thanks, Max
@bobc.64192 жыл бұрын
I have a question about this lens, which I have purchased. When I enter Playback mode, there's a slight thump from the lens. When I exit Playback mode, there's a big thump - which is quite annoying. This happens in autofocus mode or manual focus mode. I've never had a lens do this. I'm wondering if other people have encountered this behavior with this 18mm f1.4 lens, and whether anyone knows why this might be happening. Thanks.
@sclogse13 жыл бұрын
I'm interested in what results you will get if you use your bamboo screen, and select the corners to focus on, and what the difference in sharpness is compared to focussing in the center.
@thatjordandrake3 жыл бұрын
At 5:16 we do exactly that.
@kerry5403 жыл бұрын
i dunno if i should get this, or the 16mm f1.4
@RiposteThis3 жыл бұрын
Seems like an odd lens to release when the 16 1.4 is flawless.
@familyfun73463 жыл бұрын
how about Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 ?
@DhanukaThanooja3 жыл бұрын
can I use this lense to x s10
@jamez342 жыл бұрын
Can I throw this lenses on a xt200?
@ngaihongmok32223 жыл бұрын
thanks! I see no reason why don't buy 16.4 with similar performance but lower price
@GoodPhotos3 жыл бұрын
Looks like another great bit of Fuji Glass. The part I'm looking forward to the most though is all of the XF18/2 lenses that are about to hit the USED market. :) I stupidly sold mine a few years ago and have been missing it's almost pancake compactness and it's somewhat unique signature. Will be perfect on my X-E4 with the Loawa 9/2.8 in one pocket and the XF35/1.4 in the other. :)
@problemat1que3 жыл бұрын
Covid pricing is insane right now. I picked up my 18 for $150, didn't enjoy it (it's great for close-ups and zone focused landscape/street but not so great for environmental portrait, which is my interest) and prices had shot up to over $350. I ended up trading it for three EF lenses, since I use a Fringer adapter and my trading counterpart was looking to go light and compact. He has a great pocket system with the 18 f2 and the 27 now, and I have the cheap STM 55-250 to use at F8 for landscapes and the 40 pancake for using with a future FF or GFX purchase. What I'm saying is you'll be able to buy yours back but wait a few months for prices to return to normal.
@johnger8503053 жыл бұрын
Fujifilm is so amazing....
@smooth111012 Жыл бұрын
I hear this is as good or better than a Q2, would you agree
@diablerotz3 жыл бұрын
In my view the only thing this is better than the 16mm 1.4 is the Linear Motor. the difference in perspective is minimal.
@1barnet13 жыл бұрын
agreed and while you can crop in you can't crop out.
@RamonLinares3 жыл бұрын
If the price of this lens is a sign of what is to come from Fujifilm I am ready to jump ship. I love my Fuji X-T3 and some of my Fuji glass but it's difficult to justify those prices for a hobbyist.
@ladislavpomsar13463 жыл бұрын
If you are hobbyist, you probably don't need f1.4 tho.
@dnielkiss3 жыл бұрын
You can always choose the F2 versions, which I will most likely go with too...
@Paul_Rohde3 жыл бұрын
Wait for a sale.
@RamonLinares3 жыл бұрын
@@dnielkiss yes, I guess so. But I am not sure if I want to keep investing in a system that will force me to do this type of compromises. I was excited when Fuji released the XC 35mm f2, I thought they were going to follow the route of offering cheap prime lenses, but they stopped there. Probably the sales of that lens were not good? who knows
@RamonLinares3 жыл бұрын
@@ladislavpomsar1346 you are right, I don't need it
@lukazupie7220 Жыл бұрын
1000$ is good price for apsc prime now?😀 Equivalent sony 28mm 2.0 is how much, 400$?
@fwfeo2 жыл бұрын
They need a 9 to 11mm range fast prime to compete with 14mm f/2.8 on fill frame brands. Or at least a 16mm equivalent. How can you shoot cropped 4k video for real estate for example? 8-16mm f/2.8 is the only option which is as heavy as a RF 15-35/2.8! Fast wide primes and bad video focus are two handicaps of the system.
@AxelPironio3 жыл бұрын
What about this lense for astrophotography ?
@mytravellinfo3 жыл бұрын
Hey! What happened to pentax k3 m3 ?
@thatjordandrake3 жыл бұрын
We're still waiting for a review sample. Stay tuned!
@MariNate10163 жыл бұрын
Tempted to cop even tho I’m set with the 16-55, 8-16 and 55-140
@VinceDae3 жыл бұрын
Yeah .. I'll keep my 16 1.4 ... :D
@thecaveofthedead3 жыл бұрын
Luckily ttartisans is about to put out a 17mm f1.4 at 1/10th the price for the super low-rent fujistas among us. Weirdly, with those focusing issues, it'll likely be more appealing to video shooters even if the price of the Fuji is no object.
@kaneshirosan16423 жыл бұрын
Are you currently in Japan?
@niccollsvideo3 жыл бұрын
I wish! Sadly no. It's one of my favourite places to visit too.
@TakahiroOda3 жыл бұрын
1:00 wow!! that's how you call "transition" !! LOLOL
@hankroest68363 жыл бұрын
slick music too!
@nrice36233 жыл бұрын
I liked that transition! I watched it a few times lol
@johnjon18233 жыл бұрын
Where is the promised OM-D E-M10 IV review??????????????
@imAnsar3 жыл бұрын
Fantastic review. The price is still expensive. Love my 16mm though
@synura80863 жыл бұрын
4:48 That's a sad looking plant. Is Chris feeding off its life force? That would explain a lot. :)
@niccollsvideo3 жыл бұрын
That's a failed project for my wife unfortunately. You can't see it but the second shoot lower down is still alive so that's why it hasn't found its way to the compost.
@AxCYeR3 жыл бұрын
i'm happy with my fuji stuff and all, but apsc bokeh like at 6:11 just doesn't do it for me... way to busy and weird looking. hoping that one day there will be a nice little full frame fuji! leicas for everyone ffs.
@CyrusAshayeri2 жыл бұрын
I have a question. I received this lens today. It feels like at least one of the elements is loose inside and when flipping the lens 90 degrees it drops back. However, once I turn the camera on I don’t see this behavior. Is this normal? And if yes, I’m interested to learn what’s causing this? Thanks.
@xmj6830 Жыл бұрын
It’s normal because it’s a linear motor, it disappears when you turn the camera ON.
@fwfeo2 жыл бұрын
For $1000 USD, you might as well get a Nikon f/1.8 S lens which I find to be expensive anyway! Viltox makes them for 1/3 the price you get about 90% what this lens offers.
@xmj6830 Жыл бұрын
You don’t need to buy when not on sale. At the moment in NZ where I live, it is at US$776 equivalent until the end of this month. I’m about to grab one at this price! 😁
@KILLROYCZOP3 жыл бұрын
I gotta know what the point of having a 16mm 1.4 and an 18mm 1.4 in the fuji lineup is?
@4Kandlez3 жыл бұрын
Ones 16mm, the other 18mm
@ziginox3 жыл бұрын
Complains about not having a manual focus ring clutch, and then praises the linear motor.. Chris, you can't have them both!