Fun Fact! The B-36 Wasn't Too Reliable

  Рет қаралды 1,168,240

Sporty's Pilot Shop

Sporty's Pilot Shop

2 ай бұрын

Пікірлер: 603
@imageeknotanerd9897
@imageeknotanerd9897 Ай бұрын
saying "cooling issues" implies the engines were overheating, but the fires were actually due to the carburetors freezing, leading to uncontrolled fuel flow. The engines being effectively backwards meant the parts that are normally heated by hot air coming off the cylinders were instead being cooled by the air flowing from in front of the engine. I learned that from an Air Force veteran working at an air museum where they had one of those engines on display.
@cwheels01
@cwheels01 Ай бұрын
You'd think a lot of people would be saying "hold up, this sounds like a bad idea"
@kugelblitz1557
@kugelblitz1557 Ай бұрын
​@@cwheels01 yeah but I bet some engineer had an idea like "hey, maybe with the engines this way it would do X better..." And then some higher up grabbed onto it and held on for dear life even when the engineers tested it out and said "y'know, maybe it won't work as well as we thought and we should go back to the drawing board." Or the ever famous "we don't have time to go back to the drawing board on this, so fuck it we go with the design we have."
@murgyj6198
@murgyj6198 Ай бұрын
​@@kugelblitz1557sounds like more military contracts 😂
@hotprop92
@hotprop92 Ай бұрын
Sounds very plausible. The pusher config gave greater range less turbulent airflow over the wing, laminar flow. The military is always pushing the boundaries on what's possible because that's what the bad guys are going to be doing. Both engines on the P-38 were critical, not to see how many of our pilots they could kill but because it gave better performance that way.
@lokey5430
@lokey5430 Ай бұрын
Why the heck didn’t they just turn them around
@tylerblocker2501
@tylerblocker2501 Ай бұрын
My grandfather was a b-36 pilot he told me the best part was retiring it and switching to b52s
@chrishamilton8134
@chrishamilton8134 Ай бұрын
I bet, . 😊
@fastone942
@fastone942 Ай бұрын
B36 jet engines ran on Avgas the same fuel used by the rest of the piston engines, which was rare for a jet engine
@allied_forces_310
@allied_forces_310 Ай бұрын
Did he ever mention about the B-47 Stratojets
@jadenantal1652
@jadenantal1652 26 күн бұрын
​@@fastone942 Interesting, did not know that thank you
24 күн бұрын
Lol that's funny!!!
@aidenlarson9911
@aidenlarson9911 Ай бұрын
“The _____ was famous for reliability issues” could be used to describe about 95% of military equipment
@Bulogan
@Bulogan Ай бұрын
😂 So true
@hughcopson1799
@hughcopson1799 Ай бұрын
"Military-grade" means lowest bid! 😅
@TheBookofLab
@TheBookofLab Ай бұрын
"Its only gotta work long enough to get there" 😅
@bobbybandz9194
@bobbybandz9194 Ай бұрын
Get what you pay for 😅
@thetheatreorgan168
@thetheatreorgan168 Ай бұрын
The B29s all fell out of the sky because their engines loved catching on fire They tried putting close to original enginrs on Doc but after realizing how much they suck, switched to connie-spec radials.
@thatww2nerd81
@thatww2nerd81 Ай бұрын
"And two more unaccounted for." I like that this implies that two of the engines just fell off the aircraft.
@Cemi_Mhikku
@Cemi_Mhikku Ай бұрын
Or the also-notorious wiring issues a lot of aircraft of the era had. "Gauges are on the fritz again"
@destructorinator
@destructorinator Ай бұрын
Oh they didn't fall off, they grabbed the parachutes and jumped for it
@BCWasbrough
@BCWasbrough Ай бұрын
"They are still there, but sight-seeing!"
@alexandersheridan2179
@alexandersheridan2179 22 күн бұрын
You can really feel the frustration and deprecation through that last slogan! 😂 Long past denial and bargaining, they had fully accepted it.
@silentblackhole
@silentblackhole 20 күн бұрын
That the joke... ?
@polar_baer
@polar_baer 2 ай бұрын
From what I’m hearing, it made anything but peace!
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu 2 ай бұрын
Peace Faker
@dj.sauerkraut9022
@dj.sauerkraut9022 Ай бұрын
piece maker
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu Ай бұрын
@@dj.sauerkraut9022 Peace Taker.
@simonrabeder1599
@simonrabeder1599 Ай бұрын
I love this comment
@andrebello4191
@andrebello4191 Ай бұрын
It made peace because it didn't make it to the battlefield
@gregswank4912
@gregswank4912 Ай бұрын
It never dropped a bomb in combat, so one could argue that it excelled at making peace.
@dalemcdenver7816
@dalemcdenver7816 22 күн бұрын
Peace with it's maker maybe, never knowing if this was it's last flight...
@Alduins_Flame
@Alduins_Flame Ай бұрын
2 turning, 2 burning, 2 choking, 2 smoking and 2 more unaccounted for, the unofficial slogan of the B-36 Edit: Jesus christ, can I get like 20 people to sub to mt channel? This has gotta be my most liked comment
@sternencolonel7328
@sternencolonel7328 Ай бұрын
But this wasn't build by Boeing ? Right ?
@Alduins_Flame
@Alduins_Flame Ай бұрын
@sternencolonel7328 No the "B" prefix is to signify its a bomber aircraft, the B-36 peacemaker was made by Consolidated Vultee, later Convair
@metatechnologist
@metatechnologist Ай бұрын
People can now understand why the military was very eager to move on to the B52 successor and its reliability!
@davidtuttle7556
@davidtuttle7556 Ай бұрын
​@@metatechnologistThe BUFF may live for ever.
@MrMaxymoo22
@MrMaxymoo22 Ай бұрын
​@@davidtuttle7556a couple years ago I made a pile of landing gear bolts for those from original drawings stamped 1954. It'll never die.
@Snek_1000
@Snek_1000 Ай бұрын
“2 turning, 2 burning, 2 choking, 2 smoking and 2 more unaccounted for” had me rolling 😭😭
@MrPlab1780
@MrPlab1780 Ай бұрын
My class in a nutshell. 💀
@narrativeless404
@narrativeless404 Ай бұрын
XD Says a lot about our society lmao
@quentinking4351
@quentinking4351 Ай бұрын
That B-36 is at the US Air Force Museum. Last time I was there, it was leaking oil. Still. Hasn't flown in decades.
@simonm1447
@simonm1447 Ай бұрын
The last B-36 flew in 1959.
@renierbarnard2999
@renierbarnard2999 Ай бұрын
After all these years it is still giving problems And its been retired for 60+ years Amazing
@railworksamerica
@railworksamerica Ай бұрын
Infinite oil glitch
@circeciernova1712
@circeciernova1712 23 күн бұрын
That's why the US kept that one
@OG-BIG-SHEPHERD.
@OG-BIG-SHEPHERD. 22 күн бұрын
You know there are more than one air force museums right?
@jonathonhass4178
@jonathonhass4178 Ай бұрын
Had the engines been mounted the way the engines were designed, probably would’ve solved the reliability issue
@cisarovnajosefina4525
@cisarovnajosefina4525 Ай бұрын
No way, insight they couldn't have had when it was made😮😮😮
@jonathonhass4178
@jonathonhass4178 Ай бұрын
@@cisarovnajosefina4525 No “insight” needed. The engines were designed to be pullers, yet they were mounted to be pushers. Engineering math would show that engines designed to be pullers wouldn’t be anywhere near as productive or efficient if mounted as pushers.
@cisarovnajosefina4525
@cisarovnajosefina4525 Ай бұрын
@@jonathonhass4178 and you think they didn't know that back then 🤨🤨
@jonathonhass4178
@jonathonhass4178 Ай бұрын
@@cisarovnajosefina4525 More than likely, yes, yet decided to experiment anyway obviously. The wings would’ve needed to be redesigned to mount the pulling engines in a pull orientation, then all the work done to actually do this. Obviously this was decided to be too expensive as the B52’s were starting to come online and sinking money into both projects wouldn’t have made sense.
@Rabbinicphilosophyforthewin
@Rabbinicphilosophyforthewin Ай бұрын
Somewhat. 28 cylinders per is still a loooooot of moving parts to expect much reliability. Jet engines were a much better choice when available-fewer moving parts, more power for the weight, etc.
@331Grabber
@331Grabber Ай бұрын
One of the most impressive transition aircraft ever. Saw one when I was a kid. Hard to believe it can fly
@cbmech2563
@cbmech2563 Ай бұрын
Between the age of 3 and 5 I lived on Fairchild AFB (my dad was army Corp of engineers, in charge of runway construction) and I can tell you that they flew...with a thunderous roar. Our house was out at the end of officers row, about were they would break above house house top level. About 0500 5 days a week the whole wing took off.
@thomasmleahy6218
@thomasmleahy6218 Ай бұрын
Where.
@cbmech2563
@cbmech2563 Ай бұрын
@@thomasmleahy6218 Fairchild AFB, about 15 miles west of Spokane Washington.
@memethief4113
@memethief4113 Ай бұрын
@@cbmech2563bet you never needed an alarm! Probably had to adjust sleep schedule though
@cbmech2563
@cbmech2563 Ай бұрын
@@memethief4113 the only time it woke you up was when it was foggy and they didn't take off.
@buckeyeinmi9950
@buckeyeinmi9950 Ай бұрын
Fun fact. The B-36 was especially unreliable in Alaska. Because the engines were in a pusher configuration, the arctic air getting into the intakes was NOT good for the aircraft. And may have lead to a broken arrow incident along the Pacific coast of canada.
@cl844
@cl844 Ай бұрын
actually it was greenland not canada close but not canada and there is still missing nuke parts they never bothered to even try tk recover greenland got SACed
@Natediggetydog
@Natediggetydog Ай бұрын
How the hell did a broken arrow incident occur in friendly territory?
@cl844
@cl844 Ай бұрын
@@Natediggetydog its happend at least 4 times only twice in the usa rest were greenland an spain
@cl844
@cl844 Ай бұрын
@@Natediggetydog like the movie what is more scary a singl lost nuke or that it has happend enought to give it a name
@Natediggetydog
@Natediggetydog Ай бұрын
@@cl844 I think you have the wrong name, broken arrow is when a US military position gets overrun. It’s a request for all available support, and a status report all in one.
@marckcf9600
@marckcf9600 Ай бұрын
Engineer: how many engines do you want me to attach to the aircraft? Director: yes
@KaylieRayne
@KaylieRayne 28 күн бұрын
I had an uncle who was a flight mechanic on the 36s. Use to tell stories of going in the fix the engines mid flight and stuff.
@ylstorage7085
@ylstorage7085 Ай бұрын
"2 turning, 2 burning, 2 choking, 2 smoking and 2 more unaccounted for" "Sounds like a Kinky party, I m in" "It brings nuclear kaboom too" "Cool, is that some kinda Voldaka cocktail" "sure"
@Boop__Doop
@Boop__Doop Ай бұрын
It even sometimes almost didnt catch on fire
@kibbs325
@kibbs325 Ай бұрын
Legend has it they even sometimes made it off the runway
@skipthefox4858
@skipthefox4858 Ай бұрын
I've heard rumors that one time they were actually able to get all the engines to start normally but i'm pretty sure that is just a tall tale
@BentleyTypeR
@BentleyTypeR 2 ай бұрын
One of the more fun facts I've heard in a while
@Eggman0430_
@Eggman0430_ 2 ай бұрын
The thing was a powered glider, like a rubber band engine on a paper airplane
@budwhite9591
@budwhite9591 29 күн бұрын
Rubber bands are more reliable
@jezzdogg6857
@jezzdogg6857 19 күн бұрын
​@@budwhite9591underrated comment lol
@theamaturepro
@theamaturepro Ай бұрын
I knew a man who was a WWII aircraft mechanic. He mentioned this as well, but more than anything he despised the F4U Corsair, which is my favorite plane. Said they were the greatest fighter plane ever imagined, but the worst to work on. Every time they took off, he hoped they wouldn't run out of oil. They leaked all over with no hope of stopping it. But considering they were designed, built, and in the air during active wartime, it makes sense they would have been rushed. Incredible plane though
@stealthgaming2298
@stealthgaming2298 Ай бұрын
I would love to see the b36 added to warthunder
@nippon19
@nippon19 Ай бұрын
jsut to see it burning in the sky ?
@lancerevell5979
@lancerevell5979 Ай бұрын
Of course, the B-36 was the most complex piece of machinery ever devised by Man up to that point! More complexity, running on the razor's edge of technology, of course there will be issues.
@SergyMilitaryRankings
@SergyMilitaryRankings Ай бұрын
That's just nonsense it was an absolute failure that forced the development of a better bomber, and was fast obsolete when the Soviets invented the ICBM
@eustatic3832
@eustatic3832 Ай бұрын
Even catches fire in the movies
@robertmatch6550
@robertmatch6550 2 ай бұрын
Always wondered if they had separate fuel for the jet engines. Kinda expensive to burn high quality gas meant for the radials. On the other hand fuel management would be complex.
@MrWhite2222
@MrWhite2222 2 ай бұрын
Oh absolutely had different fuel systems. Radials are 4 stroke and use high octane gasoline. Jets use kerosene, which is very similar to diesel fuel. Neither are compatible/ interchangeable with the other engine.
@pickle4332
@pickle4332 2 ай бұрын
@@MrWhite2222can’t turbine engines burn gasoline even if it’s terribly inefficient/damaging to the engine?
@MrWhite2222
@MrWhite2222 2 ай бұрын
@@pickle4332 so, looked it up more, and looks like jets "can" burn gasoline, BUT it will rapidly degrade the mechanical fuel systems most likely. Not so much the engine itself, but kerosene/diesel acts as a lubricant itself, while gasoline acts as a solvent which strips oil from parts. Possible with modifications? Probably. However, one of the greatest benefits of jet fuel (especially in combat situations) is that it doesn't burn easily in leaks or accidents. It's MUCH safer than gasoline.
@LOLHAMMER45678
@LOLHAMMER45678 Ай бұрын
On a smaller bird it would, but on B-36? Adding extra dedicated JP tanks was a piece of cake. They had room to haul an entire RF-84 along too
@jalpat2272
@jalpat2272 Ай бұрын
​@@MrWhite2222I know it was built during transition era but, why built a vehicle that needs two types of fuels and engineering.
@oriolesfan61
@oriolesfan61 Ай бұрын
Jimmy Stewart had no problems with his
@cbmech2563
@cbmech2563 Ай бұрын
Yeah I've always wondered how they did that.....maybe camera tricks?
@oriolesfan61
@oriolesfan61 24 күн бұрын
@cbmech2563 the film was low key usaf propaganda so of course it never had failures
@Loli4lyf
@Loli4lyf Ай бұрын
probably the most amount of engines for a single aircraft ever
@paulmryglod4802
@paulmryglod4802 Ай бұрын
Spruce goose had 8 4460 engines, flew a little bit over the long beach harbor and that was all.
@JRHaley
@JRHaley Ай бұрын
⁠The B-52 which is still operational also has eight engines. The B-36 had 10, the Dornier Do X had 12, and NASA had a solar powered unmanned aircraft named Helios HP01 with 14 motors.
@SergyMilitaryRankings
@SergyMilitaryRankings Ай бұрын
When your engines are bad you need many
@F40M07
@F40M07 Ай бұрын
**cries in B-36 fanatic**
@whisperingforest9909
@whisperingforest9909 22 күн бұрын
I feel your pain
@BreandanAnraoi
@BreandanAnraoi Ай бұрын
Peacemaker or Piecemaker? 😀
@vincentandhimi6990
@vincentandhimi6990 14 күн бұрын
First Peacemaker (Actual name is Peacemaker), now both
@ZEBEE0110
@ZEBEE0110 Ай бұрын
Fun fact my great grandpa made that emblem😊 its cool to see it in more places than pictures my family has passed down (the strategic air command emblem) his name was Robert Thor Barnes. He won a contest and got to have his art as the emblem for the S.A.C. I didn't think much of it as a kid but I'm happy I got to learn about him as much as I did, we still have most of his old art collection. Man was an insane artist tbh
@BIGMANLOGJAM
@BIGMANLOGJAM Ай бұрын
I was lucky enough to find myself in Dayton, OH for a work trip recently. We had about one hour left to see the Air Force Museum in this video, so we did a speed run in our work clothes. It’s truly massive and everyone that works there are amazing. They gave us great directions to see all the best parts and we were sweating by the end of it. Really glad we went!
@Hoshimaru57
@Hoshimaru57 22 күн бұрын
I want to go back and see the new experimental hangar. All the x-planes were off display when I went.
@GregWampler-xm8hv
@GregWampler-xm8hv 8 күн бұрын
Is the XB-70 still there?
@brandonpeterman9964
@brandonpeterman9964 Ай бұрын
Such a beautiful aircraft and such behemoth, it would be amazing to see one returned to airworthy status
@Veemon657
@Veemon657 Ай бұрын
Buddy that thing wasn't air worthy when it was new
@deluxalpha4138
@deluxalpha4138 10 күн бұрын
@@Veemon657 Of course it was air worthy, it could up to a whole 15 feet of altitude before the engines caught fire
@fgrau7376
@fgrau7376 Ай бұрын
Strategic Air Command with Jimmy Stewart is a great movie that featured so many beautiful scenes of the B-36 and the B-47 Worth Watching if you are an aviation lover
@earlwyss520
@earlwyss520 Ай бұрын
Great film. Ever seen "Bombers B-52?" There is a scene in the film where they're demonstrating the B-52's CLASSIFIED ability to "crab" roll sideways.
@fgrau7376
@fgrau7376 Ай бұрын
@@earlwyss520 No , I just ordered it new DVD on Amazon Thank you looking forward to watching it!!! By the way, I was reading the movie, Doctor Strange love and all the B-52 scenes the Air Force would not give them any access to an actual B-52 interior (still secret) to film that movie so the entire interior of the B-52 in Dr. Strangelove was completely made up and amazingly it was very accurate to the real B-52 .
@stevenslater2669
@stevenslater2669 17 күн бұрын
I worked with an engineer who always wore a B-36 tie tack. He never talked much about it other than to say he flew the B-36. And the story the younger engineers in his department told was that he flew the last operational B-36 to the Boneyard at Davis Monthan AFB.
@427Arbok
@427Arbok 24 күн бұрын
Who could've possibly imagined that an aircraft with *_10 separate engines_* might have some mechanical problems?
@Oak.bricks.creation
@Oak.bricks.creation 21 күн бұрын
Oh, I love the Dayton, Air Force museum
@alanm.4298
@alanm.4298 22 күн бұрын
I can comfirm this. My dad was a USAAF & US Air Force pilot and flight instructor. He mostly flew B29, B50 and their tanker variants. But he and a crew were sent from England to N. Africa to retrieve a B36 back to England "for maintenance"... only to find out that just six of its ten engines were functional. They still were able to get it in the air and make the flight back. Of course, it wasn't "heavy" with a bomb load and might even have had a reduced fuel, since the distance was probably only about 1/4 the airplane's range when unloaded. With a 230 foot wingspan, the B36 was huge! In comparison, a B29 has 141 foot wingspan and over 50 feet less length. Although it was only 3 foot longer than the B52 that followed, the B36 had 45 foot wider wingspan! In fact, only five aircraft with greater wingspan than B36 have ever flown. Three of those were one-off experimental. The two that saw regular production and service were the Antonov AN124 (1982) and Airbus A380 (2005), which the B36 preceded by 36 and 61 years, respectively.
@andrewday3206
@andrewday3206 17 күн бұрын
The 44,000 pound bomb the T-12 Cloudmaker, the heaviest bomb ever made, could only be carried by the B-36 Peacemaker
@thedepression950
@thedepression950 20 күн бұрын
'' ah yes lets put the engines backwards. nothing can go wrong and we will look so original that we will get a rise''
@michaelalbert8474
@michaelalbert8474 20 күн бұрын
I love the slogans the GIs came up with. My time in was with one of the most diverse, talented, intelligent group of people I have ever been around. I wish I had one of our turnover logs just to admire the artwork inside. One of my coworkers had a photographic memory and could go to the grocery store and had his check (that is an archaic method we used to pay for things) before the cashier had rung up the total. And if the totals were different, he was right.
@robertttttt716
@robertttttt716 23 күн бұрын
My dad worked on them when he was in the Air Force he didn't particularly care for them. Air Force was all about getting air frames in the air and this thing was a beast to keep flying.
@alanhinkel420
@alanhinkel420 27 күн бұрын
I saw this aircraft at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum. Very cool aircraft. Thanks for the story.
@levidavid3099
@levidavid3099 7 күн бұрын
When I visited the US Air Force museum, I found this plane strange since it had two types of propulsion, but it was very interesting nonetheless. Glad to see other people interested too.
@Mythilt
@Mythilt 22 күн бұрын
One of the buildings at Wright-Patt I worked in was used to do some material testing on the B-36. They had to do some flex testing on the wings of the plane, and since it would be easier to test the flex if the plane was upside down, they used a couple of cranes inside the building and actually flipped the plane over. There are photos of the work in the building lobby. (Bldg 65, the huge one just off the National Air Force Museum's old runway.)
@chipsaviation767
@chipsaviation767 17 күн бұрын
"this is the peace maker" Ohh okay "It's a bomber" What-
@Avideep_usapro2
@Avideep_usapro2 3 күн бұрын
There's a peacemaker, now we need a peacebreaker
@rakhafitra8607
@rakhafitra8607 Ай бұрын
Curious on why they didn't just fully replace the prop with jets rather than this hybrid configuration. I guess a jet would jut cut the bomber's range?
@thomasgeorge4384
@thomasgeorge4384 Ай бұрын
Two reasons. One, the origins of the program were in 1941, when there was a possibility that we might need to hit Germany from the continental US and liberate the UK from invaders. Two, early model jets lacked reliability, power, and fuel efficiency. This is also why the B-52 had eight jet engines. The earlier B-47 had six, and apparently could be seriously underpowered at the time. They DID, in fact try to rebuild this thing into a jet bomber in the form of the YB-60... which had a high degree of parts commonality with the B-36, but also looked like Convair had copied Boeing's homework.
@LOLHAMMER45678
@LOLHAMMER45678 Ай бұрын
The modification program would've cost a lot and the USAF wanted to save money for B-52
@Britcarjunkie
@Britcarjunkie Ай бұрын
Convair DID build a prototype with all jet power and swept wings, but the USAF had already opted for the B-52.
@thomasgeorge4384
@thomasgeorge4384 Ай бұрын
@@Britcarjunkie the YB-60. The BUFF actually outperformed it, still.
@GregWampler-xm8hv
@GregWampler-xm8hv 8 күн бұрын
They did in the competition that eventually went to the Boeing B-52. Look up the XB-60 for the 8 jet type.
@marvwatkins7029
@marvwatkins7029 Ай бұрын
I'm a proud Sportys consumer.
@manuwilson4695
@manuwilson4695 Ай бұрын
Engineers in the piston engine age just never seemed to have got to grips with the problems of pusher propellor engines.
@SanDiegoHarry1
@SanDiegoHarry1 15 күн бұрын
a buddy of mine's father was B-36 gunner. Said the aircraft caught fire just about every flight.
@samnelson9038
@samnelson9038 Ай бұрын
Awesome looking planes though
@hotprop92
@hotprop92 Ай бұрын
The absolutely straining the leading edges of recip analog technology. I've heard it took 45 minutes from startup to ready for takeoff just to go through all the checklists. Probably the busiest person in front was the flight engineer, jeez just to monitor 336 spark plugs if they were firing properly etc etc etc. The aluminum cloud.
@GregWampler-xm8hv
@GregWampler-xm8hv 8 күн бұрын
I think it was Magnesium cloud.
@hotprop92
@hotprop92 8 күн бұрын
@@GregWampler-xm8hv do you know the alloy used?
@t.r.campbell6585
@t.r.campbell6585 20 күн бұрын
There is a B 36 on display between Omaha and Lincoln, Nebraska along interstate 80. This B3 six is on display at the SAC Aerospace Museum.
@Airmanmanning.
@Airmanmanning. 2 ай бұрын
I recognize that shield thats the strategic air command.
@690_5
@690_5 16 күн бұрын
my Grandfather, funny enough used to tell a story about when he was ATC for the RCAF. "Tower, we've lost an engine!" "Okay, you have any runway." "No, TOWER, WE LOST AN ENGINE." "Do you need emergency crews?" "TOWER, the F-ING THING FELL OFF." No idea when this was, but it always makes me laugh. I sure wish I could ask him which aircraft it was. RIP, Captain T.M.
@nrauhauser
@nrauhauser Ай бұрын
That is the Strategic Air Command Museum at the Ashland, Nebraska exit about 20 minutes west of Omaha. There are about five acres of floor space, it's a great place to run a bunch of Cub Scouts ragged when the weather prohibits outside activity.
@kh40yr
@kh40yr 15 күн бұрын
Strategic Air Command - 1955 - Jimmy Stewart
@fixinggrace
@fixinggrace Ай бұрын
The J 47 engines were also in the Boeing, 707
@mytmousemalibu
@mytmousemalibu Ай бұрын
The 707 had J57's (JT3C) and then JT3D'S. It never had J47's they weren't powerful enough. The B-47 bomber had 6 of them as did the F-86 and a number of other early designs.
@electricpaisy6045
@electricpaisy6045 Ай бұрын
Calling military equipment "peacemaker" is the most American thing ever.
@stormtroopertk4285
@stormtroopertk4285 22 күн бұрын
“We’ve lost engine one, and engine two is no longer on fire”
@AussieMapper1
@AussieMapper1 2 ай бұрын
Reminded me of the buff when it was first made
@garymiedema642
@garymiedema642 2 ай бұрын
The opposite of pusher is tractor, not puller.
@TreesandStuff69
@TreesandStuff69 Ай бұрын
Tractors can't fly
@randomchannel323
@randomchannel323 Ай бұрын
Convair: Yeah lets add 6 engines then 2 extra jet ones won't be too complicated at all
@Nevim1297
@Nevim1297 6 күн бұрын
Another fun fact: the B36 was so heavy convair thought of adding tracks as the landing gear before eventually just going back to normal wheels
@RedPepper1312
@RedPepper1312 Ай бұрын
I LIVE BY THAT MUSEUM NO WAY
@geminijixon6899
@geminijixon6899 24 күн бұрын
I’ve talked to old timers who armed the ammunitions in this plane. Pretty wild what they did
@tylerbrooking7750
@tylerbrooking7750 Ай бұрын
It's weird that I just went to that museum 2 weeks ago, saw that plane and just thought: expensive, heavy, and the thickest wing spars I have ever seen in my life
@Armored_Ariete
@Armored_Ariete Ай бұрын
this the one in dayton?
@centerfield6339
@centerfield6339 20 күн бұрын
They added more engines. Perfect.
@dougtaylor7724
@dougtaylor7724 22 күн бұрын
My cousin was a Tech Sgt assigned to a B36 wing. He volunteered for a crap assignment to get away from those beast and work on something else. He was almost assigned to a B52 wing but to sent to an assignment in the Philippines during Viet Nam. He told me he was done with bombers. 😂 But I have to admit, when we went to Dayton to the museum, the two planes I most wanted to see was a B36 and the Globemaster.
@nolongerblocked6210
@nolongerblocked6210 19 күн бұрын
"Peace maker" ~ mission design 😂😂😂😂
@ghost_ship_supreme
@ghost_ship_supreme 24 күн бұрын
That second slogan was S tier
@YouDriveUSuccess
@YouDriveUSuccess Ай бұрын
There would need to be extra crew members just to man the throttle levers! Talk about task saturation! I bet it was quite the experience to fly one when all 10 engines were running right!
@hossahunter22
@hossahunter22 Ай бұрын
"how many engines should we put on the plane?" "yes"
@hossahunter22
@hossahunter22 Ай бұрын
"and did you want those as props or jet engines?" "also yes"
@Randomfactsofwar
@Randomfactsofwar 24 күн бұрын
“None turning, all burning”
@briancrawford69
@briancrawford69 Ай бұрын
They have one of these at Castle AFB museum in Atwater CA. I go up there on open cockpit days and this thing is massive inside and out
@JenSalvatore21
@JenSalvatore21 2 ай бұрын
Feels like it would be easier and cheaper to just flip the radial engines around to push instead of sticking four jet engines under the wings
@Khmtravelvlog
@Khmtravelvlog Ай бұрын
Idk why the engineers didn't figure that out
@marchess923
@marchess923 Ай бұрын
B29s should have also been renamed "Firebirds".
@CarMake
@CarMake 10 күн бұрын
called the "peacemaker" because it made it to the battlefield in pieces lmao
@XimCines
@XimCines 17 күн бұрын
Peacemaker reliability issues, now I know why the name of that character was chosen.
@littledino1515
@littledino1515 2 ай бұрын
Oh I wonder why the peacemaker wasn’t effective. It’s not like it’s powered by nearly 8 engines.
@John-qv5ux
@John-qv5ux Ай бұрын
This argument would hold water... were it not for the fact that the B-52 is also an eight-engined aircraft.
@thomasgeorge4384
@thomasgeorge4384 Ай бұрын
​@John-qv5ux and if the R-4360 wasn't a great engine.
@John-qv5ux
@John-qv5ux Ай бұрын
@@thomasgeorge4384 even on the B-29, this engine had no end of problems
@thomasgeorge4384
@thomasgeorge4384 Ай бұрын
@John-qv5ux the 4360 wasn't on the B-29, that was a Wright 3350 duplex cyclone. And yesthat engine had troubles. The Pratt and Whitney 4360 was on the B-50, C-97/Boeing 377, C-124, and many, many others, and served everywhere from tropic jungles to the arctic.
@John-qv5ux
@John-qv5ux Ай бұрын
@@thomasgeorge4384 I am mistaken then
@luish.990
@luish.990 21 күн бұрын
"This engine is build to pull." "Yeah lets make it push." What did they expect to happen?
@JimmySailor
@JimmySailor 26 күн бұрын
Yeah, every high performance pusher has the same problem. Actually when you look into the history of aircraft the most common reason for a promising new design to fail is a lack of proper heat management around the engine. This makes sense as engines at best deliver ~30% of their power to the shaft and the rest is heat.
@martykarr7058
@martykarr7058 Ай бұрын
The B-36 was a stopgap compromise. Because it could fly from the US to the Soviet Union and back unrefulled, it replaced the B-29 which would have had to been stationed VERY CLOSE, probably Germany, to hit targets in the Soviet Union. And it was big enough to carry the HUGE atomic and nuclear weapons at that time. It held the line until more reliable and longer range jets were developed, such as the B-47 and the B-52.
@GregWampler-xm8hv
@GregWampler-xm8hv 8 күн бұрын
Well actually it was originally spitballed to be able to make the round trip bomb run to Germany if England fell. In a very contentious competition the B-36 beat out the XB-49 flying wing. Jack Northrup always claimed the AF tried to force him to merge with then Convair the makers of the B-36. What ever transpired behind the scenes the AF was so pissed off they ordered all XB-49's destroyed and then destroyed all the tooling.
@patk8417
@patk8417 17 күн бұрын
The flight engineer didn't know what those two engines were doing for sure. Information overload maybe?
@erictaylor5462
@erictaylor5462 Ай бұрын
Complexity is inversely proportional to reliability. Anything that can go wrong will go wrong, and the more that can go wrong, the more likely something will.
@propnotch3466
@propnotch3466 21 күн бұрын
A bathroom and shower are some of her tricks, two things you can't get in an f-86
@DavidJones-me7yr
@DavidJones-me7yr 20 күн бұрын
I've heard that slogan before and it still makes me laugh!😮😂😂😊
@Michael-ch2ox
@Michael-ch2ox Ай бұрын
Trust the crews to come up with some fun names for it.
@phayzyre1052
@phayzyre1052 Ай бұрын
Seems to me like the cooling issues could have been a simple fix by way of adding ductwork. Of course, it would have involved some structural changes, redesign, analysis, etc. but it would not have been too much involved.
@tstahler5420
@tstahler5420 23 күн бұрын
Jimmy Stewart failed to mention that last bit of information. 😂
@ozzy7763
@ozzy7763 22 күн бұрын
That thing is unbelievably big in person !
@CommunistNugget
@CommunistNugget 19 күн бұрын
General Electric: Makes Kitchen Appliance General Electric Also: Makes plane/jet engines
@marksaunders1789
@marksaunders1789 Ай бұрын
Not sure if people realised but the video clips hes showing is from a amazing 1955 film could strategic air command nearly all of the male actors we're real life veterans so which I like to call them real life superheroes highly recommend that film to anyone who loves planes
@chrismayer3919
@chrismayer3919 Ай бұрын
If nothing else, she was an impressive-looking aircraft (even if her military engines weren’t the best in the world)
@cjford2217
@cjford2217 25 күн бұрын
These issues were simply a side-effect of giantism. The more equipment you have on board, the more opportunities for failure. If you have a boat with 6 outboard motors, you're 6 times as likely to have an engine failure as someone with a single engine boat. For what it was, the B36 was a colossal achievement of aviation technology. Never dropped a bomb in anger, but it still had the Ruskies sleeping with one eye open.
@newhailman
@newhailman 18 күн бұрын
Yeah, I used to have one. But the waste water dump switch kept getting jammed up so I traded it in for a B-52
@dylanzwering2255
@dylanzwering2255 27 күн бұрын
"That's a number I can live with, good landing boys who says penguins can't fly"
@TheNightlessFall
@TheNightlessFall Ай бұрын
2 turning, 2 burming, 2 choking, 2 smoking- Oh just like my grand-father.
@DonVigaDeFierro
@DonVigaDeFierro 24 күн бұрын
Two turning, two burning, two choking, two smoking, two unaccounted for.
@Ben-zr4ho
@Ben-zr4ho 28 күн бұрын
"Does anyone have a spare... 300 spark plugs I can use?"
@joshuamorin2123
@joshuamorin2123 Ай бұрын
It probably just needed more engines. Maybe a couple ram or scram engines to keep with the pattern of mixing and matching
@Clementinewoofwoof
@Clementinewoofwoof Ай бұрын
God damn, old slogans are just so funny
Why Planes Don't Fly Over the Pacific Ocean
8:47
BRIGHT SIDE
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН
Insane Aircraft Engines Sound That Will Shake Your Soul 🥶😱
29:13
Techno Fusion HD
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Surprise Gifts #couplegoals
00:21
Jay & Sharon
Рет қаралды 27 МЛН
0% Respect Moments 😥
00:27
LE FOOT EN VIDÉO
Рет қаралды 37 МЛН
Taki Taki Tutorial💃 Where’re you from?🔥
00:14
Diana Belitskay
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
McDonald’s MCNUGGET PURSE?! #shorts
00:11
Lauren Godwin
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН
See Thru Jet Engine
10:14
Warped Perception
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
🇺🇸 DOES YOUR FLAG FAIL?  Grey Grades State Flags!
18:53
CGP Grey
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Falcon BMS 4.36: High Speed Low Level SAM Attack
9:07
Julien Johnston
Рет қаралды 20 М.
Why you Should NEVER RIDE an Orange County Chopper
27:20
Bikes and Beards
Рет қаралды 3 МЛН
TOP 10 HARD LANDINGS - AIRBUS A380, BOEING 747, ANTONOV AN124 ... (HD)
8:13
Restoration of the last B-36 Bomber in Ft Worth
14:36
Bob Adams
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains The Three-Body Problem
11:45
StarTalk
Рет қаралды 4,1 МЛН
A 15 Year Old Just Broke Every Tetris World Record
40:03
aGameScout
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
🤏 САМЫЙ ТОНКИЙ гаджет #Apple! 🍏
0:29
Яблочный Маньяк
Рет қаралды 535 М.
#Shorts Good idea for testing to show.
0:17
RAIN Gadgets
Рет қаралды 808 М.
phone charge game #viral #tranding #new #reels
0:18
YODHA GAMING RAAS
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН