Yes

YES

Yessir

Bring it! My body is ready!

YES

Funny 👍

One time I imagine it, but I make it balanced cuz all sides are very based

I thought Fury was released before GuP

@@KillerT-Bone GuP released in October 2012 while Fury in October 2014 so GuP is 2 years older

You are correct. Thanks.

me when potential history has potential for history

Fury wins

Fury wins

Fury have no funky physics like in GuP

Don't need no funky physics.

Both would fail to disable or destroy eachother due to plot armor

and Miho is like 5 years old and has an*me logic

@@KillerT-Bone And warddady had Hollywood logic. Balances the two out. Good point, Miho is far younger that Wardaddy, proving how much more skilled she is in tanks even though she has less experience than the middle aged grizzly war vet.

@@KillerT-Bone Ah yes, very good argument. Though, you're 2 years too late buddy, got fit during lockdown :)

@@imgvillasrc1608she thinks she is skilled until she is put in a real tank with live ammunition. She will be good target practice for all the real tankers out there

@@KillerT-Bone she be blown up into smithereens 💀

Thank you!

La verdad, ambas son buenas obras, pero lo que me molesta es que vengan otros creídos diciendo que es mejor por tal y tal cosa, y que fury es solo una obra edgy, primero y principal una es una pelicula y la otra una serie, no están en el mismo catálago de comparación, una tiempo más tiempo para desarrollar que la otra, y segundo, una está hecha con actores reales y la otra con animación, en la animación se pueden poner más cosas y dar más detalle, en la real siempre habrán limitaciones.

@@UlisesSandoval Just ran your comment on google translate, and yeah, I kinda agree that these two shouldn't be compared. One is more realistic in a sense as it shows the harsh reality of war, and one explores the idea of warfare as a game/tournament of sorts, and yes, both are really good works.

@@manapoints9329 sorry, and true

@@manapoints9329 The truth is, both are good works, but what annoys me is that other conceited people come saying that it's better for such and such a thing, and that fury is just an edgy work, first and foremost one is a movie and the other a series, They are not in the same comparison catalog, one takes more time to develop than the other, and second, one is made with real actors and the other with animation, in the animation you can put more things and give more detail, in the real there will always be limitations.

Better than GuP

Yeah and its not cringe​@@KillerT-Bone

​@@Murderdronesfans2004 thinking gup is cringe you have no feelings and friendships.

False news

Afghan Jihad be like:you sure🗿

NEVER!!!

Depends on who A tanking team with so much armor only the Brits can beat them yes A experienced Sherman crew that has been through years of WW2 also yes The French in either GuP or real life no

​@@neonmem8826 how about st. Gloriana tanks?

I did not

But theres no Russian

Machine!! Suena hermoso en inglés

Ad victoriam ex machina non sibi sed patirae

Brad Pitt

Darjeeling approaching rapidly Start running

That's an insult to smart people.

@@turtleman8968 You mf Don't know what I mean with nerds

@@Saab_fan 1. a person who is extremely enthusiastic and knowledgeable about a particular subject, especially one of specialist or niche interest.

@@turtleman8968 Do you fatherless kid understand what I mean about nerds 💀

@@Saab_fan Your father didn't make you read books, did he?

Amen.

Amen.

Who will win high school girls in tanks Vs chad mfs who are actually in the army

Me who enjoys both but rathers Fury

Amen.

MrLampes

Gup fans be like

I agree The video had so much logic taken away that it makes GuP realistic A Tiger II cant be destroyed from a single HE shot from a sherman You can tell the explosion is grenade sized and not on the tanks and yet eliminates them anyways Same loader for 2 different tanks (Yukari) And the GuP tank crews not moving every 2 seconds Also how the video is extremely biased to Fury even though it would really end in a draw because of plot armor