@C See 份聲明是未成年家長簽,如果佢哋未畢業就公影,我念佢哋都冇乜好講,只可以硬食,人都畢咗業加已經是成年人,對自己負責話唔想公影都唔得?五個女仔私人野你叫公衆投票?依家是個女仔唔想公開,你唔霸道,唔關黃藍事,紀錄片唔使被紀錄者同意先出街?你都幾惡喎,唔好同我講對時代好有貢獻,偉人是要留番俾偉人做,唔係叫人偉人做跟住拍掌響後面叫做得好,自己響度睇戲
Even 10 years ago DVD was already outdated! Documentary film to be released to public needs full consent and agreements from the characters. The film director and the school have ethical issues of exploring these once girls!
你好子君~ 個人睇法唔覺得權力嘅問題,問題係有冇consent嘅問題;究竟呢個係咪一個informed decision。 作為局外人,好難comment on某一個人嘅唸法 to a certain extent,覺得d咩,主觀願望係咩,某一個人希望,係咪出於好意d咩未必係relevant。重點係Execution。 我不能理解,呢個係一個拍攝團隊,係一個team,冇人了解乜嘢係informed? 我可以accept導演唔係focus呢d嘢,但不能接受成條team冇人提出呢個咁嚴重嘅問題: 正如你買d有比較長時間impact嘅嘢,通常都需要有詳細解釋說明,同埋有cooling off period 一樣 - 目的就係要ensure 所有party 可以有informed decision,係有consent嘅。 一個橫跨10年嘅project,仲要由minor 變 adult 更加需要小心。 個project 咁ambitious,當然我明白對導演作為製作人係一個挑戰,會好想做得好好, 但正正因為咁,唔係就應該更加步步為營咩? 直接講:就算學生冇講過,成個team都無可能冇人提過;如果冇,條team就有問題。 我絕對同意學校有一個大d 嘅role (而客觀黎講佢個brand都瀨曬嘢㗎啦) 但even導演作為個人製作人冇直接責任,但作為製作team lead 或者project manager責無旁貸 - the buck stops at her. It's a shame because this might be a good documentary, but I think the fact that such an experience director could overlook something so important, might indicate a larger issue: maybe some bad common practice in the industry.