I think all this stages can be summarized as a normal modern american feminist girl 😂😂😂 great video, keep it up and greetings from Venezuela

Masterful and eloquent. Wonderful comparisons to totalitarian racist ideology and satanic delusions. I can just picture her thinking “Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven” as she jumped ship.

to be fair it isnt like the orcs where just chilling and she decided they needed to die ,they attacked first .i mean some humans sided with sauron and she doesent seem to want to genocide them

This sounds like a Pokémon Evolution of a Feminist lol

''ConFFLicted?!'' - Demon Beast Galadrool

Holy fuck that's right on the money!😂

It is not ''Hollywood''. It is fem ideology. Always Plotting - please be brave enough to say it

Exactly true. Those people have no morals. Very little talent too. Just enough, to expose themselves.

Thank you.

I would reply : Because that's what you really are.

Hey another day another bastardization of the Tolkien universe, in the same way I have not expected to see 'stupid sexy Shelob' and we did in the Monolith video game Shadow of War, sequel to Shadow of Mordor ;). Jokes aside it's really strange how they depicted the character in the tv show but it's just another of the misinterpretations of the complex Tolkien characters...especially the positiive ones, the author of the video may be exaggerating at moments but it's weirdly accurate how he describes the compulsive need to fight in the tv show. Tolkien Galadriel was never that obsessed :)...what she had was an ambition to rule her own kingdom, desire of freedom and exploration, a bit pride but tempered with her deep understanding of others, compassion and kindness...all traits missing from tv show portrayal (plus book Galadriel had more mystical power interests, we can simplify her as 'sorcererss' type though to elves magical powers are part of their nature).

@@fantasywind3923 Sexy Shelob is stupid as hell, but at least the Shadow of Mordor games never pretended to be anything but dumb fanfiction for the creators to have fun with. I can respect that.

@@Whitby_Abbeys_Ghost yeah, I still will criticise the use of lore in those games, for indeed those games did a lot of stuff in weird ways, but of course it was nothing else than fanfic, with an enjoyable gameplay (but the story in thegames of Monolith as an after thought anyway), still I would love one day to see a proper single player open world RPG set in Tolkien's world using the lore to full potential faithfully :) there is enormous potential for video games in Lotr universe shame though that the license is so far in the wrong hands :), first EA in true manner of evil corporation cancelled the White Council project, a game that potentially could have been hit :) later WB doesn't do enough with it Shadow of Mordor and it's sequel are probably the larger entries and still they are but shadow of what could be done in the gaming with this franchise! The lore rich worlds are ideal for rpg games :) you can have something that would be better than Elder Scroll,s Dragon Age and so on...hehe, you can have a Red Dead Redemption 2 style game with large open sandbox that uses the lore of Tolkien to create vast living world and I bet the game would do well :). Thing is the Shadow of War went really off rails when it comes to alterations and changes but also in the same time wasn't really intent on exploring the intricacies of this world :).

@@Whitby_Abbeys_Ghost But the shadow of mordor its amazing fanfiction that its written well

@@fantasywind3923 She is a magic caster class, whatever particular class. Probably Noble Elven Maiden I would put it, which does not seem impressive at first but if you put in perspective: the fact that she is Thousands of years old; and the fact that she learned her crafts from the Gods themselves (the Valar, and Melian the Maia), it is something out of the ordinary. I wouldn't say she is a sorceress because there is a lot of reference in the book to 'Elvish Magic' particularly. So not sorcery. They say that to the elves their magic is Art, so the magic she does is not a spell, but a craft. Hence she weaves the magic capes for the fellowship members to use, capes which are almost supernaturally good camouflage, and in all terrains. Hence she produces the Phial of Galadriel, which can dispel any darkness. These are all items of her magic craftswork. Another example of her craft is the lasting beauty of beings around her, in Lothlórien, where time is stalled and things don't wane or die, but instead become renewed. She really has got some very overpowered stuff if you think about it. She also has the ability to have premonitions and look into the unseen. Unfortunately her depiction in this series twists every single aspect of her true story, down right to the core. If you look at the archetype idea behind Galadriel, she is the opposite of any evil. She is Beauty, Purity, Wisdom, Healing, Mending, Ancient Knowledge. She is a clear representation of Divinity. These guys are really some twisted fucks to have taken things in this direction.

Not Psychopaths. Victims and Cowards. Weak little Twats consistently fantasize about being the big bad super villain nobody can challenge and touch and who can let their negative Emotions run free because they remain unchallenged because they're oh so powerful. The truth is that the whole series is a self insert masturbation for fat landwhales with fantasies of omnipotence. The only thing missing was Galadriel having a literal Dick and fucking other Women.

i think it is because some people will never see women as dangerous or capable of being a threat or a person in power. so applying these attributes to a female character will never portray them as evil, brutal ect. in their mind. I also seen so many times now, that i think it might be some kind of fetish.

i couldn't and still can't comprehend the absolute evil of the nazis and this video was horrifically disturbing... being so disgustingly cruel and genocidal while taking a happy pride in it doesn't even earn you death anymore man

it makes me wonder what a society would think if you brought this show back in time 20-30 years

And why we all feel sorry for Adar.

Glad to hear it.

You say sarcastic but I was convinced with every fiber of my being. Not even kidding. Can't figure out if this is supposed to be amusing or not but there you go.

⁠@@oanaclapa3743 Okay nobody really cares do you find it amusing or not being so butthurt about that comment.

Sorry for not being able to understand, is the video really sarcastic? I would like it if it is as I dislike RoP.@@jout738

Yea I already thought she was a horrible character from a writing and a moral standpoint, but this is beyond parody​@@oanaclapa3743

Women are held to be good by virtue of their victimhood as women, white males are either villains or wimps. Identity politics driven 'entertainment' is trash.

@@DespotofAntrim there are enough "strong white male" characters in modern media... just the last movie I watched with my kids was the new Jurassic Park, doesn't get more mainstream than that, and guess who the main characters was? A strong white male who is 100% good and heroic. only because they aren't in every movie anymore doesn't mean they don't exist... modern companies just realized that there are more groups to market towards.

@@underarmbowlingincidentof1981 If that is your understanding then your lost already and missed the point.. You're a lefty at heart no doubt.

@@mygodisyahweh8634 so saying "marketing movies towards brown people and women is profitable" is me being a lefty? Sure buddy. leftism is when you market towards minorities

@@underarmbowlingincidentof1981 Still missing the point

Not to mention the Woke always, always, always tear down the heroes of yesterday

I can just imagine the writers discussing how the Orcs should be white instead of black. “Orc Lives Matter!” Geez…

@@ms1535 There is literally woke literature out there criticising tolkein as racist because orcs are apparently black people. I had to learn about it during woke classes at University. Was studying 3D game art and was forced to take a module about 'the history of video games and media' that was basically woke brainwashing.

Nah, wasn't intentional. They would never make a white guy look good and a woman be pure evil intentionally.

It’s a clear sign that we have our psyche fucked up in our modern collective psyche. These writers are no idiots. They represent the movement behind the ideologies that many modern movies express.

So she should just, like, date a guy because it could put a stop to genocide on an immeasurable scale or, like, whatever?! #NoMeansNo

She has that "flat-eyed" look that sharks have. No empathy behind them. Just a goal to be achieved/eaten lol

Tell everybody you’ve never been laid without telling them, with just a comment….lmao y’all are pathetic losers.

It's legitimately the empty expression of a psychopath. No clue if it's poor direction, poor acting, a mix of both, or genuine psychopathy in the actress.

​@@lewisyeadon4046Reminds me of the Bateman stare

Most Mary Sue with Daddy issues have that look... Check captain marvel lol

Why can’t it be both?

Patently evil, if you will

I think it’s absolutely both.

Most of Hollywood is run by Satanists. They want the audience to sympathize with the Devil (Sauron) while hating the righteous (Galadriel). They are not incompetent at all. Pulling off this switcheroo was a stroke of genius. Evil Genius but genius none the less.

Don't forget that Morfydd Clark has all the acting ability of a plank of wood.

This

That's Hollywood for ya

Hollyweird*

They are surrounded by "slay it queen, go for it girl, both brave and stunning" sjw agenda

Very good comment, and I would say pretty much exactly how it played out with this dumpster-fires creators.

Fuck peace.

The howling

​@@DespotofAntrimAll my homies hate peace

@@DespotofAntrim somehow, the beast returned. Will you once again analyse it?

Its almost like orcs are palestinians and elves/men are jews or smth

@@wanttogetfoodYes, Palestinian fanatic murderous population. Just like Morgoths orcs.

@@wanttogetfood Except that it's the palestinians/Hamas that want to kill all the jews

​@@wanttogetfoodit would be the other way around The turks had started and lost 5 wars purely to genocide the jews

the scary thing to me, is that.. I dont think any of these writers have seen Schindlers list... they write who THEY are.

@@Goldenhawk583 I think you're probably right. They used their life experiences to try to write a "conflicted and multidimensional" character, and what they came up with was Galadriel being torn between being regular evil and being psycho-demon-nazi evil

@@leipzigergnom Yes exactly.. and they think its awesome. Their lack of intelligence is very clear in the dialogues in the series.. they do not flow at all. But.. they do make sense if you think of 2 (or more) narcisists just speaking words at eachother, each wrapped up in their own heads, paying no attention to the one they are talking (to) at. If they were smart enough to make this brilliant approach version, they would also be smart enough to make the dialogue alliring, catching, persuasive.

@@Goldenhawk583 yeah, it's just a reflection of who they are

Bc the ideology behind the Amazon’s RoP is the true form of the ideology of Woke-ism. It aims to eradicate the idea that white people are responsible for the sins of their fathers. All the while all the other races are not (no matter how equally stained with blood their histories are). Woke-ism has also isolated white men by successfully convincing the world that white women are equally brutalized by the “patriarchy” (wtvr tf that means).

It’s sarcastic?

@@rogersstinson4019 If not sarcastic, maybe tongue in cheek? That is, I don't think he _really_ believes the show's creators meant to create Galadriel as a psychopath. It just so happens that their ideology combined with their limited skill and vision created this. But framing it as in this video is far more entertaining.

I mean the writers wanted her to be a likeable hero and accidentally created a psychopath. You could take this video 100% at face value and I couldn't even point out, why that's wrong. It is most likely meant to be tongue and cheek tho.

Yeah mb, tongue and cheek is a better way to word it I just didn't remember the phrase.

Many points are not good

We live in a world where Sauron has won.

Oh the irony. I remember that quote but I hadn't thought of it

You are right, this isn't Galadriel. This is Guyladriel, Incarnation of Evil, The Antichrist, The Reincarnation of Morgoth.

This Galadriel is a survivor of a recent war against Evil. With a capital E. All that was good and holy and beautiful has been snuffed out by it. Including the light of the trees. Their intent was probably to have her struggle with this before attaining Grace (probably by making orcs redeemable). If there was any mistake, apparently, it was not to hammer home Elrond (or someone) warning her that she was commiting the same error as Feanor (who was woefully, terribly undermentioned).

@@beorntwit711 This 'Galadriel' is a modern woke feminists take on what they consider a 'strong female lead', which is basically taking all masculine traits, putting them in them, and removing all feminine traits. Ironic how these modern feminists have nothing feminine or see any strength in femininity about them.

@@beorntwit711the problem here is that Galadriel just isn’t the type of character to do that. Any protagonist you’re supposed to like shouldn’t go on a genocidal campaign. Galadriel has always been powerful and glorious, not someone to do things that she’s done in ROP.

@@beorntwit711If the actress was given better direction, and the writers knew what they were doing, then such a story could have been well told. We needed to see the struggle between her love of beauty and her hatred of the destruction of beauty. Elves are creatures of deep and profound feeling, and it defeats the purpose of an elf protagonist to have those feelings concealed behind a dead affect. You wouldn’t even need to rewrite the story, just some of the scenes. And give the actress different direction.

@Aszkalonthe way you type is equally cringe

Which is ridiculous.

@@bigwezz Well it should be, and it probably is, but the way the story is presented in this clown series actually makes it plausible.

@@dany1441 Yeah I get what you mean, but its still ludicrous what Amazon are doing.

@@bigwezz Beyond ludicrous. What is most insane to me is how out of touch they are with their target audience. The makers genuinely believe in the diversity BS and feel they have to use ROP to proselytize, and are completely unaware that their audience hates it and wants canon Tolkien instead.

''All shall -love- hate me and despair!''

Funnily enough, in one of The Hobbit film, we see Galadriel quite literally vaporize a massive orc with the wave of her hand. And she even picked up and carried an unconcious Gandalf, a fully grown "man." Even so, she never once lost her feminine softness and air of goodness and light. She had even warned the orc beforehand not to impede her progress to Gandalf or she would destroy him. She literally gave an orc a chance to flee and live. She killed him only because he refused to listen and she made good on her warning. Now compare that to Amazon's black-hearted, demonic mockery that they dare to misgive Galadriel's name. Truly luciferian. There's no other way to describe it.

It is truely shocking that even Melkor himself would have been a benevolent paramount of compassion compared to a one ring empowered Galadriel. Melkor at least wanted to create and rule the world. Galadriel is simply happy to see it burn.

@@HickoryDickory86 Galadriel did indeed have a "Darkness inside her" but she was by no means, a Luciferian, she is by no means Pure Evil. Which is how Amazon portrays her for some reason.

@@Aufsammelkabbler not really morgoth wanted to destroy everything sauron was the one who wanted to rule the world

And then you meet the REAL Galadriel, who despite only appearing for mere minutes was instantly loved. You can feel her amazing power and she radiates beauty. And don't even get me started on Eowyn, who's myself and many other's favorite character.

All those kids are little psychos. Bullying and destroying other´s stuff for fun is a sign of narcissism and sociopathy. Her emotions (or lack of them) are disturbing in that scene.

It reminds me of a story by G. A. Henty. "With Wolf in Canada." The main character, James, saves the little granddaughter of an old soldier from drowning. The old soldier then askes the mother of James if she could care for his granddaughter Aggie for a few years and teach her to be a little lady, because he could not do it while running a traveling peep show. James becomes a big brother for Aggie and made a model boat to sail around in small ponds. The boat got stuck and James tried to dislodge it by tossing small stones to make waves. The antagonist, Richard, then comes up. He is the nephew of the squire and heir to a large estate and fortune. He had become spoiled and did whatever he liked. He took a large stone to dislodge the boat, misjudged his aim, and hit the boat. Aggie understandably became upset, and said that he was a bad boy to wreck her boat. Upset, Richard called her a baby and gave her a little push. The push was enough for Aggies to lose her balance, slip, and dirty her dress. James then gave him a tremendous punch in the face, nocking Richard down. A "fight" ensued. Richard, despite being 2 years older, was no match for James. Richard then tried to lie his way out of the situation with his uncle, but was disproven and sent to sea for a chance to reclaim his character. Soon afterword, the old soldier reveled that Aggie was the long lost daughter of the Squire's dead son. James would later go to America and have many adventures in the French and Indian War. Richard tried to get revenge on James when he tried go get James captured, (and executed), when James went to spy out Quebec. Richard's treachery was discovered and he was arrested. James however had mercy for Richard and helped him to escape to have a second chance of life in the colonies. And of course, James marries Aggie because this is a Henty story. While Guyladriel was ready to punch a kid for sinking her boat, James punched someone bigger than himself to stand up for a girl in his charge. Of course a male standing up for a defenseless women is toxic to Amazon.

​@@charlessapp1835 Very interesting comment. Would you recommend reading that book?

@@abooga8 I have read almost all of Henty's books,(nearly 100), and I would recommend them. Henty wrote books from about 1870 to his death in 1902. He was known as "the boy's own historian." Henty's stories are almost all historical fiction. The books mostly follow the same format. The hero of the story is a young man (usually around 16-18 when the book starts), and then he takes part in some conflict or war in history from ancient Egypt to the Boxer Rebellion in China. The hero is always a fine moral person who thinks nothing of rescuing someone who is in trouble. The hero is modest and always makes light of his achievements. The hero often has a mischievous streak in him to cause harmless pranks. The history in Henty's stories is for the most part extremely accurate. The only reason some of it is not is because the history Henty used is from the late 19th Century. The only time Henty changed history, (outside of the fictional characters), is in "In the Reign of Terror," but Henty admitted to the change in the preface of the book by saying he moved the event forward in time so he could use it for the hero and his charge's escape from France. Henty, being English, understandably has a pro-English point of view. But he is actually pro-Scotland in the book "In Freedom's Cause." Books I would recommend in addition to "With Wolf in Canada" are: "Beric the Briton, a tale of the Roman invasion," "The Dragon and the Raven," "In Freedom's Cause, a tale of Wallace and Bruce," "The Cornet of Horse, a tale of Marlborough's wars," "Out on the Pampas" (Henty's first book), "St. Bartholomew's Eve, a tale of the Huguenot wars." If you want to listen to a henty book for free, you can go to Librivox.org. The readers are all volunteers so some are better than others. The reader Mark Harris is really good, he did "The Dragon and the Raven," "One of the 28th, a tale of Waterloo," and "On the Irrawaddy." I read "With Moore at Corunna" and "Under Wellington's Command."

@@charlessapp1835 You're truly a man of culture. Sir, you have my respect.

The Rings of Amazon is an intentional subversion of not just good characters, but of the underlying ethical system each character/race represented in Tolkien''s works. "Subversion," starts with casting and costumes (and acting) physically depicting elves in modern terms, as either twinks or old queens. This was a subtle, "gay" subversion that the writers were likely laughing about until the show bombed. "Subversion," continues by depicting Númenóreans not as the strongest, wisest, most honorable humans in existence, but as reflections of the writer's modern views of populist Trumpists. This subversion of Tolkien for "modern" audiences continues with Orcs having, "humanity," and the evil of Sauron being not existential, not as their core motivation, but caused by societal (structural) racism. That was not what Tolkien wrote... Hobbits are dirty traveling psychopaths, having none of the delightful characteristics Tolkien endowed them...the opposite, in fact. Tolkien intended to write a very detailed, replacement, "mythology," for England and Northern Europe, which contained precise family histories of humans, elves, dwarves, and wizards over thousands of years. I wonder what people would say if Wakanda was sprinkled with random white people among the various tribes and families? Would that make, "sense," to modern audiences? How does inserting POC elves and dwarves in Tolkien's Mythology? (It does not) The Rings of Amazon, besides being an abomination celebrating evil (as so well pointed out by our delightful Despot of Antrim, above), is a direct insult to Tolkien and all Tolkien fans, it is bad film-making, and finally, it attempts to be a series of bitch-slap subversions of every one of Tolkien's character-types, and the ethical systems and beliefs they represented in his works. As a result the writers-director-show runners fell into their own trap, their mutilations of Tolkien failing to subvert anything but themselves, by revealing themselves as moral, mental, and philosophical midgets hiding in the shadows of Tolkin's literary and ethical greatness. Rescue the Series? I have an idea. Re-dub all the sound from the first season, removing all references to Tolkien. They have enough film to rewrite the scrip, & turn this pile of S into a B- level (non-Tolkien!!) fantasy that would be better if re-dubbed into something else. They can call it, "The Warrior Princess from Hell." Plus, redubbing would add a dimension of amusing humorousness, like watching one of those early Godzilla films with the bad English dubbing. Turn this tragedy into a comedy! If they did that, and actually adapted Tolkien for the second season, I might be persuaded to watch the first episode of the second season, but right now I'll stick to the Despot for my, "Rings," and other more proficient film-makers (Drinker, et al,) than watching any more of this Amazon Abomination. Another Brilliant Work by the Despot.

If non-Whites are People of Colour, it implicates Whites as colourless. I can't help but smile at that thought since it refers to "Saruman of Many Colours" in a way the scourge of the Eorlings. Evil can't help but show its hand. The Orcs are writing the script and not only with LoTR. Tolkien's works have taken a prophetic quality as if they weren't astounding enough already. This series can remain as a testament for anti-White hatred. Other than that, let decent people and moral studios be the creators of an LoTR series if the West wants it so. I personally will NEVER give as much as a rusted penny to thosee destroyers of culture who take a great man's works and twist and warp as sure as the Elf is twisted into the Orc.

Based School Rumble profile picture.

This is a character study of the legislature in the rings of power; it's not a study of her character in The Lord of the Rings. They are two completely different works

@@stevedoetsch That is what I meant to illustrate by taking the hypothesis of this show not existing. If you were to watch this and apply it to her character from the books or the film adaptation, you'd think whoever made this video was insane. And my point is that this shows just how anti-Galadriel the writing for her was.

@@deibellator1449 Yeah, without context some modern villains can be considered the hero and viceversa

@@tsunzucchinitzatzikisan2246 They don't have to try.

Same here. 😮

Modern leftism attempts to reverse morality. Thieves are actually heroes because they steal from wypipo. Criminals are innocent and get freed promptly by the DA's. Cops do not protect from the criminals, instead they are bastards. Whores are now 'sex workers' and their work is 'empowering'. Religious people are fanatics and dangerous. Galadriel was supposed to be a protagonist. All this is intended but the reasons for this brainwashing are not yet clear. However, it seems likely promoting this kind of 'morality' is meant to turn regular people into psychopaths who cannot tell 'right' from 'wrong'.

I gotta admit, I did notsee that coming.

It was the first thing I thought when I saw that. The white horse symbolizes death. Many war movies and TV shows like Fury and Peaky Blinders have used it. Game of Thrones did too after Daenerys' genocide. And Galadriel always rides one... Then again, so did Gandalf. But Gandalf rode many horses.

Actually this is a common mistake but the white horse was actually not rode by Death but by the first Horseman, Conquest. I am using the bible as a reference of course, and not the other version of the Four Horsemen which is "War, Famine, Death and Pestilence". While the bible's version of the four is "Conquest, War, Famine and Death". The horse rode by Death was called "Pale" in some translation this is possibly mistaken as "white" but it is not. It is Pale as in sickly, possibly a very pale green. Revelation 6:8 (Look! a pale horse, and the one seated on it had the name Death.) The true rider of the White Horse, is one of Conquest which is in Revelation 6:2 (Look! a white horse, and the one seated on it had a bow and a crown was given him, and he went out conquering and to complete his conquest) and 19:11. ("Look! a White Horse, the one seated on it is called Faithful and True, and he judges and carries on war in righteousness"). That could refer to be Jesus Christ. Biblically speaking, the color white is referred to as Holy and the symbol of righteousness and spiritual cleanness. But depending on cultures, such as ones in Asia, the color White represents Death. However, since we are talking about Tolkien and he does use aspects of his faith in his books. We should used what the color white refers in the scriptures rather than what white represents in other cultures. I think the show runners wants us to believe that this Galadriel is "holy" and "morally upright" which of course her actions in that show do not reflect.

@@TheStraightestWhitest Gandalf also rode eagles (or hawks).

Death did not ride a white horse, but a pale horse - sickly green-ish pale horse. Conquest rode a white horse. It also fits the new one Galadriel.

Yep, I thought he was going to mention that

Outstanding.

I'm autistic, but that was ashen horse. White horse is conquest, but that works too that in her hubris she went to hunt Sauron and orcs to stop them (lol) only in the end all she managed was that orcs get their own fire land, Sauron who was content to be a smith becomes dark lord again.

Actually, that is not correct regarding the horse. Death rides a Pale Horse. Pestilence rides the White Horse. Death is called the Pale Rider and Pestilence is called the White Rider. In this alone you are mistaken. In everything else, you are correct, I believe. Also, just to be a completionist, Famine rides a Black Horse, and War rides a Red Horse, called the Black Rider and Red Rider respectively.

@@carolthe13th60 Famine/Pestilence are the same, black horse. Red is war, death is pale/ashen and conquest is white. Usually it goes conquest -> war -> famine -> death.

@@valder8423 You are absolutely right. I could have sworn I was. But Famine and Pestilence are not the same thing as famine represents lack of food and pestilence refers to infectious diseases. Though sometimes pestilence can refer to something that is harmful or evil. The White Rider is also called the Anti-Christ for some reason. He carries a Bow, but I don't know what that signifies. So calling Galadriel the White Rider is a pretty spot on.

or to use a lesser example, in the very last Avengers movie, my audience cheered when Thanos used one of the infinity stones to punch Captain Marvel (one of the putative heroes of the movie, but rendered horribly unlikable due to The CM movie and the trash writing given to Bri Larsen) right out of the movie.

I would say that’s somewhat unfair to the average american, especially given how badly received this was by the majority of the public. Its a small subset of our culture who thinks of this as good.

@Matthew Cloutier a rather small subset that's currently dominating the culture and media, and is only now getting pushed back successfully.

_Wicked , Maleficent, Cruella, Rings of Power_ -- Hollywood are really pushing the female villain protagonist boat out in recent years.

@harbl99 I'll be honest I did enjoy Maleficent, it had it's problems but I think it was slightly better handled than other more recent movies

Could not have said it better myself!!!!

This

Great insight ! Yeah , totally makes sense. Guyladriel is a despicable figure , not to mention a spit in the face of Tolkien's work

Yep. I always thought that 'Strong Female Characters' displayed every sign of 'toxic masculinity' you can find.

Sociopaths and narcissists are manipulative too. The most manipulative of all are IMO the narcs. Psychopaths are emotionally flat. They are kinda robotic. They might be manipulative to achieve their goals but there is not that malicious, childish subtext to their manipulations like in narcs and sociopaths. They just don´t care. Sociopaths and narcs are more emotional, which is most obvious when things don´t go as they wish. They have meltdowns like little brats, the psychopaths don´t.

Shes not beautiful though she has such an annoying face

Beutiful? She looks like a snake woman

Both are equally worrisome

Both are equally worrisome

Echo.

Gotta love it when Guyladriel says "You will die because of me! 😡" when she and discount Sauron are the only one's that are left on the sea

lol he left at least the actor himself was so scared of her that he left the role.

uhm.... yeah... about that.... the actor that played Adar has left the scene, literally.

@@ZugzugZugzugson wtf ;D

6:00 Yeah. Look at The fury on guyladriels face. She is out for blood, and no ocean of it Will quench Her thirst.

@@echelon721 he quit the show dude.

Everyone in politics thinks they’re the good guys when in reality we’re all living in a world of villains.

exactly most of the writting is a subconsious projection, you write a story of your ''ideal world'' peter jackson said it in the end, he didnt want to write his own version of lord of the rings, but tolkiens, so what we saw in the original trilogy was the world and projection of Tolkiens real world not perfect cuz it needed to be compact in 10hrs but closer to what his world was, and here in the Rangs of Power we see the pure cosmos and story of the writers themselves! cuz its their version not Tolkiens!

Another reason for us to be grateful that the og lotr trilogy was created by people who respected Tolkien and his work

They are evil, and that is that. It's utterly pathetic if people can't stomach orcs. They're just the supernatural bad guys, end of.

When in the novel are we meant to care about orcs? A few times, but they're stupid and really just an obstacle. That is how they were intended to be.

I mean lighten up

@@ishmaelforester9825 Im not saying thats how the books portrayed them, its just that Tolkien never liked the idea of a pure evil race, but he never got to do much with it in the books.

A lot of people had a similar reaction to Galadriel, she is easily the most unpopular character of 2022.

it was 100% intentional. Even if it wasnt intentional of the writers, it is intentional as a general message: postmodernism. (And they just became 'useful idiots' for it). Postmodernism, now also known as woke, critical theory, progressism, and many other names, has one specific, explicit and defined goal: corruption, dismantlement, queering (yes, the actual definition and how it is used in the various 'foundational' texts, is 'to make crooked, to contort, corrupt and overturn'). Of old morals, of old archetypes, of old values. Good things? They are from the 'sexist oppressive heteronormative patriarchy' (verbatim) and must be broken down no matter what. Aesoph's fables? They have to go. Old saying and 'common sense'? They have to go. Morality? oh that HAS to go, especially since its whats in between what they want and themselves. All the safeguarding, safety and stability that we took millennias to accrue, consolidate, conserve? They have to go in the upcoming cultural revolution (the red book rearing its snake head from the cracks once again), to make way for the new world to come. It sounds insane when you breach the subject to normal people, and thats another way they feel safe about doing all of this. "A plan so insane it might just work, because who is going to believe the whistleblowers?"

àa

@@Apostate_ofmind Instead of giving it a false name like "postmodernism" just call it for what it is, freemasonry.

​@@christianriddler5063Its just communism, plain and simple Marxist ideology applied to culture. Erode the values of society so that the people are reliant on the government for everything, and then take over the government while everyone is foudationaly lost. Most times the people who spout this nonsense do it in the opposite order, but you see it time and time again. At the end of the Reign of Terror, they tried to establish "Reason" as a God (The Cult of the Supreme Being). In Russia they encouraged people to turn on their very own families. In China they are afraid of any mention of their own history or folklore, that they've tried to bury it in places. That's the reason why ghost movies and talking animal films are banned. Point to a communist country and you'll see similar issues.

Aren't real psychopaths supposed to be very sociable and using that to their advantage while being internally emotionless?

I made that point in part one of this video (Galadriel is a psychopath).

1. Feanor wasn't in the Jackson movies and therefore doesn't exist from the writers' perspective. 2. Feanor doesn't have a vagina and therefore doesn't exist from the writers' perspective.

@@SGresponse 😆 You made me laugh so much my Diet Coke went up my nose 🥲

Holy shit you're right, this galadriel IS like Fëanor, she must've sworn a dread oath too. also when does she murder half the elves to get to sauron?

@@snowdrop9810 Except lacking any of Feanor’s greatness. All we’re missing here is Galadriel bullying her husband and daughter into taking some ridiculous oath of vengeance.

@@alexw1698 Yeah, Feanor was not a sociopathic murderer, he was more of the mad scientist driven to accomplish at all costs.

That would explain a lot.

Glad you enjoyed it!

True craftsmanship

simply amazing farse! While RoP is just horrible because it's bad, the writing in this video truly elevates what mistakes it made, to the comedy level!

All of galadriers actions only enforce this analysis of Her intentions.

I find it very sad and disturbing that Galadriel not displaying emotions was a creative decision, not inability to act from the actress. We can see her smiling all the time in videos showing the making of the show.

@@rafexrafexowski4754 The woketards see women who don´t show any positive emotions as "strong and badass".

Who writes their main character as completely unlikeable? George Lucas did it with Anakin, but it was because he was supposed to become Darth Vader. We already knew the ending. Galadriel is supposed to be powerful, wise, majestic. They created her to be a psychotic bitch lol

@@logicaldude3611 In the creators' woke eyes, a perfect "strong woman" is one that can do absolutely anything, has no character flaws, does not need any form of help from a (usually white) man (who are shown as pathetic), if anything bad happens to her, she cannot get over the grief of it and the hate that it brings becomes her main character trait, villains are meant to be weak and pathetic, often absolutely obliterated by the "strong female" hero and eventually turning into comic relief or a likeable protagonist-like character, the "strong female" has to be automatically accepted by any (female and/or non-white) side characters as a friend even if they have just met her, she has no character arc and stays as perfect as she started as or she has a pseudo-arc that does not actually end with her changing but seems like it does, and finally she has to have no (usually white) male partner/love interest/husband, and even if she has one they have to either be a pathetic loser or end up revealed as evil, going as far as to getting rid of those characters from the source material (if there are any). All of those rules result in the character coming off either as a tool to drive the plot forward, as a literal plank of wood with no emotions or character traits, or as a villainous, unlikeable b*tch that makes the villain look like the hero (sometimes all three, like we see with RoP Galadriel)

@@logicaldude3611 Anakin was not unlikable.. Wtf? He wanted to free his family from slavery, he wanted to help innocent people and this is why he wanted to be a Jedi Knight. He was inspired by the selflessness and compassion of the Jedi but also inspired by their great ability to fight evil. Anakin was driven by love for others through out the movies. Thanks to Palpatine's manipulations however, Anakin became afraid, fear took him over, fear over losing the ones he loved, especially his wife Padme. So Anakin became obsessed with finding a way to save his wife from death, his fear drove him to madness and it consumed him which drove him to become the monster we know as Darth Vader. Anakin is a relatable and human character, he is very likable and realistic. But I guess you are just another prequel hater without any substance or reality in your arguments, just blind hatred for the character because a ton of other people feel that way.

By creating a "mystery box" around him, and then ignoring the lore. Annatar helps the elves create rings of power [something Sauron can no longer do] which he then distributes to men and dwarves. The 3 Rings of the Elves were created after Sauron was discovered to be behind the crafting of the other rings, and so were less tainted [although not completely free of his influence]. Myster Box writing is lazy, but easy, which is why its so popular among those with no talent.

It was easy for the writers. They simply took their own personal beliefs, values and convictions and applied them to their main protagonist.

He's very likely still revolting on the tomb has it's still a fresh wound deep one too, I wonder what his sons thoughts are on this crap, and fun fact one of Tolkien sons was actually on the last movie of the return of the King, he was on osgiliath giving weapons

Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by apathy and ignorance....but damn, if they were malicious, they couldn't have done a better job!

@@stanbartsch1984 I mean, they are malicious, but they are incompetent too.

Definitely the second option. 99% of modern Hollywood writers aren’t intelligent or creative enough to do this on purpose. 😂

Rings of Power writer #1 to #2: Hans, are we the baddies?

@@Lonovavir more like "oy vey Shlomo"

I'm not so sure it's just a meme. It seems legit

@@dRoscoAZ I dont think the writers have the skill to do this on purpose.. they are simply writing in what is great and awesome to them.. and has revieled themselves, and the show without knowing. If they ever whatched Schindlers list, they have based her on the character that impressed them the most... and it was not the good guy, but I dont think it was meant to be so clear.

@@Goldenhawk583 I don’t even think have to watch it they just subconsciously take the side of the villains thinking it to be the good guys.

When stupidity and narcissism surpass a certain level, they become indistinguishable from evil ingenuity.

They are neither secret nor genius.

Thanks One Ring, glad you enjoyed it!

That is a damn good point.

I don't believe the scenes were meant to be copycats but it's still chilling. Next we'll find out Galadriel wrote Erika about herself.

@@Lonovavir It´s more disturbing because the scenes certainly were not supposed to be copycats. The writers are just so severely mentally ill they think a sociopathic Na*i character is a hero.

I have seen a few "good" characters recently too, where I thought this says a lot about the mental state of the writers. 😅 It's said that sociopaths and narcissists have no insight to how mentally deranged they actually are, even fully believing they are good at times. Yeah..... It really shows.

The Harfoots is an interesting idea but they are so boring and repetitive that there's not much material to work with. I have plans for them in season 2 though, I'm making a pitch to be the new ROP showrunner.

@@DespotofAntrim Maybe it would work as a horror film style trailer for the harfoots. Contrast their 'no one walks alone' mantras with them threatening to take peoples wheels and forcing an injured man to pull a wagon when there were plenty of others who could do it.

@@moseszero3281 Gollum's life story would be more suited for the 'survival horror' genre ;) I mean an insane murderer and cannibal living in a cave ;) horror vibes intensify hehe (by the way since there is a Lotr: Gollum video game in the making it's surprising they didn't choose the survival horror genre hehe).