Game Changer: New Pulsed Plasma Rocket Could Get Us to Mars in 2 Months

Рет қаралды 27,104

13 күн бұрын

Discover the groundbreaking Pulsed Plasma Rocket (PPR) developed by Howe Industries and funded by NASA. This innovative propulsion system could cut the travel time to Mars down to just two months, making space missions faster and safer. Learn how this technology works and its potential to revolutionize space exploration.
Best Telescopes for beginners:
Celestron 70mm Travel Scope
amzn.to/3jBi3yY
Celestron 114LCM Computerized Newtonian Telescope
amzn.to/3VzNUgU
Celestron - StarSense Explorer LT 80AZ
amzn.to/3jBRmds
Visit our website for up-to-the-minute updates:
www.nasaspacenews.com
Follow us
Facebook: / nasaspacenews
Twitter: / spacenewsnasa
Join this channel to get access to these perks:
/ @nasaspacenewsagency
#NSN #NASA #Astronomy#MarsMission #NASA #PulsedPlasmaRocket #SpaceTravel #HoweIndustries #SpaceExploration #MarsInTwoMonths #NewRocketTech #FasterSpaceTravel #NuclearPropulsion #InnovativeTechnology #Astronauts #SpaceSafety #FutureOfSpace #MarsBase #InterplanetaryTravel #ScienceNews #SpaceInnovation #RocketScience #MarsJourney #SpaceMission #AdvancedPropulsion #NASAResearch #SpaceTech #MarsExploration #ExploringMars #SpaceFrontier #HumanOnMars #RocketDevelopment #SpaceUpdates

Пікірлер: 40

@TrayTerra 10 күн бұрын

Increasing velocity and shortening arrival time isn’t the hard part in all this, the hard part about that is slowing down upon arrival with engines like that. Only thing that comes to mind is reaching somewhere close to but not too close to the edge of Mars’ SOI, and engaging the engine for a long duration locking in the orbit itself then lowering it from there…but even then if it isn’t enough change in velocity to lock in a safe orbit, that could be a bad scenario. Would also be the case if there isn’t enough fuel for that kind of burn time, you also need ISRU or some others way to refuel, a proper vessel to take down to the surface from there, etc. No doubt we can make it there eventually though, something like this would be fantastic for transporting cargo and personnel to and from other vessels, namingly stations, in orbit of destinations, provided it is possible to make the rendezvous happen with that kind of engine upon arrival.

@Blubb5000 10 күн бұрын

That’s almost exactly what I wanted to write. The Heugen transfer is the best and most economic way to get to Mars. Everything else needs lots more power for the acceleration and deceleration. Speed isn’t everything. Delta V is the most important thing in space.

@mikeb.7068 9 күн бұрын

My first thought also. Rocket malfunctions on the deceleration phase and astronauts are screwed.

@jhonkarter9801 12 күн бұрын

Greed Stands in Way

@user-oq8ji2jm5b 11 күн бұрын

Excellent, Yet we still need much faster

@FaeTheo 12 күн бұрын

This is only in phase two.

@scottmckinney9073 11 күн бұрын

Awesome!! Let's get this mission going

@iloveemeralds4622 4 күн бұрын

Can we please get a source on this. I would enjoy reading it for more information.

@krisdunwoody7037 11 күн бұрын

Invent "Warp Drive Engines" and Star Ships like the NCC-1701. Go to Planets like ones around the Alpha Centura Stars, in just 2 months!

@johnvaleanbaily246 11 күн бұрын

Fisson based or vision based !!??

@youngmangrand9331 10 күн бұрын

It's years away from being developed

@rk-fb5hw 9 күн бұрын

Sounds good but I'm still waiting for warp drive.

@unohu88 11 күн бұрын

Let’s explore those lunar caves too.

@allgoo1990 10 күн бұрын

Cost?

@enoch7thadam1st2 10 күн бұрын

and where do you push from if there is no resistance to using your nuc missile

@unohu88 11 күн бұрын

Maybe we’ll reconnoiter with Voyager someday.

@DwayneETowns 2 күн бұрын

But what happens if it hits a micrometeor??? Or how would it avoid space debris?

@rickyromero8056 12 күн бұрын

A VISION based propulsion system? VISION based? I guess all the astronauts have to have better than 20/20, eh?

@usemorewood3184 11 күн бұрын

They’re all going to look out the back because hindsight is greater than foresight

@user-sy8et1cr2z 9 күн бұрын

''4-6 months" *4 years*

@michaelrainerii3547 2 күн бұрын

How's the brakes? Slowing down will be just as important and launching again.

@markkmiecik9797 9 күн бұрын

What is a vision based power source?

@steventhompson9672 9 күн бұрын

I think the narrator actually said, and the writer probably meant, "fission," but the subtitles went for the more common word.

@scottzema3103 9 күн бұрын

Nuclear propulsion in outer space? Sounds good but isn't there a treaty ban?

@Jadenrocha9871 8 күн бұрын

It’s about nuclear weapons not nuclear propulsion hopefully this helps

@darrellrobinson6200 9 күн бұрын

How about fixing and cleaning up earth? Tax dollars would be better used to help mankind.

@user-rr4ws2ds2h 7 күн бұрын

Knows how old some did not scientist not a lot yes is more efficient and more and more flush if it what and you do have a problem they have them. I don’t have double pick up that high floss. Low deficiency in nuclear and color is good if you have high foot and high efficiency.

@MarkDonahue-re6iw 9 күн бұрын

Yeah but we'd probably be a splat in the back of the rocket

@BentReality.369 9 күн бұрын

Also stopping could become a pancake issue.

@4NickAder 8 күн бұрын

great job President Biden

@astridheliroemer7314 12 күн бұрын

❤🎉

@trudybutcher6256 9 күн бұрын

Wow a vision not for me ty

@chrissantoaji242 12 күн бұрын

Better change the spacecraft of voyager with this spacecraft. This spacecraft can make the oldman may happier.

@brionfranks478 10 күн бұрын

DANGER WILL ROBINSON ! CLICK BAIT AHEAD ! The big problem with this and every other propulsion method is that they are all rockets of one kind or another that require ENOURMOUS AMOUNTS OF FUEL OR PROPELLANT reaction mass to produce thrust.