Amen.

Sorry to hear if your loss As Ashley Said tho his tactics just provoke a reaction and enflame the situation. Sadly Mickys methods will soon pr9vike someone enough to react putting both party's at possible harm. A cyclist using a selfie stick while riding can cause themselves alot of injury and if they collide with a car would the motorist be seen at fault for not giving enough space to a cyclist that had Intentionally encroached on a other roads users space Micky never has a comment for cyclists flaunting rules Only Motorists which personally I feel shows his dislike for cars and vans in general. I wish no harm to any person But I wouldn't be shocked if one day his actions will lead to him having his equipment taken/broken and him put at risk

@@londonlad2585 never is pretty strong. He often speaks to them as they go by but states that he doesn’t want to endanger them. Same with motorcycles.

@@jjrscott So you agree he only takes issue with motorists as he doesn't want to endanger cyclists by communicating the error they are doing just as bad as a driver being on the phone or the wrong side of the road. If a cyclist and a motorist collide it's seen as the drivers fault and if the cyclist or a pedestrian is injured or killed the driver at fault or not will carry the incident with them. I've had a cyclist fall off a bike trying to undertake me and nearly killed the person if I hadn't slammed on brake and put my car on other side of the road to save life and instead have to pay for a at fault crash as I collided with a car and the cyclist wanted to fight me for his error

@@jjrscott Only last year I had a MAMIL (MIDDLE AGED MAN IN LYCRA) Ignore roundabout priority as obviously he's more important and nearly went under my wheels or over my bonnet and he gave me the wanker gesture. When I followed and looked for a police officer as we were in a royal park I was told to be more considerate and give way to a cyclist even tho I had right of way and he pulled infont of me on my Left on a roundabout.

Fly you fools!

Would love to see that 😂

YOU SHALL NOT PASS!! XD

Gareth F More like “YOU SHALL gOeW bEcK!”

@@gareth14111984 "Keep left, fool of a Took!"

People don't know that his father was killed in a road accident so for for him (CyclingMikey) it's very personal.

@@ramatgan1 He is also know for filming women in there cars, nothing gets said about that does it??

@@simonwalker8674 That's bollox

@@richardclarke9966 Its not bollox its true.

​@@simonwalker8674 Are you perhaps a bad driver and featured in one of his videos?

He is guilty of invasion of privacy and also vexatious litigation . Moreover English police are guilty of breach of GDPR in releasing confidential data to third parties . Virtually every prosecution thanks to this obnoxious vigilante is legally unsafe and needs to be rescinded , along with compensation to those wrongly inconvenienced . Mental Micke ought to be charged for vexatious litigation and invasion of privacy ; in addition with careless cycling and obstruction of the highway . As a foreigner , he ought to be deported back to his native africa , where he would perhaps not have such a tolerant reception to his activities ; certainly in South Africa , were he to carry on there as he does in England , his life expectancy would not be enviable .

THIS!

so blast them on social media? please tell me how that helps anyone

@@kamo7293 I presume, this part is more for him. To keep him going and maintain a true vision of the balance. Because if he did the same thing _without_ posting it on KZfaq, he'd only hear the lamentations of those impacted and only rarely get a shoutout by the cyclists that he is doing the right thing - when in fact, the vast majority of people are absolutely agreeing with what he does or at least agree that this beahviour is dangerous and should be stopped. But as any "punishment", this also serves the function of _general deterrent_ - which is a legal term for the effect a punishment has on other possible offenders in the general population. The more people see this, the more people will worry that skipping the line in this dangerous manner will not affort them the time save they are seeking, but may instead loose them time and even see them humiliated on socials, the less likely it is that there are more offenders. It's called "social control" - and the Brits are big on this. So big, in fact, that they conduct all their policing under the directive of so-called "policing by consent".

I agree we should be building bridges with others of differing opinions, however I am of the opinion that what Mikey is doing is burning those bridges between motorists and cyclists not building. His videos highlight that everyone can make mistakes and bad choices but only a specific group by their group id will get punished for making those mistakes/choices. This seem to be the ongoing theme in many areas of life at the moment and all seem to be burning bridges between groups not building 🤔

I disagree. People do things because they think they can get away with it not because they shouldn't. I think lurking around bushes grassing people in (they absolutely do deserve it btw) but grassing everyone in in that manner will start to make him look like one of them wierd "auditors" that lurk around police stations filming. People will see him, get annoyed, not accept culpability because people don't like to be wrong so our brains more often than not don't allow it because it wants the dopamine off being right and then they'll just blame the tribe affiliated to the incident because humans are by nature, tribal. So all you'll get is more road users hating cyclists in a very similar way to why people hate vegans because people don't like to be preached to. Ultimately if I was morally obliged to go out of my way to catch people breaking road laws as this video says he does, then I'd join the police. Like there's things that boil my piss like people not indicating and it it allllways some nugget in a moody cheap car driving 25 down a 40 which winds me up even more because you're either overly cautious or not at all. Bloody pick one. But the point is I don't go around lurking on street corners to jump out at people with my camera over it

@@stoney2424 so would you also "build bridges" with rapists and serial killers?!

@@hymatwat9412 rapists and serial killers how the hell do you get on to that subject from a video on road users? Your mind works in a strange way, are you one of the above mentioned??

People will just use their phone where they can’t be caught. Like the open road which is far far more dangerous then standing traffic. Education is the key. Mikey doesn’t care about education he has more of a “gotcha” approach. Which ends up rubbing up the drivers who are caught red handed and the whole thing becomes pointless.

The primary difference is in the way you are going about things. You're just quietly doing your thing, no blocking traffic, confronting members of the public or breaking any laws. You're recording the offences being committed, and forwarding it on to the relevant authorities to deal with. And it would appear from your data that you're being successful. I have a lot more respect for your methods than I do for the person mentioned in the original clip. The only questions I would ask are if it's only drivers you report, or do you try to report cyclists too (if they are guilty of the same transgressions in your area)? And also, have the police or local authorities ever looked at safety initiatives or layout changes? If you're sending in a fair number of reports, someone somewhere must have realised there's something wrong.

@@mcdon2401 I appreciate this comment - one of these days I am going to post a video about all of this on my channel with some highlights of motorists that have been processed for the offences identified. In answer to your question about cyclists - in my example, there is a dedicated cycle lane, so they're often filtering in their own dedicated space and don't feel the need to contravene the sanctity of the keep left traffic island/pedestrian refuge sign. Also, cycling is not as common in the outer suburbs of Leeds and Bradford as in say central London - partly because it's very hilly and also because we don't last long until we're nearly killed (In my 6 years of riding daily I had 4 nasty accidents, none were my fault or could've been avoided. 3 were hard and painful, the last one was a near death experience which permanently ended my cycling career). What I will say is having a hyper-vigilance/awareness of wrong doing or selfish road use is not something I approached with a bias towards one vehicle type or another. I have verbally chastised red light jumpers or salmon cyclists and I have shared clips of their bad behaviour as examples of what not to do. That being said, if you watch Mikey's longer form videos he does the same to cyclists, he tells them off, he reasons that if he were to try and stop them and they fell off that they could get hurt and he'd be liable. And lastly, one of the current benefits of riding a bike is you do have an element of anonymity and impunity on the road. I understand this annoys some motorists as they think cyclists are getting something for nothing, but at the end of the day, if we rode our push bike at 60mph into the side of a school, orphanage, maternity unit, care home, we'd just be a stain on the wall, where as if a motor vehicle did this, there'd be untold damage and countless casualties... people shouldn't be annoyed that they are using the road on the understanding that they should be responsible and held responsible for wrong doing.

@@MiseEnZheng you've absolutely got my sympathies about the accidents you've had. Had a few myself over the years, and I know it's not fun, although thankfully I've been relatively lucky with my injuries only causing slight issues years down the line. So I can absolutely understand wanting to improve road safety generally, and in that area in particular. With any luck, your efforts will bear fruit in getting the powers that be to take action to make the place safer. And absolutely get some of the clips up, if only to show that there's an alternative to shouting and confrontation that can still get results.

@@mcdon2401 indeed, I'm planning to do a montage of some of the offences with a voice over just giving a little more context as to why I'm filming and why it's a problem which I have a compulsion to engage with - I was awake early one morning in the summer of 2020 when I heard from my bedroom a speeding vehicle and the sound of an abrupt terrible crash - then the sound of a vehicle speeding away... Isma Nawaz was a local member of our community and lost her life in an instance of combative driving on the junction in question. I spoke to the police who at the time didn't know the cause but just assumed Isma had lost control - I told them I'd audibly witnessed a vehicle speed away after the sound of the crash and that I didn't think it was purely accidental. It did indeed turn out a 2nd car had been directly involved and that driver is now serving a lengthy prison sentence. To me, the problem is there are too many drivers who take risks selfishly, they think because every time they've committed an offence it's been inconsequential, that they build an experiential-bias that it will always be that way. But it's not until something like what happened to me last year, when a driver ignores several give ways speeding through a junction and not bothering to make any observations, colliding with and maiming a cyclist, that their "chancing it" risky, lazy and selfish driving finally results in consequence. A while back I also did a video that touched on why cyclists "over-react" and maybe don't help themselves by having dramatic reactions to what motorists might deem to be fairly minor instances. In essence that there's often a lot of built up negative anecdotes and trauma in that cyclist's experience, and someone putting you back into reliving that head space/memory/incident for a moment can be really triggering. (It's called Cycling Incidents 17: on my channel, but youtube doesn't like it because the thumbnail is my bloodied up face and there's some gruesome injury detail).

@@MiseEnZheng unfortunately whilst the vast majority of road users genuinely don't want to hurt anyone, there are a small but significant amount of people whose behaviour is always going to be an issue. The causes may be wide and varied, but the outcome is frequently the same. Deliberately reckless behaviour that usually leads to someone innocent being dragged in. I will keep my own opinions on how they should be dealt with to myself, except to say that no matter the mode of transport, there will be a Darwin award for them at some point. Controlling and mitigating the damage they cause until then is a problem we're unlikely to solve any time soon, but they should surely be apologising to the trees that make the oxygen they have stolen from society. Outside of that, you've got probably a majority of people who want to do the right thing, but are unsure what that is or how to do it. That's the sort of people that are best placed to be educated, maybe they've never driven a car or ridden a bike, so they don't know what they don't know. We get them educated and the roads will be infinitely better places to be. Good luck with the videos. I hope they concentrate the minds of those who can be taught, and maybe even the ones in a position to sort some of the issues you'll raise 👍

Yeah, lame ass excuse. Hes just biased and hates cars.

Hmmm, but is willing to stand in front of a car and get run over?

No, but he's perfectly willing to force other cars onto the kerb running innocent pedestrians over.

​@@dontsqueezethecheese "Force" cars to take the pavement? Thats the rapist mentality.

⁠​⁠​⁠@@dontsqueezethecheeseforce other cars onto the curb ?? running innocent pedestrians over ?? He doesn’t Force anyone, they choose to do that & not one in his videos have been run over. That’s the most Stupid claim I’ve ever seen 🙃

He needs to go away and top making a nuisance of himself ; he is guilty of vexatious litigation , not to mention wasting police time .

Perfect example of why this kind of citizen reporting is justified, and why the inevitable cries in response of "But cyclists!" are misjudged.

Don’t agree vicious revenge and awful hypocrisy.

@@brianfitzell1664 Awful hypocrisy? How? Fiddling with a phone or making handheld calls while driving is known to be dangerous, why the hell should people expect to get away with dangerously breaking the law?

@@brianfitzell1664 You will need to help me out with the hypocrisy bit? What do you mean? Once you have done that help me out with the vicious revenge bit too. Banning distracted drivers is about making the streets safe for law abiding road users.

%100 correct, there is no excuse for these people, however many straw man arguments people build and they should lose their license for life.

How is he promoting road safety by leaping out in front of cars? He could achieve the same just by filming and reporting.

@@Dibley8899 The videos wouldn't be entertaining otherwise so he wouldn't get as many views and generate as much income.

@@cyclingSausage Never thought of that. Scrounging money.

@@Dibley8899 Scrounging? hahaha righto... He's promoting road safety by those people being corrected at the time of the offence. He isn't leaping out in front of cars, he's stepping out in front of cars, just as ANY PEDESTRIAN WOULD WHEN THEY CROSS AND DONT EXPECT SOMNEONE TO DRIVE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD. Fines after the fact, especially many week after the fact do not have the same impact, as when someone is caught during the commission of a road offence

Young driver*. Fixed, 10 months later but, you're welcome.

@@sugarrats666 Did she stop being female in the last 10 months?

@@peacemaster8117 I don't know, possibly? This is the diverse world we now live in, anything's feasible. Maybe you should ask this individuals gender if you're that interested. If you dare.

He also can always be seen telling the cyclists off when they do that. I guess maybe he wasn't doing it on the very early videos. But anything last year, he tells them off too. Just doesn't jump in front of them.

@@PovilasPanavas telling them off, is he their father?

@@curtisj2165 are you one of those "stay silent, and never say anything"? Do you understand that a lot of people do bad shit, because no one tells them to not do it. Then there's a part of nice people, and then the part which will never change. So, why not to try and make a world a better place?

@@PovilasPanavas better to mind your own business, that way you don't end up getting assaulted

@@curtisj2165 with that attitude all countries would be ruled by dictators.

Two doctors who actually help make people's lives better by treating illnesses, rather than a nobody with a bike and too much free time on his hands going round spying on people. Who's the scumbag?

@@IndigoJo so doctors are OK to commit serious traffic offences just because they are doctors. They have suffered dearly for their behaviour and I for one am absolutely thrilled that they have. Loved every delicious second.

Several points arise from this. If a doctor said that they were on an urgent home visit I guess Mikey would let them go immediately. If a doctor in such circumstances got reported then the police would probably not take action even though it is still an offence BUT that raises the question of whether we are all each others police officers? I don't think we are. At the most he should give them a note saying they've been cammed and will be reported. Even better the note could advise contacting legal advice as they will be reported. Then let them go. To me that would strike a balance between on the one hand just letting them go and on the other holding them up for long enough to inconvenience the law abiding traffic coming from the other direction. These long arguments with stroppy gits make good watching but are no more helpful than a more moderate approach would be. I do wonder how much Mikey is motivated by revenge for his best relative who was killed by this sort of driver. The desire to change thinks is admirable, but when it tips over into revenge it can actually prolong a feud (in this case cars v cycles) and that helps nobody. Just my two ha'p'orth

@@IndigoJo Doctor's aren't above the law, and to be honest many of them who are GPs these days don't bother treat or see patients.

Hopefully one day Mikey or his children need medical attention and it is unavailable because some nob head in Lycra is blocking a road 😂😂😂

Neal has got this wrong

You shouldn't need a no entry sign. It's not really an entry or exit. The keep left sign there should be enough (although here in Australia the keep left sign actually also says keep left). They're still choosig to break the law, they know theyre doing the wrong thing.

Yeah, society changed in that direction considerably before he started filming these, though he may have influenced a few _cyclists_ to start doing the same.

Including all the clips that Ash's viewers send in to him. Ash himself always deals with the clips he does in a constructive way (and his channel is a good one to watch if you wonder how this can be done). However I often doubt the motives of the cammer who submitted the footage because too often they seem to be wanting the loony road user to get into trouble. In fairness there are also honourable exceptions: especially when the cammer send in a video of their own mistake and admits they got it wrong

Mickey does it for the wrong reasons. Unlike Ash, he does it to fuel a superiority complex from the results of his actions and making videos. Whereas Ash, tends to take a far more philosophical approach and addressing the faults and solutions. You’ll never win with these kinds of drivers, so why lecture them? Especially in spandex and a daft looking Heath Robinson contraption.

@@ParallelSyntax I disagree with your analysis of Mickey's motives, while I certainly do agree that Ash's approach is likely to be more effective in the long run. Mickey's history suggests that he is doing this to try to rectify a wrong that earlier in his life has hurt him. That's not a superiority complex: that's taking shit and try to grow roses with it. It's like people who suffer cot deaths setting up charities for others in that situation; like cancer sufferers raising money for scanners that will arrive too late to save them, and so on Or are they just superior bastards too, in your analysis? Are you one too?

Yes, Id argue it's the big dash cam channels that started this trend.

He says the same about motorcyclists and I am honestly with him on the reasoning. I’ve seen so many motorcycle crashes where riders have just grabbed a fist full of front brake in a panic and I can imagine the same happening if a person jumped out in front of them.

@@FoghornWashington exactly. He does tell the cyclists off but short of pushing a stick through their spokes I’m not sure how he could stop them.

Yes - poor reporting from Ashley to have not seen this in the videos, as it's mentioned many times. Making 1 comment to ask Mikey, then featuring his non-reply to the comment made it even worse.

@@hennnnerz from 2 years ago, no less.

Yes, I'm not at all impressed by this video and decided not to subscribe to this channel.

I disagree, he's priority is road safety

@@middleman9183 if it was about road safety he would stand infront of the keep left sign which would stop car's and bikes making the illegal turn in the first place along with stopping them having to dangerously reverse back up the road. it would be safer for all parties involved but he enjoys the confrontation.

You’re one hundred percent right. The moment he got that argument with the two doctors on film and saw the millions of views roll in, he was hooked on causing as much confrontation as possible. “Road safety” is a pretext, KZfaq money is the real goal.

So anyone with a dashcam needs to drive in front of the offender, create a road rage incident rather than just capturing the offence and reporting it?

@@ashley_neal maybe by “creating a road rage incident” he’s also preventing a more serious accident occurring? Also it boils down to the publicity - he might be doing it for clicks, but any publicity around people getting caught driving in an unsafe manner and usually punished for it is surely a good thing?

@@ashley_neal No, I’d say best not to confront , observe and report. That’s a good way . Obviously Cycling Mickey has a KZfaq channel and wants content. Most dash cam users don’t .

@@ashley_neal I don't think Andrew meant to drive in front of others to cause road rage. If you did that as a driver you'd get ticketed as well. That seems like an immature comment or at the very least not well thought out.

@@ashley_neal Who is the one creating the road rage incident? The one holding a camera or the one shouting obscenities? You're probably right that it would be better not to stand in the middle of the road, but Mikey is not the one that gets aggressive. Most drivers back up when they see Mikey in the road. It's only the more self-entitled drivers that think he should get out of the way for them.

I'm with Mikey on this one. He already said it's not safe too attempt to stop cyclists, What would anyone think if a random person attempted to stop them. Probably think they are having their bike stolen. And If they enforced number plates and insurance many people would stop cycling, as in my opinion a law obeying cyclist is probably a dead cyclist

Yeah. That's true. I like the local Operation Snap videos that show the offence and the legal consequences for the same reason.

Sadly there's thousands in UK with up to 50 points but still allowed to drive, and because of these, folk have the mindset of there's no consequence so no deterrent, and I also bet they're pretty loaded so cost to insurance won't mean anything.

Yes, that's the important point - by displaying the consequences in terms of points, fines, etc, he's demonstrating that drivers' actions have consequences, and if that ends up in less bad driving like that, then it's a good thing. It's no different to what traffic police do on social media, though they anonymise the culprits.

@@EE12CSVT The problem with this, whilst I agree with your point, is that it is basically preaching to the converted. The drivers who pull this nonsense aren't likely to be watching his channel, and if they do, it's only probably because they want see see if they've been featured!

All it needs is the police there for a week or two, or a couple of days every month and ticketing everyone who does it, would soon put a stop to the law breaking.

​@@nickcastings1568Yep exactly, one fine for doing 28-30 mph in a 20mph zone which is so frequent in London and the drivers will soon comply.

@@nickcastings1568 Blame the _Just Stop Oil_ protestors who are taking up police time.

Sorry please explain how he is an extremists in his methods? He's never violent, or aggressive.

@@nickcastings1568 until the police are no longer there and people realise they can get away with it again.

I don't hate cyclists that report driving crime. I just hate all cyclists 👌

I fully agree. I feel like CyclingMikey is sometimes too "agressive" in a way, making a huge fuzz about small things that I would have just ignored, but on the other hand it's insane that so many people are more angry about a person pointing out dangerous driving and disrespect thrown at cyclists on the road, than they are about drivers endangering other people. I see it all the time. A cyclist makes a mistake? People proceed to blame all cyclists for blaming rules etc., but when a driver kills someone it's just a single incident by one distracted driver. Sometimes people even look for all kinds of excuses to pin the blame on the cyclist for getting run over. Why get angry at a man blocking illegal manouvres, rather than the drivers pulling those manouvres? In another video on KZfaq two cyclists cycled a few metres over an empty sidewalk, at a slow pace, because traffic was blocking the street. The comments were foaming at the mouth about how those cyclists dared to go on the pavement, supposedly endangering pedestrians that weren't there, but completely ignored how a car was illegally parked on both the road and the pavement. Cyclists are supposedly a huge danger to pedestrians, yet cars kill a lot more pedestrians than bicycles do (1 in 60 car-ped collisions kill a ped, compared to 1 in 217 for bike-ped collisions). The hate for cyclists is so overblown compared to the actual harm they cause, especially compared to the lack of outrage over car drivers endangering others.

I think I've seen that mentioned a few times, a driver struck and killed his father.

When he was growing up in South Africa his dad was killed by a drunk driver.

I have seen Mikey in more recent videos try and at least have a word with cyclists who are also breaking the rules saying "come on you're letting the side down". But he can't very well stop the cyclists while dealing with the car driver and he can't report them after very easily cause of no numberplates.

Yes his father was killed by a drunk driver, and per his videos using the phone while driving increases risks more than drink driving hence him reporting the phone drivers.

@@highdownmartin He grew up in Zimbabwe not SA

If you film the offender and report it, they won’t get away with it.

That last clip where's he's blocking the road, which leads to further road safety violations where cars driving the other way are driving over the pavement to get past just proves he's not interested in road safety or driver improvement through education. Get the video, send it in, but then, GET OUT OF THE WAY and let people get on with their lives.

@@RichO1701e agreed. It's attention seeking.

@@RichO1701e the drivers mounting the pavement are a danger too. Its the driver heading the wrong way that is in the wrong, not Mikey. If I was him I'd report the drivers mounting the pavement too.

@@glenn1534 you’ll notice on more “recent” videos that his bike is parked where drivers would mount the pavement. Other must have commented on it I’m the past.

And cyclists...

@@johnkeedwell5549 what about ism again. Drivers kill 1500 a year, cyclists kill none. Drivers seriously injure 200,000 a year, cyclists HIT , at all, 500 Also more drivers run red lights than cyclists, as a percentage, 85% break 20mph speed limits and 50% the 70, and so on. At all points the material prob,em is drivers, not cyclists.

@@robclayton9612 That makes it OK then for cyclist to break the law!

@@markm-ci6rj Rob didn't say that though, did he?

@@robclayton9612 That's a bit like saying Idi AmIn was a good guy because he murdered less of his people than Hitler or Stalin did. Militant road behaviour helps no-one. Reasonable consideration for other road users is the obvious way forward, we all get where we're going and causing the least inconvenience to others, although some people are just out there looking for confrontation. Ride/drive safe.

Yes, but in some cases, he breaks the law because he is less savvy than he thinks, although he tries to project he knows what he is doing. His video shows a whole host of road safety breaches, which he could be find for., and I suggest the police also be made accountable since they are aware of his actions in the way he carries out his crusade. I'm not going to go into chapter and verse. You must work that out by researching the law and Highway codes. Simply reporting the events to the police would surface and achieve his goal of bringing people to book instead of creating a breach of the peace or escalating to a Sec 5 PO or more, which he may also be party too. If I were the officer attending the scene, I would make that quite clear to him to cease, and if he continued to jump out in front of cars, I would be tempted to arrest him to prevent a further breach of the peace. Please remember that B of P is a common law offence and arrestable by any member of the public.

@@Dibley8899 except he does know the rules around around what he is doing and he has been doing it for years and hasn't been told to cease by the police for a reason...

@@Dreadpirateflappy His videos are full of committing offences in his pursuit of motorists and does nothing to attribute the same attention to cyclists based on they might fall off if stopped. What, they don't have breaks? He is a candidate to be arrested for breach of the peace offences, which the police turn a blind eye to. If one day a driver gets out of his car and lumps him one, then it may be construed that the event was instigated through Bikey Mikey leaping out in front of him, and the police complicit in the offence because they did nothing to stop this fool from jumping in front of cars. This idiot, of self-importance, to gather evidence, breaks the law to enforce it, and case law would suggest a defensive response. Bikey Mikey could achieve the same effect just by filming and reporting. Still, it would appear he is hell-bent on causing confrontation, which might lead to more serious offences and hospitalisation. If such an incident occurs, the police will have been party to this event, given they did nothing to warn this fool of his actions using a breach of the peace offences, which he could be arrested for by anyone.

@@Dreadpirateflappy That's because the police are corrupt and aware each time he jumps out into oncoming traffic, he runs the risk of causing a breach of the peace or, likely to cause a breach. If, in the future, he gets decked by some angry driver, the police would be complicit in creating such an event because they did nothing and sanctioned his behaviour. He could quite easily achieve his aims by filming and reporting instead of choosing a route of confrontation. I have also noted in some of his videos that he has also committed some offences in his quest against drivers. That's why I have called him a hypocrite.

Dibley your comments are strange. You are more concerned by his actions than of someone driving on the wrong side of the road? The reason his actions don’t break the law is a pedestrian would not be expecting to look the wrong way down the road when crossing If he just filmed and reported it would have had nowhere near the same impact. I would guess that Mikeys actions have made people think more about it and potentially saved lives. Is he a hero? No but he’s making a difference

Tom Scott is my favourite channel so it's interesting you make this observation as it didn't even cross my mind to copy Tom's style 👊

@@ashley_neal Not to say you copied really just a similar style. It was more of the video being a walk about talk to camera style instead of in the car. It seemed different and more informative as you was actually there (not saying your in car videos aren't i'm just saying it was different). It was like i was watching a TV show for a minute 😃

@@ashley_neal lets see how you react when your driving school gets a public audit . the last one i saw the driving instructors were very abusive and physically attacked a disabled gentleman who was confined to a mobility scooter .

@@markdunkling1604 Video? Have you got source footage i would like to see it.

We all want to cut corners in life? Really? Not sure you’ve thought that one through….

Gas lighting from the car-brained. Well said!

Yea true but he knows better and does it anyway. Actions have reactions, just send in the footage, confrontation should be avoided.

Exactly

Ash is dead on though. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Just because you see someone doing something they shouldn’t, doesn’t mean you should act all high and mighty and confront them. By all means send footage off, but to block the roads and bugger other road uses up over a pathetic argument you started and have no hope in resolving. It’s idiotic. Mike has a superiority complex and the results of his actions only adds fuel to his psychological fire. He will do it to the wrong person one day and if he escapes with his life, he will be lucky.

@@ParallelSyntax is it not a citizen's duty to step in if they see a developing incident that could bring harm to others? It isn't mandatory, but still could. Stepping in and trying to prevent an incident isn't a 'wrong'.

I love the whole view on cyclists being the ones who are bad on the road. Just so you know there are as many bad cyclists out there on the road as there are car users. It’s not the mode of transport it’s just there’s a certain % of population who just aren’t quite with it!

On one of his videos he follows a driver into a near empty private car park. He was upset the driver was using this car park when he wasn't allowed and he proceeded to troll the unfortunate driver, you know the old "you are going on youtube" sort of thing, until he over-reacted. Sod all to do with road safety just the actions of a deeply unpleasant individual.

He could just record and report the offending drivers. He doesn't need to stand in the road and cause a fuss.

Well said Sarah. 👏

@@TheLowerIntestine 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I think an innocent until proven guilty model of justice is fitting in most cases. While I do agree wholeheartedly that drivers breaking the law, and using their phone should be punished, I don't agree that that punishment should be decided purely based on one persons hearsay argument.

these days if you don't have a cam the other guy wins. Get a cam, they're not expensive. I've got front and rear in my truck, front and rear on both my motorbikes, side cameras as well on my best motorbike, a cam on my bicycle and even a body cam on my shopping bag. What you do with the video is up to you, but you can't do anything with it if you didn't have the ability to record it in the first place.

Also hopefully you agree with the fact that when reporting this sort of thing you shouldn't be breaking the law yourself?

@@John-Smlth if you directlynwitness them talking on the phone, that is by definition not hearsay.

@@robclayton9612 Huh, yep I'm not the best with definitions. I guess it would classify as first-hand or eyewitness testimony, but my opinion is still true that more evidence than that should be needed to convict.

With that chutzpah, it's easy to see why cyclists are the jews of the road.

Yep, he also gives out to them.

@@rabbiezekielgoldberg2497 excuse me?

@@Blorp_ The first step is recognizing all the problems you cause other people. Only then can you work on improving yourself.

@@rabbiezekielgoldberg2497 As many of the wannabe Lance Armstrongs are known in Ireland...road lice.

For Gandalf corner in particular I wonder if the island could be shrunk enough to fit in a lane for turning right on the left hand side of it, so people can 'skip' the queue for straight ahead without contravening the keep left, which would probably overall improve the traffic flow. I suspect there's not enough width overall though, but perhaps eg putting in a traffic light controlled crossing would allow for removing the island entirely...

I think you are right about road design. There is a road where I live that's posted at 30mph but most drive at 25 as the road has a block paved surface and a zebra crossing. It's like people just want to drive slower there including me.

they don't Netherlands has 3.8 road deaths per 100,000 people to the UKs 2.9 there are very few countries safer on the roads then the UK and the Netherlands certainly isn't one of them.

@@flemit35 and The Netherlands have a significantly less population than the UK, and as a result, that figure you mentioned, is in fact, inflated.

All that does is make the roads less efficient and accessible

Agreed Too many treat driving as a right that cannot be removed, and their need to be somewhere at an arbitrary time means they can drive however they like. This needs to not be the case.

Yet, on at least one occasion, he totally ignored a cyclist doing the exact same thing he was berating a motorist over. All caught on his own camera.

@@ianl1052 yes, and? He's one person. He cannot berate everyone every time. Ever noticed how the police don't arrest everyone commiting minor offences while they deal with something more important?

@@ianl1052 much harder to stop an errant cyclist who can weave past you and no registration plate to send to police. I've tried, eg in Woolwich Foot Tunnel while I was walking with my bike

@@robclayton9612 You mean how the police do nothing against burglaries and cyclists running red lights but have plenty of time to sit in a van equipped with speed cameras? The least he could have done is say "come on mate, you're making me look a pratt by setting a bad example." But no...cyclists can do whatever the f**k they want.

Mikey does nothing to improve road safety, his whole goal is to punish car drivers for the death of his father years ago when hit by a car, he is pulling the wool over your eyes my friend. Have you ever wondered why he never replies to messages on his site ? He has a very serious mental problem.

Stopping them would be dangerous because they might lose balance and fall off? 😂 what if they get hit by a bus then?

Yes - poor reporting from Ashley to have not seen this in the videos, as it's mentioned many times. Making 1 comment to ask Mikey, then featuring his non-reply to the comment made it even worse.

@@johnydnb you can see a bus coming and it's relatively predictable. You don't expect a ped to jump out at you.

@@robclayton9612 that still doesn’t make it ok to cycle on the wrong side of the road does it?

He's not. that's the issue. he's an appeaser, as I've described in the comment above - and we know from history where appeasement leads to.

But the cause of the driver behaviour is probably their own negative feelings about them being in a queue of traffic, being late etc.

Does everyone just get along mean that the worst behaviour needs to be tolerated or that everyone should follow applicable laws and regulations? Much better world if the entitled are inconvenienced by forced to follow rules and laws than endangering the innocent through reckless their actions.

Well said

I like this response!

Bang on.

it is wrong actually if he is or he is causing an obstruction to the highway.

@@stevecampbell7589 As I have said in my original post, the police don't have an issue with it and he has submitted plenty of evidence.

He regularly causes issues with his riding, I have seen him on west carriage drive a number of times (where the majority of the gotchas for mobile phones are filmed) and he swerving about and stopping in the opposing lane all the time

It isn't wrong lmao

@@marz_mitzi what isn’t wrong?

I think most drivers in London are cyclist haters to be honest.

@@bludgerabled disagree - I spent the week in London using the electric scooters and the drivers are way way way more tolerant there than they are in my home town

he does go out of his way to antagonize people he could just upload the video to the police and be done with it yet he tries to get some form of confrontation so that he can monetize his channel

@@dubreg6711 Exactly, he does it for internet views that's it, nothing to do with road safety.

@@dubreg6711 not sure that’s true / more name and shame

He's a sad, angry little man looking for validation on YT/social media bcos he's insecure. Almost guarantee he's a failed police trainee/mall cop. Nothing more.

@@RichO1701e you clearly know nothing about CM. The police are quite happy with him.

@@RichO1701e Maybe, just maybe, his actions have saved injuries or even lives. That’s not a bad testament in my book.

What about doing something to fix the problem in the first place 🤔 why are people using the wrong side of the road ? There's obviously a problem so why can't they see if something can be done to alleviate it 🤔 As motorists, we pay LOTS of tax - use some of it to help us !!!

I think people like myself and Ash who called Mikey out on it made his change his attitude to the cyclists Tbh I support what he does on that corner because if he saves one serious injury then it’s worth it Don’t agree with him hunting phone users in traffic jams

Only he does not 'always call out cyclists' and there have been occasions where he could easily stop the cyclist ( or at least try) . The little, half hearted 'come on, you are letting the side down' is meek and shows he is determined to embarrass car drivers, not cyclists. What he also does is force drivers, cyclists and bikers/mopeds to drive up on the pavement to get past his stand off, which often go on and on and on - yet why? He has the car number, he has the footage - stand aside, let the traffic flow again. I think his issue is not so much what he is trying to do but the way he goes about it. Too tunnel visioned and woefully self righteous.

@@eddieingalls534 This ‘What About’ is infuriating. I bet uninsured and no MOT vehicles pass all the time. Mikey should be checking the DVLA records of every vehicle. And that lorry had balding tires, why oh why didn’t Mikey measure the depth of the tred???? He’s just not interested in road safety is he. And what about saving the whale eh? He never mentions that either. Bloody waste of space isn’t he.

That's a fair point but a very condescending way of saying it

@@jamesmartin7966 no, it's a blunt way of saying it.

@@robclayton9612 I don't think those adjectives are mutually exclusive, but regardless, it certainly wasn't a respectful or constructive way of saying it. Whether or not the comment is condescending is besides the point anyway; that attitude doesn't help the discussion at all.

@@jamesmartin7966 yes it does. It shows that AN is missing a major part of how they can help improve road safety. Those idiots CM catches aren't ever goi;got watch any video about improving driving. They're so clearly self entitled and unaware of their dangerous habits that they won't see any need to improve.

No its police's job to intervene nd implement law..only think he can do it report such driverz to police..bt confronting them means taking law in our hands , u never knw wht other person is like...its same like confronting a thief or murderer , nt only u putting ur life to risk bt theirs nd everyone arnd's life at risk too

Do you actually want a you tube mikey prowling round every junction poking his nose in...really.? If he feels that strongly about road safety why dosen't he stand AT the keep left sign and stop them breaking the law instead of springing out after, giggling and hee heeing promoting his you tube profile. And finally how many of us, INCLUDING your sniggering hero can honestly claim they have never ever made a stupid mistake while driving. Main crime on this channel is the rotten stinking hypocrisy.

​@@ixa.m9915 Peer pressure is a powerful tool for curbing undesirable behaviour. 'The only thing necessary for evil to triumph in the world is that good men do nothing.' Passive acceptance/apathy towards bad behaviour encourages more of it. Shaming them when they've been caught on their phone sitting in traffic is a lot better than having to lock them up for being on their phone while driving and killing someone.

@@epsleon pissing people off rarely makes them safer drivers... if I put myself into the head of an agressive driver, I think that if mikey pulled something like this on me, I'd definitly do something worse. i.e. creeping the car forwards into mikey, mounting the pavement to get round etc.

Truth? then you only get there outside rush hour. As a motorist you are not bothered by cyclists, you can kill them, they cannot kill you. Cyclists can move quickly through traffic and as a driver I can be quite jealous of that but understanding. You don't want to hit a bicycle with your car. An accident is easily made. That is why in NL cyclists always have priority even if this is against the traffic rules. They are the weaker road users and motorists must respect this. Maybe you can learn something from this why your thoughts are not quite right. Greetings from the Netherlands.🌷

@@ariedijker2911 you have no idea what the cyclists here are like...NL and UK have different mentalities...come see for yourself

@@supersaiyanjin2199 I've been to London, which is nothing compared to Amsterdam or any other large or small city in NL. I am a driver and fully support the NL approach. We have to watch out and that's good. Every accident involving a pedestrian or cyclist is our fault. The mindset of road users doesn't matter, it's the regulations that matter POINT. Any lawsuit resulting from an accident is lost by the driver POINT. How difficult can it be here. For example, a roundabout where cyclists can cycle left and right. The 1st time you get a terrible shock, but you get used to it quickly and the traffic flows faster. Why? People are more likely to take the bicycle nowadays because it has become easier and much safer. I think that here motorists are better able to estimate/imagine what the cyclists are going to do because everyone also rides a bicycle. That can also be a difference. Greetings.👋🌷

@@ariedijker2911 no the point here is that the people who cycle here have no sense of responsibility whatsoever just because they are the priority...they need to follow the traffic rules like regular drivers....how many times do you see recreational bikers here who thinks they have tour de france on the roads and not even have the common sense to even signal when they turn? Do you really think you have to predict what they should be doing? If so i will agree to everything you say if the cyclist will have to pay mandatory insurance for damages

@@supersaiyanjin2199 Unfortunately, you will have to learn to live with it. I do understand your anger, but one more time they are the weak and maybe also the stupid, but do you want to have a dead person on your conscience? Yes, you can often estimate in advance what someone is going to do. You often see cars, cyclists, etc., moving or looking to the left or right before a turn or overtaking maneuver without any reason other than that they want to turn. In NL you are always at fault as a motorist in an accident and you will have to pay the cyclist compensation regulated by law. I understand that you find this strange and unfair, but believe me in practice this does not happen often and because more people cycle there is less traffic. Enjoy your car and smile a little meanly when it rains and it's Englend so there will be a lot of rain. I myself am the ultimate car driver, if it was possible to go to the toilet by car in our house, then I did. Please be careful in traffic there are a lot of fools driving around. It was nice communicating with you, more people should do that too. Greetings and enjoy a wonderful sunny weekend.🌷

cyclists have no issues stopping he just chooses not to confront them.

If comments are delivered in an intelligent and constructive manner they are always welcome on my channel. It's irrelevant whether we share the same opinion or not.👊

@@ashley_neal 👏

Ashley, I watch both mikeys and your channel. I enjoy both. I do feel however you are on the wrong side of the argument here.

@@ashley_neal Luxmore Road off Walton Lane is a black spot for this type of behaviour. Many drivers cut the wrong way down the one way street rather than following the route into the next road to join Walton Lane and this causes problems for those turning right into Luxmore, those heading north and south on Wlaton Lane and pedestrians trying to cross and having to look in an extra direction. In my experience I have mostly seen Delta drivers doing this but that is a whole other subject altogether

😂

I'm sure you're correct that you have seen such, however, this is not the case here. One issue with Ashley's videos is that they try to be 'balanced', in the same way a debate involving Flat Earthers can be 'balanced'. The idea that it is 6 of one, twos 3s of another makes it seem balanced, when in fact it is more a 100 of one and 2 of another. Yes, both may have some degree of potential refinement, but that does not mean scolding both equally is balanced, just like airing both as equally valid is not balanced. This is relevant because it makes the more egregious party think they are just as much in the right and therefore don't need to take responsibility. In clips like this, the cyclist is annoying, the car drivers are deadly - thats not balanced. The car drivers need to take responsibility and change. If you say its half a dozen of one and 6 of the other you get people like that 'helpful' fellow who 'has an idea, sir' trying to get the cyclist to move so the driver can enjoy the benefits rather than learning.

​@@RJWhitmore sorry where is this saying from... its "six of one, half a dozen of the other". The hell is two 3s? huh? But yes agree with you. Making this a balanced discussion completely ignores the fact that drivers and cars (and larger) are responsible for over 95% of all the accidents that lead to injury or death. While even with a car vs cyclist accident, the car driver is at fault more than 80% of the time. Cars are more dangerous when peole choose to do the wrong thing with them, or choose to be distracted.

I can blame Mikey for that! His actions of obstructing traffic indirectly caused other road users to take dangerous actions. Not all action need intent for it to be illegal, the lack of intent can equally be criminal. For example but driving without due care and attention may not of been intentional but it could lead to a fatal traffic collision, that is negligent resulting in Man Slaughter. That is an extreme example but it happens and they may no malice or intentions behind it but it is an offence. Mikey's principles do not outweigh the result in eyes, he should be given a warning by the police.

You absolutely can blame him for that. And his awful attitude to the man who wanted to simply have a conversation is horrible. What if there was an emergency vehicle that wanted to get down that road?

@@slyfoxyandalifesaver doesn't matter if someone is blocking the road in front of you, this is where patience comes in. It's still an offence under Highways act to deliberately and willingly drive onto the pavement.

@@pugsterjosh7925 that "man who simply wanted a conversation" had spent the previous 5mins trying to intimidate him. Watch the videos in context and you'll see.

@@slyfoxyandalifesaver he's not obstructing traffic he's preventing an offence. If he rugby-tackled a mugger in the middle of the road to get some little old lady her handbag back would you be blaming him for that?

The lack of camera there and at similar locations is proof that the government does not see the motorist as a "cash cow" like many scofflaws allege.

@@Dave-bu6bc they still regard motorists as cash cows because there are many fixed and mobile cameras in places where they know they can make a lot of money and aren't accident hotspots.

I believe they cannot install cameras there because its a conservation area and would need planning permission and would be objected to by residents.

they have a weirdo who does the job for free

second this, if i recall the reasoning for it is the fact that a car is more likely to stop, and at less danger to the driver than standing in front of a cyclist on their bike

Not at all disengenuous, he physically stops car drivers but makes no effort to stop motorcyclists and cyclists, instead merely shouting to them. It's clearly visible in dozens of his videos. Dishonest of you to deny reality in that way! As a life-long motorcyclist I'd like to see him make an effort to treat all road users equally. Even though it's easier for a motorbike to get around him and evade his efforts than it is for a car he should at least be stepping out and making the same amount of effort, not just giving 2-wheelers a free pass.

@@Dave-bu6bc it's not physically possible for him to stop motorbikes or cyclists, unless you are suggesting he should step out into the road carrying a long set of ladders! Doing this would likely put the motorbike or cyclist at great risk - remember, they are vulnerable road users too! A cyclist also poses much less of a risk to pedestrians than a car, so whilst they are still wrong to contravene that keep left, the danger they create by doing so is orders of magnitude less than that created by a car driver.

@@shm5547 It's not PHYSICALLY possible for him to stop car drivers either, a human body will not stop a car, that's simple physics. Most of those cars that he stops could have got around him by taking to the pavement and accelerating hard, anyone trained in evasive driving would have little trouble evading one person trying to block a gap of that size. The reason the drivers stop is because they encounter an unexpected pedestrian and do not wish to collide or evade, they just want to be able to ignore the rules and most of the times when they're forced to stop for a pedestrian the pedestrian then moves out of the way. Most 2 wheelers would stop for exactly the same reason. He might have a slightly lower success rate with maybe 1/4 going around him instead of stopping but he'd get the opportunity to "re-educate" the majority, he'd dispel the appearance of bias that his actions currently have, and it's not like he's expending a massive amount of effort just taking a couple of steps into the road. A cyclist can still kill a pedestrian, people have died from being struck by a bicycle, so the risk should be assessed as being the same, that of death. A heavy motorcycle weighs almost as much as the lightest car and the potential for damage to a pedestrian is actually higher due to the absence of smooth surfaces and crumple zones.

@@Dave-bu6bc as I said, trying to stop a cyclist or motorbiker would put *them* at risk. The only person being put at risk when he tries to stop a car is Mikey himself. There is a huge difference between doing something risky that affects you and doing something risky that affects someone else. A lot of people don't grasp this though. It's the reason there's a safe overtaking distance for cars overtaking bicycles, but not the other way round.

Firstly nobody should be on their phone while driving but the issue i have is GR was in stationary traffic and CM went out of his way going from the cycle path onto the road so he could creep alongside his car causing causing anyone filtering to go further into the other lane and as you mentioned CM was in fact at times on the wrong side of the traffic divide causing oncoming traffic to slow down because he was so focused peering into the car. I would say he is a far bigger danger than GR in this case but yet he didn't receive any fine or points it doesn't seem balanced.

Depending on the cycle being used, and if they're not going too fast, you can stop a bike in its tracks by grabbing the handle bars at the beam connecting them.

@@rogueuniversities6866 I'd have to check, but that might technically be assault.

@@rogueuniversities6866 That's just asking for someone to get injured.

@@nkt1 Not if the cyclist is going slow enough. I've done it to my siblings

@@sleekweasel Yeah is assault if they reasonably believed you were going to use physical violence on them, even if you don't actually hit them. But just as they have no registration plates on their bikes, you have no registration plates on your body. Run! :)

so you think it's better to stop the flow of traffic to tell off 1 driver and "educate" them while you know all you're doing is getting them more irritated which means they're not hearing a word you're saying? rather than it would be to record the offense/mistake and illustrate what could be done better to an entire audience who are actually interested in improving their behaviour on the road? seems to me that you annoy a lot less people with ash's method

@@OB1KXB but that doesn't get THAT bad driver off the road, which CM has done on multiple occasions. Both approaches have their merits, neither is superior.

I notice he's started parking his bike on the pavement that ought to stop people taking a short cut round them.

They're quite literally taking the pavement because of his actions. Had he not stopped that driver, that car wouldn't have been there, so there would have been no need to take the pavement.

@@CristiNeagu you really think that driving illegally is excused there? Really? They were not forced anywhere. They chose to drive there, because a driver decided to argue as to why their illegal driving wasn't that bad or illegal, instead of just reversing up and taking their medicine like an adult. They chose to drive there because they were impatient. It's yet more self entitled driver syndrome. Their perceived need to make progress at the expense of all others shining through.

Protesting with illegal actions (such as blocking the road) is not protest.

@@CristiNeagu of course it is.

@@maskofsan1ty It's not. You're not allowed to, for example, go punching people in the face to attract attention to some cause, no matter how noble.

@@CristiNeagu blocking the road is not an act of violence

@@maskofsan1ty Blocking the road is illegal, however.

“The wise build bridges while the FOOLISH BUILD WALLS.”

@@RichO1701e You live outdoors? Or behind a wall?

We need to be doing both. Bridges for cycle lanes to go over and divides to keep motorised vehicles out of the cycle lanes.

@@adamzain6770 it's a metaphor. Walls can be barriers. Or, in the case of our houses, they can be there to hold up the roof. They can also be sausages...

@@gavinminion8515 An obvious but poor metaphor. People need walls and bridges - literally and metaphorically. Building both is not foolish. Nor are barriers a bad thing: Your PIN number is a barrier, your house walls are barriers, a medical exam is a barrier, as is a driving test, all of which are positive things in a less than ideal world. Most of us rely on metaphorical walls for multiple positive things - peace, privacy, protection, (have you heard of a firewall?), and walls (metaphorical and literal) can be as effective in preventing conflict as bridges.

Improving road safety by walking out in front of cars creating a hazard, blocking the road, which is also an offence, and making money from it on KZfaq. Yeah he’s all for road safety is Mikey, nothing to do with views on KZfaq.

He would be attacked physically in my area he would be In hospital the first try and his bike stolen and camera destroyd and him left in the street

@@dizzygamer619 oh look at you hard man 🤣🤣 go back to bed

@@darius181818abl I didn't say I would do it lol

@@darius181818abl also I've seen people get jumped and pushed of their bike regularly especially now the E Scooters are out they use them to catch faster riders and if you have a electric bike you just asking to get robbed I'm from Newcastle upon Tyne

The big thing is that Police and emergency services in Ireland are exempt from phone and seat belt laws. Only the plebs can be pulled for use of phones or non wearing of seatbelts. Exemptions are made for door-to-door deliveries but such deliveries are rare nowadays. I am lucky to have handsfree which is a boon for calls. I do not use the phone for satnav unless I can set up the thing at a standstill before actually moving off.

You can get run over if you step out in front of a car🤪

@@Plexipal Well he never has, and he’s not likely to, so what’s your point? Seriously?

I've heard the excuse, but don't accept it as fact, it's a weak excuse at best. He doesn't jump out at the last second and force them to emergency-stop., he gives them enough time to stop, and they're mostly well under the speed limit anyway. Every motorcyclist has had training, it's called a CBT, you're not allowed on the road without it, they shouldn't be losing balance just because they're forced to stop any more than a car should be going into an uncontrolled skid just because it's forced to stop. This mythical cyclist who is going to fall off just because someone walked in front of them would probably fall under the wheels of a truck pretty soon anyway, being forced to come to a halt in a timely manner is part and parcel of using the roads, if you can't manage that you're a danger to yourself. If it was true that being forced to stop caused 2 wheelers to fall off then every busy zebra crossing and every traffic light with a shorter than average amber would be carnage with cyclists and motorcyclists rolling in the road and bowling down pedestrians on a daily basis. Mikey gives cars as much chance to stop as most pedestrians give to all types of traffic at the average zebra crossing. If it's good enough for everyone at a zebra there's no reason why it's not good enough for 2-wheelers at Gandalf corner. I fully support what Mikey does, but I don't support his excuse for giving 2 wheelers a free pass.

id stop a cyclist any day, even if it means taking them down if they abusing road rules as i try to cross

That is the least believable explanation I've ever heard. I think it is because of the car's maneuvreability. Motorcyclists and cyclist wouldn't give a toss about him and would just go around.

ANPR camera , excellent idea.

While I'm sure the ANPR camera would pay for itself in fines issued, they shouldn't be installed because someone is being cavalier. Honestly I'm surprised Mike hasn't got a warning from the police himself for obstructing traffic. No traffic shouldn't take dangerous manumeas to drive on the wrong side of the road, but likewise don't give an incentive for someone like Mike to take matters into their own hands.

ANPR isn't going to stop any of the other road users breaking the law or behaving dangerously. Better to have a couple of coppers standing there. The fines will pay the wage bill, and the sight of traffic police may be enough to have most of the potential transgressors suddenly behave themselves.

@@slyfoxyandalifesaver he isn't obstructing traffic, he only steps into the road when it's to prevent an offence being committed and he gets back out of the road as soon as the offenders vehicle is no longer positioned to commit the offence, so that's legal, it's using reasonable force to prevent an offence.

Royal parks authority won't allow cameras