I've never seen Gareth interrupt a guest so much as this - very annoying

Gareth, why you always interrupt? Either way, I know Tristan for a long time and his people around him the past years - and the politics involved. Tristian and Cliff are, very similar in many regards. And both are very territorial on their broadcasting medium. This show was about Gareth, not Tristan. Maybe Tristan should invite G and we turn the table around. As said, they are very similar.

Interrupting 😡

First interview I've ever seen were Gareth does not let the interviewee complete their answers. Piers Morgan style :(

I don't normally enjoy these pre-recorded shows after a nice shower in the morning, but this episode was fire. Gareth had his Debora Patta mode switched on.

Came straight here from Tristans' comment section❤

It's great that you asks these questions, Gareth.

This was a great discussion loved every minute of it.

Let the guy talk @G ffs!

I think you got stuck talking about Satanism as a response to Christianity, it is a pity Gareth doesn't allow Tristan to get to the real discussion. I guess that's why it is called the occult for a reason, the secret knowledge is only available to some.

Great insight

If someone, anyone isn't free, then none of us are. Fight for minority rights, Tristan; you don't need a mandate! I only see a lot of privilege from a fellow atheist - the lived experience of most does not reflect his own

I wonder why the host interrupted the guest, not allowing the guest sufficient time to answer questions?

My main question to Christians was, "why is it that there is so much pain and suffereing under the watch of the Christian God" and all"" prayers fall on deaf ears. No christian person or leader could explain it to me throught their own wizdom or using biblical scripture. In fact they stumbled over them selves in an atempt to answere the question but couldn't. Gareth, I love your show! But you need to let the man with understanding speak!😂 We want to learn😊

The need for content and talking points has become critical for cliff central. This is scraping the barrel

Gareth well done! I always knew you were well read. You have surpassed yourself. Genius comes to mind. You won hands down!!!

Get JamJam on

Now this should be intersting. I can't wait.

""Thumbs up"" button not working in this video either.

Twee van my gunstelinge. Het die gesprek geniet. Ook aangenaam verbaas toe Cliff noem dat hy ook hun ongelowige is.

if you have the back bone for a real conversation invite Grant Retief (Christ Church Stellenbosch) onto the show, and ask him the same questions..

Gareth, rather listen to your staff next time.

This seems like yet another spinoff of some wokey BS grift

Love your brain Gareth, interrupt away 🙏🏻

I am in 3 minds. 1. Subject is a win 2. Gareth constantly interrupted. This is not like him... And I'm a bit disappointed 😢 3. Gareth won with reason, as if it was a competition, the poor oke jumped from point of view to another. Not quality at all.. Sorry G, I love you but... Nah

Worst ever in every sense ☹️

This interview is a mess. It's like Cliff thought he'd just wing it without doing any research. Probably thought because he picked up a smattering of hot takes on philosophy and Christian history over the years he’d be set to take on this subject. It’s more like a platform for his ideas and biases than an interest in letting his guest speak. Though Kapp needs to temper his inclinations to throw in off topic quotes and work on curbing a tendency to ramble. It's podcast fodder of the worst kind.

Tristan seem to be under the influence of Restorationism (Biblical Primitivism) and Post modernism. To explain this to someone, let's start by breaking down the key concepts and then showing how they are being combined in this focus. 1. **Restorationism/Christian Primitivism**: This movement seeks to return Christianity to its original, early church practices and beliefs, arguing that over the centuries, certain interpretations and traditions have strayed from the true teachings of Jesus and the apostles. Restorationists often scrutinize historical and biblical texts to identify what they believe are the most authentic forms of Christian faith and practice. 2. **Postmodernism**: A broad intellectual stance that challenges the idea of universal truths and objective knowledge, emphasizing instead that our understanding of reality is shaped by cultural contexts, language, and power dynamics. Postmodernism encourages questioning established narratives and interpretations, suggesting that meanings are multiple and subjective. When he is using a mix of Restorationism and Postmodernism in his work to argue that Christian interpretations of homosexuality (or sexuality in general) are wrong, he is engaging in a multi-layered analysis: - **From the Restorationist perspective**, he might be examining early Christian texts, including the Bible, to argue that the earliest followers of Jesus did not understand or condemn homosexuality in the ways contemporary Christians do. He may look for historical evidence to suggest that current interpretations are based on later cultural biases rather than original teachings or understandings. - **Incorporating Postmodernism**, he challenge the notion that there is one "correct" way to interpret biblical texts about sexuality. He argue that interpretations are influenced by cultural, social, and historical contexts. This perspective allows him to question dominant Christian narratives about sexuality, suggesting that these interpretations are not objective truths but rather constructions that reflect specific power relations and cultural norms. By combining these approaches, he is essentially arguing that not only have Christian interpretations of homosexuality deviated from the original teachings of Christianity (a Restorationist claim) but also that the very process of interpretation is influenced by subjective perspectives and cultural contexts (a Postmodern claim). He might conclude that contemporary Christian condemnations of homosexuality are more a reflection of modern biases than an accurate understanding of early Christian teachings or the inherent meanings of biblical texts. Classic PHD bait.

Tristan you are wrong about the Constitution - Section 15 "Everyone has the right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief and opinion."

Terrible Terrible interview.

Rarely have I witnessed a more confused character. Gareth is right, therapy for Tristan, don't pass go!

Read Satanism in SA by captain Jonker

Gareth.....die vriendelike outjie is vir my "creepy"

Too many false assumptions. And inaccurate historic representation does not make it suddenly true. When comparing religion, at least ensure you define Christianity correct. There are so many inaccurate statements about Christianity. SO many things said here about Christianity is blatantly false. There are lots of people calling themselves Christian THAT ARE NOT CHRISTIANS by a long shot. So many arguments here fall flat. Lots of terrible people give Christianity a false impression because of them doing unchristian things. So, discuss what you like It is interesting. But it would have been nice to see a true representative of the Christian world there as well. Many people are insanely unhappy about their life, and this is mostly not Christianity's fault. The world is a crazy place. This guy grew up in a world we grew up. White apartheid South Africa and I can say with certainty say what he has gone through was not the norm. Lots of people in that time, calling themselves Christian, did the most horrible things. So, to now scream at religion when people were the issue back them is way off. HE clearly has confusion due to now structure in his childhood and now all of a sudden it is the whole system that is the problem, rather than his view. He just seems to be not able to rationalize his view as reality and the norm without blaming the whole system.

Why worship Satan? He is a lower level god. God is God