yessir

Yah this man is a natural.makes look so easy but trust me its not. So its a YES for Mr George

tbh it probably isnt as good as loi tv

@@tidlif6671 Who?

That’s funny....because Odio didn’t give effort and was lazy you some how dismiss that with him even though manager said it; but then turn around and blame others for those things which is total conjecture. LMFA at how lame. Showing favoritism eh?

More yancelloti!

The 2 goats are here

Both!

That’s funny....because Odio didn’t give effort and was lazy you some how dismiss that with him even though manager said it; but then turn around and blame others for those things which is total conjecture. LMFA at how lame. Showing favoritism eh?

Exactly just goes to show that he`s the best player in the team

that’s right we’re lucky to have him

Yeah, he is. Meanwhile, Tammy (at this moment, maybe it'll change in the future) isn't our main man. Tammy isn't a top six side striker. There...I said it.

@@timothyonyebujoh7597 we know this lol chelsea is the only top 6 team without a player capable of scoring 20 plus goals in a prem season

He was really good in the second half

@@lottepetterson8413 Actually Tuchel said it was more of a "pre-injury" so maybe they were just holding him out so he can play this game

Mount is levels above in workrate

No it doesn't. He has been bang average since returning from injury.

Yh. At the minute I feel Tammy is more of a championship winning/ bottom 14 prem striker than a top 6premier league striler

@@stibbz25 True, he doesn't seem that focused to me but I would have picked Giroud over Abraham based on the injury last week.

@@stibbz25 definitely agree, his record against big six teams is really not that great. Only really scores against small teams. It's probably because he's young, but i definitely think it was premature giving him the number 9 shirt, he's not yet a striker Chelsea can rely on.

Word!!! Giroud, makes better runs in the box. Giroud has better passing, link ups, hold ups, heal flicks, headers. In a heavy possession game, Tammy has no upside! there won't be a counter attack, so don't need his "speed". Teams are stacking in Mid and Low Blocks to slow Chelsea's ball movement and 5 players upfield. Giroud' s Vision and touch is needed. Please tell me when we last scored a counter attack goal? Don't hold your breath for "club feet," "What do you mean i have to work on my 1st Touch?" Werner.

Giroud liked my comment. lol. I always get 1 like when I root for Giroud.

That guy was diving but he got injured from it. I was even wondering why the Southampton manager kept playing him when he was clearly in pain the whole time

@@kingkanon he wasn't diving he got a few dirty challenges

*you’re ;)

Considering he came back from injury, I think he was a tank in the game. Cutting passing lanes left right and center, ofc you can argue the one time he needed to cut the pass for the eventual minamino goal, he didn't. But still, kante was still doing his role.

Completely agree. Pretty sure he gave the ball away 18 times. If he does that against a more ruthless opponent we will be in big trouble!

@@lukekaymak6585 no he didn’t bro

@@lukekaymak6585 he payed rlly well

Kante kept winning us the ball back tbh, just needs to work on his passing but i know he’ll be back to his best soon

James had a chance icl, but played decent. Abraham was not even fit I don’t know why he was starting.

ziych 10 minutes what r u expecting from him and i dont know why no one talk about werner all the matchs 90 minutes and what he did nothing

@@serb26 Ziyech had 15 minutes on the pitch. And besides little time does not explain why he could barely trap a ball or why he kept losing the ball. Listen I want ziyech to succeed, but he has been awful

@@kingcj3701 ziyech was better with frank lampard its too shame on tuchel

@@kingcj3701 we will see againt atletico

Absolutely

That's not how it works mate, wrong decision by Tuchel. You don't know how much something like that can affect a young player's confidence and morale. CHO wasn't even that bad, its not like he was the reason we were losing and taking him off made us win.

@@areebsiddiqui758 there is a reason he is the manager and your a fan

@@areebsiddiqui758 There is a reason. Southampton were taking advantage of his non-existent positioning, and off the ball he offered nothing, his attitude was bad. Although Tucjel was harsh, it was the right decision.

@@ta8258 I never said I was better than the manager but you have to call him out when he makes the wrong decision. I believe in Tuchel but he shouldn't have subbed off Callum like that.

@@vishnuj8375 Well it clearly wasn't the right decision because we didn't win the game. If CHO was the reason we weren't winning I would have understood but that wasn't the case. In fact, going forward his pace and skill was a great asset and he was fairly decent. Subbing him off like that didn't help us win and you don't know what something like that can do to a young player's confidence.

That's why we struggle to score. System doesn't fit our most technical players. We need creativity upfront but system can't allow those players (ziyech, pulusic, havertz) to play.

@@limofootball problems arise again in this formation back line lacks width, centre backs frustrated, wingbacks too high up before the ball is in opponent's half and most of the times with their back facing goal, one extra centre back thus one less midfielder, long balls needed and may lose possession easily Alonso in this match always making forward runs too early, and when possession changes, he lacks pace to join defence only 2 midfielders lack protection to the defence and creativity when comes to attack James is poor in the first Saints goal. 3 centre back formations are used for more solid defence, but when this happened, I think the 4 at the back would not make any difference to defence but will definitely boost the attack substitution not good, I did not see a change in formation at the start of second half. I suggest to substitute CHO for James to change the formation to 4231 completely again, possession does not mean control and dominance. centre backs are forced to pass to each other which creates high percentage of possession but is not effective try to think of the formation before blaming the players as the formation may not suit them well Ziyech and Havertz are not suitable in a 3 at the back formation as said before because they need a well controlled type of game to let them make the key pass when time is good, clearly in any 3 at the back formation pace is everything, none of them can control the game well for the two players to shine. this is all to do with the lack of midfielders. also, such a waste of Chilwell, he is awesome in a 4 at the back formation please use a 4 at the back formation in the future to tackle these problems

@@limofootball I think we'll see the best of them come next season. Because right now Tuchels goal is too 4, and as far as possible with the CL and FA cup.

Lol players should adapt to the team and not vice-versa. Ziyech has been a flop and I hope he starts plays well for CFC.

ahh yes, lets cater to what Ziyech needs at the expense of the club... Tuchel needs to sort this team out and get them in top 4! doesnt have time to take risks. he has not lost a game and has taken Chelsea within the top 4. Give Tuchel time, and slowly all the players will be integrated. Ziyech has not been at his best, has had few chances and not taken them.

no he needs to change the formation

He is showing that his tactics and way of thinking is closed minded imo and I think he will ruin the team that Lampard created. He will make a lot of top players play like shit like he did with Ziyech

@@emmanuelobi4265 Why is there a need to change the formation if some of the players aren`t simply switched on during games

@@emmanuelobi4265 I am going to provide solutions: problems arise again in this formation back line lacks width, centre backs frustrated, wingbacks too high up before the ball is in opponent's half and most of the times with their back facing goal, one extra centre back thus one less midfielder, long balls needed and may lose possession easily Alonso in this match always making forward runs too early, and when possession changes, he lacks pace to join defence only 2 midfielders lack protection to the defence and creativity when comes to attack James is poor in the first Saints goal. 3 centre back formations are used for more solid defence, but when this happened, I think the 4 at the back would not make any difference to defence but will definitely boost the attack substitution not good, I did not see a change in formation at the start of second half. I suggest to substitute CHO for James to change the formation to 4231 completely again, possession does not mean control and dominance. centre backs are forced to pass to each other which creates high percentage of possession but is not effective try to think of the formation before blaming the players as the formation may not suit them well Ziyech and Havertz are not suitable in a 3 at the back formation as said before because they need a well controlled type of game to let them make the key pass when time is good, clearly in any 3 at the back formation pace is everything, none of them can control the game well for the two players to shine. this is all to do with the lack of midfielders. also, such a waste of Chilwell, he is awesome in a 4 at the back formation please use a 4 at the back formation in the future to tackle these problems

@@sharaliev96 Ziyech was already a flop when Lampard was leaving, I mean not only ziyech but almost everyone.

He brought in ziyech who was worse 🤦‍♂️

Mount didn't do anything until 2nd half, he doesn't create chances just crosses into a random area in the box, no killer passes splitting the defence or anything

Relax brah. It is too early to talk about how tuchel would look under us

Exactly, I believe in Tuchel but the more I see it, I'm convinced that the 3-4-3 isn't the way to go forward with the set of players we have.

i hate tuchel

@@emmanuelobi4265 why

Yeah it seemed like Zouma's position was exactly that of left CB rather than the central in a 3 back

Exactly. Finally someone said it. Zouma is not a player for a manager who looks for possession and attacking game. Zouma is perfect for conte or mourinho or simeone.

Christensen shoulda played in the middle. He’s a good ball player and he moves it better. Probably a rotation option with Thiago

yeess!!! i think back 4 is more suitable for chelse right now

Azpi can’t play in a 4 at the back I think

@@bf3655 he's our CPT.. he should be on the pitch at all times... She should be in until Silva is fit.. and y not partner them both

Yo go do your work bruv

Same lmao

More i see him more he reminds me of torres at chelsea

Giroud wouldn't have worked against high line teams like southampton, he would work against low block atletico

@@maxwellyeboah9214 let's just get E.B Haaland asap😂

@@sarthakchaurasia7942 agreed

And u support barcelona nice

@@qaadirabrahams1628 Nope I support Chelsea... Dont say I support a team because I have Messi as my profile picture I just support Messi.

@@kikoxdfc2979 Yea same we blue's

My favorite player is Messi too. But Chelsea will always be more to me than even Messi! 💙

@@fishyfish6510 Yeh same if Barca and Chelsea ever face I won't really care if messi has a good or bad game I would wish he would loose against the BLUES!

I think Tuch can finally see Alonso for the snake he is.

Exactly what I was asking myself while watching the game

Atletico won't defend with all 11 players in their half the entire match ...

@@vraccas4312 are you sure about that

@@JoffreyJ_certi686 I agree. Atletico will want to score just one goal then park the bus. We won't get past that wall shame

Atletico have been more progressive this season

1 bad game and his career is over grow up

I don't. Once his passing improves, we'll be more effective on the attack. Watch the Southampton match and you'll notice the passing from Kante and Werner were actually quenching our attack on several occasions. This is a basic skill. It's passing for goodness' sake.